Sean Stackley, assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition, said that “Marines absolutely love this aircraft” as they prepare to field a new F-35 squadron in June.

Testifying before the House Armed Services Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee said the aircraft “was designed and built for the future, for high-end threat.”

According to USNI, Mr Stackley added it was really a “false choice” to consider upgrading legacy aircraft instead of replacing them with the fifth-generation fighter that will be used by the Navy and Air Force, as well as the Marines.

The US Marine Corps plans to purchase 340 F-35Bs, to replace current inventories of both the F/A-18 Hornet (A, B, C and D-models), and the AV-8B Harrier II, in the fighter and attack roles.

The Marines plan to use the F-35B from “unimproved surfaces at austere bases” but with “special, high-temperature concrete designed to handle the heat.”

The USMC declared Initial Operational Capability with about 50 F-35s running interim Block 2B software on 31 July 2015.

 

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

25 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Daniel Adams
8 years ago

It can’t be true!! All the people with no expirancing in the project and vested interest in other planes say it’s rubush!

Cliff Benton
8 years ago
Reply to  Daniel Adams

Nailed it!!!!

Peter Daly
8 years ago
Reply to  Daniel Adams

Bring back the Sopwith Camel !

Daniel Adams
8 years ago

The shadow defence sec will probably say we shouldn’t buy them because of future technology might mean planes can be shot from the sky.

UK Defence Journal
8 years ago
Reply to  Daniel Adams

Please leave politics off this page, cheers.

Mark L
Mark L
8 years ago

Politics is so closely linked to Defence that it can’t simply be ignored I’m afraid, much as I’d like to!

Steven Gellard
8 years ago

To be fair, I remember the Eurofighter Typhoon being poo-poohed before it even left the ground

Chris Power
8 years ago
Reply to  Steven Gellard

To be fair General Melchett warned us to never ignore a poo poo.

Chris Power
8 years ago
Reply to  Steven Gellard

“I hope so, Blackadder. You know, if there’s one thing I’ve learned from being in the Army, it’s never ignore a poo-poo.
I knew a major, got poo-pooed made the mistake of ignoring the poo-poo.
He poo-pooed it.
Fatal error, because it turned out all along that the soldier who pooh-pooed him had been poo-pooing a lot of other officers who poo-pooed their poo-poos.
In the end, we had to disband the regiment, morale totally destroyed by poo-poo”

Paul Jones
8 years ago
Reply to  Steven Gellard

Yep the Typhoon was slated before it went into service. Now everyone realises what a fantastic platform it really is. More than a match for any aircraft anywhere. But the F35 will compliment the Typhoon.

Chris Power
8 years ago

But a bloke I was talking to down the pub said it didn’t work !

UK Defence Journal
8 years ago
Reply to  Chris Power

Did he also use the wrong caption for the wrong variant of Typhoon? 😛

Chris Power
8 years ago
Reply to  Chris Power

I cannot belive that’s been on a RAF website since 2007 and wasn’t corrected!

Steve
Steve
8 years ago

To be fair, this guy is hardly unbiased. If he said anything other than these were amazing jets, he would be effectively saying his organisation (and considering his role, probably himself) made a mistake with the purchase, which they would never admit even if true.

Who knows which side of the argument is right, but this doesn’t get us any further to knowing.

Adam Jackman
8 years ago

But Pierre Spray says ……………………………

Jordan Chapman
8 years ago

Ryan Kelly

Ryan Kelly
8 years ago
Reply to  Jordan Chapman

You’re rubbing it in so much :'((

Jordan Chapman
8 years ago
Reply to  Jordan Chapman

see the F-35 is good

Ryan Kelly
8 years ago
Reply to  Jordan Chapman

NEVER

Jordan Chapman
8 years ago
Reply to  Jordan Chapman

Accept it. We are getting a damn good aircraft lol

Ryan Kelly
8 years ago
Reply to  Jordan Chapman

NOOOOOOO

David Southern
David Southern
8 years ago

All the Putin bots say its rubbish too! Russia Today also say its rubbish; in fact so many people who could potentially end up being on the wrong side of this aircraft say its rubbish with such conviction that it simply must be rubbish!

Adeel Chaudhry
8 years ago

of course they do
F-35 was originally suppose to be a replacement for Harriers
but marines dragged the airforce and navy into this stupid program
now the navy and airforce are stuck with this underperforming aircraft
F-35 is a good enough replacement for harriers but is not capable enough to replace F-18, F-16 and A-10

David Southern
David Southern
8 years ago
Reply to  Adeel Chaudhry

Strange, because when you compare stats, the F35 is vastly superior to the Harrier (GR7). Compared to a F18D the F35:
has better range
Similar top speed
better take-off weight
And significantly better Avionics. If you cast your mind back to the TSR2, Tornado, Typhoon etc. there were a large proportion of people talking about what lemons they were.

John Stevens
John Stevens
8 years ago

The F35B will be a very good aircraft..I think in years to come some of you guys might be surprised, give it time.. I have seen several pilots saying it is a top-notch aircraft, these are guys that have flown the F35B during flight testing, would of thought they are the people to listen to.