The USS Portland conducted a high-energy laser weapon system demonstration on a static surface training target yesterday while sailing in the Gulf of Aden.

During the demonstration, the ‘Solid State Laser – Technology Maturation Laser Weapons System Demonstrator Mark 2 MOD 0’ (let’s just call it LWSD) aboard Portland successfully engaged the training target.

The new laser was developed by the Office of Naval Research and Northrop Grumman, and has an output of 150 kilowatts. this is n contrast to the Laser Weapon System (LaWS), deployed on the USS Ponce in 2014, that had a reported output of 30 kilowatts, enough to shoot down small drones. The 150-kilowatt weapon, according to a report by the Lexington Institute, “would be capable of addressing the threat posed by UAVs, small boats, rockets, artillery, and mortars.”

The system was first tested last year.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

50 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ian M
Ian M
2 years ago

Ok, so “Photon torpedoes” anyone?

On a more serious note however. The photo seems to have been taken using an infrared filter, as these powerful LASERs are normally not in our visual spectrum. That means an adversary wouldn’t know what’s hit them! Literally.

Farouk
Farouk
2 years ago
Reply to  Ian M

Don’t know if they are somehow related, but I read an article the otherday about an all silver F22 currently been used for trials

Ian M
Ian M
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Would probably offer some defence against LASER type weapons, depending on reflectivity, heat dissipation etc?

Mr Mark Franks
Mr Mark Franks
2 years ago
Reply to  Ian M

It’s been widely reported that the US and the UK are trialling experimental adaptive camouflage coatings. On the theme of Star Trek you could say they are trialling a Klingon cloaking device.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Mark Franks

I read many years ago of DERA making an armoured vehicle vanish.

Ian M
Ian M
2 years ago

Hi Daniele, I do recall some technology whereby tiles applied to the side of an AFV displayed images captured by cameras on the other side, thus rendering it “invisible”. I don’t think my mind has addled enough to be making it up!😁

DRS
DRS
2 years ago
Reply to  Ian M

Yes there is the camera plus esentiallytv panels on the other side, there is also visual cloaking by HyperStealth and adaptive armor by BAE

ADAPTIV – Cloak of Invisibility | BAE Systems | International

Ian M
Ian M
2 years ago
Reply to  DRS

The ADAPTIV looks interesting but you are in the poo if the baddies are using top notch visuals a la AJAX.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Ian M

That’s the one! And I’d left it vague as I had forgotten what it entailed.
Thanks.

Pretty amazing to my own addled and very unscientific brain.

CR is the man to comment really.

SwindonSteve
SwindonSteve
2 years ago
Reply to  Ian M

Yeah, it was BAe piece of tech, I think in Estonia or one of the Baltic States that made the IFV ‘invisible’ when looked at via a certain spectrum.

David Barry
David Barry
2 years ago

A bit like MOD Army.. they’ve made many armoured vehicles disappear and they meant to be on our side!

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  David Barry

I sent you an apology BTW on the other thread….Barry! 🙄

David Barry
David Barry
2 years ago

Ta bud.

Locking Nut
Locking Nut
2 years ago

It’s seems lately they’ve expanded on that and have made an entire armoured vehicle procurement vanish.

If only it had been someone else’s.

James Fennell
James Fennell
2 years ago

Ajax?

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  James Fennell

No, this was way back in the late 90s early noughties. Don’t recall the vehicle only the tests.

FieldLander
FieldLander
2 years ago

Challenger 3?

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago

Mate the MOD and various Governments have made about 2000 Armoured vehicles bloody vanish!!!!!!!😇

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

🤡😇😰

Steve M
Steve M
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Mark Franks

Stephen Coonts wrote about F-22 Adaptive paint (called Chameleon) in book years ago (1999) battling in Siberia against Japanese new ‘Zero’ with stealth !!!

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve M

I’d also read, regarding the “Black world” now, and back in the 90s, of a drone using some sort of “chameleon” skin.

It was seen as so classified that any crash would mean bombing the nation it came down in “back to the stone age” to protect the tech.

Who knows what they have now. Fascinating stuff.

andy a
andy a
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

apparently an f35 in same outfit has been seen. Some theorising was from or near Skunk works

Nathan
Nathan
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Depends on the wavelength of the laser. I’ve tried to attach a pic. Which shows silver is very absorbent of light in about the 500nm and below wavelength. ie it will take that energy and burn but longer wavelengths will bounce off. You can see steel is easily cut by nearly everything, aluminium though isn’t. Further right is more red, which is what the photo above seem to suggest. Quoting from laserax: fiber lasers, for example, produce shorter wavelengths, with some examples ranging between 780 nm and 2200 nm. CO2 lasers, on the other hand, produce longer wavelengths that typically range between 9,600… Read more »

Gareth
Gareth
2 years ago
Reply to  Ian M

Could have been taken using UV cameras too. I know the image is coloured red but that doesn’t mean it’s an IR/red laser. I imagine the frequency range of the laser is tunable and classified.

Ian M
Ian M
2 years ago
Reply to  Gareth

I agree, I was trying to convey the idea that weapon style LASERs are invisible to the naked eye.
cheers

shane laycock
shane laycock
2 years ago
Reply to  Ian M

Actually they have nuclear powered lasers which radiate glass rods to produce directed beams of x-rays. So in effect it could be called a ‘photon bomb’ in it’s infant state. Or what we all may consider more appropriate with it’s estimated destructive capability, ‘the death ray’.

The Mech Engineer
The Mech Engineer
2 years ago

Do we in the UK have any hope of joining in this DEW fun?

