Recent data acquired under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA 2000) unveils a number of drone sightings over UK nuclear facilities from 2021 to 2023.

The Ministry of Defence Police (MDP) has kept specific location details confidential, citing national security implications.

Upon submitting the request, my primary aim was to gather aggregate data on what kind of incidents have been reported from 2021 to so far in 2023. Recognising the importance of security in such matters, the request centred on broad counts and categories, deliberately bypassing detailed or sensitive specifics.

Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to get all the information I needed. I was told, “Due to a technical issue, we cannot currently search our system before August 2021”.

August 2021 – December 2021

Within this window, ten drone-related episodes were recorded. These varied from alarm activations and straightforward sightings to instances of authorised drone flights.

  1. Drone alarm activation, pilot located and given words of advice.
  2. Notification of drone flight.
  3. Report of drone, area search carried out, no trace of drone or pilot.
  4. Report of drone over, area search, no trace, alarm not activated.
  5. Drone alarm activation, area searched no trace. Crime report submitted.
  6. Drone alarm activation, system error.
  7. Officer reports seeing a drone, pilot located and spoken to, it was an accident, no footage of site obtained.
  8. Drone alarm activation, search carried out, nothing found.
  9. Drone reported, area searched, pilot located, authorised flight local Police.
  10. Notification of authorised drone flight.

Entirety of 2022

The year saw nine incidents. This included a mix of potential drone sightings, sanctioned events, and even drones detected at significant altitudes by pilots – one as high as 20,000 feet.

  1. Report of possible drone sighting. Search carried out, nothing found.
  2. Report of drone, search carried out, Officers found out it was a pre- planned event.
  3. Report of drone flying, area search carried out, nothing found.
  4. Drone reported to be flying, Officers carried out area search, no trace.
  5. Report of drone flying. Area search carried out, no trace.
  6. Small drone system activated, showing small drone. Officers attended, no trace.
  7. Report of drone flying, Officers conducted area search, operator located. Spoken to by Officers, who viewed footage from drone, operator voluntarily deleted all footage.
  8. Report from pilot of drone at 20,000 feet. Nothing seen from the ground, area search carried out for operator, no trace.
  9. Report of drone flying, area search carried out by officer, no trace.

January – August 2023

During this period, there were six documented drone events. Most were routine sightings followed by unsuccessful area searches. One, however, was a pre-arranged authorised drone flight.

  1. Drone seen flying. Area search carried out; Pilot not found.
  2. Drone seen flying, area search carried out, no trace.
  3. Drone reported, area search carried out, no trace.
  4. Drone reported, area search carried out, no trace.
  5. Pre planned authorised drone flight.
  6. Drone alarm activated, although alarm activated, drone didn’t enter protected area.

What are UK nuclear sites in this context?

In the context of the UK, nuclear sites generally refer to a range of facilities associated with the nuclear energy industry and defence establishments. These can include:

  • Nuclear Power Stations: These are plants where nuclear energy is converted into electricity. Examples include Hinkley Point, Sizewell, and Dungeness.
  • Nuclear Research Facilities: These are centres where nuclear research takes place, such as the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy or the Dalton Nuclear Institute.
  • Nuclear Reprocessing Plants: Sellafield in Cumbria is a prime example, where nuclear fuel is reprocessed.
  • Nuclear Submarine Bases: The UK operates a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, and these vessels are based at certain naval docks, notably HM Naval Base Clyde (sometimes referred to as Faslane).
  • Defence Establishments: Some sites are associated with the development or storage of nuclear weapons, such as the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) sites at Aldermaston and Burghfield.
  • Nuclear Waste Storage and Disposal Sites: Locations where nuclear waste is stored, treated, or disposed of.
  • Decommissioned Nuclear Sites: Former nuclear facilities which are no longer operational but might still have nuclear materials or be under decommissioning.

These sites are of strategic importance to the UK, both in terms of energy supply and national security. As such, they are heavily regulated, monitored, and protected. Any unauthorised activity, such as drone flights, in the vicinity of these sites is taken very seriously due to the potential security and safety risks involved.

What drives these flights near such sensitive areas? Are they a product of curiosity, deliberate reconnaissance, or mere coincidence?

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
5 months ago

Time to get a Gepard on sites. Shoot first ask questions later😂😂😂
I actually thought it would have been more.
When I was working close to faslane area I would take a drive around, past the ammunition jetty, it had an RFA ship there for a while, go to the town near faslane, have look at the base, there’s a torpedo test site aswell in one of the lochs,

Duker
Duker
5 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Too silly for words

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
5 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Several other facilities round there mate.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
5 months ago

Lots of interesting places around there. Nice place to drive around also.

