General Sir Richard Barrons has claimed that Britain’s military is ‘broken’ and the British Army is ’20 years out of date’ at a Defence Select Committee meeting.

“All three Armed Forces are falling behind the rate of innovation you see in our peers. The people who are in defence, they have to keep going every day so they are never going to say publicly, or to themselves, or to their enemies, or to their allies that we’re broken.

But when they fly, sail or deploy on the land and they look at their equipment, they look at their sustainability, they look at the shortfalls in their training and they look at their allies, they know they are not fit for purpose.”

General Sir Richard discussed what he perceived to be the problem:

“The first discussion should be in Government, ‘How much risk are we running in the world and what do we need do to fix it?’ They don’t seem to want to have that discussion.

So you end up with the risk of a ridiculous, zero-sum, discussion both within a Service the nonsense of culling Marines to buy more sailors and between the Services – which is why you end up generally with a Navy that’s currently structurally under-funded, an air force that is holding together a bunch of very good equipment but really at the edge of their engineering and support capacity, and an Army that is now, broadly speaking, 20 years out of date.”

An MoD spokesman said:

“As one of the few countries to exceed NATO’s 2% spending target, our rising defence budget is the largest in Europe.

We are investing in brand new equipment from submarines, frigates and carriers for a growing Navy, to state-of-the-art vehicles for the Army, to a whole range of cutting-edge technologies through our £800 million innovation fund.”

The Royal Navy, by the way, is not growing.

34
Leave a Reply

avatar
19 Comment threads
15 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
24 Comment authors
GeorgeDENBOlianeGeoffrey RoachIan Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Patrick
Guest
Patrick

At least the brass are speaking out and with the spending review delayed it will hopefully mean the Government will properly sort out this mess by providing the much needed funds the military require.

Colin McCourt
Guest
Colin McCourt

He is retired so can speak freely.

Pacman27
Guest
Pacman27

Good – about time we had these sorts of discussions. Its clear the RM in particular are pivotal to the UK’s defence capability as they are constantly deployed. I really do believe we should be increasing the marines to a full Division, as they offer so much value to the UK. I agree with the Gen. Barrons and as many people on this forum have previously stated we need a comprehensive risk assessment (probably severely impacted by the massive reduction in the capabilities of the Foreign office in the past 20 years) and then the funding to match our preferred… Read more »

David Steeper
Guest

You think he’s upset ? This is nothing just imagine how angry he’d be if someone asked him why we need as many Generals as the US army ? Then he’d really be upset !

Rover10
Guest
Rover10

Yet more dire warnings, just what does it take to make the government awaken to the truth? Great Britain has never been more in demand in so many theaters, either substantially or in an advisory role. However, if assets and manpower are up for the budget grab, matters will only get worse. Time for a major rethink on what is deliverable and what is not. The MOD needs to know what future spending is likely to be secure and what is not. I would recommend one option is to pull back from many overseas commitments until Brexit is sorted, that… Read more »

Mr Bell
Guest
Mr Bell

About bloody time too. Even the top ranking military officers, usually professionally silent for fear of being sacked are now starting to speak out. I would love to see the defence select committee go further and utterly roast the defence secretary. The Torries have admittedly inherited an utter mess from Blair and Browns years but never before has the UKs defences been so perilous. We know it, our potential enemies know it and are emboldened as a result. Answer is simple. Up the defence budget immediately to 3 or ideally 4% gdp to defence ratio. Increase and improve pay and… Read more »

Colin McCourt
Guest
Colin McCourt

He is retired so that is why he can speak freely.

AV
Guest

Good on him for speaking out…hopefully more will follow.

Wayne
Guest
Wayne

The nonsense about being one of the only country in NATO to meet the 2% target ignores the fact one are one of only 2 that operate a nuclear deterrent. That cost is included in the 2% as on going running costs but also the treasury has moved this figure into the main defense budget from 2010 at least for replacement costs. If this and the running costs were outside of the defense budget as a whole or the 2% figure was raised to compensate for this fact then the budget would probably do as everyone desires.

