Russia operates bots on Twitter as a tool for spreading disinformation and manipulating public opinion.

These bots are often used by the Russian government or other organizations to interfere in political processes, such as elections, and to promote specific political agendas.

How do they work?

Russian bots on Twitter typically operate by following and retweeting accounts that support their agenda, as well as posting their own content. This content can include false or misleading information, inflammatory language, and divisive political messages. The goal of these bots is to create the appearance of widespread support for a particular political view or candidate and to manipulate public opinion in their favour.

The use of bots on Twitter allows Russia to amplify its messages and create the appearance of widespread support for its views. By following and retweeting accounts that support their agenda and by posting their own content, Russian bots can create the impression that there is a large and vocal group of individuals who support their views. This can influence public opinion and shape the political landscape in their favour.

In addition, the use of bots on Twitter allows Russia to bypass traditional forms of media and communicate directly with the public. By using Twitter, they can reach a large audience quickly and easily without needing to go through the editorial process of traditional news outlets. This allows them to spread their messages quickly and effectively, and to avoid being held accountable for the accuracy or veracity of their content.

Russia operates bots on Twitter as a tool for spreading propaganda and influencing public opinion. By using these bots, they can promote their political agenda and interfere in political processes without being held accountable for their actions.

How can you tell?

Russian bots on Twitter can be difficult to spot, as they are designed to mimic human behaviour. They may have profile pictures, bios, and activity that make them appear to be real people, and they may also engage in genuine conversations with other users. However, there are a few signs that can indicate that an account is a bot.

One way to identify Russian bots on Twitter is to look for accounts that have a large number of followers but very few friends. This is a common characteristic of bots, as they are designed to follow and retweet other accounts in order to gain visibility, but do not typically engage in conversations with other users.

Another indication of a bot account is if it consistently posts at odd times, such as in the middle of the night, or if it posts a large volume of content in a short period of time.

The point of this article

It is important to be aware of the threat posed by Russian bots on Twitter, as they can undermine the integrity of public discourse and damage public trust in institutions and leaders. By being vigilant and looking for the signs of a bot account, individuals can help protect themselves and others from the harmful effects of disinformation.

Avoid engaging with suspicious accounts. If you come across an account that appears to be a Russian bot, do not follow, retweet, or engage with it in any way. This will help to limit the reach and influence of the bot, and prevent it from spreading disinformation to other users.

Report suspicious accounts to Twitter. If you come across an account that you believe to be a Russian bot, you can report it to Twitter. This will help Twitter to identify and remove these accounts, and prevent them from spreading disinformation and manipulating public opinion.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

28 COMMENTS

  1. Musk had a problem over bots and spoof accounts before he bought Twitter. Maybe some of the Russian speaking employees now working 20 hour days and sleeping in the office on camp beds have been tasked with identifying them

    • Twitter and other social media companies come up with endless excuses for not handling the issue, same with all sorts of disinformation like fraud scams etc. In the end it comes down to them just wanting to profit at all expense and not really caring about solving the problem.

      However bright side Russias days of being able to influence anything are over, they will never recover from this war, even if they completely rebuilt their army the reputational damage is done, no one would be scared of it. Going to be interesting how much a drop in funding the conservatives will have without russian money.

      • Don’t underestimate the Russians. The Germans got to within 25km of Moscow and look what happened afterwards

        Stoltenberg said last week that NATO is getting perilously close to direct involvement in Ukraine. The Russians are deliberately attacking the civilian population – which is a war crime in progress. They might have got away with it in Syria, but there are many people in the eastern european countries who want NATO to be more forceful

        Its going to take 2-3 years to replenish our supply of NLAW btw

        • To be fair Hitler made a whole raft of mistakes during that campaign which gave the Russians opportunities any half decent commander would have denied his opponent. That said you are quite correct not to under estimate an opponent or indeed over estimate them. One strategy the Russians seem to thrive on is the willingness to needlessly throw away lives & equipment in quantity well beyond the limits of any sensible country.

    • Twitter was a mess years before Musk bought it. Liberals are now trying to blame Musk for everything that goes wrong now days. He’s an ultra successful person the liberals hate. He is for free speech which the liberals only want for their views.

