HMS Defender, a Type 45 Destroyer, is shadowing a Russian naval task group off the UK coast.

The warship, say the Royal Navy, was called upon to sail over the weekend and keep watch on the frigate Admiral Gorshkov and three auxiliary ships as they passed close to UK territorial waters.

Defender is monitoring the Russian task group and keeping track of their activity in areas of national interest.

HMS Defender left Newcastle on Saturday the second of Match to head north east of Scotland and meet the Russian task group in time for them to pass the UK coastline yesterday, soon after they anchored in the Moray Firth temporarily in order for bad weather to bypass the group.

The group comprises of the frigate Admiral Gorshkov, tug Nicolay Chiker, supply ship Elbrus and tanker Kama.

Commander Richard Hewitt, the Commanding Officer of HMS Defender, said:

“The security of the seas around our coastline remains crucial to our national interests. Escorting the Admiral Gorshkov has demonstrated the Royal Navy’s enduring commitment to protecting our home waters and readiness to undertake such tasking whenever it’s required.”

HMS Defender will continue to escort the Russian naval task group this week as it passes through the English Channel say the Royal Navy.

120
Leave a Reply

avatar
29 Comment threads
91 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
43 Comment authors
Paul TCam HunterFrank62JonathanJulian Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Daniele Mandelli
Guest

One of my favourite current RN ship names.

Andrew
Guest
Andrew

I agree, its a wonderful image on a wonderful ship!

andy reeves
Guest

AT LEAST THIS TIME WE HAD A WARSHIP TO SHADOW THEM WITH.maybe its time to steam off murmansk a few times, and show them the same contempt for their waters as they do to ours

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

We do that with our SSN’s Andy…or the 45 off Crimea recently.

They are transiting international waters. As Basil says below
it happens more these days due to the political posturing.

Rokuth
Guest
Rokuth

Or the RN can take a page from the Spanish playbook and play “Rule Britannia” over the loudspeakers while sailing off the coast of Murmansk…

😛

Stephenbirt Birt
Guest

The tug that escorts the Russian naval groups around the world must severely deteriorate their range. Really strange that their risk assessment for this keeps coming up with that mitigation.

Rob
Guest
Rob

Shadowing another vessel with no anti-ship missiles I see. Pathetic isn’t it! We must be a real laughing stock in other navies.

Paul.P
Guest
Paul.P

Defender is a state of the art sigint I think. I’m sure the RN are gathering lots of info on the Admiral. And Daring can be fitted with Harpoon Block 1C though I don’t know if she is carrying them on this assignment.
The Admiral will be well within range of Defenders 4.5in ….hope any optical aiming is not dazzled!

Jack
Guest

The only laughing stock Rob is you. Idiot. I bet you read the tabloids and believe every word.
In UK waters you will have an Astute and Typhoons with LGB’s.
By the way the Navy doesn’t have more Admirals than ships, I expect you are the ill-informed type who believes that old lie as well.
Rob, read this and be educated, if you can manage it.
https://thinpinstripedline.blogspot.com/2019/03/does-royal-navy-have-more-admirals-than.html

Rob
Guest
Rob

You sir are just rude and are the worst type of internet troll, no debate, just insults. Well done for showing yourself up.

By the way, I get my information from my family members who actually serve, one of which is a weapons specialist on a T23 and another a pilot in the army. They love their jobs and the armed forces but are the first to admit its failings. Lack of lethality being a major one.

Lee1
Guest
Lee1

The point is that this shadowing operation is not designed to cause a war it is merely an observational task. They have no need to put a ship able to destroy another ship as the ships passing through are not going to be attacking anyone!

Rob
Guest
Rob

Of course we aren’t going to start shooting and I never said that shadowing another vessel would end up with an engagement. But we frequently put our £1bn destroyers to sea with few offensive weapons, please name another 1st tier navy that does the same? The Americans quite rightly prepare for the worst and carry the biggest stick they can, we on the other hand carry very little to save money.