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
5 months ago

Both Dungeness power stations are non-operational. Dungeness A was a Magnox plant which reached the end of it’s life in 2006. Dungeness B was a British designed AGR and was shut in 2021 for safety reasons. Both have been de-fueled and are being decommissioned

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
5 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

Quite alot of Nuclear power is going off this decade. Has there been any extensions?

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
5 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Hi MS. The UK has 5 nuclear sites in operation with 9 reactors, which are run by the French firm EDF Hartepool – 2X AGR – Closing Mar 2024 Heysham 1 – 2X AGR – Closing 2026 Heysham 2 – 2X AGR – Closing 2028 Torness – 2X AGR – Closing 2028 Sizewell B – 1X PWR – Closing 2035 Of the 9 reactors, 3 are currently offline for maintenance/refueling but all are expected to resume operating before the end of the year. Today EDF nuclear are producing 4.24GW, or 14% of electricity demand. Renewables (wind – at 0730hrs) are… Read more »

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
5 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

That’s interesting thanks for that info. I remember visiting Dungeness when a teen at school the AGR wasn’t yet online due to delays but the Magnox was operating. Interesting that having given up on the Advanced Gas Cooled Reactor design that the new modular mini reactors being designed will be Gas cooled it seems. Been reading up on them and certainly some of my initial concerns have been alleviated. The design with their use of Pellets for fuel is inherently safe to the point that if you withdraw the control rods they actually by its very process (not by safety… Read more »

George
George
5 months ago

I wish we had invested heavily in research regarding thorium salt reactors back in the eighties and nineties. We could have had dozens of them by now. Inherently safer I’ve been told by people who should know. Therefor much less likely to upset the locals. Apparently thorium reactors naturally shut down rather than meltdown when something goes wrong. This grunt has a good scientific education but is well out of his depth on this subject. Is there anyone in this community silent service engineer perhaps, who knows about them. Little gems of info, such as why we did not follow… Read more »

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
5 months ago
Reply to  George

I don’t know much about reactors apart from basic stuff. The main issue now seems to be is it worth the massive cost? Not just the. Construction but running the sites and then the decommissioning at the end. While it’s useful to have a base load for the electricity system is it the. Best use of money that could be spent else where on generation. £10 billion could do a lot for tidal and wave power to develop it and bring it online. The same amount also spent on energy storage development and procurement would do a lot. There would… Read more »

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
5 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Nuclear is the most expensive way to generate electricity. Our Magnox and AGR reactors were built like the proverbial brick shithouse, only stronger. We have never had a major incident with nuclear power reactors

Onshore wind and solar followed by offshore wind are the cheapest. For example, yesterday CCGT (gas) generation was £445/MWh. N Sea wind was £48/MWh, but is subject to a humungous windfall profits tax which brings to cost up to about £400/MWh

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
5 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

Well there was Windscale in 57 but I take your point, not in commercial reactors. AGRs by design were very safe indeed which is why aspects of the technology is somewhat ironically coming back into fashion it seems.

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
5 months ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

Yes, I acknowledge the 1957 Windscale disaster. Were it not for Cockcroft insisting on filters being installed on the chimneys (against opposition by the Treasury on cost grounds) the situation may have been much worse.

Anybody interested in finding out just how close our boffins came to making the UK and Western Europe uninhabitable could watch one of the several YouTube documentaries on it, this one is my favourite

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xj_BxVvf6c

Reactor Manager Tom Tuohy and Tom Hughes, his 2IC, got no credit for eventually putting the fire out. Both of them deserved a medal – and that is an understatement

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
5 months ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

@Spyinthesky
I have replied to your post but it’s been moderated, probably because it contained a link to a YouTube documentary on the Windscale fire

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
5 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

Indeed completely agree with you traditional nuclear is really going to be just a base technology to smooth out the flow, for emergencies and to get us from A-fossil fuel to B-renewables or safe alternatives. The modular reactors have certainly convinced me to be the immediate future to help in the above and as a long term safer generator for space exploitation. They can potentially be produced quickly and relatively. cheaply (at least by nuclear standards) in a factory and shipped to wherever needed and are again by nuclear standards inherently safe if the designers and the science are to… Read more »

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
5 months ago
Reply to  George

I read up upon them some months ago and sadly my memory is somewhat short term on specifics but sadly if we had committed to them as you say it’s highly unlikely that we would have had dozens of them by now. There was much research and hope for them going back to the 60s and yes they are inherently safe. However and I can’t remember the exact issues now, they had problems that it was beyond the technology of the time to solve in a commercial design.. Now that said there is considerable new interest in the concept in… Read more »

Last edited 5 months ago by Spyinthesky