A Royal Navy amphibious task force has anchored in Stockholm, following a display of defence tactics against a fictitious invasion of Sweden’s intricate coastal terrain.

The amphibious flagship, HMS Albion, headed the Littoral Response Group (North) (LRG) on a journey into the Baltic Sea as part of Exercise Aurora – marking the most substantial Swedish national defence exercise in over twenty-five years.

The Royal Marines left an indelible mark during three amphibious assaults on Sweden’s complex coastline. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson expressed his deep admiration for the commandos, stating that he would like the troops to participate in exercises in the country ‘next year and every year’.

In total, the LRG collaborated with their hosts’ military forces and those from Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Latvia and Lithuania. HMS Albion also served as the temporary home to several US Marines for the duration of the exercise.

Marines from 45 Commando made a formidable entrance on the shores of Gotland, a strategically significant island in the heart of the Baltic. They also stormed the Stockholm archipelago, a labyrinthine network of approximately 30,000 islands leading to Sweden’s capital.

In the presence of the Swedish premier, Defence Minister Paul Jonsson and key military figures, the Royal Marines performed a dramatic landing on the island of Korso, located on the eastern edge of the archipelago. This display showcased the allies’ ability to thwart an enemy invasion.

The political and military delegation also made a visit to Albion at sea, highlighting the deepening ties between the UK and Sweden.

You can read more on this here.

Tom Dunlop
Tom has spent the last 13 years working in the defence industry, specifically military and commercial shipbuilding. His work has taken him around Europe and the Far East, he is currently based in Scotland.

35 COMMENTS

  1. Hi folks hope all is well.
    Great stuff, once more we see our magnificent military in operation, not sure how many European militaries have the capability of carring out a similar deployment? You experts can advise me on this.
    My concern is; as we all know is the lack of numbers, no doubt we can take and hold ground for a while, however, numbers are instrumental in holding onto for example a bridge -head.
    Also I’m sure over the last couple days in the media reports of Ben Wallace still going ahead with army cuts?
    Despite Ukraine! A bit depressing considering.
    Cheers,
    George

    • IT is hard to take in really ,a cut of 10.000 troops specially when there used for home land Emergency floods ,outbreaks ect never mind the Battlefield 🙏

      • It’s not 10k troops, as the army has around 75K at the moment, so in reality around 3 000, achieved by not recruiting replacements for those leaving voluntarily. It’s establishment is set for 82K, which it can not reach.

      • HI Andrew.. As Daniele said. There are over 75,000 Trade trained personnel in the army, if you add personnel that are trained but not trade trained to that figure the numbers reach over 79,000.

        The total number of trained regulars and army reserves is probably somewhere around 104,000.

        So when it comes to trade trained regulars and trade trained reservists, probably looking at a figure just under 100,000.

        The original figure of 82,000 army trade trained personnel was never met. There are also around 6,500 Marines in the Royal Navy including reserves.

    • Don’t worry, I’m sure Rishi Sunak will come along soon and tell us how we are punching above our weight.

  2. How realistic is this exercise? In a real conflict situation would you take a capital ship into the Baltic?

    • SR wrote:

      “”In a real conflict situation would you take a capital ship into the Baltic?””

      That’s a very interesting question, no doubt the many fjords (Do the Swedes call them fjords?) and small inlets around the Baltics would afford some protection in allowing such a ship to play hide and seek and should such a ship see an increase in defensive weaponry in which to be able to better defend itself (Looks back at Bluff Cove in 1982, which is currently a hot topic at the moment with the media regards finding somebody to blame) 

    • A good question but the Baltic is over 630,000 sq miles of water and a ship can move. So if it is vulnerable and I agree it is. How about all those airfields and other fixed military facilities. Surely guided missiles makes those untenable in a real conflict so how how do we make those exercises with aircraft based from fixed airfields realistic ?
      It seems to many on here and in the media warships particularly our carriers are toast in a peer type conflict but never mention fixed land bases.
      I hope we never find out.

      • That’s why the Swedes disperse their air force to their motorway system. And I’m not suggesting for a moment that large ships are vulnerable per se. Yes they can move. But in the Falklands we kept the carriers always outside the range of Argentine aircraft. If Argentina had had a decent submarine force the conflict would have been entirely different. It might not even been attempted. I’m just asking the question, that’s all

  3. Fingers crossed Erdogan loses today’s election and the new Turkish president gets behind approving Sweden’s application for NATO membership.

    • I was thinking just the same thing. Would be wonderful for Sweden to join NATO this year, as Finland did.

      • Kai wrote:
        “”We can’t even defend our own borders let alone Swedens.””
         
