Western weapons have been flooding into Ukraine over the last few days as NATO transport move cargo to an airfield in Poland near the border with Ukraine.

The cargo is then moved into Ukraine by road to assist in the fight against Russia.

‘We’ve got lethal and non-lethal aid into Ukraine since the invasion’ says Defence Secretary Ben Wallace recently confirmed.

In an interview with Sky News, Ben Wallace confirmed that the UK is sending supplies to Ukraine.

What is being sent?

The below table, currently being updated, lists who has so far given what.

I’m currently helping to produce the table below for this Wikipedia page as part of efforts to have information collated in one place, the table is being shared here under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0.

StateAid provided
 AustraliaAustralian Government approved military aid for Ukraine:

  • non-lethal military equipment on Feb 25, 2022.[1][2]
  • lethal military equipment on 28 Feb, 2022.[3][4]
 AustriaChancellor – Karl Nehammer approved military aid for Ukraine:

 AzerbaijanPresident – Ilham Aliyev approved aid for Ukraine:

  • €5 million of medical supplies and equipment
  • free fuel for ambulances and vehicles of the State Emergency Service at SOCAR petrol stations
 BelgiumBelgian Government announced that it will send Ukraine the following:

  • 2000 machine guns, 3800 tons of fuel and personal military protective equipment on Feb 26, 2022.[8][9]
  • 3000 machine guns and 200 anti-tank weapons on Feb 27, 2022.[9][10]
 Bulgaria
  • unspecified number of clothes, shoes, tents, sheets, blankets[11]
 CanadaPrime Minister – Justin Trudeau approved military aid for Ukraine:

  • non-lethal military equipment on Feb 3, 2022.[12]
  • $7.8 million worth of lethal military equipment on Feb 14, 2022.[13][14]
 CroatiaCroatian Minister of Defence – Mario Banožić approved military and humanitarian aid for Ukraine:

  • 124 million kuna (€16.5 million) worth of lethal military equipment, including infantry weapons and protective equipment.[16][17]
 Czech RepublicCzech Ministry of Defense approved military aid for Ukraine:

  • 36.6 million korunas worth of lethal military equipment on Jan 26, 2022.[18][19]
  • 188 million korunas worth of lethal military equipment on Feb 26, 2022.[20][21]
  • 400 million korunas worth of lethal military equipment on Feb 27, 2022.[22][23]
 Denmark
  • Parts for 300 or more man-portable air-defence systems (model FIM-92 Stinger, to be assembled by US before shipping), on Feb 27, 2022.[24]
  • 2 700 light anti-tank weapons (model M72 LAW), on Feb 28, 2022.[25]
 Estonia
  • Javelin anti-tank weapons systems on February 18, 2022[26]
 FinlandThe Finnish Government approved financial and military aid for Ukraine:

  • €14 million ($15.6 million) increase to financial aid on Feb 24, 2022.[27][28]
  • 2,000 bulletproof vests, 2,000 composite helmets, 100 stretchers, equipment for two emergency medical care stations on Feb 27, 2022.[29][30]
  • 2,500 assault rifles with 150,000 cartridges, 1,500 disposable anti-tank weapons and 70,000 field rations on Feb 28, 2022.[31]
 FrancePresident – Emmanuel Macron

  • €300 million ($337.56 million), on Feb 25, 2022.[32]
  • unspecified defensive weapons and fuel, on Feb 26, 2022.[33][34]
 GermanyChancellor – Olaf Scholz approved military aid for Ukraine:

 Greece
  • Unspecified numbers of portable rocket launchers, ammunition and Kalashnikov rifles, on Feb 28, 2022.[39]
 Hungary
  • 28 tonnes of food and 100,000 litres of vehicle fuel on February 28, 2022[40]
 IrelandMinister for Foreign Affairs – Simon Coveney approved military aid for Ukraine:

  • €9 million worth of non-lethal military equipment on Feb 27, 2022.[41][42][43]
 Israel
  • 100 tons of humanitarian aid, including 17 tons of medicines and medical equipment, water purification systems and emergency water supply kits, and thousands of tents, blankets, sleeping bags, and coats.[44]
 ItalyItalian Minister of Foreign Affairs – Luigi Di Maio approved military aid for Ukraine:

