The Ministry of Defence recently announced that they intend to buy up to 61 ‘Intercept & Escort Craft’ to respond to incidents and board other vessels.

Further information came to light via the following exchange.

Kevan Jones, Member of Parliament for North Durham, asked:

“To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, in the context of his Department’s decision to buy up to 61 new intercept vessels, which vessels they will be replacing; when the Department will tender for the design of those new vehicles; and what estimate his Department has made of the cost of the contract.”

Jeremy Quin, Minister for Defence Procurement, responded:

“A tender was issued on 10 December 2021 for the procurement of up to 61 new intercept vessels. The deadline for tender response is 4 February 2022 after which responses will be assessed against the various assessment criteria. It is expected that the Invitation to Negotiate will be issued in March 2022. The Intercept and Escort Craft project’s aim is to replace the following craft variants:

· Avon Sea Rider

· Pacific 22 and 24

· Arctic 24

· Delta Dive Rigid Inflatable Boats

The project will reduce the number of variants currently operated while upgrading capability. The estimated tender value has been advertised at between £16 million and £26 million.”

We reported earlier that a contract notice was published specifying a firm requirement 36 ‘Intercept & Escort Craft’ craft and an option for an additional 25 craft over a 6 year period.

The specifications for the craft, as listed in the contract notice, are outlined below:

  • The capability shall provide a high performance fast response craft.
  • The capability shall have a length overall of less than 9.5M and be powered by outboard motors.
  • The capability shall be fully operational at very short notice to respond to incidents anywhere within the defined patrol areas in the defined response times and in all environmental conditions.
  • The capability shall enable the User to safely undertake the boarding of other vessels (including high-sided vessels) while stationary or underway.
  • The capability shall integrate complex communications and navigation systems to enable the User to effectively assimilate and compile the operational picture while underway.
  • The craft will be provided with a detachable ballistic protection kit.

Ministry of Defence to buy up to 61 new intercept vessels

You can read more here.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sam
Sam
2 years ago

Fingers crossed this contract goes to one of the many, very competent, UK based boat builders.

Bloke down the pub
Bloke down the pub
2 years ago

If the MOD are looking to sell off their old RIBs, there’s a guy in Calais who’s in the market for a load at the right price.

Nicholas
Nicholas
2 years ago

Seaworthyness not necessarily an issue?

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  Nicholas

EBAY , also has Masking tape at less than BQ retail price

James Fennell
James Fennell
2 years ago

The RN recently bought a bunch of inboard powered Pacific 24s as seaboats, so these are presumably outboard powered RHIBs (it specified outboard in the tender docs)?

James Fennell
James Fennell
2 years ago
Reply to  James Fennell

Avon Seariders are pretty ancient, they were making them when I was a boy in the 1970s!

Last edited 2 years ago by James Fennell
David
David
2 years ago
Reply to  James Fennell

Yes, and still being produced 50 years later, but by Zodiac now….

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  James Fennell

Still got my Smallboats ticket ,

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  James Fennell

We had them fitted replacing the old 3 in 1 whaler in 83 within 4 months 1 whilst carrying an I S platoon the tube separated from the Hull total write off

Tim Hirst
Tim Hirst
2 years ago

Unless the MoD goes with one of the new outboard diesel designs there will be a need to store and dispense large quantities of petrol on all RN warships.

geoff
geoff
2 years ago
Reply to  Tim Hirst

Good point Tim. A serious hazard even in peace time.

Tommo
Tommo
2 years ago
Reply to  geoff

When on Hunts we always made sure Jerry can were totally filled up no Vapours half empty cans are more dangerous, Vapours

James Fennell
James Fennell
2 years ago
Reply to  Tim Hirst

I imagine all RN warships already carry a small amount of petrol for outboards, I carry some on my 34′ sailing boat for the inflatable – as do most pleasure boats. RN have been using outboard powered Zodiacs since the 1960s. There are some good diesel outboards around. I’m pretty sure many of these will not be used on warships. The inboard diesel powered Pacific 24s bought recently are for suface ships as seaboats. I imagine these are both for use on ships and for harbour duties, to support MCM as dive boats, for RM and SBS

Last edited 2 years ago by James Fennell
Gunbuster
Gunbuster
2 years ago
Reply to  James Fennell

Petrol is kept in a dedicated stowage on the upper deck. Kept in fuel cans , the cans are placed in a stowage that slopes downwards over the side. If you need to ditch the fuel you pull a lever and the whole lot is jettisoned over the side.
Pacific RIBs are diesel powered waterjets so the need for petrol has diminished. Its still used for some outboards but not many but its also used for things like Disaster relief stores like chain saws.

Latch71
Latch71
2 years ago
Reply to  Tim Hirst

Just like they have to store and dispense even larger amounts of aviation fuel then….

Tim Hirst
Tim Hirst
2 years ago
Reply to  Latch71

Aviation fuel is just high specification paraffin. Far far less hazardous than petrol. I was told that the Pacific 24 diesel is a multi fuel engine and when used at sea is often run on aviation fuel as it is more suitable for smaller engines than the ships supply on marine diesel.

Latch71
Latch71
2 years ago
Reply to  Tim Hirst

Considering the inferno you tend to get in an aircraft crash I’m going to carry on classing aviation fuel as fairly hazardous.

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
2 years ago
Reply to  Tim Hirst

AVCAT is far worse than Dieso in a fire. lower flash point and burns way hotter.

Ianbuk
Ianbuk
2 years ago

Oh great, more English Channel Taxi’s.