The Government have confirmed that planning is underway to evaluate the feasibility of berthing the Queen Elizabeth class carriers in Gibraltar.

Bob Stewart, MP for Beckenham asked in a written question to the Secretary of State for Defence:

“To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what infrastructure and dredging will be required at the facilities at South Mole in Gibraltar to enable the Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers to load (a) life support cargo, (b) fuel supplies and (c) munitions directly from the dock side.”

Answered by Harriett Baldwin, Under Secretary of State for Defence Procurement:

“As part of forward planning for the Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers, the Royal Navy continues to review ports that would be accessible to these ships. This process includes the infrastructure requirements at South Mole in Gibraltar.”

This comes after Minister Mike Penning described the territory as a “massively significant base”.

According to the Gibraltar Chronicle, Mr Penning also confirmed that HMS Queen Elizabeth would visit Gibraltar by Easter of 2018.

“Queen Elizabeth, the new aircraft carrier, will be here. She will moor in Gibraltar.”

Just incase you were wondering how big the carriers are compared to the territory:

 

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

46 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ben P
Ben P
6 years ago

Can already hear the triggering of the Spanish.

Good to see it will be visiting. Hopefully it does a tour of our territories including Cyprus. A visit to the Caribbean islands would be a good show of the flag while it is over there next year for trials.

Jack
Jack
6 years ago

Gibraltar is a cash cow for the Spanish economy, many people in that part of Spain adjoining Gibraltar work there and take their earnings back home.
I doubt the Spanish government will want to disrupt that too much.
And if the UK want to send a British warship to a British territory, that’s up to us.

Remedios Sanchez Jimenez
Reply to  Jack

La vaca la tenéis vosotros con España piratas Gibraltar fue, es y será Español, dejar de parasitar a España y marcharos con monos o sin ellos, ¡¡ PIRATAS!!

Remedios Sanchez Jimenez
Reply to  Jack

España aledaña a Gibraltar, noooooooooooooo Gibraltar es España.

Baz
Baz
6 years ago

Wouldn’t matter if they decided to retake it by force as we have nothing left to fight with anyway
Becouse of theses carriers we wont now have any means of landing troops by sea as all the anfib ships plus the marines are going to go to pay for theses carriers which have no means of defending themselves let alone Gib

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

Cobblers. The problems not the carriers it’s Dreadnaughts brought onto core budget by Mr Osborne. You’re talking rubbish. As for Gibraltar, like the Cyprus sites it’s a key oversees asset t hst I hope gets expanded. Spanish can go take a running jump.

Will
Will
6 years ago

Spot on re the SSBNs.

Baz
Baz
6 years ago
Reply to  Will

So are you both suggesting we get rid of Trident?

Ben P
Ben P
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

Nether of them said that. Trident is the reason we are in such a budget mess. The cost was moved from the treasury to the MOD in the 2010 review.

Ian
Ian
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

Trident is not ‘the’ reason – it’s one reason.

MOD cuts in 2010 were same as most UK spending departments i.e. 30%. This is the main reason we’re in this state.

Then from that greatly reduced budget pensions were added in.

Then Trident was inserted into MOD budget from central funding.

Then the Brexit £ collapse added to the woes of purchasing US denominated assets of which there are quite a lot.

They are all reasons. CASD is responsible for barely 20% of the hole

Ben P
Ben P
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

A 20-40 Billion £ program is 20% of the 30 Billion £ black hole?

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

Catalonia, Baz, Catalonia.

We as a maritime nation are in the curious position of having two aircraft carriers with no aircraft and fewer escorts than ever.

Paul
Paul
6 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Barry for comparison, please look at the launch and commission dates for previous carriers Ark Royal for example was launched June 81, commissioned November 85. So although she would have had working up of her air group during the 4 years, how is that much different from the plans for HMS Queen Elizabeth? She will have aircraft available when she is commissioned. Escorts are a cause for concern, an awful lot is actually riding on the Type 31 as the first of those is due into service in 2023.

Baz
Baz
6 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Paul i wasn’t on about the program for getting the carriers operational what i was trying to imply was the fact that because of these carriers it now looks as though we will have to loose al our anphib capability

Baz
Baz
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

Sorry
Wrong Barry lol

Ben P
Ben P
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

The carriers are not the reason we are potentially losing our amphibious ships. They have been planned for many years and the costs have overrun no more than any other program.

Ben P
Ben P
6 years ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

And Barry, stop been a daily mail idiot and think for yourself. We have many aircraft, we have a small amount of F35s, they are undergoing trials, HMS QE is also undergoing trials. The F35 will be flying from HMS QE by the end of next year.

Geoffrey Roach
Geoffrey Roach
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

Says who??

David Stephen
David Stephen
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

Do you know something we do To? There has been no decisions on any further cuts and until there is you are speculating.

Paul.P
Paul.P
6 years ago

Probably will generate Spanish jobs. Shrewed move in the Brexit negotiations.

Peter Crisp
Peter Crisp
6 years ago

This may an odd question but can the carriers berth at the new London Gateway port? How about other large UK ports as it could be a nice opportunity to have them visit from time to time and maybe let people have guided tours as I have a feeling a lot of people would jump at the chance to see these ships.

Baz
Baz
6 years ago

Eff off
W**ker

Baz
Baz
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

No
Just a reply to the crap you are always talk

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

The sign if ignorance from someone who’s served his country? Alongside the likes of you, who wish to downgrade and talk down their nation at every opportunity in a forum following a subject you despise??? Personally I’d deport you tomorrow…..baz has every right to insult you as I’m sure many others feel the same!

