The first Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) has driven off the BAE Systems production line to be delivered to the U.S. Army.

The AMPV is central to the US Army’s modernisation plans and comes in five variants to meet a wide range of missions across the battlefield, say BAE.

“Finalizing the first AMPV for delivery marks a major milestone for the program and the U.S. Army,” said Bill Sheehy, AMPV program director for BAE Systems’ Ground Vehicles product line.

“The AMPV is designed to meet the Army’s missions for the Armored Brigade Combat Teams (ABCT), and lay the foundation for the future of the battlefield.”

Identified by the US Army as a top priority for safety and survivability, the AMPV family provides the Army with a highly survivable and mobile fleet of vehicles that address a critical need to replace the Vietnam War-era M113s and maneuver with the ABCT in challenging terrain on the front lines.

The Mission Command vehicle will be the first vehicle delivered and is the cornerstone of the Army’s ABCT Network Modernisation Strategy. BAE say that the vehicle facilitates digital mission command, taking advantage of increased volume, protection, power and cooling capabilities.

The other variants in the AMPV family include:

  • the General Purpose vehicle: operates throughout the battle space to conduct resupply, maintenance, and alternate casualty evacuation from point of injury;
  • the Mortar Carrier: provides immediate, and responsive, heavy mortar fire support to the ABCT in the conduct of fast-paced offensive operations;
  • the Medical Evacuation vehicle: enables immediate treatment or evacuation at the point of injury to either ambulatory or litter casualties;
  • the Medical Treatment vehicle: is the first of its kind, serving as an “operating room on tracks” for life-sustaining care to Soldiers suffering from life-threatening injuries.
2 2 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

meanwhile our armoured equipment could be on the chopping block..

Paul T

I wonder how this sits cost wise compared to Ajax/Boxer and Warrior ?.


BAE would charge the MOD a lot more than they charge USA military


and rightly so, i would guess the UK order would be a 100th of what the US order is, which is why we recently have piggy backed onto the US order to get the value from the economy of scale.

If we ordered separately, we would ask for them to be built in the UK etc etc and that would shoot up the costs.

r cummings

This sounds like a Battlefield Support Vehicle, the role currently carried out by our elderly FV 432s . There was a move to use surplus Warriors to replace the FV432 Bulldogs but that has all gone quiet. We badly need a vehicle like this for our armoured infantry brigades. Alas, instead of upgrading Challenger, Warrior and Bulldog — which were the logical next stepp in the AFV procurement cycle – the army has rushed off in pursuit of shiny new toys to equip lightly-armed Strike brigades. (They did at least rstart replacingthe old FV100Ss with Ajax, only because they can… Read more »