The UK will double the number of British troops deployed to Norway over the next three years, increasing from 1,000 to 2,000 personnel, as ministers link the move to rising Russian military activity in the Arctic and High North.

In a Ministry of Defence announcement, Defence Secretary John Healey said demands on defence in the region are increasing and described Russia as the greatest threat to Arctic and High North security since the Cold War.

“Demands on defence are rising, and Russia poses the greatest threat to Arctic and High North security that we have seen since the Cold War. We see Putin rapidly re-establishing military presence in the region, including reopening old Cold War bases,” Healey said.

The announcement connects the UK increase in Norway with NATO’s newly launched Arctic Sentry initiative, which was unveiled just hours earlier by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. Healey is expected to confirm that UK Armed Forces will play a role in the mission, with “detailed military planning” underway at NATO, ahead of the NATO Defence Ministers meeting in Brussels on 12 February.

Alongside the NATO track, the UK-led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) is preparing a major High North exercise in 2026. The MoD said Exercise Lion Protector, scheduled for September 2026, will deploy air, land and maritime forces from JEF nations across Iceland, the Danish Straits and Norway.

According to the announcement, the exercise will train forces to protect critical national infrastructure from attack and sabotage and strengthen joint command and control, with hundreds of personnel deploying across the operating area.

The UK’s 2026 activity begins earlier, with the MoD stating that 1,500 Royal Marine Commandos will deploy to Norway for NATO Exercise Cold Response in March, described as a multinational exercise across Norway, Finland and Sweden focused on operating in strategically important terrain including fjords and mountainous areas.

Healey framed the overall posture as a combined deterrence and readiness message: “The UK is stepping up to protect the Arctic and High North, doubling the number of troops we have in Norway and scaling up joint exercises with NATO allies,” he said.

“Cold Response and Lion Protector will this year see thousands of troops deploy across the Arctic and North Atlantic, with the UK leading the way. We train together, we deter together, and if necessary, we will fight together.”

The MoD also pointed to closer bilateral defence cooperation with Norway, referencing a Lunna House Agreement signed in December. The statement said the agreement will see the UK and Norway “jointly operate a fleet of submarine-hunting Type 26 warships,” expand joint Arctic training, and pre-position British military equipment in Norway to improve readiness for future crises.

Contextually, the UK decision lands as NATO sharpens its own northern focus. In his pre-ministerial press conference in Brussels, Rutte said the Arctic and High North are becoming more important to collective security and cited increased Russian activity and growing Chinese interest. He described Arctic Sentry as an effort to bring NATO and Allied activities in the High North into one operational approach, initially tying together large-scale exercises such as Denmark’s Arctic Endurance and Norway’s Cold Response.

For the UK, the MoD is presenting the troop uplift, JEF activity and NATO Arctic Sentry planning as one package: more presence, more exercising, and a more formal operational framework for the High North.

Lisa West
Lisa has a degree in Media & Communication from Glasgow Caledonian University and works with industry news, sifting through press releases in addition to moderating website comments.

18 COMMENTS

  1. So first we had 3 Commando Brigade.
    Then we started losing their shipping.
    Then the LRGs North and South were born, but, typically, never fully formed despite the usual grandstanding and hype.
    Then they lost the 2 LPDs and Argus.
    Then 1SL let slip while discussing something else that both 40 and 45 were assigned to Norway. No formal announcement or any real details from the MoD, par the course.
    So LRG South is effectively stillborn.
    And we’ve come full circle, but now have a weakened UKCF, with a new name, fewer assets, and no increased artillery or aviation support, nor any apparent expansion in it’s enablers, the CLR, and the Army 24RE and 29RE.
    And typically, where are the actual details as to how we double troop numbers? Anyone seen an official breakdown?
    Fully support the commitment. Indeed, 3 Commando should never have left..

    • Hi D – As part of most of the aforementioned, I fully agree but as ever, we vent our spleen to no effect. We will change nothing. It is frustrating to say the least but what action must be taken to shake our politicians and to some extent our MoD (Civ) to life? I’m stumped, that’s for sure. Maybe Ivan will make the move for us – I sincerely hope not,,,,,,,,,,,,

      • Hi Ex.
        Indeed, of course we have no power here. But those amongst us knowledgeable enough can expose the hype, hypocrisy and spin of HMG on a daily basis for the world to read. Which I hope includes some important people, you never know.
        That surely is certainly better than remaining silent.
        It is for me certainly!

      • I believe sites like this are critical to keeping politicians honest.

        If we don’t keep pushing for change, then who will?

        I know it seems like we don’t make a difference, but I believe we do.

        Knowledgable people like Daniele have the detail that keeps the facts in the public domain, shining a light on all this BS is important in itself

        Let’s keep going… there’s no one else fighting for the right equipment or funding for those that serve & politicians have proved that they are happy to send troops out in clapped out Subs, ships & snatch land rovers, as long as it’s not their kids…

        Keep up the fight D

    • Looks like just confirmation of the 40 and 45 Commando slip + whatever is going from HQ & Signals, RLC, 29 and 24, probably counting everything they can ala 845 squadron too.

      As for the LRG’s there’s really only one anyway now with only Lyme Bay “available” (albeit laid up in Gib because we have no money).

      • Yes, they’re effectively dead.
        I recall seeing a slide that gave LRG North an LPD, Bay, and an Escort, and LRG South a Bay, Argus, and an Escort.
        With the lack of escorts, was never realised.
        The 2k is easy enough to guess.
        40 and 45 Commando Groups, so elements in support from 30 Cdo, which effectively forms the HQ and support unit with niche enablers, the CLR, 24RE, 29RA, and elements of the CHF ( 845, 846, 847 NAS )
        Supported as needed by JHSU and TCW, TSW.
        Bits of all of which I understand have some arctic training, though 45 I understand was in recent times the main arctic outfit.
        SRS of 30 Cdo acting as the forward eyes and ears.
        As always, as onecof our premier fighting forces, it would be good to see the Corps get some actual
        CS CSS expansion beyond HMGs stepping up spin.

    • We can do a lot worse than adopt the USMC MEU org concept as it seems the sizing of deployments is around 1500 + air ( when deployed)
      Given the size of our whole military, we should be looking at the USMC model as a modern BEF.
      I actually think if we embraced it we could teach the USMC a few thing in a couple of years time, as being short of cash doesn’t always mean lack of innovation (the opposite really)

      Defence is in a mess, no doubt. John Healey has not been the solid defence sec we all thought he would be, which is a pity as I think he is honourable.

      No problem with the focus on tasking, but we need to back it up with more funding & a larger RMC.

      We should also look at aligning equipment, such as CV90 & CB90 if again we are serious about the High North.

  2. So we have a larger commitment in Norway, an ongoing deployment to the Baltic States with potentially new requirements in Ukraine and Greenland?. Did I fall asleep and miss the announcements about an increase in the size of the army, the RMs along with additional rotary/fixed wing assets, new amphibious vessels and all associated equipment, munitions and vehicles to make all this actually work.
    Whilst we are part of an alliance we are genuinely not pulling our weight despite supposedly having a £60bn defence budget and sadly Mr Trump does have a point about over reliance on Uncle Sam.

    • It is all grandstanding mate, as you well know. There is none of that happening and most of the coming increases will vanish into the ether straight the the MIC, into the DNE, AUKUS, GCAP, payments to Mauritius, and whatever else.
      UKCF wise, I understand the programme to replace the LCVP is still ongoing, and assume the LCU’s as well.
      Most of the rest of the RM LC capability went to the wall along with their ships.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here