A NATO RQ-4D Phoenix has returned to Sigonella in Sicily after a sortie lasting around 25 hours, most of it flown without appearing on public flight tracking.

The aircraft, using the callsign MAGMA10 and carrying the registration MM-AV-SA-0017, departed Sigonella late on the evening of 24 August and landed on the night of 25 August.

It reappeared on tracking at 58,000 feet over Greece as it headed back towards Sicily.

Sorties of that length are within the design endurance of the type but sit at the upper end of what is routinely observed. The RQ-4D is NATO’s variant of the Global Hawk Block 40, capable of remaining airborne for more than 30 hours at altitudes above 50,000 feet, and the airframe is built around persistence rather than speed.

The Phoenix fleet forms the Alliance Ground Surveillance force, one of the few capabilities NATO owns and operates directly rather than relying on contributions from individual members, alongside the airborne early warning fleet at Geilenkirchen. The aircraft are based at Sigonella and flown by a multinational unit, having reached initial operating capability in 2021.

Their sensor is the Multi-Platform Radar Technology Insertion Program radar, which combines synthetic aperture imaging with a ground moving target indicator mode. In practice that allows the aircraft to build a radar picture of terrain and structures and to detect vehicles and formations moving across it, from a standoff distance and without entering the airspace it is watching.

Since 2022 the fleet has flown extensively along NATO’s eastern flank, with regular missions over the Black Sea, Romania, Poland and the Baltic states, and over the eastern Mediterranean. Flights are frequently visible on public tracking, which is a deliberate feature of the way NATO conducts much of its surveillance, though aircraft do periodically operate without broadcasting.

CIA chief was aboard mystery US C-17 flight to Moscow

As we reported on Tuesday, a United States Air Force C-17A Globemaster III, serial 07-7191 and using the callsign REACH 4555, flew from Riga to Moscow Vnukovo, arriving mid-morning. The aircraft had routed from Joint Base Andrews to Latvia two days earlier. CIA Director John Ratcliffe was aboard for meetings in the Russian capital, according to CBS News senior White House reporter Jennifer Jacobs, in what appears to be his first known trip to Russia since taking the post.

Neither Washington nor the Kremlin explained the flight while it was in the air, and military aircraft generally require approval before entering another country’s airspace, which is what made the Riga to Moscow leg notable.

NATO does not comment on individual intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance sorties, and no link between the two movements has been established. Alliance Ground Surveillance aircraft fly routinely over the Black Sea, the eastern flank and the eastern Mediterranean, and a long mission on any given day is not in itself unusual for the type.

Alliance Ground Surveillance sits under Allied Air Command and delivers its product into NATO’s intelligence structures rather than to any single nation. The programme was funded by fifteen member states, with Britain not among the original contributors, though the United Kingdom operates its own strategic ISR fleet including the RC-135W Rivet Joint from RAF Waddington, which flies missions along the same frontier.

One of those aircraft flew a patrol around Kaliningrad on 7 August, and a substantial allied air package including a NATO E-3A Sentry operated over the Baltic region on 18 August, with further flights on the two days following.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

5 COMMENTS

  1. The surprise flight of an unmarked U.S. military C-17A Globemaster III to Moscow’s Vnukovo Airport on 25 August 2026 ignited a flurry of activity across OSINT communities, flight-tracking networks and geopolitical forums

    Initial confusion surrounding the heavy transport aircraft cleared when mainstream media confirmed that CIA Director John Ratcliffe was on board for unannounced meetings. OSINT analysts and forum communities have broken down the logistics, operational oddities, and underlying motives of the trip into several key talking points

    The mission used the high-priority Air Mobility Command callsign REACH 4555. It originated from Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, stopped at Riga, Latvia (a NATO member nation), and then flew directly into Russian airspace to land at Vnukovo Airport

    Analysts noted that the specific airframe used (07-7181) was almost completely devoid of identifying livery. It sported only a muted U.S. flag and a low-visibility U.S. Air Force roundel, a standard configuration for covert or high-priority government transport

    OSINT data suggests the delegation initially flew from Maryland to Riga on a C-40B (a military Boeing 737) before transferring to the heavy C-17 Globemaster for the final leg into Moscow

    The C-17 is typically utilized to transport heavily armoured vehicles (such as diplomatic motorcades or security details). This correlated with social media footage captured by Russian motorists showing an American diplomatic convoy moving through Moscow shortly after the landing

    Apparently the Trump administration explicitly asked Ukraine to pause long-range drone and missile strikes against Moscow and St. Petersburg for the exact duration of Ratcliffe’s visit. Forum users view this as an intentional move to ensure the safe passage of the spy chief and prevent an accidental flashpoint

    According to circulating leaks attributed to The Wall Street Journal, the primary driver for the urgent face-to-face meeting was fresh U.S. intelligence indicating Russian mobilization preparations and covert plans to test NATO’s resolve (including fears of infrastructure sabotage or false-flag provocations on Polish soil)

    According to regional independent outlets like UA.NEWS and information circulating among journalists, Putin abruptly cleared his main calendar items for Tuesday. He had originally been scheduled to attend a major public event that hundreds of people spent days preparing for. The event was quietly postponed just a few days prior, matching the exact timeline of when the U.S. began coordinating the high-stakes backchannel flight

    Other OSINT sources are reporting that the CIA learned of an assassination plot targeting Putin on one of his “meet the Russian actors posing as Moscow citizens” jaunts

    Some OSINT sources are claiming that Trump personally instructed Ratcliffe to travel to Moscow to meet with Putin to warn him of the plot. Putin cancelled his diary yesterday amid much speculation that he was meeting with Ratcliffe.

    Commentators point out that utilizing a CIA director rather than a diplomat allows for “off-the-record” conversations that don’t require the burden of public statements. With U.S.-brokered peace talks over Ukraine currently stalled, forum sentiment is split on the purpose of this Moscow visit

    With acknowledgements to George

    • Putin is desperate and something unpleasant is coming. Those years of under funding defence and paying lip service to mass will come back to bite. Cameron/ Boris/ Sunak and Starmer – take a bow! Just 100 Typhoons, 5 frigates and zero SSNs as well as an appalling lack of GBAD must keep the CDS awake at night. Time for him to bang his fist on the table and make uncomfortable demands. Trump isn’t reliable and we must be plan on a scenario that doesn’t include them.

    • If true, the Putin assassination plot is interesting.

      It works both ways – hey, we’re saving you life here, so you owe us a buggy. Or, look what might happen to you if we think you’re messing with us too far…

  2. wonder what we spotted. unlikely there is a russian speaking population in poland to hide behind. russia will seek to avoid open conflict with nato but will want to intimidate and carry out plausible deniable attacks

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here