The role of Members of Parliament is multifaceted, encompassing everything from constituency work to holding the government to account on the national stage.

One measure of an MP’s engagement with specific issues is the frequency with which they raise questions in Parliament.

Grant Shapps, who has been an MP for 18 years, has only asked 79 defence-related questions during his parliamentary career. A basic analysis of these figures seems to suggest a relatively low level of interest in defence matters.

Shapps by the numbers

To put the figures into perspective, Shapps has asked an average of 4 defence-related questions per year over his 18-year career in Parliament.

When considering that he has also been a Minister for 9 of those years, the numbers do look a bit more generous; roughly 8-9 questions per year if we exclude his ministerial tenure. Even so, compared to other MPs with similar longevity, these figures still appear relatively low.

Public perception and accountability

While numbers alone don’t provide a full picture, perception matters in politics, and even more so when it comes to a portfolio as sensitive as defence. The UK is facing an increasingly complex international environment, marked by evolving threats and geopolitical shifts.

In such times, the Defence Secretary plays a vital role, and their record in relation to defence matters will naturally come under scrutiny. The lack of previous engagement could be seen as a cause for concern, raising questions over his preparedness and focus. Could this perceived lack of previous interest in defence topics impact his credibility and efficacy in his new role?

Royal Air Force carriers?

In a blow to his perception in defence, the new defence secretary confused the RAF with the Royal Navy on the second week of the job while speaking to LBC here.

Speaking to LBC’s Nick Ferrari at Breakfast on Wednesday, he described the new carriers, “the largest carriers the RAF has ever had”. The aircraft carriers are operated by the Royal Navy, rather than the RAF.

In his own words

The Secretary of State said recently, “Defence is in my DNA because Britain gave my family our freedom Now as Defence Secretary I’m committed to protecting the freedom of every British family by ensuring our Armed Forces are ready to respond to any threat.”

The future

Grant Shapps’ appointment as Defence Secretary has brought attention to his limited track record of parliamentary questions on defence issues. While not an exhaustive indicator of his abilities or interest, these statistics do shine a light on an area where increased focus and engagement would be beneficial.

As Shapps assumes his new role, his actions and decisions will matter far more than his past record of parliamentary questions. However, as is often the case in politics, perception can set the stage for how actions are received and interpreted. As such, it would be in his best interest to actively engage with the complexities and responsibilities of this new role from day one.

Lisa West
Lisa West
Lisa has a degree in Media & Communication from Glasgow Caledonian University and works with industry news, sifting through press releases in addition to moderating website comments.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

87 COMMENTS

  2. Nope no interest, expertise or even the foggiest clue what to do.
    What’s Grant Shapps area of expertise?
    Grant Shapp.
    He is only out for himself and his own hopelessly incompetent career.

    At least with Sunak you know what he stands for. Money. Money. Money. Big business, city of London, Tory party grandees and trying to screw the country over to make a quick buck whilst in charge.
    Investment portfolio is looking good for Sunak and Co.

  4. The only suitable person has just left the job. The rest left to choose from are a bunch of incompetent, malevolent fools. As others have said he is only in the job as he is a total Sunak sycophant and will not challenge him in any shape or form. Yet another sad, worrying day for our armed forces, you can guess that bad news in just around the corner regarding fixing the obvious, current deficiencies.

    • I had hopes for Heappey as the steady-as-she-goes candidate. Tugendhat would have been a gamble, but at least he would have brought a breath of fresh air and a bit of rigour.

      Anyone of the PM’s usual suspects would have been useless by design. Useless for Defence I mean. Rishi thinks he might win by simply appearing to do safe things and taking no risks. So Shapps is a safe pair of hands because he will never be thrown the ball and wouldn’t dream of chasing it.

      • Mourdant would have been another shout. Shapp is a political Delboy and while that can work for some departments at times, I can’t see it working for Defence. At least not at the moment when its a priority, Wallace had gravitas and a history with the Forces. Shapp in comparison comes across as just another political appointment rather than someone hand picked for their known ability in military matters when we have a land war in Europe. Seems a bit odd to me, especially with an election in just over a year so deal with what’s in front of you, even assuming Rishi thinks he’s going to be calling the shots after the election, he can rejig things then…. Not a great appointment for this amateur commentator.