Tim62
Tim62
6 years ago
Reply to  Baz

Baz
TH is wrong, but insulting him just makes you look foolish – and lowers the tone iof this website and forum, we don’t need it.
I know he always sings the same tune, so be it. It is not like he is winning any friends here. Nor is that what he wants to do
best Tim

Baz
Baz
6 years ago
Reply to  Tim62

Sorry

Mike Saul
Mike Saul
6 years ago

If we could we should hand our overseas territories independence, however as long as residents wish to remain part of the UK family then we should defend their right to do so.

Regards Cyprus, we should retain Akrotiri SBA and hand back Dhekelia to Cyprus.

Regards defence cuts, we should keep the refitted Albion and scrap Bulwark. I do not wish to see any cuts to the army and RM ‘bayonet’ battalions.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago
Reply to  Mike Saul

In my opinion the UK should retain all assets within Akrotiri SBA, with Troodos and Ayios Nikolios sites also retained. With Dhekilia being mostly an army garrison I agree that could be released. I recall thousands of acres of disused sba land have also already been released. Myself I’d rather see the loss of an infantry battalion rather than cuts to the only LPD’s we have. Keeping such specialist well trained troops such as the RM is also a given.

Fred
Fred
6 years ago

It is a sad state of affairs that this once great nation now haso a 4th rate armed services ,which couldn’t befendo a play Park from a nursery school class , due to the fact that we have had a third world government for the last 25 years. Where else do injured service personnel need to rely on charities for the support they deserve.

Paul.P
Paul.P
6 years ago

HMS Queen Elizabeth, flagship of the US 6th fleet?

Baz
Baz
6 years ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Lol
Not the flagship but she will only operate with the Americans as we wont have enough ships of our own to protect her

Ben P
Ben P
6 years ago

Another post, another TH been an annoying troll.

John Clark
John Clark
6 years ago

Forward basing a QE class Carrier at Gib in times of tension in the med makes a lot of sense, Gibraltar really is a hugely strategic facility.

Base areas like Gib and Akrotiri, allow the UK to box above its weight and I would regard them as absolutely vital as the UK secures its world wide interests post BREXIT.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli
6 years ago
Reply to  John Clark

Spot on

Lewis
Lewis
6 years ago

An insult for someone who’s argument is only worthy of insult. You hate this country and it’s armed forces, you’re just a a troll. Get lost already.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
6 years ago

Not sure why operating a base for these ships in Gibraltar is in anyway a contentious issue.
We have got a base for them being built in Bahrain for goodness sake noone is saying ..” wait a minute we cannot do that”
Ocean has not gone yet, there are still plenty of people like me still lobbying my mp to forcefully argue against any more defence cuts.
I hope and pray Fallon is telling the truth and they are going to increase the size of the RN.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
6 years ago

Another more relevant point might be to have a 2nd uk facility that can berth and resupply these magnificent ships.
That makes much better strategic sense.
Portsmouth as primary base and maybe Cardiff or Belfast as a fall back base in case Portsmouth facilities destroyed or damaged.

James
James
6 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Belfast. Give them the SSBNs too. Sick to death of hearing the Scots whine on and on and on about them.

FrankLT
FrankLT
6 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Presumably Rosyth too seeing they were assembled & fitted out there.

James
James
6 years ago

During a discussion with Michael Foot about Charles’ and Diana’s honeymoon on the royal yacht Britannia, the Queen said King Carlos of Spain had telephoned to complain about the couple’s planned visit to Gibraltar.

According to Roy Hattersley, Her Majesty said to Foot: ‘I told him he’s my son, it’s my ship, and it’s my dockyard!’
Whereupon Foot informed her: ‘The first Elizabeth couldn’t have put it better, ma’am!’

Ian
Ian
6 years ago
Reply to  James

Love that 🙂

David Southern
David Southern
6 years ago

Thanks for commenting TH. Thought you’d gone. I always like to read the Putin party line for a laugh now and again.

Phil Cjadwick
Phil Cjadwick
6 years ago

USS John F Kennedy docked alongside in Malta so that port is a definite yes.

Gunbuster
Gunbuster
6 years ago

So TH , a little off topic but what is your opinion on the following. Members of the Armed forces are paid by the tax payers ( Including themselves. I worked it out that when in the Armed Forces I paid my own wages twice a year through tax and NI…that’s pretty cost effective. ) and undergo compulsory drug testing. If they are found to have illegal substances in them they are in all likelihood going to be sacked, and rightly so. Why should the UK Tax payer fund the taking of illegal substances. Should this also be applied to… Read more »

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
6 years ago

The Spanish are going to be rather busy soon with a civil war with Catalonia, i cannot see them really giving two figs about QE or POW berthing at Gibraltar for a while. wonder what our “friends and allies” in the beloved EU will do about Catalonia? Probably arm Spain to the teeth to flatten the region, i would not be surprised about that, with the EU returning to the Foreign Legion they sent into the Spanish civil war to fight for the nationalists. return of German troops to Spain? Would not be surprised, the leopard cannot change its spots.… Read more »

Tim62
Tim62
6 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

@Mr Bell You may not mean what you’ve written in any serious sense but you are so off-ball with your comments here re: the EU and Catalonia that they cannot go uncorrected: 1. While I agree Madrid is badly mishandling the entire crisis – it is Madrid and Barcelona and NOT the EU that are in the driving seat over Catalan separatism 2. Both Spanish PM Rajoy and Catalonia’s Puigdemont face awkward corruption allegations – and so ramping this issue suits them both – it mutes a lot of their own domestic opposition. 3. The EU has been on the… Read more »