Los pollos (Hermanos) Chicken
Guest
Los pollos (Hermanos) Chicken

Sir , i’d respectfully like to point out that no nation on earth is immune from shortcomings or issues with availability ,serviceability lack of spares, lack of trained users etc etc so on and so forth. The U.K. is no different, infact even the mighty US has from time to time same concerns. Let me enlighten just because on paper the US has 6-700 or so F15’s does not mean they can put all of them into action at once infact things have been known to be so poor at least 50% of them can’t fly yet here if a… Read more »

4thwatch
Guest
4thwatch

‘Lack of lethality’ that is a valid point and one which should excercise those who defend our seas and Maritime interests generally. How has this ‘not-sink-the enemy’ strategy become UK Naval doctrine? There is virtually no way for either the RN or RAF to sink an enemy ship except by gunfire or exposing an SSN to getting within torpedo range. Even the RAF have no effective anti ship missile. How for instance could we even sink a convoy cripple? If you understand the difficulty of sinking a large modern merchant ship with gunfire you understand my point. In wartime towing… Read more »

Robert Blay
Guest

Paveway 4’s from a Typhoon would make mince meat of Russian vessle, especially one that requires a tug to follow it around.

Ron
Guest
Ron

4thwatch, I totally agree what has happened to Fishers saying of “hit first, hit hard and keep on hitting.
It is really time that the government understands that when a warship deploys it needs to deploy on a war footing as it needs to be ready for anything including defending itself 24 hours a day anywhere in the world.
Speaking about this, does anyone know if the Type 45 is designed for Mk 41 VLS and if so for how many?

Ollie Beckett
Guest
Ollie Beckett

Rob,

The Type 45 is primarily an air defence platform, the Sea Viper system is unmatched by any ship in the world. But the point of the shadowing operation is for political reasons. If the Russians (Hypothetically) ever tried something we have Astute’s, Typhoon’s and (soon to be) Poseidon.

Paul T
Guest
Paul T

Ron – yes they are,articles on here and elsewhere seem to suggest room for 12 Tubes – as to the chances of them being fitted at some stage that’s another can of worms.

andy reeves
Guest

now,now ladies, don’t lower the tone of the site with silly fall outs over nothing. i CAN say that portsmouth naval base supports six admirals, i’d imagine the same at a mix of rosyth, faslane and devonport, plus those at the admiralty and the M.O.D so yes in all probability there ARE more admirals than ships, and worst of all it would appear w’re stuck with it. while all we get are silly ‘fanny boat’ opv then that’s about it.

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

LOL. Who are these 6 Admirals? There are Admirals, and there are Admirals. Admiral. Vice Admiral. Rear Admiral. All have their roles to play, down to Commodore. I think off memory Pomey has one 3 *, a Vice Admiral at Fleet who doubles as CinC Home, with several other 2 *Rear Admirals the heads of the varied Directorates at Fleet HQ, or at Fleet Battle Staff, which is right and proper. Others are at Fleet Ops at Northwood, like “COS Ops” who is also FOS Flag Officer Submarines. All three services have reduced the 1* above several times already. People… Read more »

spyinthesky
Guest
spyinthesky

I do agree, I think many on here have a very dated Battle of Trafalgar view of Admirals on here. Things are a lot more nuanced and wide ranging now than even the concept of what they do in the last War. I don’t care how many there are as long as they are all in useful roles and not simply financing their pension.

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

That, I think spy, is the key.

There are many other RN 1* star Commodore’s through to Rear Admirals I did not mention, like in training establishments, at FOST, at tri service organisations from DES to JFC, DI and Main Office.
All are there for a reason.

There was fat and it has been culled for years, going back to Front Line First in 1995.

Organisations often up to several hundreds with budgets of many tens of millions cannot be overseen by able seamen!!

Cam Hunter
Guest
Cam Hunter

Jack, that was a great read, everyone should read this who thinks the RN only has 19 warships.

Simon
Guest
Simon

We’re not likely to need to sink Gorshkov. HMS Defender is there to shoot Gorshkov’s Oniks and Kalibr out of the sky. After that Gorshkov is as impotent as Defender.