  5. No I would go for Lammy over shapes…Lammy was an inner city kid with a single parent that ended up graduating from Harvard law school with a masters degree, called to the bar in 1994…like his politics or not he’s not an light weight…interestingly Lammy has done significant campaigning for the rights of veterans from ethic minorities and was instrumental in the investigation into the commonwealth war graves commission being found to be pervasively racist in its commemoration of Britain war dead from other non white ethinc groups.

    shapps was from a leafy middle class suburb, attended grammar school but only ever managed a higher BTec In business from a Poly..he then went into selling photo copiers and doing some iffy business deals and setting up some pyramid selling business with his wife before becoming a politician.

    whatever the politics I would still go for Lammy over shapps who I consider a prime example of why the Conservative Party has slipped into incompetence.

    • Jonathan wrote:

      Lammy was an inner-city kid with a single parent that ended up graduating from Harvard law school with a master’s degree, called to the bar in 1994…like his politics or not he’s not an light weight

       
      Just because somebody has a degree or even been to a prestigious learning establishment doesn’t infuse that person with intelligence or even common sense. For example when I was based at Chatham we used to teach young officers straight out of Sandhurst combat engineering. On one occasion after a night time mine field laying exercise using a bar mine layer, and a 432. We heard the APC starting up and watched it start zig zagging across the lanes of mines that the candidates had laid the night before. I ran across the field from our landrover shirtless (seeing as I was in the process of having a shave) waved the 432 to a halt and asked the YO in the commanders hatch what he was playing at? His reply “I was disguising the rows “
       
      So David Lammy:
      In 2013, Lammy accused the BBC of making a “silly innuendo about the race” on Twitter during the announcement of the next Pontiff where the BBC tweeted “will smoke be black or white?” in reference to smoke above the Sistine Chapel. Lammy criticised the BBC’s tweet as “crass and unnecessary.” He subsequently apologised after it was pointed out the role played by black and white smoke in announcing the election of a new Pope.
       
      In January 2016 Lammy claimed that one million Indians sacrificed their lives during the Second World War, not for the survival of Britain and to fight Nazism, but instead for the “European Project” (actually the figure of Indian military dead is 87K which includes Nepalese Gurkhas)

      In 2017, writing in The Guardian, Lammy argued that Comic Relief perpetuated problematic stereotypes of Africa, and that they had a responsibility to use its powerful position to move the debate on in a more constructive way by establishing an image of African people as equals

      In February 2019, Lammy criticised Stacey Dooley for photographs she posted on social media of her trip to Uganda for Comic Relief, and said that “the world does not need any more white saviours”, and that she was “perpetuating ‘tired and unhelpful stereotypes’ about Africa”. The stance Lammy made regards white people and comic relief resulted in a fall in donations in March 2019 from the previous year by £8 million

      In 2019, Lammy claimed that he was raised in a family reliant on tax credits, which were not introduced in the United Kingdom until Lammy was aged 31.

      In 2019, Lammy was criticised for saying his comparison of the Brexit European Research Group (which consists of Conservative MPs) to Nazis and proponents of the South African apartheid was “not strong enough”.

      When Boris was removed as PM last year, Lammy speaking on the BBC claimed that help for the Ukraine from the Uk would not falter and gave the following examples:

      “”Churchill replaced Chamberlain just days before the Second World War, Lloyd George replaced Asquith weeks into [the] Somme, Eden lost his job during the Suez crisis.””

      Churchill actually replaced Chamberlain in May 1940 – nine months after the Second World War began. Lloyd George succeeded Asquith weeks after the Somme offensive had ended, in December 1916. And Eden actually quit No. 10 in January 1957, two months after the ceasefire led to a cessation of hostilities between Britain and Egypt.

      But then I am talking of a bloke who went to Harvard and who as a contestant on Mastermind came bottom with these answers: Claiming that Henry VII (7) succeeded Henry VIII (8) as king, that Marie Antoinette won the Nobel Physics prize in 1903 and that the big prison in the middle of Paris was called ‘Versailles’.

      There loads more silly gaffs from him, such as “Ive been here an hour and not seen a Policeman” on national TV, with a Policeman stood behind him. All of the above gaffs could have been avoided if he had just spent a few seconds on looking up the subject.

      As I said, I’d draw the line at Lammy which is why I placed Jeremys squeeze in front of him.

