SHARE

Leaders of various NATO air forces have claimed the F-35 fighter jet is a vital component of the alliance’s air capabilities in Europe.

As reported in Politico Pro, Lt. Gen. Dennis Luyt, Commander of the Royal Netherlands Air Force said:

“The F-35, even in its most basic version, is already a huge force multiplier. A single F-35 was able to provide so much situation awareness to the rest of the force.”

General Tod Wolters, Commander of Air Allied Command and US Air Forces in Europe, added:

“When we do bring fifth-generation assets into the European region, it is something that certainly serves as a deterrent. They might be in a position where they have to jump into a boxing ring to fight an invisible Muhammad Ali.”

A recent spending report has shown a steady cost drop for all variants of the F-35.

On 24 March 2016, the annual Selected Acquisition Reports (SAR) for 2015 was released. This report provides status on programme cost, schedule, and performance as of December 2015.

It has been revealed that the Pentagon’s estimate for the total acquisition cost of the F-35 program is $379 billion, down from $391 billion projected in 2014.

According to a statement from the F-35’s project office:

“The overall Acquisition Cost (RDT&E, Procurement, and MILCON) of the program decreased by $7B in base year 2012 dollars (BY12$) and $12.1B in then-year dollars (TY$). The increase of $16B (BY12) and $95.2 (TY$) to Total Program Cost is the net impact resulting from a transfer of $300M to RDT&E, a $7.5B decrease in Procurement, an approximately $200M increase in MILCON, and a $23B increase in O&S.

The RDT&E increase is the result of a transfer of money from the Procurement account to the RDT&E account to fund the modification of 24 Operational Test aircraft for Initial Operational Test and Evaluation, in accordance with Service guidance.

This transfer out of Procurement into RDT&E had zero net effect on Total Program Cost.”

According to F-35 Joint Program Office chief Lt. Gen Christopher Bogdan:

“We are coming down the learning curve and the price curve a little steeper. We are coming down the price curve faster than we anticipated years ago.”

The average unit cost of the aircraft decreased by:

$1.8M for the F-35A
$0.7M for the F-35B
$1.0M for the F-35C

Jeff Babione, Lockheed Martin’s programme manager for the F-35, told reporters that the cost of the F-35A will drop to about $85 million by 2019. This is understood to be thanks to efficiencies and cost-cutting manufacturing technologies. The B and C variants are also steadily reducing in cost.

By contrast, the US Navy’s F/A-18 Super Hornet aircraft cost about $60 million apiece.

Looking back at last years SAR, the average cost-per-unit for the aircraft for low-rate initial production lots six, seven and eight had also fallen as shown below, the figures also include engines and adjust for inflation and show the continued drop in price.

F-35A conventional takeoff and landing model: $117 million, $112 million, $108 million
F-35B “jump-jet” model: $145 million, $137 million, $134 million
F-35C carrier variant: $134 million, $130 million, $129 million

Back to the current SAR, the estimate of annual operating cost decreased by an average of two percent and the estimated steady state cost per flying hour decreased by:

2.2 percent for the F-35A,
3.3 percent for the F-35B,
4.2 percent for the F-35C

These reductions were reportedly the result of improved maintainability and sustainability as the aircraft matures, the design stabilises, and maintenance of the aircraft becomes more efficient and effective.

F-35 unit costs have been going down with each successive lot of aircraft and will continue to. The bottom line is that overall programme costs have gone down and continue to massively decrease annually.

4 COMMENTS

  1. They are indeed important, because just 4 squadrons will be expected to replace the dozen or so squadrons that the Tornados & Harriers comprised.

    So, whatever way one squares it, it’s a significant force structure decrease.

    • It’s not really down to us to deter Russia, more the nations towards eastern europe and the US.

      The RAF is useful ally, but its committment towards the eastern boarders of europe is extremely limited.

      • They are as committed to the east as they are to the west, north & southern borders.
        There is no difference there.

        Whether British people like it or not, it is the UK’s job to deter.
        If this burden becomes onerous, then Mr Corbyn is waiting in the wings to gleefully remove the UK from NATO.

      • I’m now a firm believer that all negative propaganda against Russia is created to justify the US, Nato defense budgets. The facts you can’t hide from are that collective budgets are greater the Russia’s. We also out number them in everything from ships, jets etc

        I’ve stated on here several times about the need for draw back regarding militarization around the world, but it’s not happening. I don’t trust the US, Nato and the EU and certainly not Russia and China.

        I feel sorry for the eastern flank nations caught between the monopoly of US and Russian relations. I just wish the media would report our actual strength in numbers and collective budget instead of reporting Generals so called fear of Russia aggression.

        Russia has the right to be fearful of us which is creating this issue.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here