Tim62
Guest
Tim62

The general is talking a lot of sense. You can hollow out institutions, and they will look fine, but they will become increasingly brittle and incapable of responding. The trouble is that a frank political discussion of UK risks and policies – and then setting the defence expenditure to cover that has almost zero political utility if you are concerned about being re-elected in the next GE (no matter which party we are talking about). We are not yet investing enough in cyber operations and counter-cyber warfare – given we are coming under increasing attack and penetration as a society… Read more »

andy
Guest
andy

problem the military had was once the wall came down and the main threat from Russia at that time collapsed so did our military spending,i remember the day they were asking men for voluntary redundancies unheard of in the military you either did your service and left or kicked out for being a disgrace,since then spending on equipment and manpower became non existent exercises were scaled back,cuts to ammo supplies,i remember my RSM saying if anything kicks of we are screwed,he even joked at the cuts and said won,t be long before we carry broom sticks painted black instead of… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Guest
Daniele Mandelli

What parts are out of date? I do not doubt the General, it is refreshing someone has actually spoken up. Does he mean equipment? Does he mean doctrine? Does he mean organisation? Does he mean a combination of all these? Challenger II is having an upgrade. Pretty old. Warrior is having Warrior Capability Sustainment Program. Old. Jackal, Coyote, Mastiff, Ridgeback, Panther, Foxhound, Husky all purchased for Afghanistan, often from UOR. All taken into core I believe. MIV will replace HPM Mastiff. CVRT vehicles.. Ancient! Being replaced by FRES Series. FV432. Even more ancient! The Royal Artillery has been neglected for… Read more »

Mike Saul
Guest
Mike Saul

As90 needs a 52 calibre gun to be effective.

Light gun needs to be replaced by M777.

Over 900 Fv432 still on orbat, although most are not working.

No LRATGW since swingfire.

Watchkeeper still not operational, 4 have been lost during training.

Desert Hawk 3 to be scrapped.

Sophie
Guest
Sophie

Mr Mandelli, Challenger 2- is getting a sustainment program, not an upgrade. The gun is still ineffective and the engine is still going to be under powered. Warrior 2 – Is costing a huge amount for the purchase of only 4 Btns worth, I give it 90% chance that project will be cut in the next 3 months. MIV- years behind Schedule and will not offer the kinetic effects that a true IFV such as warrior can, but strike does have its up sides. Jackal, Coyote, Mastiff, Ridgeback, Panther, Foxhound, Husky- Not war fighting platforms and would be wiped out… Read more »

joe
Guest
joe

And the M777 is technically a British product already!

Lee H
Guest
Lee H

Remember guys, it’s not the politicians who decide what equipment is required- it is people like Gen Barron’s (rtd) – wait and see where he ends up (somewhere in the defence industry). On kit M777 – restricted by weight – gun and ammunition. Light Gun and some ammo can be carried by Puma, Merlin and Chinook. Only Chinook can carry M777 and some ammo. No point in deploying a gun with no ammo or men and we just do not have the lift flexibility to do it. AS90 was not deployed to Afghanistan because the amount of lift required to… Read more »

Mike Saul
Guest
Mike Saul

Our use of AS90 with 39 calibre barrel and 105mm light gun by UK armed forces is that we do come up against a well equipped enemy, their longer range counter bombardment capability will devastate our artillery forces.

Urgent upgrade of our artillery forces is required.

Daniele Mandelli
Guest
Daniele Mandelli

Agree. I feel the Royal Artillery has been neglected for decades.

I would give Watchkeeper to the AAC. The RA’s use of UAV’s went back to a time when they were to be used in conjunction with MLRS. Now the UAV is used as a wider ISTAR asset.

The 2 Regiments supporting the planned Strike Brigades, 3 RHA and 4RA, used to have AS90, and now have the Light Gun. This is totally unsuitable for the Strike Brigades. I read there is a plan to replace them with some form of wheeled SP gun, possibly the French Caesar.

Graham
Guest
Graham

Simple solution, cut the foreign aid budget in half and invest the money in the MOD. This would roughly equate to a 17% increase in defense spending, 10% would cover the ‘annual’ structural deficit and the remaining 7% could be used to add back vital capability (like ship based ASM) and to rebuild our parts / missile /ammunition inventory.

Pacman27
Guest
Pacman27

Actually there is another solution to the Foreign aid budget – Paint all the old Helicopters, Land Rovers and Ships that we no longer want White and sell them to DFID for dispersal around the globe. Every time I see one of our ships going to deliver Humanitarian aid it has a load of brand new white Toyotas on it. Why can’t it be a set of well maintained and rugged Land rovers instead. Same with Rat packs – lets get them over to DFID in the last year of their shelf life and bill them for it. But ultimately… Read more »

Ian
Guest
Ian

As importantly as the budget being reduced, we need to pull out of the official Aid rankings because the rules are to prescriptive even to sell DFID our out of date kit.

We should make up our own rules and report on those instead.

joe
Guest
joe

Remarkable how the brass find their gonads and speak out once they have secured their fat pensions and retired.

The excessively large number of serving brass remain mute

Ross
Guest

i love how the govt always say we have a growing defence budget and spend the 2%

Thanks to the repackaging (chucking a bunch of largely irrelevant things into the budget that were traditionally not part of spending) it sure looks like we have that 2%, but in reality it is far, far less.