        Since Moscow invasion of the Ukraine, I have often wondered how would the Uk react if say it was invaded (hypothetically by the EU simply as it is the political block next door)
        I feel there would be mass acts of sabotage across the Uk by the pro EU crowd. Of course, they would be supported by mass strikes by the unions demanding the right to be rid of a far right fascist government, then there would be mass peace protests by the “Not in my name” and give peace a chance” lot. How about mass riots by people who don’t see themselves as British and who simply want the right to excuse knife and gun attacks across the UK, as stop and search is racist (2011 riots)

        The thing is we already see examples of the above already taking place. Which has me asking what next? Rounding up people and jailing them for not supporting the above causes. Now I expect to rile up a few people here with what I have written,

        but regards my last statement we are already seeing the old bill arrest people for misgendering chicks with diks, and it doesn’t take much for such a wonk mindset to look at others who require defending , I mean look at how the BBC has gone well out of its way to remake ISIS terrorist Shaminia Begum as a victim. Yes the very people who peddle the line that children are old enought to vote, take drugs and even chnage gender are now telling us that a nasty peice of work was far too young to understand what she was doing

        My point, after years of political brainwashing, we have bred a selfish generation who not only think only about themselves (I deserve a pay rise, as I am using food banks on ÂŁ30K+ a year) but hate everything about the Uk (In 2020 Children at Pimlico academy in London tore down the Union flag outside the school and then burnt it as they saw the Uks flag as racist) and as we are seeing would have no problem siding with an invader than they would with the British.

        I’m now going to grab a Beer and some popcorn.

        • Totally agree with you mate.
          Still, at least they are all neuro surgeons (according the the liberal crowd).

        • As it’s Sunday I’ll rise to the bait. Why not?

          The EU has no military worth speaking about, nor do the next door Irish. I imagine if the French invaded we would assume it was an exercise by a close ally, thank them kindly for their visit, and ply them with warm beer and fry ups until they went home in disgust clutching their “I went to London and all I got was this lousy Tee Shirt” tee shirts. (Or beer and popcorn if you happen to be there, Farouk.) Suella Braverman would insist they were sent to Rwanda if their boats weren’t big enough, but she would be politely ignored and sanity would prevail.

          Might there be protests on the street? I’d imagine so if the weather was nice. What are you protesting against? What have you got?

          As for the rest of your polemic — I hope you don’t mind me calling it a polemic — much of it is even more fanciful than a French invasion. Burning British flags is really only of interest to the council that designated Pimlico a smokeless zone and the Chinese who would manufacture the replacements. Unlike the Americans we don’t have a flag code which insists the correct way to dispose of a flag is to burn it, yet simultaneously feel that burning flags is a protest against the nation. Children learn through their mistakes, I only wish more adults did, although whether their accusation about the school uniform being racist was a mistake or not, I couldn’t say, I haven’t read it. However, the reports clearly say it was the dress code that was labelled racist, not the flag.

          Our younger generation are significantly financially disadvantaged in comparison to my much older generation. They are saddled with a significant level of debt as they start adult life if they want tertiary education, and the cost of housing makes it far harder to get a mortgage. Saying so doesn’t make them entitled. Nor does asking for a pay rise to cope with inflation.

          Of course there odd cases where the police screw up, such as that of gender activist Catherine Farrow, which appears to have been a wrongful arrest for malicious communications. It happens, it should definitely happen less, but the sky hasn’t fallen in.

          However, to equate a few protests with the mass civil disobedience 48% of the country is hardly tenable. In fact lumping all those people together and accusing them of being on the edge of mass acts of sabotage is nothing short of bigotry. I’ll define that as grouping people together according to a characteristic that defines nothing relevant and treating all the same because of the membership of that group: in this case the group being all those pro-EU and accusations of them wanting to commit acts of treason.

          It’s now my turn for beer and popcorn, I think. British beer. None of that foreign muck brewed by paella-eating anti-Gibraltar protestors.

          • I should add for completeness that my Abbott Ale, brewed in Bury St Edmunds by Greene King, is actually owned by a Hong Kong conglomerate and distributed by Swedes. Maybe we already have been invaded.

        • I may also get blasted for this but my angle is that as a country we have simply become too democratic. Everyone gets a voice and so many individuals and organisations are allowed to work at cross purposes to a unified country and elected government. Every prolonged legal challenge sucks up billions and pandering to professional anarchist protesters who consider it their paid career to travel the country protesting any cause whether they care about it or not (yes they do exist as a community). Our forefathers fought for democracy and i have served and would do so again to defend it but it sickens me when people who wouldn’t do so use its name in vain to support their nefarious politics by other means.

          • BigH1979….. the silent majority don’t get a voice….the shout loudest minority get a voice…
            Starmer wants 16 year olds to vote and TicTok will tell them where to put their cross

  4. So no air defence for Hms Albion again? MoD took that same risk a few years ago, by sending her straight through the S.C.S full of RM!
    For goodness sake, attach some Sea Ceptor boxed cells along the side of the ship!

    • If you want to burn and then drown after that’s a great way to do it. There are a million different weapons that will accomplish that in that neighborhood. For the love of God how about some air defense. The crappiest Turkish drone will…. Figure it out.

  5. Referring to the photo at the top of this piece:
    For a flagship, HMS Albion is not displaying very visible flags!

  6. It was an exercise and apart from training personnel etc. you find and weedout problems that arise and can then correct them for the future. Quantity is important but quality even more so.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here