      • I wonder how these Russian boots work is so dangerous and how they would differ from most leftist teachers in English Universities…?

      • We don’t hate him because he is “succcesful” but because he is a liar and exploits his workers. Basically all Elon Musk cares about is Elon Musk. And don’t tell me what I feel and think….I don’t presume to know your thoughts and feelings.

  2. During WWII Dennis Wheatley spent much of his time carefully crafting stories for the German’s to read – all of them spoofs. Russian Intelligence is doing the same now. In today’s world combating this should also be a western priority as it was for the Germans in that war. So; what is Twitter doing about this?
    All the best, George, keep up the good work.

  3. Yeah if you think Russian bots were/are the big problem at Twitter you obviously haven’t been paying attention recently.

  4. Hey George, Don’t forget all the Chinese and Indian ones as well🙄…
    My twitter account seems to be full of them, with the latest news on Ukraine, politics, and so on
    Their pages and tweet waffling on
    Glad we have the choice to BLOCK them

  5. I don’t use social media really. I sometimes look at Twitter if a website copies a post but that’s about it. I’ve managed just fine without constant social media. It does seem useful for journalist types

  6. I’ve got the perfect answer to Russian bots – don’t use Twitter. Never used it myself and managed to keep myself sane without it.

  7. I deleted all my social media accounts almost 3 years ago. I don’t miss any of that garbage. I feel so much better not reading all that B.S. and fake posts meant to demean people for thinking a certain way and pushing leftist, socialist doctrine on the masses. Social media is truly the sewer of the internet.

  8. This is a most interesting subject and one which we in the West ignore at our own peril and that subject is…Misinformation and the problem we have in the Uk, is when our own media outlets :
    BBC
    Guardian
    Daily Mail
    Channel 4
    Have no problem pushing out the narrative that, The UK was an evil empire, that throughout history only the UK was guilty of the slave trade, that the Uk is the most racist place on the planet, that the Union flag is a hate symbol. that terrorist is a loaded word and that Militant is the correct term to use, same goes for paedophile and groomer, and that a man with his two meat and 1 veg is really a woman. Then why are we surprised when outside agencies target the Uk (not just the West) with misinformation. So Ukraine what did we see before Feb 22:
    1)    The Ukrainians are all Nazis.
    2)    The US has biolabs in Ukraine
    3)    The Ukraine has carried out a genocide in the Donbas
    4)    NATO wanted to set up a nuclear missile base inside the Ukraine
    And the sick, lame and lazy swallowed all that up, ,then after the balloon went up we were regaled to:
    1)    Ukraine was on the cusp of launching an attack on the Donbas
    2)    The Russian attack, defeat (and subsequent retreat) around Kyiv was nothing of the sort, it was actually a feint and the Russians simply pulled back after the attacks elsewhere succeeded. (Really?)
    3)    Sumy, Kharkiv and Kherson were are well planned in advance tactical strategic withdrawals
    4)    That all the mass graves found inside recaptured Ukraine are all false flag operations by Kyiv.
    5)    The Russians are simply waiting for winter, because their vehicles and soldiers are trained for winter war, and the Ukrainians with their western supplied vehicles aren’t.
    6)    The fighting for the city of Bahkmut is the most important battle during the war and once it is taken, Ukraine will lose the war.
    7)    Moscow will launch a new attack from Belarus on Kyiv and capture it
    Since the 3 day operation turned into a 10 month one, a lot of the above is aimed at Public consumption inside Russia in which to keep the plebs happy, which is certainly the case regards Bahkmut, which holds no strategic value for Moscow, other than a propaganda story for Moscow to claim. “look we are winning” Its one city that they have failed to take after 5 months of fighting, Germany captured half of Poland in 6 weeks, it took the entire low countries and France in 5 weeks , 11 weeks in total and nearly all of Europe and here we have the most powerful single nation in Europe, taking on a nation which spent less in 22 years on its military than what Moscow does in 1 unable to capture one city. Anybody else would have outflanked it and cut it off and yet for some very strange reason Moscow whose military is designed around long range deep penetration strikes appears to have lost the ability to carry out such an operation. (Meaning they know only too well, that their armour is vulnerable to anti-tank weaponry) But they don’t want their own or the sick, lame and lazy in the west to know anything about their limitations so they peddle lies in which to colour the atmosphere. So of late we have been regaled to:
    1)    Moscow respects the rule of law
    2)    Moscow is not targeting civilian targets
    3)    The Ukraine walked away from peace talks after Boris Johnson told them to do so
    (On that note, Kyiv walked away from peace talks after mass graves started been found around Bucha on the 1st April 22, Boris Johnson didn’t visit kyiv until the 9th April 22)
    4)    Ukraine is losing 1000s of men a day , the country has been smashed into the stone age so they should seek the peace deal Moscow has offered since day 1
    5)    Moscow is just as strong (if not stronger than it was in feb) and its call up of 300K will turn the tide.
    All of the above is there simply to colour the opinion of the chattering classes (Think Tet Offensive and Walter Cronkite) and press for the bare minimum of a cease fire. Which at a stroke would afford Moscow the breathing space it drastically needs, allowing it to consolidate its position inside the Ukraine, allow it the time to build up its forces in which to restart an offensive in the Spring and which would place the Ukraine and the West in a much worse postion.
     