Besides, I’m pretty sure Defender is merely the visible part of the escort and other things happen under and above the waves 🙂

Rob
Guest
Rob

Fair enough, but I am not sure I share your optimism that there is always a sub around. We just do not have enough for that.

Craig Ballantyne
Guest
Craig Ballantyne

With 6 hunter killer subs currently active I see no reason why we wouldn’t have 1 patrolling UK waters. We rarely get told when and where they are for a reason.

dadsarmy
Guest
dadsarmy

HMS Astute herself spends a lot of time in Scottish Waters, mostly west coast as far as anyone knows.

Pete B
Guest
Pete B

Really don’t see an issue with no embarked anti shipping missiles on such a mission, close to home most likely with an Astute lurking close by and localised air support, for Ivan to cause trouble would be a suicide mission.
Just out of curiosity is it standard practice for such ships to be allowed into the likes of the Moray Firth to shelter from bad weather? I assume HMS Defender would have remained with the Russian group?

Robert Blay
Guest

Yes, the Russian Vessels where still within international waters.

Andrew
Guest
Andrew

You may find that we do not know what is under the water Rob. I would be amazed if there wasnt an Astute prowling around. And in any case, the Russians are not going to start a war, fire on one of the most advanced destroyers in history with a frigate and a tug! Defender is equipped with the most advanced intelligence gathering and data interception suites, they will be learning a lot from the Russians. The Russians are just showing off one of their newer surface vessels. Although i get your point re harpoon, i think this isnt going… Read more »

spyinthesky
Guest
spyinthesky

Out of interest whats the American situation at the moment with their anti ship missiles if Harpoons are as inadequate as we hear so regularly (fitted or otherwise in this case). I know they have plans to fit new missiles but what do they have at the MOMENT that doesn’t make them a laughing stock too? Anyone have a definitive answer as this question keeps coming up but no real clear answer other than the future plans that I have seen.

Ron
Guest
Ron

@spy, from my understanding the US navy are purchasing the Naval Strike Missile from Norway to launch from ships. With its 100 mile range and 125kg warhead its a bit lightweight but as an interim it should be ok. From what I have being reading there does seem to be a final upgrade package available for Harpoon to Harpoon II+ developed in 2007 with continuation development until 2017. It should take Harpoon up to 2030. If this is the case and Perseus is on time then there should not be a problem as long as the MoD does something about… Read more »

Frank62
Guest
Frank62

I think I read a larger warhead option isbeing or has been developed for the NSM.

Cam Hunter
Guest
Cam Hunter

Yeah it’s the JSM and it can be fired from land, f35 a Ships mk41 or canister, and it’s has a warhead twice the size of NSM at 250kg, oh and they even offered it for the typhoon. This would be my choice because of the options it gives.

James M
Guest
James M

Harpoon is getting outdated, but at least they’re carrying an AShM of some description. The USN is currently looking into NSM and LRASM if I recall correctly.

Benjamin Rule
Guest
Benjamin Rule

I’m all in favour of providing the best possible kit for our armed forces. However, I’m quite sceptical of the value of ship based anti-ship missiles. If you decide to use them aren’t you likely to be extremely exposed to the same threat in reverse? Plus when was the last time we needed to use that capability? In the Falklands we were chasing Veinticinco de Mayo with Harriers and Belgrano with SSN (one of which was super effective in that task). We have a lethal SSN force and have a (re)developing naval air capability. Isn’t that the right focus?

Paul.P
Guest
Paul.P

It’s clear I think that the RN and probably the USN share your scepticism as to the value of ship launched AShM. Against fast attack craft and in the littoral the RN has chosen the ‘sniper’ approach – Wildcat and Sea Venom. In open water against a peer frigate oppoment if you can call on air support from a carrier or land base then air launched AShM is a good option. The US equips it’s F-18s with these. The P-8 can carry Harpoon and I think LRASM is planned. I think we should fit these to our P-8s and buy… Read more »

James M
Guest
James M

Last I heard SPEAR3 is basically going to be an upgraded Brimstone. You’d need about two dozen to kill anything big enough to be labelled a ship, and more for anything with decent CIWS as I’m pretty sure they’re planned to be subsonic.

