The UK government has provided an extensive update on the ongoing review of Afghan relocations and assistance policy (ARAP) scheme applications, particularly concerning Afghan specialist units such as Commando Force 333 and Task Force 444, commonly known as the “Triples.”

These units fought alongside British forces during the conflict in Afghanistan, with some of their members losing their lives. Lord Coaker, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, addressed the House of Lords, explaining the importance of rectifying inconsistencies in the application decisions affecting former Triples.

In his statement, Lord Coaker acknowledged the critical role played by the Triples in supporting UK operations in Afghanistan and emphasised the overwhelming support from veterans and the British public. He stated: “Former Triples have the support of veterans of the conflict and the British public, as well as all Members of the House.” The review was initiated following growing concerns about the inconsistent handling of ARAP applications, with the Minister noting that the previous government’s approach had left many Triples in a perilous situation.

Key Issues Resolved

The review of approximately 2,000 ARAP applications has progressed, with more than three-quarters reassessed. Coaker said: “Key issues have been identified and resolved, and the Government are now making important progress, with eligible former Triples and their families now being invited to relocate to the UK.” He highlighted that the UK Government had uncovered direct employment relationships between some Triples members and the UK, refuting previous claims that no such ties existed.

Despite the delay in concluding the review, which was initially promised by the previous Government within 12 weeks, Coaker assured the House that significant progress had been made: “Given the perilous situation in which many former Triples still find themselves, this is a source of deep regret and concern for me that I know everyone will share.” The Minister confirmed that the review is expected to overturn around 25% of previously rejected applications, allowing these individuals to be relocated to the UK.

Challenges in Record Keeping

The review uncovered new records, revealing payments made to Triples members, which contradict earlier reports from the previous Government. Coaker addressed the complexity of the issue, stating that “The nature of the relationship between the UK Government and the Triples evolved over the almost 20 years of UK military involvement in Afghanistan.”

These records, spread across multiple departments, had led to inconsistencies and miscommunication. He acknowledged that “a failure to access and share the right digital records and challenges with information flows across departmental lines have all led to this significant body of information being overlooked, with huge real-world implications.”

In conclusion, Coaker assured the House that the Government is now pushing forward with relocations, offering sanctuary to eligible former Triples and their families. He emphasised that “the Defence Secretary and I will keep the House updated on our approach to Afghan resettlement” and reaffirmed the commitment to righting the wrongs in this case.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Nick Paton
Nick Paton (@guest_864272)
3 hours ago

Good Evening! About time! This should have been done long ago. Great to see this now being done.

Nick

Jim
Jim (@guest_864312)
1 hour ago

Ridiculous it’s taken so long and it’s ridiculous we have to pay a price for America’s blunder. Hopefully we learned our lesson on blindly following America into any more wars.

Jacko
Jacko (@guest_864314)
1 hour ago
Reply to  Jim

We didn’t blindly follow America! They invoked A5 and we fulfilled our obligation.
Where it went from there is a separate question!

Jim
Jim (@guest_864329)
40 seconds ago
Reply to  Jacko

Exactly, the mission in Afghanistan went way beyond the A5 invocation. It became nation building which was a mistake, then the US threw the entire thing under the bus for no reason other than domestic political point scoring and there was zero consultation with us or any other Allie’s. We permanently deployed a brigade in the middle of no where for over a decade at great cost in blood and treasure and now we have to offer tens of thousands of people asylum in the UK. This was exactly what happened in Vietnam which we fortunately had the smarts to… Read more »