In a dramatic demonstration, a drone successfully ‘dropped bombs’ on the Royal Navy’s experimental vessel, XV Patrick Blackett, as part of the uncrewed systems training exercise REPMUS24 held off the coast of Portugal.

The event, which took place in Troia, showcased the Royal Navy’s use of autonomous systems in military exercises designed to push the limits of cutting-edge technology.

The UAV Rotron drone performed the artificial bomb drop as part of the Royal Navy’s broader experimentation with uncrewed systems, marking a significant development in autonomous warfare capabilities. Personnel from 27 nations, including the UK, participated in the exercise, designed to test and integrate these technologies into operational task groups.

The REPMUS (Robotic Experimentation and Prototyping Maritime Uncrewed Systems) exercise is NATO’s annual event focused on advancing uncrewed systems. XV Patrick Blackett, the Royal Navy’s testbed for new maritime technologies, played a central role in the trials, which also involved a wide range of other uncrewed systems, including mini quadcopters, surveillance drones, and autonomous Pacific 24 ribs.

Building on last year’s exercise, the Royal Navy tested various uncrewed aerial vehicles, including Peregrine, Puma, and Ebee Vision drones. Additionally, NavyPODS, specialised shipping containers, were used as operations rooms, command centres, and storage for the uncrewed systems.

The exercise also contributed to progress under the AUKUS agreement, a key defence and security partnership between the UK, Australia, and the United States. Through exercises like REPMUS24, NATO and its allies continue to refine and test emerging autonomous technologies to enhance future military operations.

Avatar photo
Lisa has a degree in Media & Communication from Glasgow Caledonian University and works with industry news, sifting through press releases in addition to moderating website comments.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

21 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_857343)
1 day ago

Off topic, but Healey is reported as seeking legal advice on the terms of the FSS contract – considering options.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_857345)
1 day ago
Reply to  Paul.P

And you’ve got to wonder about the MRSS too despite their earlier statement of commitment.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_857387)
23 hours ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

Personally I think the MRSS programme is way to ambitious anyway. Look realistically what the RNs amphibious capabilities have been this decade..it’s been 4 ships in active commission..I would bet money on the MRSS never going above four and if it means the RN can fund and crew another batch of 5 T31s to take the escort fleet up to 24 I think that would be a very sound decision. consider this at present in the 2030s the fleet is heading for 2 very large carriers 6 MRSS 3 FSS 4 large replenishment oilers or 15 very large targets that… Read more »

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_857510)
14 hours ago
Reply to  Jonathan

The French uses the Jacques Chevalier class – a bigger version of Italian Vulcano – to replenish and also do weapon supply to their carrier., they tested recently to resupply VLS under way.

Can’t RN do the same?

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_857554)
12 hours ago
Reply to  AlexS

They cannot now because they have built 4 brand new 39,000 ton fleet oilers. Not sure why the RN could not have done as the French and Italians have done and have say 4 30-40,000ton multi role fleet support ships…but they have splashed on 4 oilers and 3 solid stores ships..so now they are going to run 7 40,000 vessels.

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_857404)
22 hours ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

Yes, Jonathan’s comment is spot on. The fleet is unbalanced. As my grandmother used to say at meal time ‘your eyes are bigger than your belly’ 🙂

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_857373)
23 hours ago
Reply to  Paul.P

That will be because of the failure of one of the core contract holders, you would expect nothing less..if they shipbuilders are looking like not being able to complete then NMG need another option..I suspect they may be trying to shift the contract to either BAE and or Babcock, at worst they will look for a quick cheap out of country build..but I would be surprised.

actual changes in numbers will not be something that happens before the defence review.

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_857398)
22 hours ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Govt priority will be UK jobs and cost saving.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_857403)
22 hours ago
Reply to  Paul.P

I will be interesting to see which one they prioritise in this case as I don’t think they can do both..unless the drop the FSS down to 2 ships..which is possible because in the end they have been running for a long time with one knackered combined solid stores and tanker…so two is better than what they have had for a long time..and the tide class are perfectly capable of replenishing a frigate or other single deployment for solid stores. my personal view would be 4 tides, 2 FSS and 4 MRSS would be a reasonable compromise to get to… Read more »

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_857473)
16 hours ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Agree your point about unbalanced. Regarding Fort Vic I found this answer to an April 29th 2024 parliamentary question ( by Lord West). “RFA FORT VICTORIA is in a scheduled refit package to prepare her for future service. Her upkeep will enable her to fulfil future operations”. Fort Vic is slated for CSG2025; your suggestion of 2 or even just 1 FSS to supplement Fort Vic would be a capability upgrade. Healey must be aware that the priorities are to resolve the FRA pay dispute and address recruitment and retention in both the RN and the RFA. After that the… Read more »

Mr Bell
Mr Bell (@guest_857378)
23 hours ago
Reply to  Paul.P

Is that because the yard is about to be bought out by Navantia a Spanish conglomerate? Therefore a breach of contract in that not a UK owned yard anymore?

Paul.P
Paul.P (@guest_857397)
22 hours ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

The H&W holding company is going into receivership..no govt loan forthcoming. I think the government sees this a problem = opportunity 🤔

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke (@guest_857344)
1 day ago

How is this cutting edge?

This is ancient, in drone terms, technology.

I can see the point of using this to deal with swarming boats etc. Except that a drone won’t be too useful dotting between fast moving craft. So ‘what is it for?’

Could be about supporting RM…

Mark
Mark (@guest_857370)
1 day ago

Amazing. The UK, with all it’s alleged technological might, has managed to copy something the Ukrainians have been doing for the last two years with store bought parts. Makes you proud to be British, eh?

Armchair Admiral
Armchair Admiral (@guest_857372)
23 hours ago
Reply to  Mark

Just so. Looks like a radio control Bristol Belvedere!
Did it just hover above the boat or did it do a bombing run?
AA

Smickers
Smickers (@guest_857459)
17 hours ago

I am also bemused by this primitive “Heath Robinson” UAV and the image of bombs raining down the ship’s stern
Lisa sterted:
“In a dramatic demonstration, a drone successfully ‘dropped bombs’ on the Royal Navy’s experimental vessel, XV Patrick Blackett”……..The word dramatic and successfully are worrying me
Can someone please tell me these WW1 bombs didn’t dent the deck of our latest RN ship or worse😧

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_857511)
14 hours ago
Reply to  Smickers

Why would they not? WW1 bombs still explode and the ships today have no armor.

Stephanie
Stephanie (@guest_857374)
23 hours ago
Reply to  Mark

The Ukrainians aren’t doing anything new really. Drone racing has been a thing since 2011. Dropping simple bombs from aircraft is something GB was doing in the Great War.

Simon
Simon (@guest_857462)
16 hours ago
Reply to  Stephanie

Italo-Turkish war of 1912 was the first instance of bombs ( or grenades in this case) being dropped from an aeroplane

Robert H
Robert H (@guest_857465)
16 hours ago

No doubt these drones have or will, find their way into Ukraine hands!
Well done MOD UK at fueling the fire:(

Andy Goward
Andy Goward (@guest_857648)
5 seconds ago
Reply to  Robert H

Or …. the MOD. Providing the means to kill Russians. Which is a win for the rest of Europe. No one will have anything to do with the Russians for a generation. They are pariahs.