Given previous Anglo-French cooperation on Storm Shadow, I’d put money on Perseus coming with an air-launch capability. Probably won’t fit internally on an F-35 but shouldn’t be a huge deal for a Typhoon or for external carriage on an F-35, albeit at the expense of some reduction in stealth.

Julian
Guest
Julian

SPEAR3 is a bit more than an upgraded Brimstone. What I’ve read says it is pretty much exactly twice the overall weight of Brimstone so presumably the warhead is about twice the size. It is also much longer range. At the end of the day though you are right, twice the size of the small Brimstone warhead is still small and it would need to rely on precisely targeting specific areas of a larger vessel to get a mission kill because it isn’t going to get anywhere near sinking it outright.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan

It actual takes very little to mission kill a modern warship, you don’t need to sink it, just knock out its sensors etc and it’s out the game. There have been examples of single Anti radar missiles mission killing cruiser size air defence ships.

From what I understand spear 3 will be able to target specific parts of a ship, 12 of those is going to be far more likely to penetrate defences that a pair of larger heavyweights.

captain P Wash.
Guest
captain P Wash.

This article fails to mention Russia’s “Vomit Weapon”. Apparently one of the Ships Is carrying a new Disorientation Device which Is said to Induce vomiting.

captain P Wash.
Guest
captain P Wash.

It’s called the 5P-52 Filin. And It’s fitted to the Admiral Gorshkov. If anyone’s Interested.

Paul.P
Guest
Paul.P

No problem…we will just eat more carrots!

Julian
Guest
Julian

For me a bottle of vodka would be a pretty effective disorientation weapon that induces vomiting.

Mike
Guest
Mike

Half the bottle would be mission kill for me ?.

DaveyB
Guest
DaveyB

Yep, the ship’s fitted with the Filin 5P-42 device. This type of device was originally designed for tanks and is an optical visual/IR and UV dazzler designed to jam SACLOS or laser anti-tank guided weapons targeting systems. The dazzler’s side effect is quite well known as uses a variable speed strobe.

captain P Wash.
Guest
captain P Wash.

Time to Fit some mirrors to our Ships then !

captain P Wash.
Guest
captain P Wash.

I have a better Idea, Load the Spice Girls into the VLS and See how the Russians like their Tuneless Screaming !

James M
Guest
James M

Call it dazzle camo mk. 2 – reflective boogaloo.

andy reeves
Guest

‘vomit’ weapon,? fantasy more like where did that come from?

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

Seriously though, Non Lethal Weaponry has been around for decades and is quite hush hush, but surfaces from time to time.

Many of the occupants of the US Embassy in Moscow were getting ill and it was discovered the Soviets were using Microwaves on the building. Just one example.

A study of mind control and MK ULTRA experiments leads on to that sort of stuff.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan

Yes I’ve read a couple of papers on emotional control, it’s actslly possible to make a person feel basic emotions like fear etc using electromagnetism or some such magic.

HF
Guest

Ratio of support ships to combat vessel is interesting. Must be a long deployment.

Lee1
Guest
Lee1

It seems all Russian ships need a tug… 😉

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

That struck me too Lee.

HF
Guest

Let’s not mention the T45 engine problems…

andy reeves
Guest

my son is on duncan, and says the ship is so good, they still haven’t had o change a lightbulb! slagging off our state of the art warships is pointless, too many on here are reading the tabloids too often.

Paul.P
Guest
Paul.P

The British press is less interested in accuracy than it is in winding up its readers with negative and reporting and divisive opinions. I tend to stick to Reuters these days.

Rob
Guest
Rob

For the record, despite what Jack says I do not read tabloids. I actually get most of my defence news from this site, Save the Royal Navy, and most importantly my family members who serve.

The T45 is a fantastic ship but is under-armed, that was and is my argument, nothing more.

Rfn_Weston
Guest
Rfn_Weston

Genuine question… At that range would an ASM have even have time to arm itself and correct its course after launch to impact an enemy ship?

