The MoD plan to have three P-8 Maritime Patrol Aircraft in service by 2020 it has been revealed.

The P-8 Poseidon, developed by Boeing, is designed to conduct anti-submarine warfare, anti-surface warfare and shipping interdiction, along with an electronic signals intelligence role. This involves carrying torpedoes, anti-ship missiles and other weapons.

The following information comes from this response to a written question on the 21st of December 2015.

“The Ministry of Defence is currently engaged in detailed negotiations on the Boeing P-8 Poseidon Maritime Patrol Aircraft. As the Prime Minister announced to the House on 23 November 2015 (Official Report, column 1059), we intend for at least three of the aircraft to be in place by the end of the Parliament.”

Additionally, it was reported earlier in the year by various sources that the UK is looking at having two US Navy P-8’s, with British crews, operate from the UK in order to bridge the gap between now and when the first P-8’s enter service.

The UK will order 9 Boeing P-8 Poseidon aircraft to be based at RAF Lossiemouth in Scotland.

The history of the aircraft dates back to June 2004, when the US Navy announced the selection of the Boeing multimission maritime aircraft, 737 MMA, and awarded a contract to Boeing for the system development and demonstration phase of the programme for the US Navy’s next-generation maritime surveillance aircraft. The aircraft was given the designation P-8A in March 2005.

Poseidon contains up to 7 crew computer consoles in its cabin, has an electro-optical and infrared sensor turret, a maritime surveillance radar and signal intelligence system. Its radar is capable of detection, classification and identification of ships, small vessels and surfaced submarines.

It also has coastal surveillance capability. The P-8 is fitted with advanced magnetic anomaly detection system for submarine tracking. The Poseidon can be used for search and rescue operations.

According to the US Navy, the aircraft in US service carries lightweight Raytheon Mk54 anti-submarine torpedoes. It may also carry other torpedoes, missiles, free-fall bombs, depth charges, mines, or sonbuoys in its weapon bay. Air-to-surface and air-to air missiles, such as Harpoon anti-ship missiles, SLAM or AGM-65 Maverick land attack missiles, and AIM-9 Sidewinders or AIM-120 AMRAAMs will be carried on the under wing hard-points.

It has been speculated that the UK may elect to integrate Storm Shadow on the aircraft, as it had planned to do with Nimrod prior to the cancellation of the aircraft.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
36 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Neil Bunting
Neil Bunting
5 years ago

What Maritime Patrol aircraft are the RAF using at this moment?

Frank Castle
5 years ago

2020? Wow, brilliant ???

UK Defence Journal
5 years ago
Reply to  Frank Castle

The first is expected to be in service in 2017 with US owned by UK crewed aircraft filling the gap.

Frank Castle
5 years ago
Reply to  Frank Castle

Very short sighted of the government to scrap nimrod without considering a replacement. Leaving us in a situation where we have virtually 0 maritime surveillance capability….and we trust these people to make important decisions, what a monumental fuck up!

Andrew Griffiths
5 years ago
Reply to  Frank Castle

It is the same with the ole Harriers…:(

Jason Owens
5 years ago
Reply to  Frank Castle

Oh god, not the harriers again

Frank Castle
5 years ago
Reply to  Frank Castle

Yeah, who needs aircraft for aircraft carriers? Oh yea, we do.

Kyle Greet
5 years ago
Reply to  Frank Castle

We had to choose between the Tornado and the Harrier – we chose the Tornado (a good choice).

UK Defence Journal
5 years ago
Reply to  Frank Castle

We’re getting them. Sometimes dealing with the public is tiresome.

Mark Dunbar
5 years ago
Reply to  Frank Castle

If it’s on time and on budget…it’ll be a bloody miracle

Frank Castle
5 years ago
Reply to  Frank Castle

I know uk defence journal, all these members of the public commenting on your public posts on social media. It must be tough on you ??

Mike Reeve
5 years ago

It was announced by Philip Dunne to Parliament earlier this month that our first P-8’s would be identical in specification to U.S. Navy ones with no modifications whatsoever. Does this mean that all it’s weaponry will be of American manufacture of the types you have just listed, including air to air and air to surface? If so, then there is no reason not to upgrade Harpoons to Block II and also fit them to our Type 45’s etc.as well as initially putting AIM-120’s on the F-35B.

