Lockheed has hosted a ceremony to celebrate its new F-16 production line in Greenville, South Carolina.

F-16 tooling and equipment previously in Fort Worth, Texas, has since been installed in a newly-refurbished hangar in Greenville, where the company will begin manufacturing F-16 Block 70 aircraft later this year, say the firm.

“This is an exciting time as we celebrate another important milestone for the F-16 ‒ the world’s most successful, combat-proven 4th generation fighter,” said Michele Evans, executive vice president of Lockheed Martin Aeronautics.

“The future is bright, and it begins right here in Greenville, South Carolina ‒ the new home of F-16 production.”

Bahrain became the first F-16 Block 70 customer in June 2018Slovakia signed Letter of Agreement in Dec. 2018 for 14 Block 70 aircraft, and Bulgaria and the US Government are currently negotiating Bulgaria’s planned acquisition of new F-16 Block 70 aircraft.

The US State Department also recently approved the proposed sale of 25 new production F-16 Block 72 aircraft and F-16V upgrades for Morocco.

“This is a great day for Greenville and South Carolina,” said U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

“We have the best workforce in the country and now we are going to build the most advanced F-16 ever right here in the Palmetto State.”

South Carolina’s workforce is second to none, and the fact that Lockheed Martin continues to invest and put its faith in South Carolinians to build the newest F-16s in Greenville speaks volumes about our state and the company,” said South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster.

“Every person who calls South Carolina home should be proud that the F-16 is made right here in the Palmetto state.”

More than 400 new jobs will be created to support the F-16 production line in Greenville. F-16 production also supports hundreds of U.S.-based Lockheed Martin engineering, procurement, sustainment and customer support jobs and thousands of U.S. supplier jobs.

A significant portion of F-16 production occurs in the supply chain, which currently includes more than 400 U.S. suppliers in 41 states.

14
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
11 Thread replies
11 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
John ClarkSubatomicDanandy reevesGeoffrey Hicking Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Neil o'Neill
Guest
Neil o'Neill

How much are f 16 block 70 flyaway with radars sensors etc…compared to f 35,eurofighter ?

The Big Man
Guest
The Big Man

First flight 1974 and still going strong! This is what happens when you have the budget to produce a tool for each job rather than a tool for many jobs.

Cam
Guest
Cam

And the F16 jet still looks modern…. but wasn’t it always meant to be a mass export jet. Is it still the vast majority of the American fighter jet numbers?

Rokuth
Guest
Rokuth

It was the “F-35” project of its time, although much more successful and less controversial.

John Clark
Guest
John Clark

Not quite Rokuth, the F16 was originally conceived as a pure light fighter. It’s matured into a highly capable machine, the current F16V is the result of 45 years of constant improvement and international market tracking. At one time it was generally accepted that the F16 would end production in favour of the F35A, the reality is the F35 is probably overkill for many countries and the V is an excellent fit, more than matching any potential adversary. It would make a great deal of sense for the US to procure the V model too, to replace some of their… Read more »

HF
Guest
HF

‘tool for each job rather than a tool for many jobs’ – LM actually say on their website that’s a multi role aircraft
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/f-16.html

Not that I’m knocking it – brilliant aircraft – but does it now have the avionics for all weather fighting now ?

Rokuth
Guest
Rokuth

Actually, the F-16, in its original concept was suppose to have a naval fighter variant as well. It was suppose to be the replacement for the A-7 in USN service. Long story short, the USN put its foot down, insisting on a twin engine aircraft, as well as citing some other shortcomings in the Naval F-16 variant. In the end it was an enlarged version of the YF-17, the F/A-18, with McDonnell Douglas becoming the Primary contractor and Northrop the major subcontractor. The same thing happened with the F-111 project, where Grumman became the primary contractor for the Naval F-111B… Read more »

John Clark
Guest
John Clark

Absolutely agree, but wasn’t the F111 a clean sheet design with the Naval requirements built in from day one, although very poorly to be fair!

The French Rafael is a good ( rare) example of an aircraft that successfully has a boot in both camps and came from a land based design.

Hard to think of any others to be fair…

You might say the land based Rafael is somewhat compromised by its Carrier limited dimensions and added structural weight, but the French seem very happy with it in general.

Subatomic
Guest
Subatomic

I’m not sure I agree, Many successful navy designs where developed from land aircraft: Sea Harrier, Goshawk, Sea Venom, Sea Vixen & I think many more.

John Clark
Guest
John Clark

Fair point with the Sea Harrier …. In keeping with many British designs however, it never realised its development capability, the unbuilt BAE Harrier ‘big wing’ would have transformed the Sea Harrier, coupled with its Blue Vixen radar, it would have been a capable fighter. The Goshawk has little in common with the Hawk to be honest, the modified and strengthened forward fuselage is really the only near common component. The Sea Vixen, sort of, it wasn’t a developed ‘in production’ land based aircraft, but more shared a common heritage with its still born land based cousin. The Sea Venom… Read more »

Geoffrey Hicking
Guest
Geoffrey Hicking

Just out of interest, what are the main difficulties in converting a land aircraft to naval aircraft, and vice versa?

John Clark
Guest
John Clark

A Naval design has to have a beefed up structure and constructed from corrosion resistant materials, it also has to have excellent low speed behaviour and undercarriage capable of repeated high rate descents.

Very difficult to reverse engineer into a land based design, but the other way round, it gives you a very strong aircraft, downside, unnecessary structural weight being lugged around with perhaps a reduction in high G and turn performance.

The inherent low speed performance does give a certain advantage in ‘pointing’ for a close range missile shot.

andy reeves
Guest
andy reeves

old basic design, but maybe a contender for tornado replacement?

Dan
Guest
Dan

The F-35 is the Tornado replacement for the RAF.