According to local media, military aircraft could return to Leuchars in a bid to counter the threat posed by Russian submarines.

The Courier report that the Ministry of Defence is considering locating several Maritime Patrol Aircraft at the former RAF base to prevent foreign incursions into UK territorial waters.

The MoD is expected to be considering the purchase of Boeing P-8 Poseidon aircraft as part of the government’s forthcoming Strategic Defence and Security Review, there has however been no indication of where these aircraft may be based although RAF Waddington seems like the favourite according to our contact in the Royal Air Force.

The production of Boeing’s P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft has been accelerated as domestic and international orders pick up pace. The increase will see production capacity grow beyond the numbers already committed to under Boeing’s current US and Indian Navy contracts leading to speculation by many that the UK is looking at purchasing a number of the aircraft.

Jimmy Dodd, VP and general manager of Mobility, Surveillance and Engagement at Boeing Military Aircraft said:

“The whole idea is to make sure we create a little headroom for the international market as we build the Navy units out. Everything was stalled out waiting on the UK elections, and now that’s over we are hoping activity will increase and there will be a commitment.”

Further fuelling the speculation, in a report on Future Maritime Surveillance, the House of Commons Defence Committee noted that the UK has a strategic requirement for maritime surveillance on a world-wide basis, for both military and non-military purposes. It stated that it had serious concerns regarding the MPA capability gap and its impact on the UK’s ability to undertake the military tasks envisaged by SDSR 2010.

In his evidence to the same Committee in October of last year, the Secretary of State for Defence stated that SDSR 2015 would need to consider the MPA capability in detail, considering whether ‘based on our experience since 2010 of managing this risk – largely by working with allies – it is a capability that we need to regenerate and, if so, how we would most efficiently regenerate it.

Discussions with the Ministry of Defence are believed to be centred on an initial contract for six firm plus six options, Boeing’s involvement has so far been minimal as the US Navy will lead any negotiations.

30
Leave a Reply

avatar
16 Comment threads
14 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
19 Comment authors
Derek GibsonNeil Fostertony geldershark baitChris Power Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Howie Elliott
Guest

best move to stop mad Putin….

Brian Aitkenhead
Guest

if we do buy p8’s stand by for Bae systems getting there slice…..

UK Defence Journal
Guest

BAE are already involved with them in the US.

Brian Aitkenhead
Guest

we will need all new ‘british kit’ which will add a few million to each aircraft! lol

Rob Donaldson-Webster
Guest

Why would the MoD base a modern MPA at Leuchars, a run down former fighter base, when they could use Kinloss which has all the infrastructure needed for a modern maritime patrol fleet.

The Courier article is pure speculation based upon a local politician’s fantasies.

UK Defence Journal
Guest

We are inclined to agree Rob.

Rob Donaldson-Webster
Guest

Thought you might – I read the article in “The Courier” this morning in response to a similar post elsewhere.

My money is either on Kinloss, or if the RAF doesn’t want to reactivate their former maritime base, then Lossiemouth. Lossie has the space as shown by the recent and previous “Joint Warrior” exercises.

Awaiting the SDSR with baited breath.

Matt Fray
Guest

It’ll be Lossie. Northern QRA plus MPA… Still not more sqns than Connigsby, Marham, Brize or Waddo. Plus MUCH cheaper than a new base, even if it’s an old one.

Benjamin William Champley Waterhouse
Guest

Guesstimate 6-8 P8?

Rob Donaldson-Webster
Guest

I’m thinking 8-10 P-8.

UK Defence Journal
Guest

Most likely is RAF Lossiemouth but it should be remembered that Leuchars is far from a run down fighter base and has one very significant thing that Kinloss lacks and that is a Runway! The old Runway at Kinloss is no longer licenced and would require a complete replacement before any aircraft let alone a heavy MPA can land on it. Also the former MPA facilities that were there were removed by the RAF prior to handing the site over to the Army.

Derek Gibson
Guest
Derek Gibson

You are obviously either totally ignorant or incredibly stupid. The Runway and taxiways of Leuchars had all been refurbished and had new aircraft handling and maintenance infrastructure put in place to ensure that 1 and 6 Squadron where capable and fully fit to handle Northern QRA responsibility- that is why so many people where questioning the rationale of moving QRA to RAF Lossiemouth, after so much work to integrate the Typhoons into Leuchars and Northern QRA was carried out. It would have been more sensible and cost effective in the mid to long term to retain RAF Leuchars for Northern… Read more »

Chris Moss
Guest

Fallon and his mates are doing a deal and out sourcing the interception patrols and apparently the best tender has come from a Mr V Putin.
I suspect skullduggery !

Simon Taylor
Guest

Makes sense for maritime patrol a aircraft.

Jason Bartlett
Guest

As long as there in the best place to do the job who cares, they just need get on with the deal so we dont have to go cap in hand to another country again asking them to find a russian sub for us.

David Crook
Guest

They will go to Kinloss, and the Reapers going to Culdrose

UK Defence Journal
Guest

Why would the Reapers go to RNAS Culdrose when they are RAF Aircraft and already have a home at RAF Waddington?

David Crook
Guest

Still not cleared for UK airspace, overland.

Neil Foster
Guest
Neil Foster

Why should we the UK waste more money by deploying MPA to Scotland? Bad enough that millions are already planned to be thrown down the Scottish Independence plughole for the basing of our nuc boats and future T26 construction.

A firm commitment is needed from the Scots that they will stay in the Union before the MOD wastes vast sums of money.

bill peters
Guest
bill peters

Leuchars no longer exists, HM The Queen changed it to suit the Army.

David Anthony Simpson
Guest

Seems strange for you to effetively underin a specualtive article.

Chris Duncan
Guest

Leuchars was by far the better choice as a base rather than Lossie anyway. Absolute sin to shut RAF Leuchars

bill peters
Guest
bill peters

couldn’t agree more, & the B of B airshow is gone, this hurts the most.

Chris Power
Guest

Waddington (and I know its not by the sea) and let’s actually confirm we’re getting them first!

shark bait
Guest
shark bait

Waste of money opening and operating another base. They should belong at wadington wwith the rest of the ISTAR fleet. No matter where you are in the UK you are never far from the ocean, especially when you can travel at 500mph

tony gelder
Guest

why keep sending more new aircraft into Lincolnshire? lets have a share in the north,RAF LEEMING is still operational and has plenty of surplus capacity as only 100 SQUADRON hawks and NUAS grobs are the resident flying units

Neil Foster
Guest
Neil Foster

That’s alright only if the MPA aircraft we buy can be refuelled by our tankers. If we go for the P8 then as it’s from “Uncle Sam” it will fitted for boom refuelling. How much more will the cost if we have to have them re plumbed.