    • It’s a shit choice from the options you mentioned, Shapps is just wank at pretty much everything and Lammy is a racist with a chip on his shoulder! Ah choices choices, we are so lucky aren’t we as an electorate 👍😇!

  6. Agree 100% Farouk – a ‘yes’ man that won’t ask for any more money from the PM and will make defence ‘go away’.

    Our Armed Forces deserve better!

    • To be fair he was barely asked any questions on Defence in the whole interview. The first, on 2.5%, wasn’t even pressed before he was asked if RAAC was an issue for the MOD. He’d barely answered that before being steered off onto RAAC in schools. If they wanted to ask questions on the condition of the MOD estate, then why not ask those? At least they would be talking about something in the Ministers remit. The Today Programme editors should hang their heads.

      • Agreed, but no votes in defence, and now the schools are falling down in addition to everything else this lot have ignored.

        • I was recently canvassed by a Conservative on behalf of their new candidate in my constituency. I’m a floating voter in a marginal, so I sent back the message: there are votes in defence and you are about to lose mine. For all the good it will do.

  9. The quality of comments in this site are abysmal . By all means have an opinion on Grant Shapps , but rude and insulting remarks about him are not necessary or helpful

    • The quality of comments on this site are actually bloody good if you made an effort at looking at contributors posts, history and experience!

    • If the man hasn’t been employed as a talking head, why is he already on talk shows and the media circuit? Wallace wasn’t at this stage, Mordaunt wasn’t either. It’s not like he’s talking about Ukraine or anything that urgently requires a defence minister. This is the problem. Somebody should be running the MOD and Shapps nominally has that role. But the reality is that he’ll be spending an increasing proportion of his time explaining non-defence government policy to the media in the run up to the next election. It’s a classic role for a minister without portfolio.

      The Prime Minister thinks so little of Defence that he’s effectively leaving steering a complex department as a part-time role to someone with no experience in the area or even of adjacent areas such as security or FCDO. I agree with the others that the primary qualification of Shapps for that aspect of the role is that he won’t ask for more money for a chronically underfunded area. This might be useful to the PM, but it’s certainly useless to the defence of the realm.

      This isn’t being rude, and if it’s an insult, it’s an insult to the British people not the Minister.

  10. Right someone get this written down for the minister. Army do land. Navy do sea. Airforce do sky. Sometimes roles cross but tends to be if it’s big and grey it’s navy. If it’s brown and green it’s army.

    • Addendum, Def Sec to note, when on detachment/deployment the following accommodation is provided
      Army – dig holes in the ground
      Navy – any drunken roadside gutter
      RAF – 4* hotels as a minimum. No point in living rough if you don’t have to.

  11. I wonder if he will be thrown in at the deep end.

    What is going on in Romania?

    “There have been a number of confusing updates coming out of Romania regarding the possibility of a drone falling onto its territory earlier this week.

    On Monday, Kyiv claimed Russian drones had fallen onto on Romanian territory during an overnight strike.

    Bucharest denied the claims in the immediate aftermath. 
    This matters because Romania is in NATO, which deems an attack against one of its members an attack on all.

    A Ukrainian MP on Monday went as far as accusing Romania of denying drones were found on their land to avoid NATO sliding into a direct confrontation with Russia.

    Then, today, Romania’s defence minister Angel Tilvar gave the vague comments that “pieces which might be the elements of a drone were found,” on Romanian territory near the Ukrainian border.
     
    The president of Romania then spoke – but did not immediately verify his defence minister’s quotes.

    Instead, he said that if parts of a Russian drone were confirmed to be in Romanian territory, this would constitute a “serious violation”.

    So – Ukraine claims it knows of a Russian drone on Romanian soil, and while Romania initially denied the claims – it appears that (at least some in government) have backtracked today.” 
    . 

    • I don’t think anyone is going to war because a couple of pieces of metal were found in Romania. During the Cold War, there were instances where Soviet aircraft violated NATO airspace. Nobody thought of going to war.

      But the incidence certainly illustrates the wider dangers of the continuing war in Ukraine.

    • NEWS FROM THE FLIGHT DECK

      This will make Russia think twice if it kicks off 😂😂

      18 Aug 2023 — Romania expects F-35 Letter of Agreement in 2024, first aircraft in 2030 … in two stages, culminating in delivery of three F-35 squadrons.

