SHARE

The reported performance of the F-35 is a major victory for an aircraft that was criticised for its cost and earlier developmental setbacks.

Earlier in the month it was reported that the F-35 had earned a 15:1 kill ratio against the aggressor squadron F-16s, more recent reports from the US Air Force and Lockheed Martin now put that ratio at 20:1.

An aggressor squadron is a squadron that is trained to act as an opposing force in military exercises.

Tech Sgt Robert James said about the jet:

“It’s giving the airmen something they never had before. It’s giving the maintainer information to help them do their job faster and easier while making the Air Force more streamlined.”

Along with the aforementioned kill ratio and maintenance rate, the jets executed unprecedented weapons targeting exercises.

James Schmidt, a former A-10 pilot said:

“I flew a mission the other day where our four-ship formation of F-35As destroyed five surface-to-air threats in a 15-minute period without being targeted once. It’s pretty cool to come back from a mission where we flew right over threats knowing they could never see us.

After almost every mission, we shake our heads and smile, saying ‘We can’t believe we just did that’. We flew right into the heart of the threat and were able to bring all of our jets back out with successful strikes. It’s like we hit the ‘I Believe’ button again after every sortie.”

Lt. Col. George Watkins, 34th Fighter Squadron commander, said flying the F-35A in combat feels like air dominance’.

“I’ve had four of my (F-35A) pilots come back from missions, guys who have flown the F-15 and F-16 at Red Flag for years, and tell me ‘This is amazing.

I’ve never had this much situational awareness while I’m in the air. I know who’s who, I know who’s being threatened, and I know where I need to go next.’ You just don’t have all of that information at once in fourth-generation platform.

The first day we were here, we flew defensive counter-air and we didn’t lose a single friendly aircraft. That’s unheard of. The number of adversaries has increased, their skill level has increased, the sophistication of the surface-to-air threat has increased.”

Royal Australian Air Force Group Captain Stuart Bellingham, Air Operations Center director at Red Flag said:

“It is a step up and a look into the future for us. It’s really exciting to work alongside the F-35A and the F-22 to understand how we best integrate that into a high end fight in the training scenarios that Red Flag provides.”

According to a press release:

“Since the exercise began, Hill’s Airmen have generated 110 sorties, including their first 10-jet F-35A sortie Jan. 30 and turned around and launched eight jets that afternoon. They have not lost a single sortie to a maintenance issue and have a 92 percent mission-capable rate, said 1st Lt. Devin Ferguson, assistant officer in charge of the 34th Aircraft Maintenance Unit. Legacy aircraft average 70 to 85 percent mission-capable.”

The Royal Air Force had also deployed Typhoon jets, Sentinel and Rivet Joint intelligence gathering aircraft and Voyager tankers to Exercise Red Flag.

In the words of the Ministry of Defence, “Red Flag pits ‘Blue’ coalition forces against hostile ‘Red Force’ aggressors, mirroring real-life threats in air-to-air, air-to-ground, space and cyber warfare.”

Typhoons, from 6 Squadron, RAF Lossiemouth, were operating in a swing-role capacity, fighting their way into hostile airspace, launching precision strikes on ground targets and fighting their way out again. A Voyager tanker and a Sentinel and Rivet Joint were also present.

The F-35 programme has gone through serious teething problems, problems also experienced by the majority of complex aircraft flying today such as the F-15, Typhoon or any other modern combat jet; it’s no secret however that the F-35 has had severe cost and schedule issues. The biggest issue for the project continues to be the fact it is the most expensive military weapons system in history owing to the sheer scope of the programme but that being said, aircraft costs are now coming down and will soon be similar to the cost of many aircraft it’s replacing.

Today the programme is maturing rapidly, right now much of the activity around the jet is dealing with software bugs and testing to validate the software, with most of the physical testing being to do with weapons integration and the gradual scaling up of capabilities that comes with each new software block.

