The Ministry of Defence has reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining crewed aircraft at the core of the UK’s air power strategy, despite rapid advances in autonomous and uncrewed systems.

Responding to a written question from Ben Obese-Jecty MP, Defence Minister Luke Pollard said the “safety of aircrew and the survivability of crewed platforms remain paramount.” Pollard’s comments were made in the context of the Strategic Defence Review 2025, which sets out the government’s long-term transformation agenda for defence.

The review, published in July, acknowledged the accelerating role of autonomy, artificial intelligence, and networked systems across the battlespace but made clear that human control and decision-making would continue to underpin the UK’s approach to air operations.

The government has accepted all 62 recommendations from the review, including those concerning future air combat integration and the balance between crewed and uncrewed capability.

Pollard noted that implementation of the recommendations “is underway” and that it will be “priority business” executed through a “whole of UK Defence effort.” He confirmed that the forthcoming Defence Investment Plan (DIP) will provide further detail on how these reforms will be delivered.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

28 COMMENTS

  1. The UK must maintain manned aircraft at the core of its fleet as it’s been completely unable to acquire a jet powered drone despite 20 years of trials, tech demonstrations and design study after design study.

    There is a long list of programs with everything from Celtic gods to four letter acronyms but not a single aircraft.

    • Pre SDSR. Eagle. “Wait for the Defence Review”
      Post SDSR. “Wait for the DIP”
      After, we will probably be none the wiser when a vague document of waffle and repeating what has already been announced appears.
      What is the betting to start us off?

  2. So another meaningless comment, as we know, hopefully, Tempest is still coming.
    So we will still need “manned” assets.
    How many is the answer we want to know, of anything.

  3. tempest is crewed, the MoD just repeating for comfort …thinking we integrate usa weapons last and hoping software sorted and not F35 mess

    • Whatever we arm it with we need the ability to integrate, test and deploy ourselves. No more waiting for the magical mystery Block IV fairy ala F35-B.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here