      Any updates on full-rate production yet? its only 2023.

      Meteor? Spear 3 for the F-35B this decade.

      TR3 or Block 4 even? How about the AN/APG-85 Radar schedule and the engines to power it and the software 😂

      • Did your carer type that for you? Good job Finland, Norway, Denmark, Romania, Czech Republic, Greece, Germany, Netherlands,Belgium, Italy are all purchasing F35, which will massively strengthen airpower in Europe. Keeping us safe from those pesky Russians. The same Russians you used to massively big up 😆Thank god none of them have seen your comments eh Nige. 😄 Typhoon will have been in service for 28 years with the RAF before it gets its first AESA radar at IOC. You not slagging that timeframe off?

        • UPDATE FROM THE FLIGHT DECK

          “Typhoon will have been in service for 28 years”

          Exactly 😂😂

          The F-35 first flew in 2006

          Any updates on full-rate production yet? it’s only 2023.

          Meteor? Spear 3 for the F-35B this decade.

          TR3 or Block 4 even? How about the AN/APG-85 Radar schedule and the engines to power it and the software required 😂

          As for “The same Russians you used to massively big up 😆Thank god none of them have seen your comments eh Nige.”

          Let me see these comments, I’m sure everyone else would like to.

          Or have you reverted to telling lies once again? I can show them these if you like?

          • What’s really funny Nigel. Is that all the above will all be completed. Blk4. Spear 3, and 19 other weapons acrossthe F35 fleet. AN/APG-85 (F35’s 2nd AESA radar) And many other upgrades over the decades. And many more orders. And you will have nothing else to criticise 😆 I’ll watch with pleasure.

      • LIES FROM THE FLIGHT DECK

        WHAT A SAD LITTLE MAN YOU ARE

        ROBERT BLAY

        Caught red-handed again telling porkies to cover up his lack of knowledge on any given subject to gain some credibility filled with cheap comments to fill in the gaps. How very sad.
        January 15 2023 19:43

        “I think this article explains it in plain enough English for you Nigel from a reputable website. I know you love a link. Or do you still think 6th gen will be available from 2025? that was a cracker of a prediction.”
         
        REPLY

        No doubt the clown in the room didn’t read my post on UKDJ fifteen days ago regarding Tempest and makes a complete fool of himself once again.

        Give it up Blay and stay off the wine, even I feel embarrassed for you.

        UKDJ December 28 2022

        F135 engine upgrade receives £62m funding boost
        Some good news nonetheless!

        “The UK MoD FCAS director, Richard Berthon, told Airforce Technology that a single supersonic demonstrator aircraft will be manufactured for the 2027 first flight, although declined to comment on which systems will be initially tested on the platform.

        “The flight itself is one milestone of many milestones,” Berthon said.
        Work in progress

        The design has also flown 100 hours digitally, testing key elements ahead of the start of platform manufacture, while the flight demonstrator platform was described by officials as being “low observable”.
        On 18 July engine manufacturers, Rolls-Royce also presented details of Project Orpheus, a programme to develop and run a new design jet turbine in under 18 months, which would be used to inform propulsion requirements for Tempest.”

        LINK

    • I think everyone will spot a serious attack from Russia when and if it comes. Surprised Ukraine even bothered mentioning it. It would need at lot more than a bit of debris.

  13. He is just keeping the cabinet seat warm until this whole incompetent shower are kicked out sometime in the next 12mths

  14. The last UK defence secretary with military experience before Ben Wallace was Tom King from 1989 to 1992. Not one of new Labour’s had any military background. So what? What extra does a former captain bring to discussions with generals, admirals and air marshalls?
    What is needed is the critical intelligence to grasp issues quickly and ask the right questions.
    I don’t know whether Shapps can do that but looking at the last 30 years, how many could and did?
    The big decisions on procurement and commitments are all taken by cabinet, not by a def.sec on his own.

    • In our political system its often going to be the case that we have career politicians in the Defence gig, I’m not arguing that it always should be an ex forces guy but we’re in pretty unusual territory and we had a Defence minister that WAS an ex military man who seemed to be able to deal with guys who are fighting a war. We’re going to have an election in 12 to 15 months so one way or another there will be a change of people in the big seats. I’d rather go with a bit more like for like in the short term scenario of dealing with our allies, potentially also those that aren’t our allies but we might have to negotiate with.