 JapanPrime Minister – Fumio Kishida approved military aid for Ukraine:

 Latvia
  • Stinger anti-aircraft missile systems on February 23, 2022[50]
  • 30 truckloads of individual equipment and supplies (including helmets, dried food, medical devices and medicine)[51]
 Lithuania
  • Stinger anti-aircraft missile systems on February 13, 2022[52]
 NetherlandsMinister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation – SchreinemacherMinister of Foreign Affairs – Hoekstra and Minister of Defence – Ollongren approved military aid for Ukraine on 18 February 2022 for a total value of 7.4 million:[53][54]

Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation – SchreinemacherMinister of Foreign Affairs – Hoekstra and Minister of Defence – Ollongren approved military aid for Ukraine on 27 February 2022:[55][56][57]

 New Zealand
  • initial pledge of $2 million to support health facilities on the ground and providing basic needs – such as food and hygiene items[58]
 NorwayPrime Minister – Jonas Gahr Støre approved humanitarian aid for Ukraine:

(Flown to Poland on Feb 28 afternoon, 2022.[61])

 Poland
 PortugalPresident – Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa approved military aid for Ukraine:

  • Undisclosed amount of automatic rifles (model H&K G3) and “other military equipment”, on Feb 27, 2022.[68][69]
 RomaniaPresident – Klaus Iohannis approved military aid for Ukraine:

  • €3 million ($3.3 million) worth of non-lethal military equipment on Feb 28, 2022.[70][71]
    • fuel, bulletproof vests, combat helmets, ammunition, food, water, and medicines, also blocks to Russian media state outlets in country
 SlovakiaSlovakian Government approved the following aid:

 South Korea
  • $10 million USD in humanitarian aid announced on 28 Feb, 2022.[72]
  • An undisclosed amount of uniforms and military gear to be sent to Ukraine, delivered via NATO.[73]
  • Bilateral ODA to be increased by designating Ukraine as a 중점협력국 “Priority Cooperation Country”.[73]
  • Market release of some of the petroleum which Korea holds as part of its strategic war reserve, as well as re-selling LNG to Europe as part of “international efforts to help Ukraine.”[74][75]
 SpainKing – Felipe VI approved military aid for Ukraine:

  • 20 tons of humanitarian aid worth more than €150,000, on Feb 27, 2022.[76][77][78]
 SwedenMinister of Defence Peter Hultqvist together with Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson proposed on 27 February 2022 military aid for Ukraine which was approved by the Riksdag on the 28 February:[79]

  • 500 million Swedish krona ($52.9 million), on 28 Feb. 2022.[80]
  • 5 000 AT4 light anti-tank weapons, on 28 Feb. 2022.[81]
  • 5 000 M90 helmets, on 28 Feb. 2022.[81]
  • 5 000 bulletproof vests model 18, on 28 Feb. 2022.[81]
  • 135 000 field rations, on 28 Feb. 2022.[81]

Development Aid Minister Matilda Ernkrans presented on 27 February 2022 100 million Swedish krona towards humanitarian aid in Ukraine distributed as follows:[82][83]

  • 50 million SEK for the UN Refugee Agency
  • 30 million SEK for the UN Humanitarian Land Fund
  • 20 million SEK for the International Committee of the Red Cross
 Taiwan
  • 27 tonnes of medical supplies[84]
 Turkey
  • Unspecified number of blankets, tents, sleeping bags, cleaning and hygiene materials as well as five specialists, one mobile kitchen and one disaster response vehicle.[85]
 United Kingdom
  • Trained 22,000 Ukrainian troops since 2015 as part of Operational Orbital.[86]
  • Delivered “thousands” of NLAW anti-armour weapons.[87]
  • Sale of two Sandown-class minehunter minehunters.[88]
  • £1.7bn agreement to support the acquisition of eight missile craft and one frigate.[89]
  • Deployment of RC-135W Rivet Joint surveillance aircraft to provide information on size and position of Russian forces.[90]
  • £40 million of further humanitarian aid to Ukraine.[91]
  • Increased the amount of financial support available to Ukraine.[92]
  • Unspecified further military aid, on Feb 28, 2022.[93]
 United StatesFormer President – Barack Obama approved military aid for Ukraine:

