HMS Severn is being replaced with a new batch River class offshore patrol vessel after only 14 years of service.

The ceremony took place earlier in the day in Portsmouth.

In April this year in a written answer to a question raised by Sir Nicholas Soames, Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Defence Harriet Baldwin stated that the 14 year old Severn would be decommissioned on October the 27th 2017.

Severn recently sailed for a final visit to her affiliated town of Newport. The vessel is being replaced by one of the new Batch 2 River class vessels being built on the Clyde.

The new Offshore Patrol Vessels were ordered to fill a gap in orders after the second carrier and before the Type 26 frigates begin construction. Critics, the UK Defence Journal included, have raised concerns that they’re severely overpriced and lack important features, such as a helicopter hangar that other, cheaper vessels of the same type have.

The names of hulls four and five came to light the morning before they were officially announced.

The Strategic Defence & Security Review states:

“We will buy two further new Offshore Patrol Vessels, increasing the Royal Navy’s ability to defend UK interests at home and abroad.”

The vessels will be used by the Royal Navy to undertake various tasks including border protection roles, including anti-smuggling, anti-piracy, fisheries patrols, and immigration law enforcement.

The order and construction of the new OPV’s will help sustain hundreds of skilled jobs on the Clyde until the Type 26 build begins, ensuring that the yards remain viable.

The vessels were described at a Defence Select Committee meeting a vessels “the Royal Navy does not want or need”.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
27 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Geoffrey Roach
Geoffrey Roach
3 years ago

To the Coastguard, Border force, somewhere useful in the UK PLEASE

Rob Collinson
3 years ago

These are too big and costly to run for the Coastguard/Border Force

Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  Rob Collinson

I agree. Depending on how much the former HMS Severn could be sold for then, if the asset (now in cash) were to be transferred to the Border Force I suspect they would prefer to use it to buy a couple of extra 42m cutters or, if the budget wouldn’t stretch that far, one cutter and an extra 20m RIB or two. The Border Force really does need to make more use of surveillance drones though so spending any proceeds (in the highly unlikely event that any actually come their way) on some pilot projects for serious drones (long duration… Read more »

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
3 years ago

Ridiculous! She still has 15 years service left in her.
Equip her as a drone mothership for mine clearance.
what a waste.
give her to border force as an armed coast guard vessel akin to us coastguard and many other armed coast guard services the world over.

Geoffrey Roach
Geoffrey Roach
3 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

That was the sort of thought I had in mind.

William Franklin
William Franklin
3 years ago

Easily 15 – 20 years life left in her. Pass her to the Coastguard as an armed response vessel.

James Harrington
James Harrington
3 years ago

If the UK is to take control of her 200 mile off shore limit for security and commercial fishing this vessel is needed to ensure our European friends keep their nets off our fishing stocks, which are badly managed and depleted due to the European fishing management system. Mrs. May has already given away two additional years of fishing rights to the EU, who aggressively represent the interest of those countries that lack their own fishing grounds. The amount of fish taken from within the 200 mile limit by French, Dutch, Spanish, German and other boats is staggering, whilst must… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
3 years ago

The ship would do little to stop or reduce immigration because the powers that be do not want to stop it.
Why else are the NATO ships in the med being used as a free taxi service to Europe rather depositing economic migrants back where they came from. Its all EU policy.
Indigenous populations be damned.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
3 years ago

Not really. It’s replacement is better. At least they are being replaced one for one which in itself is a bloody miracle. Price is poor though for the goods at the end.

Sjb1968
Sjb1968
3 years ago

In a small way this episode ie getting rid of a simple OPV before the end of its economic life and paying a premium to replace it just about sums up the MOD and why we get such poor value for money out of a huge defence budget. We all want shipbuilding to remain and flourish in the UK but the money spent buying 5 OPVs to replace 4 perfectly functional ships is a national disgrace. The money spent would keep our LPDs running for many years or buy a couple of Type 31s. Multiply this approach across the MOD… Read more »

Sjb1968
Sjb1968
3 years ago

Sorry rant over guys

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
3 years ago
Reply to  Sjb1968

No I think you put that quite brilliantly.