The jet is a quantum leap in capability, able to give the pilot as much information as only theatre commanders have previously had. While the primary value of the jet is in its sensor and networking capabilities, it is also valuable in that it’s able to perform many tasks designed to increase the lethality of not only itself but other assets, such tasks include the ability to co-ordinate small fleets of unmanned combat aircraft, guide weapons launched from other platforms (even warships), launch a wide-range of its own weapons and use it’s own radar to conduct electronic attacks.

The F-35 will drastically increase the situational awareness and combat capabilities of the forces with which it will deploy and for the UK, where numbers may be a concern, it represents a fantastic way to enhance combat capability in any coalition or national effort. There is no denying that jet is overbudget and behind schedule compared to original estimates but an incredibly capable platform is emerging and one that I believe will shape the future of air combat.

11 COMMENTS

  1. Here here!
    About time the shortsighted who gets were
    finally forced to shut up.

    The F-35 is a quantum leap in capability.
    This always comes at a price although the
    large production run will soon send the
    price down.

    Whatever you think it’s here and it’s happening so we all need to take a breath and move on.

  2. Who needs hundreds of F35s when u only need a few and a forces mix of standoff typhoons and reapers?

    You may say the F35 gives us stealth abilities to penetrate others’ air defences but Taranis can do this as well.

    F35 and Taranis up front with Reapers in midfield and a Typhoon defence. Sounds plausible.

    • F-35 critics are really stuck on stupid. First they will claim that the plane is junk. When the facts show how wonderful the F-35 truly is they will say that it is too good and we don’t need it in large numbers.

    • Great article from Sharkey Ward on this in this months Warships / International Fleet Review magazine regarding the F18…and for balance, the counter argument put forth also,

      I would love to know what this will cost to fly per hour including maintenance. and whether a simpler aircraft would benefit flight crews with more real flying hours than in a simulator?

      How long does it take to build these things…look how quickly Textron ‘threw’ together a bunch of Cessna bits and came up with the Scorpion. In time of conflict with expensive aircraft getting depleted by cheaper missile threats…how long to replenish squadrons? I guess it’s the Hurricane vs Spitfire BoB comparison…hardy plane quickly built and repaired compared to a stressed body thoroughbred that took longer to build/repair. The Russian T-34 tank scenario too, where the cheap/quick to build tank could outnumber and overwhelm the opposition…

      When these comparisons are made, cheaper manned and unmanned aircraft, with reduced flying hour costs with a decent weapon load could benefit the air forces.

      I like what HAL and BAE Systems are trying to do with the advanced (Combat) Hawk. However it doesn’t look as this will benefit domestic UK manufacturing as BAE Systems seems to only want to produce ‘bits’ of planes these days. In fact BAE Systems and the consolidation of Hawker, Blackburn, English Electric and others was probably the worst thing that could have happened to the UK Aviation Industry…other than the Hawk, there’s who? Britten-Norman….

      Remember the Jaguar, Harrier argument for rough dispersed sites during the cold war…apparently the F35 because of the jet thrust, requires a prepared strip and has problems landing vertically with a weapon load….similar to the Harrier…have we really advanced?

      Why can’t F-35 sensor suites be incorporated into cheaper aircraft? Is stealth really important when a decent weapon load has to be carried externally? Maybe when running away!! I’m sure the F35 is a step forward Technologically…but is the cost benefit compared to a more conventional, smaller ( lower signature..non-stealth!) aircraft really beneficial when you look at the real world events that air forces have been involved in recently.

      • Why stealth…. because the main threat is from the ground. Radar guided surface to air missiles. If you don’t have stealth you need serious electronic warfare capability.

        Volume vs quality… check out performance of soviet armour in gulf war number one. Don’t be second best in a two man fight.

        Landing with weapons…. Why exactly would you land with a weapon load? Nobody does this.

  3. I would be interested to know how our Typhoon’s faired. From what I have seen on another site a US observer stated the Typhoon has proved to ‘be a tough nut to crack’ at Red Flag events.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here