30mm & main gun (even small arms .50cal) would surely be the first choice at what? Crica 600-800mtrs?

Cam Hunter
Guest
Cam Hunter

Considering the guns on defender can shoot many miles yes.

Paul.P
Guest
Paul.P

My understanding is that the Mk 8 4.5in gun very accurate up to 12 miles…and has a rate of fire of about 25 shells per minute. Within the horizon it is a no brainer versus one or two Harpoons which would be easy to decoy or shoot down. NSM or LRASM are the up wnd coming over the horizon weapons.

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

What good looking ships the 45’s are.

Ron
Guest
Ron

@Rear Gunner, in some ways I agree, but I wonder if a sub wants to be on the end of a Type 23 search. In their primary role the T23 will still give any modern stealth frigate a run for their money. I have often wondered why don’t we just take all the gubbings out of the T23 and put it in a new hull superstructure and call it T31. The radar suite of the T23, surface to air missile suite, the sonar suite, much of the powerplant is new or newish and the underwater noise profile is still one… Read more »

Ian
Guest
Ian

As we all know, this type of escort duty can be Carried out by River Class OPVs or type 31e, eventually freeing up the 45s for carrier escort/strike duties and 23s/26s for ASW. The press always sensationalises Russian vessels transiting U.K. waters, especially (East-to-West) at the narrowest part of the channel, when it’s nothing more ‘headline Sensational’ than U.K. vessels transiting the Bosphorus Straights. As mentioned, a three or four vessel (transiting) task group, consisting of a Tug and RAS, hardly requires a type45 or type23, with or without Anti Ship missiles. A Typhoon’s Spear-3 or lurking/shadowing Astute Class would… Read more »

Basil
Guest

During the cold war thr Soviets rarely used the channel/ north sea route, preferring to keep thier distance via north Atlantic corridors. In recent years the trend to display themselves adjacent to foriegn territorial waters is purely a political gesture, hence the requirement for a visible response, bear in mind not only UK warships escort them. As said above the weaponry of escorting vessels is irrelevant, it is a case of simply letting them know that they are being noted ( and a chance to gain elint info). In fact sending a small OPV may be a significant political gesture… Read more »

Ian
Guest
Ian

ELINT can be gathered by a tug if fitted out for it, similar to how the Russians use to do it. But like you suggest, it’s about peacocks spreading their plumage.

Basil
Guest

Quite a bit, however this is probably not the best platform to discuss details. Suffice to say anything electrical emits electronic ‘noise’ when operating, some of which can be unique to the source. This was an area that the batch 3 type 22 frigates were configured for, now the mantle being taken by T45.

Ian
Guest
Ian

I should imagine they speed-dial-in vessel signatures for more effective friend or foe capabilities. But electronic warfare is advancing rapidly, decoys are becoming much more advanced and no one really knows how the likes of F35 will hold up against offensive EMI/EW attacks. Was the Donald Cook Incident ‘Fake Russian Propaganda’?
As you know, even mines are becoming much more difficult to detect, lying in a benign state until they recognise the pre programmed signature.
It appears to me, EW/EMI is at the sharp end of modern warfare and shouldn’t be underestimated.

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

I actually agree with Rob on the Sub. NATO and Fleet HQ / MIC at Northwood will have been long aware of this group coming from Murmansk and assigned assets to it accordingly. Why use an SSN? They are sailing from their ports up in the Kola to I guess the Med, and NATO has plenty of opportunities to deploy SIGINT assets against them. Thus Defender with Shaman, and no doubt land based assets too. As for the RN being a “laughing stock” I disagree. At the end of the day, navies far and wide send their ships to FOST,… Read more »

Rob
Guest
Rob

All I can do in response is to pass on what my cousin says about this, he serves on a T23 and is responsible for the weapon systems. He is pretty confident that a T23 can hold its own against peer vessels and survive to fight another day. But he is scathing about the T45, he says Sea Viper is fantastic, but 48 Aster missiles is nowhere near enough for its primary role and he just cannot fathom why they do not carry ASM as standard on all 6 ships, especially as Sea Venom isn’t ready yet. You can disagree… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

Rob, I was disagreeing with the term “Laughing Stock” in the eyes of other navies that you used and gave some examples as to why we are not.