Paul.P
Paul.P
3 years ago

This is the NSS in action; sell assets before they need expensive refits and while they are attractive to foreign navies who will pay to customize the River 1’s. The Philippines, Bangladesh, Columbia and Ireland might all be interested in purchasing ex HMS Severn for various roles.

JME89
JME89
3 years ago

Gift it to the Gibraltar police force

FrankLT
FrankLT
3 years ago

A dreadful waste of UK taxes. Many years service left in her.

Lewis
Lewis
3 years ago

14 years? What a joke. They might as well have not built her. For the love of god give her to the border force or Gibrator so they have an actual ship to defend themsleves from Spanish incursion.

Steve
Steve
3 years ago
Reply to  Lewis

I wonder if the Gibrator government has considered buying it. I guess the main problem is it is a military ship and so not ideal for domestic policing roles.

Steve
Steve
3 years ago

It will be a simple debate, the government will state that the navy has done a review of its equipment against the threats posed to the country and that the ships are no longer required. I doubt there will be a vote on the topic, and even if there was i can’t see enough policticans breaking rank and voting against it.

Paul.P
Paul.P
3 years ago

By this time we ought have 3 or 4 Type 26 in service and have retired a couple of Type 23’s. And rather than 5 new OPVs we should have 5 Type 31s. Incredible foul up, but no point in crying about it. Heads should roll, but they won’t. The country will go down with balanced books!

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
3 years ago

What should be happening is hmg pay for a few hundred more sailors so the batch 1s stay in the Fisheries Protection Squadron at home enabling the batch 2’s which are more capable vessels to be deployed abroad saving the escort fleet from doing those roles. The frigates and destroyers could then form groups dedicated to the carriers, LPDs and covering Faslane.

Paul.P
Paul.P
3 years ago

Yes; the only reason this is not happening in my opinion, is the risk the treasury would see an ‘ocean going patrol vessel’ as a frigate replacement, especially if it had a hanger. Actually there could be method in the RN madness of creating the concept of ‘River Batch 2’.

Julian
Julian
3 years ago

In fact the RN has technically only had Severn for 5 years not 14 years! Prior to September 2012 the batch 1 Rivers weren’t owned by the RN, they were on lease from Vosper Thornycroft on 5 year contracts that in 2012 weren’t renewed and the RN purchased the three batch 1s outright instead (for £13 million each according to Wikipedia).

Is Clyde still leased? I think she is which makes me wonder whether she will disappear from RN service by simply not renewing that leasing contract when it comes up for renewal.

farouk
farouk
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Julian,
That’s a good point you mention regards how the Military was straddled with so many lease contracts by the Labour Government. Leases which were designed to promote the image that the government of the day was defending the country whilst balancing the books. However as time has told, it was a false economy. The leases I know of are:
River class boats
C17 Heavy Lifters
A330 Tanker
White fleet lease (£100 million contract with Babcock)
Skynet 5 satellite system

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
3 years ago
Reply to  farouk

C17s all bought now.
I think the army’s “c” vehicle fleet is also leased? I think that’s engineers plant, and stuff like that?

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
3 years ago

Fit her with a RAMMING head, great big lump of hardened steel. Then next time the Russian carrier comes smoking its way down the coast of the UK accidentally in purpose RAM her. Only joking… I think a useful role for these vessels would be to refit them as surveillance/ ELINT vessels. We have lost all capability in that area. Alternatively up arm them and give them to the coastguard as a new military force, akin to US coastguard. We need more hulls in the water post Brexit to police our EEZ. just what exactly does the government want to… Read more »

NPB
NPB
3 years ago

A vessel of that type equipped with an unmanned aircraft like the Aerovel Flexrotor would create a tremendous offshore patrol capability: surely that combination could sell to our European neighbours or worldwide if we don’t want it.

R Cummings
R Cummings
3 years ago

The sale price for 3 River 1s would not even pay for a cheapo T31 frigate. There are far more capable, better-armed OPVs and corvettes on offer from a dozen shipbuilders, at a lower price than BAe managed. Selling off sprightly, 14-year-old vessels for comparative peanuts only makes sense to the bean-counters in the Treasury and MOD. There is a role I would like to see these OPVs play. I have long believed that the RN should equip its RNR units with sea training vessels, which they did until the 90s. It makes no sense to have 15 (RNVR) ships’s… Read more »