Former President – Donald Trump approved military aid for Ukraine:

President – Joe Biden approved military aid for Ukraine:

  • 90 tons of lethal military equipment on Jan 22, 2021.[113][114]
  • $125 million of lethal military equipment on Mar 1, 2021.[115][116]
  • $150 million of lethal military equipment on Jun 11, 2021.[117][118]
  • $60 million of lethal military equipment on Sep 1, 2021.[119][120][121]
  • $200 million on Jan 19, 2022.[122][123][124]
  • $350 million of lethal military equipment, on Feb 25, 2022.[125][126][127]
Intergovernmental organizationAid provided
 EU
  • €450 million worth of lethal weapons.[128]
  • €50 million worth of non-lethal aid.[129]
 NATO
  • Undisclosed amount of man-portable air-defense systems and light anti-tank weapons, on Feb 28, 2022.[130]
  • Undisclosed amount of humanitarian and economical aid.
Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

109 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Puffing Billy
Puffing Billy (@guest_624351)
2 years ago

To quote WC ‘Give us the tools and we will finish the job’.

Andrew
Andrew (@guest_624358)
2 years ago

Interesting to see neutral Sweden and Finland supplying lethal aid to Ukraine.

James
James (@guest_624386)
2 years ago
Reply to  Andrew

They really want Russia’s interest in expansion to end with Ukraine.

David A
David A (@guest_624438)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

I think that is very true. I suspect most of the countries here are sick of Putin’s paranoia. This is payback for years of threatening, cheating and lying from Putin.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_624519)
2 years ago
Reply to  Andrew

Hi Andrew, As I am sure you are aware Finland has ‘only’ been independent from Russia since 1917, and Putin has already made veiled threats if they should try to join the EU or NATO. I am also aware that Russian troops have been ‘getting lost’ on the Norweigian / Russia boarder and have been pointed in the right direction by Norweigian forces on a number of occasions each year for some time now. I’m not aware of anything specific for Sweden but I bet they have had ‘isssues’ recently as well. So I think we’ll see Sweden and Finland… Read more »

Expat
Expat (@guest_624627)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

I think Sweden has had incursions by Russian subs.

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_624639)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

CR, whilst I think you are spot on re Finland and Sweden by becoming NATO member states, I wonder if that will elevate Russian paranoia. That being said, things are pretty bad already.

David
David (@guest_624692)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Russian aircraft entered Swedish airspace the other day.. Sweden reinforced Gotland due to its dominant position in the Baltic and increasing interest by Russian Forces.
I also read undersea cables from Norway to a satellite station on Svalbard “disappeared” .
Finland works closely with Nato in any case and will replace its Hornets with F35. Its neutral on name only in reality. Its Nato compliant basically so could switch symbolically any day they vote

Klonkie
Klonkie (@guest_624633)
2 years ago
Reply to  Andrew

that is interesting indeed!

Sean
Sean (@guest_624360)
2 years ago

Ukraine has now dealt with two Russian generals:
• Major General Vitaly Gerasimov
• Major General Andrei Sukhovetsky

James
James (@guest_624387)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Any chance they could deal with the president too!?

Sean
Sean (@guest_624390)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

In an ideal world… 🤞🏻

Puffing Billy
Puffing Billy (@guest_624392)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

I wonder if they were beaded onto with the help of USAF and RAF Rivet Joints.

Sean
Sean (@guest_624398)
2 years ago
Reply to  Puffing Billy

One killed by a sniper, another in battle near Kharkiv.
The Ukrainians learned of the later after an intercept of an unencrypted call on a mobile phone from within Ukraine to the Russian defence ministry. The Russians communication systems appear to be in a mess, with the result they are using methods that the Ukrainians can listen in on.

James
James (@guest_624402)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Thats a ridiculous school boy error to make, or maybes Putin wanted rid of him for lack of progress and rang his mobile!?

Matt
Matt (@guest_624415)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Perhaps it has been scrambled by someone?

Like some naughty naval person who cut all the German undersea cables in the channel in the first days of WW1.

Watcherzero
Watcherzero (@guest_624465)
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt

The FSB scrambler phones apparently rely on there being a 3G or 4G mobile signal, if theres no mobile reception they dont work 😂

David Steeper
David Steeper (@guest_624472)
2 years ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

The same ones the Russians have been blowing up !

