A Labour MP has warned that the UK risks becoming increasingly vulnerable to Russian aggression unless defence preparedness is accelerated, arguing that urgency has been lost despite clear warnings from senior military and intelligence figures.
Writing in LabourList, Graeme Downie, the Labour MP for Dunfermline and Dollar and chair of the Labour backbench defence committee, said the threat posed by Russia should be treated as immediate and systemic, not hypothetical. He argued that the UK’s strategic position and leadership role within NATO make it a prime target for hostile action.
Downie wrote that the recently published Strategic Defence Review had identified Russia as a “real and present threat” requiring a “whole-of-society approach to deterrence and defence”. He pointed to public warnings in recent weeks from both the Chief of the Defence Staff and the head of MI6, who have said the UK must prepare for the possibility of war.
According to Downie, “Russia already considers itself to be at war with the UK”, citing hybrid threats, cyber activity and pressure on NATO’s northern and maritime flanks. He argued that Britain’s geography does not insulate it from attack, noting the vulnerability of undersea infrastructure, cyber networks and long-range strike threats.
In the article, Downie contrasted the UK’s pace with that of other European states, highlighting Estonia’s invocation of NATO Article 4, Poland’s physical border preparations and Germany’s approval of tens of billions of euros in new military spending. He warned that failing to match that tempo could leave the UK exposed.
Downie also cautioned that political attention had drifted since Labour entered government, writing that the danger had been “normalised to the point that urgency has been lost”. He warned this risked the country “sleep-walking into a direct conflict with Russia” that many would later claim they did not foresee.
While praising the government for measures such as pay rises for service personnel, reforms to military housing and export successes for the defence industry, Downie argued these steps must now be matched by faster recruitment, training and equipping of the armed forces. He concluded by calling for a national conversation on defence and security, warning that the cost of failing to deter Russia would ultimately fall on British households through economic shocks, higher energy prices and reduced security.
Downie’s article was published on LabourList on 5 January and can be found here.












Well If we do Insist on using Astutes to pick up Migrants in rubber boats🤔 (Picture in article for those who haven’t a clue what I’m banging on about) (which is usually the case) (cue hate and insults !)
Even more worryingly it looks rather over loaded.
It could be It’s getting pulled under with towing so many boats ?
🤣
So that’s the White cliffs of Dover in the background…..
Good to know water is wet. Sadly the Govt has yet to show it is equally aware.
Fortunately, any aggression won’t be tank-to-tank, but protecting underwater lines, beating off cyber attacks and possible drones hitting vital infrastructure. God forbid if the UK Government puts troops on the ground in 50/60-year-old armoured vehicles! Sadly, the MOD would have little choice but to place lives in such vehicles if ordered.
Starmer and co are risking going down in perennial infamy, the Chamberlain family will probably be happy the focus would have moved elsewhere but let’s be honest he got a bad deal, at least his Govt was busily re-arming not hiding disarming. Starmer would be lucky to stay out of the Tower by comparison, unless foreign boots get to march down Whitehall in which case he will get the Quisling medal.
The UK is actively disarming
🏆for best comedy comment of the day
Fact – he’s not wrong though is he. Since 2010 we’ve shedded a significant chunk of our capabilities with barely anything in return. We still retain world leading j2 but that’s it
No what’s happened is a lot of our capabilities have have just gotten too clapped-out, too old, too expensive to repair, and even too dangerous to use.
If you think regenerating carrier strike, building 13 frigates, developing a 6th fighter, and upgrading the Challengers is “disarming” then I’ve some crypto currency I’d like to sell you… 🤣
What’s replaced GR4, Sentinel Bulwark, Albion, Warrior, Tranche 1 FGR4, Enterprise, Echo, Puma2, C130J….
GR4 => Typhoon Ground-Attack
Bulwark, Albion => MRSS
Sentinel => P-8, E-7, R1, Protector
Warrior => Boxer
C130J => A400
Typhoon TR1 = > Tempest
Echo-class => Proteus & …
Perhaps visit the site more so that you know these things without having to ask?
When are MRSS due? FGR4 is designed for air superiority not really for CAS. Has limited capability for SS v’s GR4. Just 100 jets for DCA and CAS isn’t growth. P8 doesn’t replace Sentinel capabilities. Boxer is wheeled not tracked and lacks armament v Warrior. How May more Atlas have been ordered to cover for loss of C130s? FGR4 T1 has been cut without immediate replacement. You haven’t mentioned Puma2 and tactical battlefield movement. I don’t need to check as I’m in the know. For those of us who’ve served we’ve experienced and seen the hollowing out of capabilities and roles on the loose promise of jam tomorrow. In the meantime they’re cuts. Open your eyes
Blah blah whinge whinge 🥱
Fact – labour and conservatives have pissed on our nations defence for the last 20 years. I’m surprised you can’t see it – no maybe I’m not.
whinge, whine, moan 🥱
Clueless – you’ll be lucky to find any current and ex service personnel from any service who would agree with you. Winge yes but capability gaps and weaknesses cost lives.
You have good reason to whinge. The reality of what we could muster right now to fight with if required should be sobering to anyone, even to many on here who keep their heads buried in the sand.
whinge, whine, gripe, moan… 🥱
and can’t expect that tosspotPM of ours to do anything with the information. he’s a lying wet lettuce and a trump poodle since 1982.the navy has LESS Than a third of the ships it had back
🤣
Good to see someone in labour taking the threat from Russia seriously.
If only the people with capacity to act would take it seriously. It’s been a long time since we had a prime minister with any fight in them (and by that I mean fighting against the enemies of Britain, not against the British public).
I’ve said this before but our country has now spent several years “educating” the public about the evils of empire, colonialism and war; it’s been open season for anyone anywhere to have a pop at British culture, British history, the British military and so on, to the point where we now have people infiltrating military bases under a foreign flag and there was a massive identity crisis about whether we can fly out own flag.
Labour might soon have to ask the same people it’s alienated, and allowed to be indoctrinated into the “Britain bad, West bad, everyone else is our victim” mentality, to take up arms to fight for this country.
I’m not sure how that’s going to work to be honest; how can you tell someone their country is evil and their flag is racist, then turn round and say “You know what, we’re the good guys and you’ll need to carry that flag”?
The Russians aren’t going to war with the UK in the standard sense but they will needle us with grey zone ops snd thats where the UK needs to protect itself snd its infrastructure and to be honest where it should retaliate in kind against Russia.
and you don’t think we’re currently retaliating?… 😏
Suprised nobody has picked up on the fact that if Trump thinks Greenland should belong to the USA, then he probably thinks the same for Ascension Island and the Falklands…