British strikes have killed 1,000 Islamic State fighters in Syria and Iraq since bombing began with zero civilian casualties.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Christopher Kent
Adam Hicken

Just shows it can be done

Marcoseduardo Tavares

Congratulations,good to know, very much professionals.

Rob Selby


Mick Angel


Sakib Rezwan

What a joke!!

Shaun Banks


Chris Tsielepi

The RAF are the best at precision. Even the USAF acknowledge this.


The RAF is only second to the IDF. The IDF air force personnel are the most skilled of all air force in terms of precision and Dog fight on air.

William Richardson


Luke Melesi…. Just saying

Willem Moseley

Angus Kitchin, see!

Angus Kitchin


Alan Duncan

The French are doing a better job but still well done for the token British support

Nick Blayney

Fráncéscá Rhŷś-Williams Evil

Nick Blayney

Sorry but how can you accurately measure that?

There are many sources

Nick Blayney

‘Airwars’ isn’t going to be biased

Nick Blayney

But I guess it justifies doing nothing ??


Putin kills 1,000 civilians for every ISIS.

david southern

Yes but the Russian people don’t know that so sssh!

Bilal Khan

I think it’s bit of exaggeration when they say no civilian I mean I agree they are great at precision strike but does that means they have preprogrammed even bomb splinters to differentiate between isis and civilians???
Secondly who will verify the claim there’s no way to go into that area and verify the claims

David Carlin

>no civilians

Damian Halpin

I remember the gulf war. The news constantly told us how amazing the patriot missiles were. The truth was that most of them missed.

David Anthony Simpson

So what are you trying to say?

Andy Christie

Technology has come so far they can’t even be compare to the crap they had in the Gulf War.

Damian Halpin

I’m not saying this post is a lie. I’m just saying it seems too good to be true. Not 1 civilian killed.

Daniel Adams

We have had 15 years of practice. We are getting good.

Steve Robinson


Ryan Andrew Black

Plus Tomahawks are $80 million each. But of a hefty price tag…

Hoffmeister Bear

….or, at the risk of using facts, about $1.1-1.5m,

Paul Phillips

Its the new tiny warheads that help avoid collateral damage. unlike the US who just pack as much explosives in their Warheads as possible.

Stuart Brown

Patriot wasn’t “smart” and was Surface to Air.

David Anthony Simpson



All this does is give the general public an unrealistic expectation that there will never be any civilian or friendly casualties. Collateral damage should be minimised but it cannot be avoided altogether. Great that we’ve been able to do it. But it shouldn’t be considered as the norm.

Love to one Angry like ?

Glen McAllister

A job well done .

David Anthony Simpson

So what you trying to say then?

otto R.


Ryan Parker

Jake Brown says it on fb so its true

Kris Bear Watson

That’s pretty damn impressive.

Mike Ryan

Vladimir Putin did better in just one day ,, ffsake ,,

Because we are not targeting built up areas we are hitting oil fields and Isis protected projects but wouldn’t put it passed Isis to use civilians as Shields so I think in the long run it will come out that some civilians have died sadly but war is hell fact!

But the Russians killed tens of thousands of them (ISIS)…

Mike Quirke

Jolly good.