A Labour MP has warned that the UK risks becoming increasingly vulnerable to Russian aggression unless defence preparedness is accelerated, arguing that urgency has been lost despite clear warnings from senior military and intelligence figures.

Writing in LabourList, Graeme Downie, the Labour MP for Dunfermline and Dollar and chair of the Labour backbench defence committee, said the threat posed by Russia should be treated as immediate and systemic, not hypothetical. He argued that the UK’s strategic position and leadership role within NATO make it a prime target for hostile action.

Downie wrote that the recently published Strategic Defence Review had identified Russia as a “real and present threat” requiring a “whole-of-society approach to deterrence and defence”. He pointed to public warnings in recent weeks from both the Chief of the Defence Staff and the head of MI6, who have said the UK must prepare for the possibility of war.

According to Downie, “Russia already considers itself to be at war with the UK”, citing hybrid threats, cyber activity and pressure on NATO’s northern and maritime flanks. He argued that Britain’s geography does not insulate it from attack, noting the vulnerability of undersea infrastructure, cyber networks and long-range strike threats.

In the article, Downie contrasted the UK’s pace with that of other European states, highlighting Estonia’s invocation of NATO Article 4, Poland’s physical border preparations and Germany’s approval of tens of billions of euros in new military spending. He warned that failing to match that tempo could leave the UK exposed.

Downie also cautioned that political attention had drifted since Labour entered government, writing that the danger had been “normalised to the point that urgency has been lost”. He warned this risked the country “sleep-walking into a direct conflict with Russia” that many would later claim they did not foresee.

While praising the government for measures such as pay rises for service personnel, reforms to military housing and export successes for the defence industry, Downie argued these steps must now be matched by faster recruitment, training and equipping of the armed forces. He concluded by calling for a national conversation on defence and security, warning that the cost of failing to deter Russia would ultimately fall on British households through economic shocks, higher energy prices and reduced security.

Downie’s article was published on LabourList on 5 January and can be found here.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

35 COMMENTS

  1. Well If we do Insist on using Astutes to pick up Migrants in rubber boats🤔 (Picture in article for those who haven’t a clue what I’m banging on about) (which is usually the case) (cue hate and insults !)

  2. Fortunately, any aggression won’t be tank-to-tank, but protecting underwater lines, beating off cyber attacks and possible drones hitting vital infrastructure. God forbid if the UK Government puts troops on the ground in 50/60-year-old armoured vehicles! Sadly, the MOD would have little choice but to place lives in such vehicles if ordered.

    • Starmer and co are risking going down in perennial infamy, the Chamberlain family will probably be happy the focus would have moved elsewhere but let’s be honest he got a bad deal, at least his Govt was busily re-arming not hiding disarming. Starmer would be lucky to stay out of the Tower by comparison, unless foreign boots get to march down Whitehall in which case he will get the Quisling medal.

      • I would like very much to bring Starmer his cuppa while they prepare the scaffold on the Green. At this rate its a certainty because the man understands nothing. All mouth and nothing between the ears. I’m making light of it but its actually quite possible him and some others may be in bigger trouble that they think.

      • Fact – he’s not wrong though is he. Since 2010 we’ve shedded a significant chunk of our capabilities with barely anything in return. We still retain world leading j2 but that’s it

        • No what’s happened is a lot of our capabilities have have just gotten too clapped-out, too old, too expensive to repair, and even too dangerous to use.
          If you think regenerating carrier strike, building 13 frigates, developing a 6th fighter, and upgrading the Challengers is “disarming” then I’ve some crypto currency I’d like to sell you… 🤣

            • GR4 => Typhoon Ground-Attack
              Bulwark, Albion => MRSS
              Sentinel => P-8, E-7, R1, Protector
              Warrior => Boxer
              C130J => A400
              Typhoon TR1 = > Tempest
              Echo-class => Proteus & …

              Perhaps visit the site more so that you know these things without having to ask?

              • When are MRSS due? FGR4 is designed for air superiority not really for CAS. Has limited capability for SS v’s GR4. Just 100 jets for DCA and CAS isn’t growth. P8 doesn’t replace Sentinel capabilities. Boxer is wheeled not tracked and lacks armament v Warrior. How May more Atlas have been ordered to cover for loss of C130s? FGR4 T1 has been cut without immediate replacement. You haven’t mentioned Puma2 and tactical battlefield movement. I don’t need to check as I’m in the know. For those of us who’ve served we’ve experienced and seen the hollowing out of capabilities and roles on the loose promise of jam tomorrow. In the meantime they’re cuts. Open your eyes

          • They aren’t nothing but what has he actually done in orders. Almost nothing. This leaves a huge gap a few years down the road. Honestly its culpable negligence, its all jam tomorrow ordered by the Conservatives who understood the dangers and actually started arming Ukraine before anyone else in Europe had woken from their slumbers. Starmers effort is non existant and utterly shameful; hoping the problem goes away. Oh I forgot the 150 special scheme recruits! Obviously all chosen for being DEI. What do you say to all that?