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_624521)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

Yup,

Prior Planning and Preparation Prevents Pissing Poor Performance… but shh don’t tell the Russians.

😎 CR

David Steeper
David Steeper (@guest_624523)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

😂

James
James (@guest_624483)
2 years ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

Are they using Nokia 3210’s or something!?

Expat
Expat (@guest_624630)
2 years ago
Reply to  Watcherzero

Apparently Russia has been targeting mobile masts. They would have better leaving them intact and using WhatsApp 😒

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_624528)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Yeh, two commanders from from the same army group way too close to the frontlines. The suggestion is that they were trying to impose their will on the battle – so that went well then! Their officer corp should be able to deal with local issues without a General coming forward to sort things out! Begs the question how well trained or prepared were the frontline commanders? The impact on the morale of the Russian troops, not to mention the potential disruption to the command structure could well explain why Kharkiv is still holding out. What with the Russian Air… Read more »

Sean
Sean (@guest_624548)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Yes it seems that the Soviet approach of top-down micromanaging so that commanders on the ground are poor at independent action is drawing senior commanders closer to the front to sort things out.
Is there a single area where the Russian Armed Forces have performed well? Everything from their airborne and special forces to logistics has been met with mishap.

James
James (@guest_624565)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

The artillery have the ability to hit a large town as a target? Other than that they seem totally useless.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_624590)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Hi Sean, If you had asked me 2 weeks ago what would happen if Russia attacked the Ukraine I would have said 7 to 10 days to take everything east of the Dniper River. If the Ukrainians failed to get their regulars across the river before being encircled then the whole country would be lost in two to three weeks tops. Now? This could go on for months. The Ukrainians are putting up a surprisingly effective defence but the Russians performance has been very surprising for all the wrong reasons. I think their plan was over complicated, their command structure… Read more »

Sean
Sean (@guest_624724)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Hi CR, well before this all kicked I thought it’d be; • seize the rebel republics in the Donbas and a land bridge to the Crimea, to secure its water supply and take full control of the Sea of Azov • take Eastern Ukraine – left bank of Dnieper – with Kyiv partitioned • decapitation by capturing Kyiv through a lightning advance from Belarus, with the rest of the country mopped up later. They went for the last option and failed miserably, possibly in part because it was so obvious? But they have even failed with the least ambitious scenario.… Read more »

Andy P
Andy P (@guest_624775)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

I think we’ve all been surprised just how badly this has gone for the Russians although I’m still a bit vague on what the objectives actually are/were. I suspect that there might have been a sliding scale of success with the bare minimum being the breakaway regions and anything else (up to and including the whole country) a bonus. That being based on The West’s reaction more than The Ukrainians (who were desperate to be liberated etc..) reaction. It was always a bit vague, deliberately so I imagine so at any point the Russians could stop and claim they had… Read more »

Max Jones
Max Jones (@guest_624361)
2 years ago

Belgian guns are FNCs, assault rifles – not machine guns

David A
David A (@guest_624439)
2 years ago
Reply to  Max Jones

Don’t spoil it: sounded gangster!😁

Pete
Pete (@guest_624379)
2 years ago

Spanish contribution is pitiful.

James
James (@guest_624389)
2 years ago
Reply to  Pete

They did naff all in WW2, cant expect history to alter the mindset.

David Steeper
David Steeper (@guest_624473)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Oh they helped a lot in WW2 just Google Blue Division.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_624532)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

There’s a surprise fought on the Eastern front as part of the Wehrmarcht.

What many don’t realise is that Brazil fought on the side of the Allies and maintained a force of 25,000 troops, plus supporting aircraft (supplied by the US), as part of Mark Clark’s army in Italy from late 1944. The Braxilian Navy fought in the Battle of the Atlantic from as early 1942.

