A Royal Navy amphibious task force has anchored in Stockholm, following a display of defence tactics against a fictitious invasion of Sweden’s intricate coastal terrain.

The amphibious flagship, HMS Albion, headed the Littoral Response Group (North) (LRG) on a journey into the Baltic Sea as part of Exercise Aurora – marking the most substantial Swedish national defence exercise in over twenty-five years.

The Royal Marines left an indelible mark during three amphibious assaults on Sweden’s complex coastline. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson expressed his deep admiration for the commandos, stating that he would like the troops to participate in exercises in the country ‘next year and every year’.

In total, the LRG collaborated with their hosts’ military forces and those from Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Latvia and Lithuania. HMS Albion also served as the temporary home to several US Marines for the duration of the exercise.

Marines from 45 Commando made a formidable entrance on the shores of Gotland, a strategically significant island in the heart of the Baltic. They also stormed the Stockholm archipelago, a labyrinthine network of approximately 30,000 islands leading to Sweden’s capital.

In the presence of the Swedish premier, Defence Minister Paul Jonsson and key military figures, the Royal Marines performed a dramatic landing on the island of Korso, located on the eastern edge of the archipelago. This display showcased the allies’ ability to thwart an enemy invasion.

The political and military delegation also made a visit to Albion at sea, highlighting the deepening ties between the UK and Sweden.

You can read more on this here.

Tom has spent the last 13 years working in the defence industry, specifically military and commercial shipbuilding. His work has taken him around Europe and the Far East, he is currently based in Scotland.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

35 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
George Amery
George Amery
10 months ago

Hi folks hope all is well. Great stuff, once more we see our magnificent military in operation, not sure how many European militaries have the capability of carring out a similar deployment? You experts can advise me on this. My concern is; as we all know is the lack of numbers, no doubt we can take and hold ground for a while, however, numbers are instrumental in holding onto for example a bridge -head. Also I’m sure over the last couple days in the media reports of Ben Wallace still going ahead with army cuts? Despite Ukraine! A bit depressing… Read more Β»

Andrew D
Andrew D
10 months ago
Reply to  George Amery

IT is hard to take in really ,a cut of 10.000 troops specially when there used for home land Emergency floods ,outbreaks ect never mind the Battlefield πŸ™

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
10 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

It’s not 10k troops, as the army has around 75K at the moment, so in reality around 3 000, achieved by not recruiting replacements for those leaving voluntarily. It’s establishment is set for 82K, which it can not reach.

John Stevens
John Stevens
10 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

HI Andrew.. As Daniele said. There are over 75,000 Trade trained personnel in the army, if you add personnel that are trained but not trade trained to that figure the numbers reach over 79,000.

The total number of trained regulars and army reserves is probably somewhere around 104,000.

So when it comes to trade trained regulars and trade trained reservists, probably looking at a figure just under 100,000.

The original figure of 82,000 army trade trained personnel was never met. There are also around 6,500 Marines in the Royal Navy including reserves.

Jim
Jim
10 months ago
Reply to  George Amery

Don’t worry, I’m sure Rishi Sunak will come along soon and tell us how we are punching above our weight.

Andrew D
Andrew D
10 months ago
Reply to  Jim

πŸ€—

Sceptical Richard
Sceptical Richard
10 months ago

How realistic is this exercise? In a real conflict situation would you take a capital ship into the Baltic?

farouk
farouk
10 months ago

SR wrote:

“”In a real conflict situation would you take a capital ship into the Baltic?””

That’s a very interesting question, no doubt the many fjords (Do the Swedes call them fjords?) and small inlets around the Baltics would afford some protection in allowing such a ship to play hide and seek and should such a ship see an increase in defensive weaponry in which to be able to better defend itself (Looks back at Bluff Cove in 1982, which is currently a hot topic at the moment with the media regards finding somebody to blame) 

Sjb1968
Sjb1968
10 months ago

A good question but the Baltic is over 630,000 sq miles of water and a ship can move. So if it is vulnerable and I agree it is. How about all those airfields and other fixed military facilities. Surely guided missiles makes those untenable in a real conflict so how how do we make those exercises with aircraft based from fixed airfields realistic ?
It seems to many on here and in the media warships particularly our carriers are toast in a peer type conflict but never mention fixed land bases.
I hope we never find out.

Sceptical Richard
Sceptical Richard
10 months ago
Reply to  Sjb1968

That’s why the Swedes disperse their air force to their motorway system. And I’m not suggesting for a moment that large ships are vulnerable per se. Yes they can move. But in the Falklands we kept the carriers always outside the range of Argentine aircraft. If Argentina had had a decent submarine force the conflict would have been entirely different. It might not even been attempted. I’m just asking the question, that’s all

ola solvang
ola solvang
10 months ago

The image is not from Sweden, possibly Norway. “Same-same but different….

