Babcock International Group, in partnership with Supacat, has secured a contract to produce an additional 53 Jackal 3 High Mobility Transporter (HMT) vehicles for the British Army.

This new order will see the construction of a 6-wheeled ‘extenda’ variant, known as the Jackal 3(E), at Babcock’s Devonport manufacturing facility.

The Jackal 3(E) is a versatile, high-mobility weapons platform that is battle-proven, having been used extensively in Afghanistan. Designed by Supacat and built in the UK, the vehicle is capable of handling reconnaissance, patrol, and logistics tasks, with the new variant featuring an additional axle for increased load capacity.

Despite the extra axle, the Jackal 3(E) retains its exceptional off-road performance, reaching speeds of up to 120km/h.

Initially developed for Afghanistan, the Jackal can be used for deep reconnaissance, rapid assault, fire support, and convoy protection. The Jackal 3(E) will further enhance these capabilities, ensuring the British Army is equipped for modern combat scenarios.

Babcock and Supacat had already begun production on 70 Jackal 3s earlier this year, as part of the UK’s Land Industrial Strategy.

Tom Newman, Babcock’s Land Sector Chief Executive, commented: “This contract delivers a critical boost to the British Army with a vehicle that is the most capable and versatile in its class. Babcock is here to ensure that the British Army is ready to fight and win wars on land and while doing so, I am very proud that we are also securing jobs in the South West and delivering on the Land Industrial Strategy.”

Production on the Jackal 3(E) will begin in early 2025, with delivery expected in early 2026. Nearly all components for the programme will be sourced within the UK, with 50% of the supply chain coming from the South West, contributing to the region’s economy.

Supacat’s Managing Director, Phil Applegarth, added: “We are enormously proud that Supacat’s Jackal 3 ‘Extenda’ is now adding to the Army’s Land Fleet, supporting the intent of increasing lethality with a modular high-mobility platform. Our partnership with Babcock continues to bring significant benefits to both the UK and local economies through social value.”

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Busta
Busta (@guest_855587)
7 hours ago

Also reading plans in place and actual work going on to increase M270 MLRS numbers up to 76 by 2029

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_855627)
5 hours ago
Reply to  Busta

And 9 M270A Recovery too.
Batteries up from 6 to 9.
Part of Land Deep Fires program.
Conventional gunnery also needs a lift, it cannot be much worse at present having given away most of the remaining guns.

Rowan Maguire
Rowan Maguire (@guest_855736)
12 seconds ago

There still the light gun replacement project set to seriously begin in the next decade; what that ends up being is in debate, some early tenders have suggested a very light SPG based on the Supercat Jackal chassis – expensive and likely wouldn’t come in numbers above 120 but would have very broad, modern capabilities. Others have been more conventional towed light guns with modern fire control, ammunition support and ergonomics – cheaper and could see numbers into the hundreds; potentially could fit out a modern RM artillery battery as well. Personally, I’d like to see a few hundred towed… Read more »

Aaron L
Aaron L (@guest_855588)
7 hours ago

Good news we’re getting more but, does the addition of an additional axel not make it a Coyote?

Peter S
Peter S (@guest_855603)
6 hours ago
Reply to  Aaron L

Extenda is a version of Jackal that can be expanded from 4 to 6 wheel configuration. Coyote is 6 wheel only.

Levi Goldsteinberg
Levi Goldsteinberg (@guest_855612)
5 hours ago

To my untrained eye these looks wildly vulnerable. I mean I know they’re well loved by the Army so obviously I am missing something, but those open cabs look totally exposed

Rst2001
Rst2001 (@guest_855619)
5 hours ago

I’m surprised these vehicles would be well loved especially winter time when it’s raining . Do they not have a canopy or anything

Joe16
Joe16 (@guest_855632)
5 hours ago

I can’t help feeling the same, having watched a number of videos of FPVs and cluster munitions hitting Russian troops assaults…
If you’re missing something, then I am too.

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_855614)
5 hours ago

Good news I suppose ,but can’t help think it’s Tanks we need. Sorry to put a damper on it guys 😏

michael
michael (@guest_855620)
5 hours ago
Reply to  Andrew D

I would think that the rapid development of drones, is making people think in regards to the vulnerability of large expensive tanks, to very inexpensive drones.
Is the writing on the wall for tanks.

grizzler
grizzler (@guest_855629)
5 hours ago
Reply to  michael

eh? So we move away from the large expensive tanks due to their vulnerability from drones and instead purchase extra Jackals (FFBNW sunroof) due their invulnerability to said Drone attacks?

Joe16
Joe16 (@guest_855631)
5 hours ago
Reply to  Andrew D

I know we need to be careful about pulling too many lessons from Ukraine without question. But, from what I’ve seen, IFVs and artillery have been far more valuable to Ukraine than MBTs.
Not sure that Jackal falls into either category to be fair, but still…

Exroyal.
Exroyal. (@guest_855719)
47 minutes ago
Reply to  Joe16

At the start of WW1 we were poorly equipped in Artillery. Our fire control, observation and lack of high calibre guns cost hundreds of thousands of lives. We were badly prepared and equipped. At the end of WW1 Artillery was the second biggest part of the army. Through WW2 Korea Falklands Artillery was key. In Ukraine we have seen the rise of the drone. One thing on their shopping list every time is 155 or such like ammunition. The basics don’t change.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_855634)
5 hours ago
Reply to  Andrew D

We need a few more Ch2 upgraded, yes. On these, the 3 regular Light Cavalry Regiments don’t use Tanks. They need a light recc vehicle with good off road performance. The Light Cavalry, Armoured Cavalry, ground based ISTAR sensors, UAV, Drones, OPs with a couple of blokes in, all complement the other regards getting the best picture on an enemy. Previously the Formation Recc Regiments of the RAC all used CVRT variants, apart from some Fox equipped units going way back to BAOR times. So are these a downgrade on CVRT? Quite possibly, I don’t use them to say? They’re… Read more »

Rst2001
Rst2001 (@guest_855617)
5 hours ago

Surely we could have a vehicle that protects driver from the rain and killer bees 🐝

maurice10
maurice10 (@guest_855633)
5 hours ago

This is good news to actually see additional vehicles bringing the total to around 120. I wonder if there is a capability to speed up the production in light of all the alarms currently going off around the World?

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_855643)
4 hours ago

I wonder if they will order any of those 120mm mortar systems to go on the back of them ?

Tom
Tom (@guest_855693)
2 hours ago

I fail to see what use these things are to anyone really, other than ‘run-arounds’ in the Sinai desert, for special forces peeps.