The Times of India has reported that a naval officer died on Friday after a fire broke out on board carrier INS Vikramaditya.

“Lieutenant Commander DS Chauhan bravely led the firefighting efforts in the affected compartment,” the Indian Navy said in a statement.

While the fire was brought under control, the officer lost consciousness due to the smoke and fumes during the firefighting efforts. He was immediately evacuated to the Naval Hospital at Karwar but could not be revived, according to officials.

The carrier came to India from Russia in January 2014 and is 284 metres long. The ship weighs 40,000 tonnes and is the biggest ship in the Indian Navy.

The vessel was originally built as Baku and commissioned in 1987, the carrier served with the Soviet Navy and later with the Russian Navy (as Admiral Gorshkov) before being decommissioned in 1996.

The carrier was purchased by India in 2004 after years of negotiations at a final price of $2.35 billion.

The ship completed sea trials in 2013 and entered service in 2014.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

45 COMMENTS

    • India must have been desperate to join the carrier club, they obviously saw it as making a statement in their region and to China.

      • They were in a “Catch 22” situation with the Russian carrier. The Indians did try to back out of the purchase but found that clauses in the contract meant that they would still have to pay sizeable penalties for backing out.

        • India has a poor record then of being shafted with military contracts…Didn’t they get stick with a crummy deal with the French and Rafale. Huge controversy over that in India?

      • India operates aircraft carriers from 1961. INS Vikrant, brought from UK (HMS Hercules) in 1957. It played a crucial role in 1971 India-Pakistan war which resulted in the formation of Bangladesh. India acquired second aircraft carrier in 1987, INS Viraat. INS Vikramadithya is the third Indian aircraft carrier. Indegenious aircraft carrier (IAC 1) built in India commissioned in 2013. IAC 2, a super carrier of 65000 tons(INS Vishal) is also under construction.

        • Not forgetting INS Viraat was the Falklands veteran HMS Hermes, now awaiting her final fate possibly becoming a floating museum.

    • The ship was Free to India but India just had to spend 1.8 ( now 2.35) billion on the overhauling of the ship and buying Russian jets but the Russian contractor spent a fortune overhauling every compartment in the ship and replacing boilers ect ect ect costing billions! and contractors from the UK and other EU nations done lots of work on the ship so Russia didn’t really make billions! lol, but looks like the ships still upto Russian standards with a fire onboard.

      And The Russian contractor actually wanted more money an extra billion I believe!!…

  1. The artitcle says the vessel was built in Baku? Baku is on the Caspian Sea which is land locked with no access to the open sea.

  2. These carriers sure have a terrible record wherever they crop up, if any class of ship is truly jinxed this is it.

  3. I had the honour to work with the IN leading and managing the integration of the Barak 1 ship defence system onboard the INS VIKRAMADITYA and the comissioning of the system on early 2017.
    Great ship and team.
    Hope the ship will never suffer from this kind of mishapps.

  4. When you look at the problems the French, the Americans, the Indians, the Chinese, and the Russians have had with their latest carriers, you have to wonder what the common elements of each problem are. How did we manage to be the only carrier nation to do well in our latest QEC endeavour? Its morbidly fascinating.

    Especially as France and America have extensive experience operating and building carriers, and India has had a lot of experience operating carriers since the 60s….

  5. RIP, my condolences to everyone and their families.
    But could this mean India could put down an order for 2 QEs??

  6. I worked in India for 3 years. India generally has a serious structural problem. The people at the top are usually completely incompetent and have obtained their positions by priviledge. The bottom do as they are told without question ( similar to Russia). The middle ranks are as good as anywhere and better than most. So the upper levels devote much of their time protecting their position from being challenged by more capable juniors. I was on an operation costing millions. Due to progress and unexpected conditions we needed help. The only source was a from the state owned company. We had to wait because they had problems. We only got help when the state comp had used up all the equipment in the country. They had a problem and lost the set of equipment they were using. Cost millions. They kept doing exactly the same thing, with the exactly the same result. After losing more 5 sets of equipment there was none left, so people then became available to help us. The inefficiency and incompetence is immense and inherent. While I was there they spent £800 million on a Space Defence center, justified on the grounds that as India was a Superpower they also need space protection. That was in 2008. I remember it because the week before Gordon Brown had annouced £825 million in aid to fund a 3 year women’s education program. Look it up. The real joke is if Mumbai was wiped out it would do 50p worth of damage.

  7. I wonder how much if the design of the QE the British government owns and how much is owned by private companies. Assuming india buys the QE design as heavily speculated, how much will flow back to the tax payer and how much will to to BAe etc overseas shareholdees.

    • I wish BAE was more Britain focused but they see the bright lights of USA and the rest and go calling! Middle finger to the UK….

      • They are a private company. They want to make money. US companies would be exactly the same if their home market was not so large.

  8. Not sure this picture is the actual event. According to the Indian press, the fire was brought under control quickly preventing any serious damage to the warship’s combat capability. The picture would say otherwise and is reminiscent of the USS Enterprise fire which killed many servicemen and significant damage. (Not suggesting this is the Enterprise)
    Scouring the Indian press, there is virtually no picture evidence.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here