I agreed with you on the SSN and as for your comments after of lack of missiles yes fair comment. Who am I to argue with your cousin?

My only comments as you can see above were to the possible reasons WHY this is so, not contradicting your cousin at all.

Gavin Gordon
Guest

Channel 5’s Warship Life at Sea on HMS Duncan was fascinating and she did go to the Black Sea & Eastern Med ‘bombed up’. Part of my fascination – and puzzlement – was Duncan’s apparently axcessively polite communications with Russian jet aircraft swarming in the Black Sea under ‘relatively mild’ tension, and later greater tension during the Syrian standoff. No doubt the comms were supposed to conform to some ‘suitable’ level of Engagement Rules, but to advise a multitude of fighters to kindly stay away as the 45’s (microwave) radar is powerful(!) and later the (Kamov?) Helo to please keep… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

Rudeness is a sign of being rattled and lack of professionalism.

A cool calm measured professional response from the RN oozes class. That we are telling you whatever you might be doing swarming our vessel WE are in control and can shoot you down, with fair warning, whenever we choose.

I’d expect nothing less from the RN.

Herodotus
Guest

Yes exactly. Politeness is something that is demonstrated ad nauseum on this site by many of the frequent contributors. It is, after all, a very British virtue!

Basil
Guest

It’s also a useful asset when presenting evidence before a court/enquiry, if the recorded communications sound clear, calm and reasonable as opposed to frantic gibbering it is powerful evidence.

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

LOL. Too true. My work involves “Safety Critical Communications” on a daily basis. All is recorded and will be used against you if you do not do it properly!

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

Railway Signalling RGR.

Yes “Repeat Back” is used.

Assumption and lack of a clear understanding can be fatal.

Gavin Gordon
Guest

‘Duly noted’ can be stated politely by our Roger Moore stand in, I’m sure. No inference of frantic gibbering either, Bas. Regards,
?

John Clark
Guest
John Clark

It’s a great opportunity for intelligence gathering, electronic /sound emissions, radar signiture etc, all done at various distances ( below, on and above) the water line.

Herodotus
Guest

I assume that the Russians are doing exactly the same thing. Best send out Tuggy Toot Toot with an Elint fit?

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

I wonder if the Tugs that accompany Russian ships carry out the AGI Elint role that Soviet trawlers and other small vessels used to do?

They would be a regular feature near to western vessels.

Herodotus
Guest

They were always present. Although the Soviets would often send like for like. I spent many an hour watching a Soviet survey vessel following our H class ocean going hydrographic vessel in Iranian waters circa 1978!

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

Oh! H class. Now lets see, that takes me back to when I just started to get interested in the military as a small boy.

There were 4…?

Hecta, or Hecla? Hera? Hydra? Damn cannot recall their names. I should do.

Herodotus
Guest

Hecla, Herald, Hecate and Hydra!

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

Ah!! 2 right.

Thank you. I just could not remember their names.

Love the name Hecate, Greek Goddess of the Moon and Magic I think.

Your vessel? So you’re our man for the Hydrographic Branch?

Herodotus
Guest

No, I am certainly no expert on the RN hydrographic side (only loaned to them). But have spent many years on the civilian side…oil industry etc.

Nick C
Guest
Nick C

Always amused to watch the comments thread on this site veer from well informed and thoughtful to personal abuse no better than you would expect on some Daily Mail site, and quite often in a couple of nanoseconds. So my four pennyworth. Yes, good to see a Type 45 doing the honours, and I reckon that the crew don’t view the armament fit with the same disdain that some commentators here do. But has anyone picked up on the fact that we had to give them shelter in the Moray Firth while the weather was bad? Ok it blew a… Read more »

captain P Wash.
Guest
captain P Wash.