    • I agree that you don’t need to be from the services to do a good job but the article points out his lack of natural interest in the subject, and my view is simply that his track record on good decisions or any sort of vision is not there, he’s s caretaker and a shark mayor, like Hancock was but happy to be proved wrong.Maybe he’ll now stop with the get rich schemes. Here’s to radical changes in personality, it is possible, rooting for you Shappy.

    • I’d demur slightly.

      It would take 6 months for an outsider to grasp all the acronyms and figure out the organisational structures.

      There is also the thing of understanding the feeling of being under fire. Watching movies doesn’t get you close.

      Sometimes you do need to cut to the chase which is where BW excelled and just making decisions in a clear manner and being able to take the pressure.

      • Most people, me included, would struggle with the acronyms in use. I’m not trying to defend Shapps but question the importance of military( esp junior military ) experience. Whereas most cabinet ministers will have just a handful of senior civil servants, paid at similar levels as the minister, , the defence secretary has scores of high ranking officers to run the armed forces. The ministerial role is relatively unimportant.
        In negotiations with the Treasury, a minister with no particular connection to the military might be more convincing in the argument for funding.
        What I want to see is a party and government that has a clear and well thought out commitment to effective defence so that a long term strategy and the funds to deliver it are forthcoming.

        • An example to illustrate your point is John Nott, 4 years in the Gurkha Rifles, rank lieutenant, author of the 1981 Defence White Paper.

          Interestingly the thrust of the paper was a focus on NATO at the expense of “out-of-area” operations. That seems to be the Labour defence position currently. It would be as wrong a decision today, if executed upon, as it was back then.

  15. Tugendhat would have been a better choice, at least he has an interest in defence matters. Personally, I’d favour being bold and co – opting Daniele Mandelli into the position.

  16. Military experience doesn’t always make a good politician. What the MOD needs is a good politician who can communicate well and negotiate with the Treasury and the enormous defence industrial base and keep major projects on track. Is Grant Shapps that man? who knows. Anyone in post has a very difficult job ahead.

    • True

      BW was a good politician in that he kept his head down and engaged cogwheels.

      He also made prompt clear decisions that enabled lemon projects to be cut so the golden projects could be accelerated with the cash headroom.

  17. He’s a straw man lightweight who won’t rock the boat for the pretend PM while he prepares for the next election by using the promised increase in defence spending to buy a few more votes with some pathetic tax cuts and pension increases! Or maybe I’m just cynical……

    • My hope is that with the spending settlements agreed, and many a major program underway, he won’t cause too much damage before he’s out on his ear anyway mate.

      Ive read a decision on the 14 ER Chinooks is one in his in tray as apparently Wallace was close to cancelling it.

  18. Agreed, Shapps or should I say ‘Michael Green’ with the weird get rich schemes, is a depressing appointment. He’s shady, an opportunist and proven to be untrustworthy, which is fine if you want him to be a mayor of a small US beach town that has a shark problem ‘hey folks the beach is open’, but in terms of being the UK Defence Secretary, jeez no. Expect decisions that will need unpicking years later and expect a scant understanding of defence issues and expect nothing in terms of vision or sticking his neck out. I can only hope the shark mayor will be out soon, at the next election.

  19. The world is the most uncertain it’s been since the Second World War and Rishi gifts the MOD a tin of magnolia emulsion, in the form of Grant Shapps. I’m with on Diane Abbott edging it just ✅

  20. He had a second job under a hidden name and denied it for years. Pretty sure his only in it for the kick backs. Luckily we have an election in a year and very little damage he can do in that time. Highly unlikely he will still be in the job after the election who ever wins.

  21. Educating Grant might be a tall order for somebody in the military but it is their job. These ministers are simply respresentatives of the people who are by and large ignorant of all things military. We have been spoilt with Ben Wallace.

