The UK and US governments have signed a new agreement paving the way for US companies to operate from UK spaceports and export space launch technology.

UK Ambassador Dame Karen Pierce and U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Non-proliferation, Christopher Ford, signed the US-UK Technology Safeguards Agreement, which will enable U.S. companies to participate in space launches from the United Kingdom, on Tuesday 16 June 2020.

According to a news release from UK Space:

“The Agreement means US space and technology companies throughout the supply chain can contribute to and benefit from the commercial opportunities offered by the UK space sector which already employs 42,000 people and generates an income of £14.8 billion each year.”

Science Minister Amanda Solloway said:

“This deal with the US takes us one step closer to seeing the first ever launch into space from British soil. This is a key moment for our commercial space industry, and I look forward to seeing companies from Scotland to Newquay benefiting, and the creation of highly skilled jobs on both sides of the Atlantic.”

Karen Pierce, UK Ambassador to the US said:

“This agreement marks an exciting new area for UK-US space collaboration and represents a significant step towards US companies launching from UK spaceports. The commercial space sector already represents hundreds of millions of dollars in trade between our two countries each year, as well as thousands of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic. This new agreement will generate further growth and prosperity for both our countries.”

The UK Government has already awarded grants totalling nearly £40 million to establish commercial vertical and horizontal small satellite launch from UK spaceports and put in place the necessary regulation to enable the first launches to take place in the early 2020s.

The UK Government’s Spaceflight Programme aims to establish commercial vertical and horizontal small satellite launch from UK spaceports.

25
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
20 Thread replies
16 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
15 Comment authors
DernJulianJonathanSteve MartinJason Holmes Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan

That’s good, that will clear the way for space x using UK sites for commercial launches.

pkcasimir
Guest
pkcasimir

There are American companies who will use British launch facilities but SpaceX isn’t one of them. SpaceX already has four launch sites in the US to choose from including their own Texas launch site and is also constructing a fifth – an off shore launch site in Texas. The kind of missions SpaceX is currently involved in and is planning for don’t mesh with what Britain is planning to construct.

Julian
Guest
Julian

Musk tweeted recently about the plans to build offshore launch platforms. He said in that tweet “SpaceX is building floating, superheavy-class spaceports for Mars, moon & hypersonic travel around Earth” (https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1272972228326379520). The “hypersonic travel around Earth” has been mentioned in various Starship presentations and he’s tweeted about it quite a few times so it does at least currently seem to be part of the plan. That I think is where the floating spaceports come into play in places other than Texas because Starship needs at least a 2 mile clear zone around a launch site but, if he does want… Read more »

Dern
Guest
Dern

Didn’t the Italians used to make launches from a Kenyan Offshore Platform?

Julian
Guest
Julian

I’m not sure but there was a multinational initiative called “Sea Launch” with 36 launch attempts between 1999 and 2014 mostly successful, only 3 failures – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Launch The thing is though that Sea Launch was only launching Zenit 3SL rockets that are 59.6m high. A fully stacked Starship will be 120m tall but integral to the concept is that the launch tower has an integrated crane at the top so that the passenger or cargo vehicle (the second stage) gets stacked onto the first stage booster actually at the launch site using that integral crane. That plus what will need… Read more »

Dern
Guest
Dern

No the one I’m thinking off was Italian government, but also used rather small Scout rockets.

For Starship I think first things first, get it flying. Musk should have enough on his hands getting a Starship to the moon in the next few years, and to be honest I think hypersonic Earth-Earth travel is going to be a bit of a non-starter, remember Concorde? It stopped flying for a reason.

ChariotRider
Guest
ChariotRider

Hi Jonathen,

What it will do is enable Virgin Orbital which I think is actual a US company, but even it is isn’t they are likely to have US companies in there supply chain. As this link highlights they are possible the launch customer for the Cornwall Spaceport. So this agreement is a key enabler to let that deal go through.

https://spaceportcornwall.com/

Cheers CR

crabfat
Guest
crabfat

The sceptic in me wonders whether, in time, this might also be a shoe-in for US companies to buy into and and then possibly take over the site. Just a thought.

But then BAE has been hoovering up US companies for years…

Longtime
Guest
Longtime

CR I think virgin orbit will only use Cornwall if they can develop a better booster module for the rocket, if they continue with the 747 then high altitude launch then will use Cornwall as the launch area but can use Newquay’s runway as its about 1000ft to short.

ChariotRider
Guest
ChariotRider

Hi Longtime,

Actually there is good reason to launch from high latitudes, such as from Cornwall. Easy access to polar or highly ellipitical orbit (HEO). Both of these are needed for various reasons e.g. navigation LEO satellites and scientific research into radiation belts respectively…

https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/457/is-there-any-advantage-in-launching-spacecraft-from-a-high-latitude-or-why-was

So I would suggest that there is good commercial reason to launch from Cornwall Spaceport.