“I was in Newcastle in 1971, and lost several things. one of which I won’t ever get back.”

OK, I’m thinking.
A. The love of Football.
B. The Ability to say anything without ending in “Wye Eye Man”
C. Your Newcastle Brown Ale Tankard.
D. A hamster named Dec.

Herodotus
Guest

I’m afraid that service to this country was ever thus. But it was never done for a thank-you…but always out of a sense of duty. Bloody hard to pin that one down…just seems to be innate…and what makes us what we are…nothing special, but at least as good as others!

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

Hmmm, just checked the Moray Firth on a map. Are you suggesting a spot of spying en route?

Lossimouth, Kinloss, Buchan, Crimmond, Fort George all close by.

Buchan and Crimmond would have signals emanating from them concerning the ASCS and the DHFCS.

geoff
Guest
geoff

Haha-good post Nick C and that thing you lost in Newcastle-why would you ever want it back!

Great Lakes Yank
Guest
Great Lakes Yank

Daniele posted: “Rudeness is a sign of being rattled and lack of professionalism. A cool calm measured professional response from the RN oozes class. That we are telling you whatever you might be doing swarming our vessel WE are in control and can shoot you down, with fair warning, whenever we choose.”

British understatement is well-respected over on this side of the pond. It conveys strength and competence. As Teddy Roosevelt put it: Speak softly but carry a big stick.

A tip of the hat to you gents.

captain P Wash.
Guest
captain P Wash.

TH Is Missing lately, Or Is He ?

Hmmmmm.

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

I had that thought myself just recently Captain.

When bad news comes he or she will be here to rub it in I fear.

Herodotus
Guest

Cynic

Nick C
Guest
Nick C

Sorry Captain P, only one of the above, football. It was the first time I went to a dog track, though.

Steve Taylor
Guest

We should ask them if they want to tender for T31 the Admiral Gorshkov-class frigate is a nice design.

geoff
Guest
geoff

Good Morning Gentlemen. 5 am in Durban-couldn’t sleep so came to read what you lot have to say! A few random thoughts-remember that huge damage was inflicted on the RN by ‘lumps of iron’ WW2 Bombs with faulty fuses/poor tactics, so sometimes one does not need State of the Art. Also notwithstanding weapons shortcomings,the possibility of a shooting match in this situation is literally zero. It’s all about posturing and observation. I would think that if a conflict threatened, the Armed forces would quickly arm up as they did in 1982, deficiencies notwithstanding. Remember we had no Sidewinders on our… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

That is dedication Geoff!

We cannot be that addictive surely!

Good morning from a sunny Surrey!

geoff
Guest
geoff

Hi Daniele! Lets hope the sun persists and you have a good Summer! Cheers

Steve
Guest
Steve

What concerns me is not this specific case, but what happens if ‘tomorrow’ another nation decides to go to war with the UK. The best approach to achieve this would be to sail a fleet past the UK pretending to be heading elsewhere and then use this as a way to launch a surprise attack. Our military assets should be in a position to defend themselves against a surprise attack and not have to go “on moment mr bad guy, i need to return to port to get my defensive / offensive equipment added”. In peace time it doesn’t matter,… Read more »

Ian
Guest
Ian

These vessels are monitored by every NATO member as they transit their waters, all information is shared and most often they are simply rotating duties.
Russian vessels would be in range of every NATO partner.
If there was any concerns about a pre-emptive strike from Russia, we would have been on a BIKINI Amber/Red Severe/Critical standing.
The real game of chess is with the Nuclear Sub Deterent, but we mere mortals will never be privy to such activities.
Nuclear Deterrence is the key to our (relative) stability in Europe. Which about the question of Corbyn and his toying around with Dreadnought!