Steven Alfred Rake
Steven Alfred Rake
2 years ago

The USS Ponce (an old Austin Class) has been the USN’s main test bed for lasers she has successfully taken out small boats and airborne drones moving at speed she has also been able to lock onto 20mm rounds fired near to the ship. There are 2 schools of thought at the moment the first is to develop a rapid response quick firing point defence system as a beam of light is a lot cheaper that 1000’s of round and/or a missile and the second school of thought is for an anti ballistic missile/anti satellite system.

Farouk
Farouk
2 years ago

S.A.R wrote: The USS Ponce (an old Austin Class) has been the USN’s main test bed for lasers That she was, but she was decommissioned in 2017 and her place as a test bed for laser weapons was taken up by the USS Portland in 2018 which saw an increase in power from 30 kW to 150KW. The US is also looking at fielding less powerful offensive lasers (60Kw) in which to allow ships with less electrical power capabilities to use them, (High Energy Laser and Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS)) as well as an Optical Dazzling Interdictor, Navy (ODIN)… Read more »

Steven Alfred Rake
Steven Alfred Rake
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Yeh it is some time since I followed this story so am a little behind the times sorry

Goldilocks
Goldilocks
2 years ago

USS Ponce was also decommisoned in 2017

chris stocken
chris stocken
2 years ago

It is remarkedly easy to defend against lasers.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
2 years ago
Reply to  chris stocken

Not if they are frequency agile or mixed frequency.

You can see what is reflected back and then use the energy in the frequencies that are melting/burning the target.

Last edited 2 years ago by Supportive Bloke
Farouk
Farouk
2 years ago
Reply to  chris stocken

Chris wrote:
“”It is remarkedly easy to defend against lasers.””

Yup this geezer seems to have made an art out of it.

I’ll get me coat,

david
david
2 years ago
Reply to  chris stocken

Captain America’s shield?

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
2 years ago

They are working on a version of this for Tempest!

The beam fired by Dragonfire will be far more powerful than a DIRCM, which need only dazzle not destroy.

MBDA has not released data on the laser’s performance, but officials on the program reportedly believe it has world-beating power and accuracy.

https://www.c4isrnet.com/global/europe/2021/03/15/britains-dragonfire-ship-laser-gun-to-get-accuracy-boost/

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
2 years ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

“The first laser will undergo user testing onboard a Royal Navy Type 23 frigate by detecting, tracking, engaging and countering unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), announced the MOD. Meanwhile, a “Wolfhound” armoured vehicle will host a laser demonstrator that will investigate capability against UAVs and other airborne threats for the British Army. The RF weapon demonstrator will also be used by the British Army, hosted on a “MAN SV” truck to detect and track a variety of air, land and sea targets. “The MOD said that the novel weapons technology will be integrated onto the Royal Navy and British Army platforms… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by Nigel Collins
Rob
Rob
2 years ago

Good stuff. With the Russians and Chinese looking to hypersonic missiles this technology of laser directed energy weapons by very nature travels at light speed. What a great counter measure; warp factor 1 directed energy weapons.

Badger.
Badger.
2 years ago

The UK’s Dragonfire project has been fairly quiet recently, unless I have missed something.

Lusty
Lusty
2 years ago

Red sky at night, sailors’ delight. Red sky at morning, sailors take warning.

(Just for Daniele as I missed Lusty Friday!)

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Lusty

You did!!!!!!! I tried being daft but I don’t have your “finesse” 😉😆

David Steeper
2 years ago

Oh ok nothing to see hear everyone. Lasers and drones never going to happen no unmanned or any of that nonsence. Stick to good old whatever. Just wanted to be the first ! 😀

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
2 years ago

Ok…Stop predicting lasers taking out ICBMs and Hypersonics. The tech doesnt yet exist in a deployable weapon form and wont for decades Solid State lasers and Fibre Optic lasers have an upper power limit of around 500Kw. That will on a good day without any air pollution, haze or moisture( because you never see that in the maritime environment!) let you hit and possibly kill a small slow target at 5km. Great for UAVs and small boat swarms but thats about it at sea. Anything capable of hitting a target at 20Km plus and at speed then its free electron… Read more »

Ian M
Ian M
2 years ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

You’ll be an Albert Hammond fan then: “Free electron band”!
😂

Citizen
Citizen
2 years ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

Solid State lasers and Fibre Optic lasers have an upper power limit of around 500Kw.

Not a problem. You simply aim multiple layers at the same target.

John Roberts
John Roberts
2 years ago

Without a doubt the mod are working really hard on the newest of modern technology ‘re world beating weapons in the disguise of the Ajax noise penetrating sound beams which will obliterate any forward based enemy troops when they hear the squadron of Ajax vehicles approach making the sound of thousands approach ing armour vehicles. Kept that one under the radar didn’t they !!!

AlexS
AlexS
2 years ago

Now do it with rain…

Mark franks
Mark franks
2 years ago

The only problem with lasers is that you cannot get it to fire around corners. At the moment it is a good line of sight close in weapons system only, the the tech although advanced is still in the early stages of development. Its taken decades to make this system small enough to fit a ship of the line or fast jet. The power needed to generate a laser beam is tremendous.

Does anyone remember the US Being YAL 1 a 7 forty 7 test bed
Some years ago. Developed I think as part of the star wars programme.

John Hartley
John Hartley
2 years ago

All of those “next gen” weapons from Reagan’s Star Wars, that were dropped at the end of the cold war, will start to reappear over the next few decades, so lasers, hypersonics, rail guns, electrothermal tank guns, hafnium isomer warheads, quantum computers, single stage to orbit shuttles, mk500 Evader warheads for Trident.