The Brazilian Navy have decided to abandon the refit of the Sao Paulo and decommission the aircraft carrier after a series of technical issues and accidents.

Rectification costs are understood to be a major factor in this decision.

The Sao Paulo is a Clemenceau class aircraft carrier commissioned in 1963 by the French Navy as Foch and was transferred in 2000 to Brazil, where she became the new flagship of the Brazilian Navy.

The earlier intention of the navy was that the vessel would continue in active service until 2039, at which time the vessel would be nearly 80 years old.

IHS Janes reported that during its career with the Brazilian Navy, São Paulo has suffered from ‘serviceability issues and has never managed to operate for more than three months at a time without the need for repairs and maintenance’.

It is no surprise therefore that the navy have now announced, as reported by DefesaNet, that the ship will be ‘demobilised and subsequently decommissioned’.

 

 

The carrier was expected to rejoin the fleet in late 2013 but suffered another major fire in 2012.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

10 COMMENTS

  1. Hmm, i wonder if the bean counters in UK MOD are currently wondering if the Brazilians would like to take the 2nd “Super Carrier” off our hands.

    • Unused and probably half price, or rather the price that they should have been in the first place.

      At the time of us starting the design work there were several countries interested in new carriers. Brazil, Canada, France, India, China, Australia, Japan. None of them at the time were looking for a 65t ton ship but more of a CDG 40t ton size. If you remember, we almost built one for the French and just one for us.

      If only we had gone down the 40t ton CATOBAR route with Astute reactors for UK and France and GTs for export and worked with Sweden on a Sea Grippen. If only, then we might have been able to build perhaps 6 and for us a FAA Grippen would mix with the RAF Typhoon quite well.

  2. Should have put a bid in for “Lusty” as she had just been refit and then taken out of commission a year later due to the then SDR.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here