     
     
     
     
     

    • The most interesting thing about the media is how they accept the designation that the left designates themselves but not the right.

      Let’s remember how journalists had no problem to name those that protested against NATO nukes as “pacifists” despite never protesting Soviet nukes in front of Soviet Embassy.
      Currently someone that is from the right and protest is an “extremist” but those on the left are “activists”..

      • As a 20 year old newbie in the military, I was tasked with others of protecting the fence line from “activists” at Greenham Common. When the US based nuclear armed cruise missiles at the airbase.

        The majority were women, though there were a few men. Trying to pull down the fencing, trying to place flowers in the tips of our SLRs and spitting at us. The vehemence of the language was disgusting and utterly deployable.

        The common them was that by allowing US based nukes in the UK, Russia/Soviet Union was targeting us. After the first week of trying to reason with them. We stopped responding, as we all quickly came to the conclusion they were brainwashed imbeciles. We used to give them the address of the Russian Embassy in London, where they should go to protest and level their complaints. But it always fell on deaf ears.

        The men who were there were in the main out and out lefties, spouting Russia and the Soviet Union are our friends.

        What a lot of these people failed to recognize, is that not only were we protecting the nukes of a fashion. But more importantly protecting their lives. There were two distinct fence lines. The outer was patrolled by UK troops and the inner was patrolled by the US. If the protesters broke through the inner, they would have been shot, no question.

        USAF Greenham Common has long since been closed down. The bunkers that housed the nuke carry vehicles are still there, with their doors wide open. As they were part of a nuclear weapons reduction treaty, and were supposed to be monitored by satellites. However, outside the old main entrance is a memorial to the “peaceful” protests that actually states helped remove nukes from the UK.

    • Nice summary of their talking points! I think I will find that quite useful in my next round of troll-baiting in the tabloids. I think I’m getting under their skin a bit – they seem to have a whole team stalking me at the moment.

      Clearly, I have too much time on my hands!

  9. People still use Twitter?!? Astounding…

    It never gained the footprint of Facebook etc and while other social medium allowed all sorts of social interactions, all Twitter ever seemed to allow was the opportunity for enraged opposing voices to endlessly shout out each other.

    I could never see the point 🤷🏻‍♂️

  10. So George finally realized that there might be te people and actually state-sponsored entities that are posting fake things on Twitter. My God what a revelation. Where have you been!

    • If you have a problem with the topics and posters on this site why do you keep coming back! Your sarcasm isn’t all that either🙄

    • I’m sure you are fully aware of that aren’t you! As for George, he writes stuff we find interesting and news worthy, unlike your sad jealous anti-Brit guff!

  11. My favourite wartime propagandist was the incomparable Sefton Delmer. He grew up in Berlin and spoke fluent German with a Berlin accent. Recruited into the Political Warfare Executive during the war, his small team had a radio transmitter and produced surreal, subversive black propaganda radio programmes targeted at German soldiers in France.

    It may be that the Ukraine has a similar propaganda maestro organising their psyops operations against the Russian conscripts being fed into the meatgrider around Bakhmut. A lot of it turns up on Twitter. Incidentally, as of an hour ago Bakhmut holds!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here