James Bartlett
5 years ago

So we getting a US Navy P-8 till we get ours then?

Rob Winwood
5 years ago

And they can’t be refuelled in flight because of a cock up! Brilliant, bring back the Nimrods.

UK Defence Journal
5 years ago
Reply to  Rob Winwood

I really wish people would stop taking defence news from the Mirror, the P-8 has sufficient range to carry out what it’ll be tasked to do both around the UK and globally, hence why no aerial refuelling probe was deemed necessary for the UK aircraft however, if it proves to be needed then they can easily and quickly be fitted, the aircraft are already “plumbed up” in-case.

Rob Winwood
5 years ago
Reply to  Rob Winwood

Bullshit!

Rob Winwood
5 years ago
Reply to  Rob Winwood

By the way I’m ex RAF sunshine!

Chish
Chish
5 years ago
Reply to  Rob Winwood

Well I am an old Crab as well and shouting helps no one. This site provides very sound info. and adds some incisive comment. Now I don’t agree with all of it but I do give it respect. Personally I think the MRA4s were bloody useless and there was more emotion than fact attached to the programme. 9 years late for glorified Comets? And lest we forget the MR2 that crashed in 2006 was called ‘unfit for service from when it was delivered 40 years ago’. (Oxford Coroner). I said it before and say it again we should have bought… Read more »

mike
mike
5 years ago
Reply to  Rob Winwood

Current RAF here, Rob, and really it is only semi-BS – like the C-17, for us the range is good.

Its a case of do we want 9 sooner, or 6 or so some years down the line after we pay for and trial and probe for what is deemed at the moment a “nice to have” capability.

End of, really. Much like the Airseeker.

Rob Winwood
5 years ago
Reply to  Rob Winwood

Ironically, the core mission system on the P-8 is derived from the same Boeing design that was being integrated on the Nimrod MRA.4s. Those mission systems were subsequently stored and might be exhumed and updated for the new P-8 program.

Fubar Saunders
Fubar Saunders
5 years ago

No point beefing about Nimrod. Nimrod is dead, was a death trap, was ten years late and a billion overbudget and still nowhere near ready.MoD lost control of the project and BAe took the micky.

Its dead. Let it go for heavens sake.

Simon Stockley
5 years ago

It’s a solution to a problem that should never have existed. UK sensitive waters need to be protected at all costs. Best ways, MPA, SSN and Towed Array Frigate.

Dave Pitchford
5 years ago

Very good news!!!

Robert Durrant
5 years ago

So ust in time for them to be scrapped under the next SDSR

David Anthony Simpson
5 years ago
Reply to  Robert Durrant

Sigh

Spike Hunter
5 years ago

2020!!!, is this a joke?….

UK Defence Journal
5 years ago
Reply to  Spike Hunter

It says “by 2020”, starting next year.

Spike Hunter
5 years ago
Reply to  Spike Hunter

Looks like we’ll have to carry on using fishing boats as our ASW for a bit longer then….

David Anthony Simpson
5 years ago
Reply to  Spike Hunter

What a ridiculous comment!

Anonymous
Anonymous
5 years ago

Hopefully the three aircraft in service will be in addition to the two loaned aircraft

Bloke down the pub
Bloke down the pub
5 years ago

They will still probably enter service before the Nimrod mr4a could have been ready.

Geoffrey Roach
Geoffrey Roach
5 years ago

No Nimrods,no Harriers,no Vulcans,no Spitfires,no Sopwith Camels. Oh dear. I swear that if all the moaners had their way we would still be using stagecoaches and carrying lanterns! Give it a rest!

Steven
5 years ago

It’s embarrassing for our armed forces for what the suits have chosen to do with it.

Borrowing a bunch of P-8’s and even tug boats from the Dutch for the Falklands is a cracker if you ask me.

David Flandry
David Flandry
5 years ago

The UK Defense Journal is not the government. It presents information which you don’t get in the mass news market. Give’em a break.

Chish
Chish
5 years ago

For all the Nimrod and Harrier fans. Here is a bridge ….. get over it people!

\\=============//

Sciolista
Sciolista
5 years ago

Japanese equivalent purpose built and half the price? Did we buy these converted Boeing airliners from the guy that sold us the fifty-year-old C 135’s?