The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has issued a Prior Information Notice (PIN) outlining plans to establish a new framework agreement for the procurement of Personal Hard Armour to support British Armed Forces personnel.

The framework could be worth up to £208 million, potentially rising to £250 million including VAT, over an eight-year period.

According to the notice, the agreement will be managed by Defence Equipment and Support (DE&S) and is scheduled to run from 31 October 2025 to 30 October 2033. The framework is intended to streamline the MoD’s ability to source personal ballistic protection equipment quickly and efficiently while fostering innovation among industry suppliers.

MOD in urgent action to replace armour for UK troops

The procurement will cover a wide range of personal protection products, including ballistic plates and associated gear. The MoD states that the aim is to enable both low- and high-volume procurement with the agility required to meet emerging operational needs.

Among the anticipated use cases are:

  • Osprey body armour replacement
  • Reduced threat level plates
  • Buoyant armour plates for maritime operations
  • Non-standard shaped plates including complex curvature designs
  • Covert plates for discreet use

The MoD intends to establish what it calls a “non-committal open framework”, allowing approved suppliers to bid on future orders without committing the government to a guaranteed volume of purchases. The notice states that this is a preview announcement, with full tender details to be released at a later date via the UK government’s Find a Tender platform.

No deadline has yet been set.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

14 COMMENTS

  1. I make up to $220 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $100h to $220h… Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now I am hoping I could help someone else out there by sharing this link.Try it, you won’t regret it!.

    HERE→ 𝐖­𝐰­𝐰.𝐇­𝐢­𝐠­𝐡­𝐏­𝐫­𝐨­𝐟­𝐢­𝐭­𝟏­.𝐂­𝐨­𝐦

    • Getting paid Every month more than $25,000 by doing very simple Online job from home.i m doing this job in my part time i have earned and received $25861 last month .I am now a good Online earner and earns enough cash for my needs. Every person can get this Online job.follow details on this website…!!

      Go Here——➤ 𝗪­𝘄­𝘄­.­𝗪­𝗼­𝗿­­𝗸­𝘀­𝗣­𝗿­𝗼­𝗳­𝗶­𝘁­𝟳­.­­𝗖­𝗼­𝗺

    • I am making a good s­al­ary from home $4580-$5240/week , which is amazing und­er a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now its my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,

      Here is I started_______ 𝐖­­­𝐖­­­𝐖.𝐖­­𝐎­­𝐑­­­­𝐊𝐒­­­­𝐓­­­­𝐀­­­­𝐑­­­­𝟏.­­­­𝐂­­­­𝐎­­𝐌

      • Besides that the average length of service in the army is about 6 years so in some respects you’re equipping every soldier (and marine and, shudder, RAF reg punter) twice.

    • No, this is £208 million funding to *come up with a procurement framework* over 8 years. NOT to actually purchase armour for troops. Absolute piss take waste of money and time on something that really shouldn’t cost that much

  2. The government need to take the previous body armour provider to court to get a refund. You can’t have ceramic armour plates with hairline cracks and defects.
    Although this order is clearly needed it has to be offset by a return and refund of defective plate armour

    • That previous body armour, ECBA, was very old. First versions were introduced in the 1980s. Wear and tear affects everything.

        • Yup, and ECBA was replaced in anything even resembling a frontline role by Virtus years ago. AFAIK the only people using ECBA are MPGS and maybe some RAF, RN and maybe some non deployable roles in CSS branches.

          It’s hardly a scandal.

    • UKSF generally have their own procurement streams, so more likely Rangers, 16AA, 2 Yorks and UKCF to get it first.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here