Just thought I’d throw at in randamly 🙂

Cheers CR

David Steeper
David Steeper (@guest_624541)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Yeah it’s such a shame Brazil get’s no coverage for there contribution. Trying to find an english language book on the war that even gives them a sentence is almost impossible. When it comes to S.America and WW2 they think Argentina and refuge for post war Nazis. One i’d throw out there is one you probably know but most don’t. The Belgian Battalion at the battle of Imjin during the Korean war. We’re always quick to jump on the Americans for ignoring us during the war but we’re just as bad.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_624550)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

Arn’t we just! The Indian Army suffered badly in 1914/15 but played a major role in stabilising the line for the British Army until the reserves could be brought in, but how many people in the UK actually know that the Indian’s even fought in both World Wars! I didn’t know about the Belgians Luxembourgers part in the Korean War (to be honest I need to read more about that conflict). Seems they put up a serious fight! The one thing I can say about that war is that it until last week I didn’t think there would be anything… Read more »

David Steeper
David Steeper (@guest_624698)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

Sorry didn’t get notification. When in doubt Wikipedia. Not so much the articles but the sources at the bottom are very good.

John F. MacMichael
John F. MacMichael (@guest_624718)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

The Brazilian forces who fought in WW2 had a great nickname: Cobras Fumantes or The Smoking Snakes. “Before the FEB entered combat, the expression “a cobra vai fumar” (“the snake will smoke”) was often used in Brazil in a context similar to “when pigs fly“; soldiers in the division subsequently called themselves Cobras Fumantes (literally, Smoking Snakes) and wore a shoulder patch depicting a green snake smoking a pipe.”

John F. MacMichael
John F. MacMichael (@guest_624722)
2 years ago

I forgot to add “FEB” in the quote above stands for “Force Expedicionaria Brasilia” or in English “Brazilian Expeditionary Force”.

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_624726)
2 years ago

Força Expedicionária Brasileira

John F. MacMichael
John F. MacMichael (@guest_624747)
2 years ago
Reply to  AlexS

Thank you for the correction. Sadly Brazilian Portuguese is not one of my languages.

Andy P
Andy P (@guest_624777)
2 years ago
Reply to  ChariotRider

There is a brilliant Spanish film about the Spanish troops in Russia, a Spanish copper who was drafted has to find a serial killer. I’ve got it on DVD somewhere, I think its called Frozen (not THAT Frozen !!!!). Worth a look if you can find it.

EDIT TO ADD – That film is Frozen Silence

Last edited 2 years ago by Andy P
James
James (@guest_624752)
2 years ago
Reply to  David Steeper

All the while being paid off by the Empire in order to not officially enter the war!!

David Steeper
David Steeper (@guest_624771)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Yep. Supply bases for U-boats as well.

Last edited 2 years ago by David Steeper
John
John (@guest_624501)
2 years ago
Reply to  Pete

Agreed. Shameful.

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_624382)
2 years ago

Italy has not supplied very much?
“Hiding” in the EU figures perhaps as they get a lot of gas from Russia I understand?

James
James (@guest_624388)
2 years ago

The funding they supplied no doubt came from an EU fund anyways.

Sean
Sean (@guest_624394)
2 years ago

Italy and Germany are the two most dependent on Russian gas. The Italians recently had a minister in Algeria to see if they could buy more gas from them.

James
James (@guest_624396)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

All EU countries need to find alternative sources of gas.

Its a shame Russia stepped into the Syrian conflict and put an end to the middle east gas line that would have ran through to Europe.

Sean
Sean (@guest_624407)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

You think that’s a coincidence?… the Russian economy depends on exporting its natural resources, a middle-east gas pipeline threatened its market share in Europe.
Similarly the predicted gas fields off the coast of Ukraine would have given Europe an alternative.

James
James (@guest_624430)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Not at all thats why I mentioned it, Syria dropping into crisis was perfect for Putin.

Does Turkey not plan on tapping the same gas fields or are they too far away?

Sean
Sean (@guest_624433)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Difficult to say if it was securing the Russia base in the Med or the pipeline that was the primary driver. Two dead birds with a single stone I think.

It’s an issue of territorial waters, though if a field spans them… Most of the expected finds were in waters around Crimea.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_624435)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Putin may be a compete nutter but he has been a better player at the more aggressive “conflict of powers” version of Geopolitics than the west.

