Ferguson Marine has launched a ground investigation tender ahead of potential yard transformation works at its Port Glasgow site, as planning for an expansion of the Scottish shipyard moves from ambition to concrete action.
The procurement notice seeks ground investigation work to establish the suitability of the site for a potential yard transformation.
A separate document seen by the UK Defence Journal indicates the work is being produced to support the development of a new portal frame fabrication shed of up to 100 metres long by 40 metres wide, with three pits sunk into the floor to a maximum depth of 1,900 millimetres.
The procurement follows evidence given by Ferguson Marine chief executive Graeme Thomson to Holyrood’s Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee earlier this year, in which he was candid about the yard’s current constraints. “You are correct that the yard will run out of space at some point,” he told MSPs, adding that the company was reviewing how to make better use of the existing site and optimise production flow. “In the journey that we are starting on, we will look at how to optimise space so there is a proper production flow that makes best use of it,” he said.
Thomson’s ambitions extend well beyond the current yard boundary. “I have been clear since I have been in the job that I hope that Port Glasgow will not be big enough in five years,” he told the committee, pointing to potential expansion at the Inchgreen facility around a mile away and other areas around the existing site. He added that he had already been in discussion with Inverclyde Council about potential expansion options, saying he hoped the yard could spread out “perhaps at Inchgreen or other annexed areas, so that we can get to the point at which we are creating a good solid commercial shipbuilding industry in Inverclyde again.”
The space constraints are not straightforward to resolve. Thomson noted one unusual obstacle, telling MSPs that “part of the issue is that we have a fire station in the middle of our yard that serves the whole community” and that it could not be moved. Despite that, he said there was land near the existing site that could potentially accommodate additional industrial capacity. “There is space in front of the yard that we could use. It does not look like much, but it could be sufficient for us to put in another panel line or other automated equipment,” he said.
The expansion question arose in the context of discussions about the Scottish Government’s proposed direct award of contracts for four further vessels, and whether Ferguson Marine has the capacity to handle that workload. Thomson estimated the programme could take around five years, though he noted that much depended on when contracts were signed.
As we reported earlier this year, Ferguson Marine has already been involved in Type 26 frigate block fabrication work for BAE Systems, completing three steel hull modules for HMS Belfast in the yard’s first contribution to a Royal Navy warship. That work has been central to Thomson’s argument that the yard is capable of competing for serious defence contracts alongside its civil ferry commitments.












It’s really vital that Ferguson along with any British yard remains flexible in the work its takes. It’s great that the Clyde has extra capacity so it can ramp up and down with demand for warships but there will never been enough work to keep all the yards going.
100 metres long, 40 metres wide and 1.9 metres deep.
There, fixed it !
HMG need to reestablish facilities on on the Tyne & support Birkenhead. There seems to be a total lack of investment in years south of the border
I agree
Sorry George but Ferguson has been a SNP funded disaster and even they are putting the CALMAC new ferry orders out to Turkey and China not on the Clyde or south of the border
The North East (Tyne ans Wear) has been neglected for too long and needs some attention from the UK and UKDJ
Cammell Laird on the Mersey has built ferries for the Orkneys and the IOW recently but did not get a sniff of the CALMAC tenders
Why not?
HMG need to reestablish facilities on on the Tyne & support Birkenhead. There seems to be a total lack of investment in years south of the border
Yards!
Is the site actually big enough to make this investment worthwhile?
Why not move the whole operation to Inchgreen as there is loads of space there for a proper yard.
The fire station could perfectly well be moved as all that costs is ££££ to build a nice new fire station.
Local Council must have opportunities to move the Fire Station IF it is getting Scottish Gov investment (lol) to redevelop the housing stock around Port Glasgow.
Inchgreen has already reportedly been allocated UK Gov funds for development of some basic infrastructure so why not build a state of the art facility there and support a larger vessel fabrication and maintenance facility.
Quite.
Buuuutttt….the issue is that Fergusons are still perceived as a bunch of jokers and if they are handed Inchgreen then nobody else can use it. Fergusons don’t really need an absolutely huge dry dock.
At some point there does have to be a conversation about BAES yard as well as it isn’t optimal either and I’m not sure I’d have build the frigate she’s where it is now on a blank sheet of paper.