Type 45 Destroyer HMS Duncan has recently undergone a series of rigorous exercises in preparation for potential future conflicts.

In a display of military cooperation and partnership, the British warship engaged in joint manoeuvres with its French and Italian counterparts, the FS Chevalier Paul and IS Luigi Rizzo, respectively.

The exercises served as a means to test the vessels’ interoperability and communication systems, which are crucial in modern warfare, where multinational forces often operate together.

During the joint exercises, the vessels were tasked with simulating a high-intensity combat environment, with crews from each ship collaborating to overcome a range of hypothetical scenarios.

The drills encompassed a variety of naval warfare tactics, such as anti-air and anti-submarine warfare, and were conducted with a high degree of professionalism and precision, proving the capability of the Type 45 destroyer to operate effectively alongside its allies.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

25 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker (@guest_706186)
1 year ago

The type 45 are going to be very useful ships in the coming years. With a propulsion fix and hopefully enough crews for all of them. Then seaceptor upgrade and changing the load out of aster.
I wonder if the next big refit will do anything major with the systems, radar etc.

Sean
Sean (@guest_706204)
1 year ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

I could be wrong, but don’t they need an additional radar surface to remove a blind spot to ballistic missiles? Not an issue currently as they aren’t tasked with providing an anti-ballistic missiles defence.
But that will change with the RN upgrading its Aster 30 Block 0 to Block 1, which can intercept anti-ship short-range ballistic missiles.

Bloke down the pub
Bloke down the pub (@guest_706255)
1 year ago
Reply to  Sean

From my recollection, it’s not new hardware, but a change of software that redirects alternate sweeps of the radar upwards. Hopefully it’ll be able to swop from one mode to the other, depending on threat from ballistic missiles, as that reduces the sweeps per minute and therefore its powers of discrimination.

Jim
Jim (@guest_706275)
1 year ago

The plate is already angled slight back and if your tracking a ballistic missile it won’t be directly over head. The beam can also be electronically steered of the direct line of sight. If memory serves the T45 was out in the pacific quite a few years ago trying out the software updates to allow it to track ballistic missiles.

https://defense-update.com/20130307_british-destroyer-to-participate-in-u-s-missile-defense-trials.html

Rob N
Rob N (@guest_706294)
1 year ago
Reply to  Jim

Yes as the system is an array some of the modules can be tasked for ABM work while others do normal AAW. There was talk of a Top plate but I do not think it is strictly necessary. There will also be a command and control upgrade to increase processing power and bandwidth in preparation for Sea Ceptor.

David
David (@guest_706212)
1 year ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

I agree – still, would love to have had Mk41 VLS fitted instead of Sea Ceptor but I will take it. Still can’t believe the Ceptors won’t be fitted until 2026! Why so long?

Gunbuster
Gunbuster (@guest_706226)
1 year ago
Reply to  David

Because the Longcast and ships plot is made years in advance. It details deployments, maintenance periods, training slots, refits. Ok you could do it now but it would remove a T45 and its trained up crew from the availability plot so it wouldn’t be available at short notice to escort a Carrier etc. Its weapons/ammo would be removed and taken back to the Ammo Depot. That ammo may be planned in for Life Extension maintenance so doing it early reduces its overall life availability and thats if the Ammo Depot has the capacity in its long term plan to undertake… Read more »

Robert Blay
Robert Blay (@guest_706245)
1 year ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

Good explanation mate. Fleet management is planned years ahead, and changing things has many knock on consequences. Being a fleet planner must be nightmare of a job at times.

Bloke down the pub
Bloke down the pub (@guest_706256)
1 year ago
Reply to  Robert Blay

I hope any potential enemy has the decency to fit their actions around our plans.

Robert Blay
Robert Blay (@guest_706272)
1 year ago

And our enemies have the same headaches with fleet management and planning refits/maintenance period’s/upgrades and operational deployments as we do. Do you think they have multiple warships just sat around constantly war ready? they don’t. The RN does a very good job with warship availability and fleet planning.

Barry Larking
Barry Larking (@guest_706280)
1 year ago

Quite! 2010 will be a date to remember.

Jon
Jon (@guest_706264)
1 year ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

Thanks for this post. Very useful.

Rob N
Rob N (@guest_706295)
1 year ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

It should have been synchronised with PIP. This is all to slow.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker (@guest_706316)
1 year ago
Reply to  Rob N

Maybe they don’t have enough sea ceptor missiles, new tubes ready yet. As gun buster said it’s a difficult process.
Hopefully there will be no hot war requiring more than 48 missiles.
What would be even cooler is a full reload of seaceptor missiles underneath the new tubes. Might effect the gym facilities.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF (@guest_706320)
1 year ago
Reply to  Gunbuster

Excellent explanation; holy crap, there are a lot of Dominos in the chain. Often guilty of tunnel vision, in spite of an engineering background.

farouk
farouk (@guest_706229)
1 year ago

Pretty sure there were a few posts regards the 40mm cannon on here earlier on. Anyway what do people think of this based on the 40mm CT cannon:

farouk
farouk (@guest_706230)
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

And heres a nice little vid on the weapon sysytem

Mr Bell
Mr Bell (@guest_706246)
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

Is it substantially superior to Bofors 40mm. Also cost Vs Bofors?

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_706293)
1 year ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Thing in the maritime environment isn’t that bothered about weight or ultimate compactness: which is where this scores.

However, the marine environment is very dependent on salt spray resistance and generally favours simpler systems.

john melling
john melling (@guest_706248)
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

Its been around since October 2022, I wonder what the RN thought of it?

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins (@guest_706273)
1 year ago
Reply to  farouk

A very useful piece of kit, Ukraine could make very good use of it as a land-based system to protect towns and cities.

LINK

Last edited 1 year ago by Nigel Collins
Delabatte
Delabatte (@guest_706244)
1 year ago

Here is the battle plan of this exercise. It seem that all three frigates are on the red forces. 2 Horizons and 1 T45 should perform great in defending all the littoral..

https://assets.meretmarine.com/s3fs-public/styles/medium_lg/public/images/2023-02/orion.png?itok=_BR-x6yh

Delabatte
Delabatte (@guest_706259)
1 year ago

https://assets.meretmarine.com/s3fs-public/styles/medium_lg/public/images/2023-02/orion.png?itok=_BR-x6yh

Here is the battle plan of thid exercise. Seems that the 2 horizons and the T45 are in the red forces.

Joe16
Joe16 (@guest_706429)
1 year ago
Reply to  Delabatte

Interesting, thank you! I had a bit of a look, this is the set up for the scenario: The area covered has been renamed ‘Arnland’ (an imaginary territory), which is being attacked by an imaginary neighbour, Mercure. In this hypothetical scenario, Mercure is trying to re-establish its regional influence by financing a militia to destabilise the south of Arnland, deploy military forces, cut off communications, and send out a disinformation campaign. From this weakened position, Arnland will receive the support of France, which will deploy its ‘national joint emergency force’. So, basically, a bit of a replay of what’s happened… Read more »

Dave
Dave (@guest_706522)
1 year ago

More peacocking