Sean
Sean (@guest_624447)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Well that’s because he has no scruples, ethics or morals. So more a Lance Armstrong figure.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_624457)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

It does always help having no scruples, ethics or morals in Geopolitics. It is a fortunate weakness of the west that we do have these. The idea of the US without some form of moral compass would be scary indeed. But it does mean our leaders actual need to be far stronger around red lines. one of the worst mistakes the west has made was around Syria and chemical weapons, there is little point in setting down a set of international rules if your not willing to enforce them.

John
John (@guest_624503)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

In this alternate world of the US without morals, you’d all be speaking English.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_624579)
2 years ago
Reply to  John

Correction John, I would be speaking America English, which to be quit frank is just terrifying.

Nick Cole
Nick Cole (@guest_624946)
2 years ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Obama backing down on that is what allowed the massive increase in Russian involvement.

John Hartley
John Hartley (@guest_624384)
2 years ago

The West still needs to step up its efforts against “McMafia” money in London, Switzerland, Luxemburg & the tax havens.

Sean
Sean (@guest_624395)
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

Why, what have the Scots done wrong?

Matt
Matt (@guest_624400)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

😛

James
James (@guest_624397)
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

How much money do you think is tied up in Paris, Berlin, Frankfurt, Milan heck last time I went to Marbella and Cyprus was Russians blowing fortunes on champagne all over the place. Its not just London and Switzerland.

Sean
Sean (@guest_624408)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Malta is awash with Russians too: the Maltese were probably the most blatant in selling citizenship for money.

James
James (@guest_624413)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Yeah very true have seen the adverts for the Maltese passports online many times before!

Matt
Matt (@guest_624411)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

This is from a Gruan piece in 2018: Over the past decade, £68bn has flowed from Russia into Britain’s offshore satellites such as the British Virgin Islands, Cayman, Gibraltar, Jersey and Guernsey. That’s seven times more money than has flowed directly from Russia into the UK. (On top of that, some £94bn has poured out of Russia into Cyprus, £13bn into Switzerland, and £23bn into the Netherlands, which has its own network of tax havens.) https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/may/25/how-britain-let-russia-hide-its-dirty-money And this from the Irish Press wrt Ireland: More than €118bn was funnelled from Ireland to Russia between 2005 and 2017, a new research… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by Matt
John Hartley
John Hartley (@guest_624819)
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Looks like a lot of Russian money is heading to Dubai. Perhaps why the UAE has not condemned Russia.

OkamsRazor
OkamsRazor (@guest_624509)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

James I agree, this constant mime suggesting that London is the centre of Russian money is nonsense peddled by lazy journalists. As someone who has worked in this area both designing AML systems and writing legal procedures Malta, Cyprus, Panama, Bahamas and Switzerland are much more central to Russian dirty money.

John Hartley
John Hartley (@guest_624538)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

For sure, oligarch money is in a lot of places, but we need to make sure our parts of the World are clean. The UK Gov is finally bringing in new laws. Good, but they need the skilled police teams to enforce them.

SwindonSteve
SwindonSteve (@guest_624417)
2 years ago
Reply to  John Hartley

I lived in the south of France for several years and the place is awash with dirty money and a shit load of it is Russian.

John Hartley
John Hartley (@guest_624537)
2 years ago
Reply to  SwindonSteve

“A sunny place for shady people”.

Sooty
Sooty (@guest_624399)
2 years ago

Not sure the MiG 29s are going to materialise, the US/Poland seem to be getting cold feet according to the latest reports. Seems its a matter of how they are backfilled with F-16s, and also how to “de-NATO” the MiGs. However, where there’s a will there’s a way.

James
James (@guest_624404)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sooty

Sign the V5C over to Ukraine and Poland becomes the last keeper, surely transfer of assets would de-Nato the jets?

It cant be technology transfer as all the weapons handed over by Nato states so far to Ukraine would fall into the same category surely.

Sean
Sean (@guest_624434)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sooty

I think the Poles are a bit concerned by an immediate drop in their available air power as it would take time to train their pilots and ground crews for the F16. I think NATO would have to station an equivalent number of extra warplanes in Poland as cover while this was being done.
Ben Wallace is also observing that Putin might view this as an escalation beyond what’s currently being supplied to Ukraine; which Putin’s not best pleased about.