Sean
Sean
10 months ago

Fingers crossed Erdogan loses today’s election and the new Turkish president gets behind approving Sweden’s application for NATO membership.

Last edited 10 months ago by Sean
Graham Moore
Graham Moore
10 months ago
Reply to  Sean

I was thinking just the same thing. Would be wonderful for Sweden to join NATO this year, as Finland did.

Kai
Kai
10 months ago

We can’t even defend our own borders let alone Swedens.

Jacko
Jacko
10 months ago
Reply to  Kai

Is there another Armada on the way we haven’t spotted yet?πŸ™„

farouk
farouk
10 months ago
Reply to  Jacko

Kai wrote: β€œβ€We can’t even defend our own borders let alone Swedens.””   Since Moscow invasion of the Ukraine, I have often wondered how would the Uk react if say it was invaded (hypothetically by the EU simply as it is the political block next door) I feel there would be mass acts of sabotage across the Uk by the pro EU crowd. Of course, they would be supported by mass strikes by the unions demanding the right to be rid of a far right fascist government, then there would be mass peace protests by the β€œNot in my name”… Read more Β»

Last edited 10 months ago by farouk
farouk
farouk
10 months ago
Reply to  farouk
Airborne
Airborne
10 months ago
Reply to  farouk

No issues from me mate, both the post and the beer!

Kai
Kai
10 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Totally agree with you mate.
Still, at least they are all neuro surgeons (according the the liberal crowd).

Jon
Jon
10 months ago
Reply to  farouk

As it’s Sunday I’ll rise to the bait. Why not? The EU has no military worth speaking about, nor do the next door Irish. I imagine if the French invaded we would assume it was an exercise by a close ally, thank them kindly for their visit, and ply them with warm beer and fry ups until they went home in disgust clutching their “I went to London and all I got was this lousy Tee Shirt” tee shirts. (Or beer and popcorn if you happen to be there, Farouk.) Suella Braverman would insist they were sent to Rwanda if… Read more Β»

Jon
Jon
10 months ago
Reply to  Jon

How long before this thread gets taken down, I wonder?

Jon
Jon
10 months ago
Reply to  Jon

I should add for completeness that my Abbott Ale, brewed in Bury St Edmunds by Greene King, is actually owned by a Hong Kong conglomerate and distributed by Swedes. Maybe we already have been invaded.

Jacko
Jacko
10 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Not really any answer to thatπŸ‘

Last edited 10 months ago by Jacko
Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
10 months ago
Reply to  farouk

As usual, depressingly spot on.

BigH1979
BigH1979
10 months ago
Reply to  farouk

I may also get blasted for this but my angle is that as a country we have simply become too democratic. Everyone gets a voice and so many individuals and organisations are allowed to work at cross purposes to a unified country and elected government. Every prolonged legal challenge sucks up billions and pandering to professional anarchist protesters who consider it their paid career to travel the country protesting any cause whether they care about it or not (yes they do exist as a community). Our forefathers fought for democracy and i have served and would do so again to… Read more Β»

Ian
Ian
10 months ago
Reply to  BigH1979

BigH1979….. the silent majority don’t get a voice….the shout loudest minority get a voice…
Starmer wants 16 year olds to vote and TicTok will tell them where to put their cross

Rob Billington
Rob Billington
10 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Blimey that was good!

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
10 months ago
Reply to  Kai

In what way, exactly?

Phylyp
Phylyp
10 months ago

Impressive, and a good show of force with respect to Gotland. An appropriate warning to Russia as well.

Meirion X
Meirion X
10 months ago

So no air defence for Hms Albion again? MoD took that same risk a few years ago, by sending her straight through the S.C.S full of RM!
For goodness sake, attach some Sea Ceptor boxed cells along the side of the ship!

Last edited 10 months ago by Meirion X
Andrew D
Andrew D
10 months ago
Reply to  Meirion X

That would mean HMG doing something sensible πŸ™„

Esteban
Esteban
10 months ago
Reply to  Meirion X

If you want to burn and then drown after that’s a great way to do it. There are a million different weapons that will accomplish that in that neighborhood. For the love of God how about some air defense. The crappiest Turkish drone will…. Figure it out.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
10 months ago

Referring to the photo at the top of this piece:
For a flagship, HMS Albion is not displaying very visible flags!

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
10 months ago
Reply to  Graham Moore

Flying the flag would give the game away to the Russians old chap πŸ™‚

Oliver Craig
Oliver Craig
10 months ago

It was an exercise and apart from training personnel etc. you find and weedout problems that arise and can then correct them for the future. Quantity is important but quality even more so.