Ian
Guest
Ian

Correction: “Which brings about the question”

Steve
Guest
Steve

I’m not saying it will be Russia, it could be pretty much any nation out there. The issue is that we are spread too thin, even if a NATO partner warned us, where is the defence going to come from? Our frigates/destroyers are spread all over the world pretty much operating solo, i am pretty sure so are our subs. We have no air based anti-ship missiles, and would be one brave RAF pilot that decides to fly within the range of the ships air defence to drop bombs. It doesn’t just have to be in the UK waters, same… Read more »

Ian
Guest
Ian

I understand what you’re saying, but if we had even a smell of such scenarios, I’m sure Spear3 and Sea Venom would be fast-tracked into service. As for U.K. waters, I’d bet an Astute Class is always on station for such duties, maybe someone on here could clarify/broaden on that? As for China, Iran…we are usually part of a task group, unless displaying Right of Passage in the South China Sea, which one vessel would have little chance of defending against with China’s increased presence. But I agree in principle that we should be looking at it, and not for… Read more »

Steve
Guest
Steve

You mean like the falklands were reinforced prior to the invasion after the intel indicated a pending threat, or like Q8 was reinforced. the problem is its not the military making these decisions, its politicians and it takes shot fired to really push them into action, which is way too late. Ok it is extremely unlikely event, but lets look at the Spanish ship with guns manned and refusing to leave Gib waters. What response has there been to show Spain that it is unacceptable, zero. Now clearly Spain isn’t going to do anything but there are multiple similar stories… Read more »

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan

What do you think Argentinian pilots did and they had second rate aircraft and incorrectly fused iron bombs.

With that they almost stood of one of the strongest navy’s in the work at a distance of 300 miles….

Steve Taylor
Guest

Who do you think would buy it?

The only navy big enough to buy it with the technical depth necessary to operate it would be Japan.

The US won’t buy them even though the main reason why we bought them and a big factor in their design and future operation is supporting the US.

captain P Wash.
Guest
captain P Wash.

Hello Steve, As much as I hear what you are saying, I have to Ask Which potential Enemy would Sail It’s Fleet past the UK. ? Other than Russia. As far As I can tell ( although recent Political Events do make me wonder ) The Continent of Europe Is mostly Inhabited by “Friends”. Canada and the USA, Also. So that leaves, Asia, and Africa with a small threat from South America. Not sure If Iran could make It Here nor North Korea. China Probably could but What Doesn’t Fall apart on the Way would probably Go the way of… Read more »

Paul T
Guest
Paul T

captain – the Chinese Navy has joined the ‘Jiggy Jiggy’ club in Sailing through the English Channel,not spotted any myself yet though.

captain P Wash.
Guest
captain P Wash.

Yes, They sent their ships through the English Channel a couple of years ago to join up with the Russians.

I guess that might be part of the Reason We are doing similar in their backyard.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan

Any nations navy (apart from the USN) that tried that would be very swiftly dead by RAF. A navy can’t opperate within another nations air defence envelope without achieving complete air dominance.

Even the US would suffer massive losses if it did this against a peer nation.

The tyranny of distance is the UKs best defence and always has been.

expat
Guest
expat
captain P Wash.
Guest
captain P Wash.

Being Submerged in Salt Water for so long, Would It make a good Submarine ?

Geoffrey Hicking
Guest
Geoffrey Hicking

Random Norwegian egg-head: “You know, this might make a good platform for a prototype semi-submersible” *dangerous glint in eye*

Geoffrey Hicking
Guest
Geoffrey Hicking

D’Øh!

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan

The shame for the motherland only having a 4500 ton light frigate to escort 3 auxiliaries passed Great Britain, look it was met by a 7000ton RN destroyer, the shame the shame……their warship was bigger than ours………for shame………

dadsarmy
Guest
dadsarmy

I think the first thing to note is that the Moray Firth, as opposed to the Inner Moray Firth, is over 100 nautical miles across at the mouth. Territorial waters run up to 12 nm, and then it’s international waters which are open to all. Lossie has the FGR4 which can take Paveway, and an Astute IS regularly perhaps always, off Scotland, probably currently HMS Astute herself as she spends a lot of time off Scotland, mostly west coast I think. Ships don’t really kill ships these days, though boats and aircraft can. Thirdly, unless the Russians have invented some… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Guest

Is it published which ship at any time is the FRE ?

I thought it was usually a T23 or a River?