Daveyb
Daveyb (@guest_624454)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

I would say the Poles have a very valid reason. There are still major armoured forces in the West of Belarus facing the Polish border, which are both Russian and Belarus. To make matters worse a lot of the big Belarus airfields have now been seen to have lots more Russian aircraft. Perhaps the biggest indication that something is going to kick off, is that there are now a lot of Mainstay and other IL-76 based ISTAR aircraft in Belarus. This is probably a move by the Russian Air force (RuAF) to try to gain air superiority over at least… Read more »

Expat
Expat (@guest_624634)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Didn’t Ben Wallace say he would back the transfer and ensure Poland was defended?

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_624746)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sean

Time’s long past to please Putin. He escalated by invading-which he promised he wouldn’t. Ukraine is “not best pleased about” being brutally invaded, NATO about being threatened with nukes or being told who it can & can’t consider for membership. We need to stand up to him, not cower & navel gaze.
A burgler doesn’t much like getting caught & sent to prison, but we mustn’t pander to criminals.

John
John (@guest_624505)
2 years ago
Reply to  Sooty

Yep, this is the problem. However, I’d argue that, assuming the F16s can be delivered immediately, a half dozen F35s committed for the next six months, combined with some green F16s would make up for the 28 Mig-29s. The US could provide four, the UK two?

LongTime
LongTime (@guest_624604)
2 years ago
Reply to  John

John just to close the loop it appears Poland are not worried anymore @1915 today 08/03/22 Poland announced full transfer of all Mig-29s to the Ukrainian air force.

Matt
Matt (@guest_624401)
2 years ago

Excellent table, and well laid out by lethal / financial / humanitarian columns on Wiki.

I see that Lego have sent aid.

Bricks to cripple the Russian Army, by soldiers standing on them in the dark.

(Plus $110 million of humanitarian funding)

Last edited 2 years ago by Matt
Sean
Sean (@guest_624403)
2 years ago

Should anybody want to contribute donations directly to the Ukrainians fight the details are here:
https://bank.gov.ua/en/news/all/natsionalniy-bank-vidkriv-spetsrahunok-dlya-zboru-koshtiv-na-potrebi-armiyi

DFJ123
DFJ123 (@guest_624409)
2 years ago

They need precision NLOS and loitering weapons, it will be way more significant than a bunch of MIG-29’s that might never materialise. You don’t need to risk a jet flying through their air defence network to smash a tank column well over the horizon. There’s also around three million military age men in Ukraine being asked to take up arms. 30,000 signed up in one day alone in Kyiv. None of these guys have body armour, a couple of thousand flak jackets here and there is not enough. What we did before the start of the war was amazing. It’s… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by DFJ123
Sean
Sean (@guest_624452)
2 years ago
Reply to  DFJ123

The maths for NATO shouldn’t be difficult;
• a NLAW or Javelin for every Russian tank and AFV,
• a Stinger or Piorun for every Russian helicopter and warplane in theatre
• enough body-armour, weapons, and rounds for every Ukrainian who wants to fight.

John
John (@guest_624507)
2 years ago
Reply to  DFJ123

Agree 100%. At least the Russians are donating a lot of kit to them. More so than anyone else.

ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_624606)
2 years ago
Reply to  John

Yeh, particularly generous when it comes to SAM systems it seems. Of course, I think it is a bit much of them to expect Ukrainian farmers to take time out of their busy day to complete the delivery..!

SAM
Engineer Vehicle?
APC

Very poor customer service, but I think the customer compliants department might be getting the message.

SAM2

Cheers CR

Farouk
Farouk (@guest_624410)
2 years ago

Ah, my first video of a MBTLAW being fired , not that good , but it shows how they are using roof tops in which to target enemy armour with a top attack weapon to good effect. Just misses the top of the roof mind.
https://twitter.com/uaweapons/status/1501149671229636608?s=21

Last edited 2 years ago by Farouk
ChariotRider
ChariotRider (@guest_624607)
2 years ago
Reply to  Farouk

Hi Farouk,

That was a close one. I wonder what the arming distance is or is the warhead armed from the get go?

Steve M
Steve M (@guest_624428)
2 years ago

According to the list Ukraine has enough anti tank & air missiles to nearly destroy every tank Russia has (twice) ? hope they get the tactical advice to use effectively

James
James (@guest_624432)
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve M

Have been used against ships aswell from what ive read online!