            • The question was whether the U.K. “was disarming” or not – an obvious falsehood.

              It was not whether Starmer has ordered enough investment into defence. He clearly hasn’t, but neither had the Tories, though at least they ordered some stuff. Labour seem to be promising extra spending while failing to find any money for it. The continual delay of the DIP is infuriating.

              As for DEI hires, I don’t think anyone should be able to dodge serving the U.K. military because they not white, male, straight, and Christian. If that had been the attitude in WW2 we might have lost long before the US entered it.

              But as usual with far-right Reform types, you jump to conclusions, don’t bother to read posts before replying, ignore facts and history, and then wonder why the rest of us laugh at your stupid inarticulate rants.

              • I am trying to have a conversation. So I dont know how you think I’m a ‘far right’ Reform type. My views of defence and national welbeing maybe old school but are healthily and sincerely held.
                I worked, help and socialise and still do with a wide range of people but I think there are dangers in DEI generally as evidenced by the RAF’s strange anything but white pilot recruits. In fact an Uncle did serve with distinction in a Balluchi Regiment in WW2. He held them in high regard and said the Germans were terrified of their night patrols.
                I think Labour are misappropriating the Taxpayers money and giving far too much to their non-productive friends and Mauritius! Whereas with the urgent need for a defence spending increase they should publish their plans and be getting on with it. The Conservatives obviously spent too much with Covid which dug us into a huge debt hole. Calling me ‘Far Right’ the replacement slur for labeling someone with the ‘Race Card’; I don’t appreciate.

                • Well you’re clearly ignorant of what DEI actually is, and ignorance is a hallmark of political extremists of both right and left.
                  DEI is about encouraging underrepresented groups; women, non-whites, etc, etc to participate. It is not about excluding and discouraging, for example, white men as the RAF did. That was “positive discrimination” and is simply race description by another name. It has been illegal since 2010, so why the RAF wasn’t prosecuted I don’t know – presumably crown immunity.

                  I agree we shouldn’t be giving Mauritius anything. We should trace the Chagossians and their descendants, and deal with them. Removing them from their islands was wrong, and if Starmer wants to do the right thing then we should be compensating them.

                  Pretty much every country overspent in both dealing with Corvid and preserving their economies. But hindsight is a wonderful thing. No doubt HMG has over spent on every single crisis since ever, but the danger is to underspend and make the situation worse.

                  Not all ‘far right’ are racists, I’m sure there are some in Reform that aren’t. That said, it is a common character flaw.

                  Your views might be “ old school but are healthily”, that doesn’t make them correct.

    • and can’t expect that tosspotPM of ours to do anything with the information. he’s a lying wet lettuce and a trump poodle since 1982.the navy has LESS Than a third of the ships it had back

    • If only the people with capacity to act would take it seriously. It’s been a long time since we had a prime minister with any fight in them (and by that I mean fighting against the enemies of Britain, not against the British public).

      I’ve said this before but our country has now spent several years “educating” the public about the evils of empire, colonialism and war; it’s been open season for anyone anywhere to have a pop at British culture, British history, the British military and so on, to the point where we now have people infiltrating military bases under a foreign flag and there was a massive identity crisis about whether we can fly out own flag.

      Labour might soon have to ask the same people it’s alienated, and allowed to be indoctrinated into the “Britain bad, West bad, everyone else is our victim” mentality, to take up arms to fight for this country.

      I’m not sure how that’s going to work to be honest; how can you tell someone their country is evil and their flag is racist, then turn round and say “You know what, we’re the good guys and you’ll need to carry that flag”?

      • If I was 18 you’d have a lot of persuading me, because of what the politicians have allowed it to become. This lot in particular.

  3. The Russians aren’t going to war with the UK in the standard sense but they will needle us with grey zone ops snd thats where the UK needs to protect itself snd its infrastructure and to be honest where it should retaliate in kind against Russia.

  4. Suprised nobody has picked up on the fact that if Trump thinks Greenland should belong to the USA, then he probably thinks the same for Ascension Island and the Falklands…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here