An RC-135 Rivet Joint ‘signals intelligence’ surveillance aircraft has been patrolling close to the Russian border near Kaliningrad.

The RC-135W Rivet Joint and its sensors are designed to undertake ‘signals intelligence’ missions, in other words they ‘soak up’ electronic emissions from communications, radars and other systems.

This comes not long after British RC-135 and Sentinel surveillance aircraft were operating over Black Sea, this heavy usage demonstrates the apparent utility these aircraft have to the Ministry of Defence.

What does the RC-135W do?

According to the Royal Air Force website, the RC-135W Rivet Joint is a dedicated electronic surveillance aircraft that can be employed in all theatres on strategic and tactical missions. Its sensors ‘soak up’ electronic emissions from communications, radar and other systems.

“RC-135W Rivet Joint employs multidiscipline Weapons System Officer (WSO) and Weapons System Operator (WSOp) specialists whose mission is to survey elements of the electromagnetic spectrum in order to derive intelligence for commanders.”

The Royal Air Force say that Rivet Joint has been deployed extensively for Operation Shader and on other operational taskings. It had been formally named Airseeker, but is almost universally known in service as the RC-135W Rivet Joint.

The UK operates three of these aircraft.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

9 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago

Its important specialist assets like this that many people forget, or have no clue, we have. We have many niche capabilites, second only to the US within NATO, that our allies want and utilise. However, we do seem to be stripping pretty much everything else to the bone, and whatever tech we have, or want, there will always be a minimum number, of any asset, which we cannot ever go below. We are there, right now, at that point.

Deep32
Deep32
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

I suspect that with many, we are already past that point mate…

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago
Reply to  Deep32

As Daniele said mate yep you are sadly correct, not much else to give or get rid.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
2 years ago
Reply to  Airborne

Passed the bone years ago mate. Deep into the marrow now.

Airborne
Airborne
2 years ago

Sad to say Daniele you are probably right on this is usual mate! Nothing else left to cut, remove or strip!

dave12
dave12
2 years ago

I fear it will take a incident that shows are armed forces lack of numbers in everything will come ,it already did in Afghanistan by only managing 10,000 troops to be deployed and sustained .

John Clark
John Clark
2 years ago
Reply to  dave12

And 10,000 would be a push today Dave. That’s the rub with Afghanistan, so much equipment and skills were lost during the war on Terror, as peer warfare was apparently a ‘thing of the past’. I remember all the so called experts saying that expensive projects like the Carriers and Typhoon were obsolete today, as we need to defend against terrorism, arguing their incredibly shortsighted approach of low tech counter insurgency and terrorism spending. 20 years later, we swing 180 degrees and it’s all about peer warfare again! New Labour got the wrecking Ball going, but the 2010 Con/Lib government,… Read more »

dave12
dave12
2 years ago
Reply to  John Clark

Yep spot on I think its criminal

Luis Enrique Ramos
Luis Enrique Ramos
2 years ago

Thanks for the comprehensive information! Greetings from Havana Cuba.