Steve M
Steve M (@guest_624445)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

yep would be very effective against modern warships as soon as they’ve within couple of k paper thin compared to a tank

James
James (@guest_624476)
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve M

Good to hear they can find multiple uses!!

Mr Bell
Mr Bell (@guest_624446)
2 years ago
Reply to  James

Very Mills Marauders like. 84mm Carl Gustav makes a hell of a bang if it hit the water line or sensitive radar equipment on a Ruskie warship.

James
James (@guest_624478)
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Hopefully quite a few have been shipped to Odessa for the upcoming attack, they somehow need to hold onto the coastline.

John
John (@guest_624508)
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve M

The challenge of course is getting them in the right hands, in the right places, at the right time.

Gareth
Gareth (@guest_624440)
2 years ago

No country has thus far publicly agreed to transfer Mig-29s or any other fighter aircraft to Ukraine. The Poles have refused several times.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell (@guest_624453)
2 years ago
Reply to  Gareth

Im confused by the politics of the Mig 29 transfer. We all agree Putin’s Rusdia is the aggressor launching a war of terror against the Ukraine. Yet because it might upset him NATO is not willing to gift Ukraine 30-40 soviet era mig29s and maybe a dozen SU25 frogfoots. The Polish might be anxious as their pilots will need to retrain on any replacement F16s. Thats fine do the mig transfer in batches. 10 at a time in 3 batches say every 6 weeks. To back cover the Mig transfer NATO can surely muster and deploy 30 aircraft for say… Read more »

Matt
Matt (@guest_624479)
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

It’s all public because the EU Foreign Minister blathered about it, and I think they don’t want to make themselves the next target.

James
James (@guest_624480)
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

The Polish may also be concerned about losing alot of air based capability for the short term.

julian1
julian1 (@guest_624490)
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

especially when you hear that Belarussia army is now fighting and Syrian non-regulars have been brought in for their FIBUA skills. Alright for them but not for Ukraine to seek outside help?

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_624748)
2 years ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

I agree Mr B. Pandering/appeasing Putin went out the door when he invaded. We’re giving him far too much leeway by not pushing back hard & we’re sacrificing many lives in the process. Failing to effectively deter & respond is our biggest weakness.

LongTime
LongTime (@guest_624609)
2 years ago
Reply to  Gareth

Gareth and Mr Bell Poland have now confirmed full transfer of their 29s

David Steeper
David Steeper (@guest_624475)
2 years ago

And very reliant on Russia for arms sadly.

James
James (@guest_624481)
2 years ago

Very good shout they do have a fleet, im fairly sure if France approaches them with a deal for some sort of Mirage as a replacement on a long term payment basis they will jump at it.

julian1
julian1 (@guest_624489)
2 years ago

Anyone know how much the National Bank Ukraine has collected yet for the war fighting fund? Hope my contribution was well spent.

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_624749)
2 years ago
Reply to  julian1

It’s imperative. Though I’d have us drive Russia back to their borders rather than reward blatent aggresion.

JamesD
JamesD (@guest_624557)
2 years ago

I imagine the Baltic States are giving up significant parts of their own inventory, I hope they’re replaced asap and for free.

Airborne
Airborne (@guest_624667)
2 years ago

Well done to all countries concerned, and shows an excellent western unity against a fucking crazy nob jockey! Interesting, and very useful donation from the Dutch of 5 old school locating radars! Good bit of kit to enable the Ukrainian D30s etc to do some accurate counter Bty fire!

Nick Cole
Nick Cole (@guest_624942)
2 years ago

We need to be encouraging more non-NATO support. It all looks a bit one-sided. And who else outside of UK can view this information?

Mark Anthony
Mark Anthony (@guest_625170)
2 years ago

I have to be honest I am no professional of military expertise, but I can’t believe why of all the lethal aid supplied these Government’s have not sent tens of thousands of QUAD BIKES imagine the Ukrainian Reserve’s being able to travel speedily through all terrain under cover of large wooded Forested areas & then launch NLAW & Javelins ???

Mark Szaszy
Mark Szaszy (@guest_626553)
2 years ago

When will air defence weapons systems be put in place in western Ukraine to stop further Russian bomb attacks?