Cheers CR

dan
Guest
dan

let’s hope their next try is successful.

Cam
Guest
Cam

We would need to invest many billions to have manned or even space Ex iss resuply rockets to fly from the UK and it’s just not worth it with the massive infrastructure already in USA. However we can corner the lucrative small satelite launch market in the UK.

Trevor
Guest
Trevor

Many billions?

Musk raised $1.33 by in 2019. Not sure how much his investments have put in to date, but they are launching satellites an BASA gave put in 3bn to SpaceX to build a manned capsule.

Avoiding the manned effort, just making rockets has now become economic. So its enterprise as opposed to bureaucracy that ought to show the way for us.

Cam
Guest
Cam

Yes many billions, lots of the hard work was already done by NASA for space x missions, without NASA space x wouldn’t be where it is, we have no infrastructure That already exists and building the expertise and launch site and rockets, safety equipment ect ect will cost many billions, but it’s pointless launching large rockets from the UK Anyway as it’s far more efficient launching from the equator as the earths rotation helps alllot.

Steve Martin
Guest
Steve Martin

Unless they build something to resupply in a polar orbit there is no reason to launch resupply missions from UK soil or indeed any launch site in the northern latitudes thanks to the assist gained from launching at the equator (the surface of Earth is travelling faster there). Our niche will be polar orbits using small satellites, something we build a large share of anyway.

Cam
Guest
Cam

5hats probably wht the French have still got land in South America where they launch European rockets, French Guiana I think. Shame the UK couldn’t use somewhere like Ascension Island, but that would cost many billions for a large rocket site setup.

Steve Martin
Guest
Steve Martin

Bit of a bugger to supply that kind if material to as well I’d imagine.

Dern
Guest
Dern

Fingers crossed, but I don’t think we’ll get very far unless we can strike a deal to build and assemble oribtal launch systems in the UK. Maybe the various buisnesses see something I don’t but I’m skeptical of the willingness for customers to pay for rockets to be transported from Bocca Chica, Long Beach, or New Zealand when there are launch sites much close to the production lines.

Shaun
Guest
Shaun

The small sat market being targeted and the orbits best accessed from the UK can be served by companies in the UK. Vertical launch from the north of Scotland requires quite small, easily shipped rockets, though to be honest while very far from difficult I suspect more local suppliers will be better able to supply the market.
SpaceX are not a consideration, there is no benefit for them. Virgin Galactic an the horizontal launch space tourist market from Cornwall is another matter.

Spyinthesky
Guest
Spyinthesky

I think you are closest to understanding the nature of what’s going on here. As far as I know the market is predominantly about the niche for not only micro satellites which we are leaders in, but also about the orbits than can best be served by a northerly launch site as the market increases. That’s why Northern Scotland was always favorite for the vertical launch. Considering this is all about lowering costs and thus expanding the market to new technology/business sectors, that cost and convenience can outweigh closeness of rocket build to the actual launch port though related rocket… Read more »

Dern
Guest
Dern

Which is why I included New Zealand in the list, Rocket Lab specialises in small rockets for Microsat launches, but unless they decide to build Electron Rockets in the UK, I can’t see how it will make economic sense for them to launch from Scotland.

IMO the way to make this work is to convince companies like Rocket Lab to produce rockets in the UK, and encourage native ones like Skyrora (though I think they want to build their own space port).

Virgin Galactic I can kind of see launching from Cornwall, but Virgin Orbital less so.

dan
Guest
dan

Are there any advantages launching from Britain as opposed to the sites SpaceX, ULA, ect already use?

Levi Goldsteinberg
Guest
Levi Goldsteinberg

Much much easier and cheaper to launch into polar orbits from here then it is from Florida

Jason Holmes
Guest
Jason Holmes

Wonder if the Huawei issue will raise its head, US commits funding, we press ahead with development…then ‘ oh hang on UK, remember our beef with Huawei…maybe you should drop them if you still want this money and tech support’

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan

Let’s not think small….There is the polar orbit market yes, but that’s not really why you go for Scotland. In truth Scotland is potentially a great place for Launching great big loads into heliosynchronous obits. Guess what you launch into an heliosynchronous obit….weather sats, ocean observation sats and……..things that the military use that need or like a constant angle of illumination. Scotland does not need to be a niche Launch site launching micro sats. it Has the potential to be the best site for lofting 5000lb earth observation satellites as well. if the infrastructure is built up. So I know… Read more »