A Royal Navy warship has escorted a Russian task group along the eastern coast of the UK.

HMS Somerset, a Type 23 frigate was used to monitor the Russian destroyer and its support ships as they transited through the UK area of responsibility. The Russian task group were returning from a deployment to Syria.

A Royal Navy spokesman said:

“HMS Somerset was on a training mission when she received the call to locate and escort the Russian units. As with other Royal Navy ships operating around the UK, HMS Somerset was at a high state of alert to deal with any maritime security task, including the monitoring of transits through the UK area of responsibility by non-Nato warships.

Somerset intercepted the task group off Brest as it approached the south west of the UK and escorted it through UK waters until they turned for home, after spending the Easter weekend off the east coast of Scotland. The group carried out an underway replenishment in the North Sea and off the Scottish coast outside of UK territorial waters.

The operation involved collaboration with Nato forces, with the French ship La Motte-Picquet and Netherlands ship Friesland also tracking the Russian task group as it passed French and Dutch waters respectively.HMS Somerset kept a watchful eye on the ships as they anchored in international waters, 20 miles from land in the Moray Firth to avoid Storm Katie.”

Commander Michael Wood, commanding officer of HMS Somerset, said:

“This transit was continually monitored through a coordinated response between the Royal Navy and our Nato partners. The transit of Russian ships from the Mediterranean to their northern ports is not unusual, but the Royal Navy is ready at all times to protect UK territorial waters.”

27
Leave a Reply

avatar
15 Comment threads
12 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
20 Comment authors
Andy KessonJames GaleSteve Altradavid southernJon Tucker Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Jack Crutcher
Guest

One frigate. Shows what little we could really do if they wanted to test us.

UK Defence Journal
Guest

It’s just a simple PR/escort, relax.

Paul Jones
Guest

It was only one Russian warship also.. With a couple of supply vessels for accompaniment.

Dave B Philips
Guest
Dave B Philips

We’d know if Russia sent a task force WELL in advance if they plan to stupidly invade a NATO country.

I believe the days of spotting sails on the horizon and signal beacons i well and truly over.

david southern
Guest
david southern

Good point! we should send a helicopter carrier with air wing plus two type 45’s and four type 23’s and a couple of hunter killer subs whilst overflying with a couple of Tornados just in case this one ship decides to do something stupid. NATO has a vastly superior fleet to the Russians.

Andy Kesson
Guest
Andy Kesson

Why would you escalate the situation by sending anything else?
You can assume and pretty much bet your house that the British air defences (the actual ‘in that situation’ air defences would be on high alert!).
It was a simple escort, as they would escort us through Russian waters in conjunction with international maritime standard actions.

Julien Dixon
Guest

I bet that one Type 23 scared the Russian Task force!

Daniel Adams
Guest

Probably more capable and sea worthy than the task force.

UK Defence Journal
Guest

It’s just a simple PR/escort, relax.

Steve
Guest
Steve

This isn’t really the point. Ok, currently we have no threats to our territorial waters and so today it is a non-issue and hopefully we had a sub tracking it also. Plus the reality is we could have left it unescorted and it would have sailed past safely. The concern is that in peace time, the best we can do is have 1 ship assigned to our channels. It is not like we have a load of vessels in harbor, should they be needed. Which is why we shouldn’t be relying on ship based defenses, if we have insufficient holes… Read more »

Paul Jones
Guest

It was only one Russian ship, with a supply escort, on its way back home from Syria. No drama.

Steve
Guest
Steve

We really should have air launched anti-ship weapons.

We don’t have enough hulls to put a decent escort together, that is anything other than symbolic/PR.

It would look far better if we had a few typhoons in the air shadowing them, rather than one frigate that was probably out gunned.

Michael Fillingham
Guest

Did it break down ?

UK Defence Journal
Guest

Yawn.

Simon White
Guest

I am sure the other frigates were on the way and would have got there eventually 🙂

Michael Stanley
Guest

Thats 50% of our Navy then lol! 😉

Michael Stanley
Guest

We should get that twat David Cameron in a dingy to follow them lol

David Appleyard
Guest

All the great battles at sea involved the navy turning up late in the day.. Seemed to turn out ok most of the time lol

Byron Martin
Guest

A lot of bad mouthing of our navy on here yes it’s smaller than it was but it’s one of the most technological advanced navies in the world and far more advanced than any Russian ship and more than capable of dealing with any threats.

John Seddon
Guest

What’s up , torpedo’s and Phalanx don’t work ?, 1 Frigate? we need Beatty on the Beat with some decent WW1 battle ships to blow the Russians to Mars.

James Gale
Guest

Love the Type 23 class. I am still surprised it was never designed to allow CIWS fitted. How lessons are quickly forgotten

Steve Altra
Guest

The physical space to accommodate a Phalanx CIWS (or Goalkeeper, etc) is available on the T23s (over the hanger, wide arc sweep available).

However, they may have not installed them as the threat level was so low. They certainly could have purchased spares, kept them in storage (and thusly brand new condition), then mount them (relatively quickly) if the situation merited doing so.

Its a modular install with no punch through of the deck below required, so, easy & quick to fit. Just needs power, which could have already been installed for the option.

James Gale
Guest

No they were never designed from the start to be fitted. They cannot be retrofitted apparently according to a number of RN personal as they are too heavy for the positions that are available that do not interfere with the ships systems. Add to the fact the additional wiring etc.
Whilst this may be true it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that work can be carried to fix this issue….just the Navy has chosen not too as very expensive. Not as expensive as losing a vessel however….

James Gale
Guest

The difference between the US and UKs reaction to our armed forces and kit amazes me when I read the idiotic comments from my own countrymen.

Steve10
Guest
Steve10

UK Defence Journal is not at all bad, why it deserves you lot posting rubbish, it makes Arrse look positively intellectual

Ben Davis
Guest

We should’ve just sent a drone, let the skimmers have a long weekend.

Jon Tucker
Guest

If the s::t hit the fan has the British warship been fully loaded with all its weapons