  22. British Army selects new rifle for Rangers and Booties:

    https://i.postimg.cc/5y11ZwQp/Opera-Snapshot-2023-09-07-010550-www-gov-uk.png

    British troops will soon be more lethal on the battlefield, as a new £90 million contract delivers modern, high precision rifles.
    The Alternative Individual Weapon (AIW) system – known as the L403A1 and procured by Defence Equipment & Support (DE&S) under Project HUNTER – is made up of a new assault rifle fitted with a muzzle signature reduction system and an improved optical sighting system.
    The AIW is a modern rifle using the latest in design technology and manufacturing methods, to produce an exceptionally reliable and accurate weapon. The magnified optic means the user is able to engage threats from greater distances; whilst the signature reduction system works to mask the AIW from detection from sight and hearing.
    Supplementing the current in-service L85A3, the AIW system has been secured under a £90 million contract with Macclesfield-based company Edgar Brothers, supporting the Prime Minister’s priority to grow the economy by helping sustain approximately 50 jobs at the family-owned company.
    Minister for Defence Procurement, James Cartlidge said:

    This is another example of how we are committed to investing in the most advanced battlefield equipment to back our troops on the battlefield. This advanced rifle’s ability to help soldiers maintain the stealth edge not only protects them but delivers war-fighting advantage over our adversaries.

    An initial £15 million order of 1,620 AIW systems has been placed, with options to procure up to 10,000 systems – totalling £90 million – under the contract over the next decade. The systems will initially be fielded to the Army Special Operations Brigade (ASOB) who operate in complex, high threat environments.
    DE&S Dismounted Close Combat Portfolio Leader, Colonel Paul Cummings, said:

    Project Hunter has been a fabulous example of close collaboration with the user community and strong engagement with industry to deliver game-changing capability at pace. This is another example of the enormous commitment of the men and women in DCC to deliver battle-winning capability into the hands of the user and I’m enormously proud of what they have achieved. We look forward to continuing to work closely with Edgar Brothers as we move into the production phase.

    The L403A1 is a high performing modern development of the ArmaLite Rifle (AR), which pushes the boundaries of modern performance. As an AR system, it shares much in common with the rifle systems used by many of the UK’s allies. Given their specialist role, and the critical task of working with and alongside many of the UK’s allies, the platform will enable ASOB to share skills and drills in an efficient manner.
    Lt Col Gareth Davies, SO1 Soldier Works, Military Capability Delivery, Army Headquarters, said:

    Project HUNTER has successfully delivered a new weapon option for UK Defence. At the current time this is being procured for the Army Special Operations Brigade (ASOB). It offers a marked increase in lethality, and the system includes one of most capable day sights currently available. Importantly the weapon system will be further enhanced by our newest generation of night optics, with which the ASOB are already equipped.

    As a key component of the ASOB, the Ranger Regiment will receive the AIW later this year. Made up of four battalions, the Rangers deployed to over 60 countries in their first 12 months of operation, following their formation as part Future Soldier under the Defence Command Paper 2021.

  23. Defence/security/military matters don’t really features in Shapps’ background (whereas they clearly did with his predecessor). But how many government ministers actually have any expertise specific to the departments they nominally head? If Ministers were allocated to roles based on their specific expertise then the concept of a ‘Cabinet reshuffle’ wouldn’t exist.

    • Some have already had experience in the same or an allied ministry at a more junior level, or they’ve held the shadow post or have been on a relevant select committee. For example Theresa Coffey, Gillian Kegan, Steve Barclay and James Cleverly all did junior ministerial jobs in the same or allied ministries. Suella Bravernam was a barrister and Attorney General, Alex Chalk barrister and Solicitor General.

      Not all do, but there’s plenty of opportunity in a long running government to appoint people with relevant experience of one form or another.

  24. 90+% of all politicians have ZERO experience or qualification to hold the post, it should be a pre-req. But the sorry state of politics globally leaves me to consider that the best option would be to do what Gerneral Cheeseburger ordered.

  27. Wow,why the hell do these useless politicians put in idiots to jobs they know nothing about ,shapps that is scrapping the barrel ,thank fxxxxxg God these idiots will be gone ,then we will have to see what labour offers ?

  28. This is what Grant Shapps has just said to Sky news, reported in forces.net:
    “”We gifted 14 of these Challenger 2 tanks to Ukraine. We accept that in a war zone, there can be material losses, which is what’s happened here,” Mr Shapps told Sky News.

    “I can also confirm that all six of the military in the tank, the Ukrainians, were actually able to survive this, which is a great testament to that British kit.

    “This is the sort of thing that happens, but we’ll always keep what we’re providing the Ukrainians with under close review.”

    Six?!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here