Nick Bowman
Guest
Nick Bowman

I don’t see the situation as nearly so dire as the General suggests. That’s mainly because the threat environment is relatively stable. Russia does not have the numbers of capable surface ships, submarines, first-rate combat aircraft, EW assets or first-rate tanks it would need to challenge NATO far beyond its borders. The US relationship with China is stable, perhaps even improving. That makes it less likely that U.K. armed forces will be called to a Pacific operation. The southern cone has stabilized. The Iranian threat is no greater than it was five years ago. Against that background, the UK’s small… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Guest
Daniele Mandelli

I echo this. Who in the world has perfect kit for every eventuality everywhere? Some will be outdated, as long as the majority is modern, high tech is maintained in many areas and that which is obsolete has a replacement in place. I suggest again the answer is a balance of quality with quantity and that means not always going for the gold plated options, which may enable the UK to get some much needed extra mass. Fantasy fleets of all high end stuff are not possible in this political climate until the world security situation declines, the public show… Read more »

Geoffrey Roach
Guest
Geoffrey Roach

Interesting Nick. I think we are at a sort of crossroad and we could do with sitting down and calmly and sensibly deciding on what our foreign policy is supposed to be, including what we could we provide for under foreign aid because I can’t see it being cut dramatically, if at all. Then it is a question of being realistic….what can we spend, what can we commit to under N A T O, what are our national priorities’ I would say we start with the people and make sure that they feel wanted,are well looked after and well paid.… Read more »

Julian
Guest
Julian

The problem for HMG however is that it’s not just defence that is in urgent need of extra cash. The NHS is looking in a pretty bad state too with waiting lists lengthening significantly and policing is looking none too healthy either. If it was only defence that was underfunded then yes, slashing the aid budget would help considerably, but if that were ever to happen (and personally I think it will at some point because the UK’s finances are under a lot of pressure that will soon get worse) the vast majority of the funds released would almost certainly… Read more »

Geoffrey Roach
Guest
Geoffrey Roach

Agreed Julian.and I take particular note of what you say about the NHS. My family and I have received excellent treatment but there is also enormous waste. The old problem….the sharp end works but the tail is dragging it down. I have posted elsewhere on a NHS only tax to ensure that people understand how much it costing because I don’t think they know we are feeding a black hole. Money spent on an ever aging population through the NHS, welfare and pensions is going to soar in the next ten years and how the politicians think we can spend… Read more »

Daniele Mandelli
Guest
Daniele Mandelli

So obvious Geoffrey and yes SO un PC.
And there lies the issue.
HMG terrified of “how it makes them look” reducing overseas aid.
When in fact, supporting your own is the most bloody obvious thing to do!

Ian
Guest
Ian

Here’s the thing. Few people give credit to the Tories for increasing aid, especially when it’s done at the expense of UK public services. It’s worse than just cutting our own public services – there is money, but we’re not going to spend it here. Upper middle class Tory global virtue signalling whilst devastating services they themselves generally don’t need or use. Really, how much (more) evil would most people say Tories were if they reduced Aid to fund vital UK services? Bill Gates would be upset but he’s not suffering for any of the service cuts because of it.

Geoffrey Roach
Guest
Geoffrey Roach

Daniele… I like un PC…to be honest I’m sick of the term but I suppose we’re stuck with it.
Ian. How many voters would be upset if we cut oversea aid and spent the money on the NHS and better conditions and kit for our armed forces? Answer…almost nobody. THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF VOTES OUT THERE IF THE GOVERNMENT ONLY HAD THE COMMON SENSE TO SEE IT.

liane
Guest
liane

Royal pomp and pagentry needs to be separated from the army/mod budget. Sports and culture maybe. Billions spent on carriages,cannons,swords, bearskins,horses,uniforms,armour suits, drums,flags. Money that a modern army could spend on men and equipment. Use private firms or volenteers for boatmen, archers and such.

DENBO
Guest
DENBO

great why did he not speak out and change things when he was serving.crap to say what should have happened when he could have made things better when he was serving

George
Guest
George

General Sir Richard Barrons has claimed that Britain’s military is ‘broken’ and the British Army is ’20 years out of date’ at a Defence Select Committee meeting. Of course there is plenty of room for improvement in public services, and this includes the UK military. But there is a curve here that the General may be falling into the normal media trap of bad mouthing our military. The tabloids do love to sling mud at our military; it appears to be a prevalent fad. Why don’t the media for once state the UK’s brilliant, one of the most professional and… Read more »