A letter dated 4 November 2024 from Lord Coaker, Minister for the House of Lords, to Lord Browne of Ladyton, addressed concerns raised over the Afghan Relocation and Assistance Policy (ARAP) and evidence of payment records for Afghan personnel.

This correspondence follows questions initially raised by Lord Browne during an Oral Statement on 15 October 2024.

In the letter, Lord Coaker acknowledged Lord Browne’s ongoing advocacy for Afghan nationals who supported UK operations and confirms that officials have now located “evidence of payments from the UK Government to members of Afghan specialist units that, for some individuals, demonstrates a direct employment relationship.” This discovery goes beyond earlier information about “top-up payments” and reimbursements for operational expenses, which had not, by themselves, confirmed direct employment.

Lord Coaker highlighted the challenges of record-keeping across a multinational operation spanning two decades, noting that more time is required to access and contextualise all relevant records. He describes the 15 October update as provisional, stating that further analysis is needed to complete the record review.

The letter also underscores the government’s commitment to transparency in the review process, as Lord Coaker states, “we are determined to retrieve information from all relevant sources and will provide an update to the House on our progress at the earliest opportunity.” He encourages Lord Browne to share any additional information that might assist with the review and assures him that efforts will be made to improve future information flows to prevent similar issues.

Lord Coaker concluded by addressing past statements made to the House, clarifying that there is “no evidence suggesting a conscious effort by the previous government to mislead the House or the public on this matter.” He affirmed that past ministers acted in good faith based on the available information.

Finally, he reassured Lord Browne of the current government’s commitment to the ARAP scheme, vowing to “ensure eligible former Triples receive the sanctuary they deserve in recognition of their work for, and alongside, the UK Armed Forces.”


At the UK Defence Journal, we aim to deliver accurate and timely news on defence matters. We rely on the support of readers like you to maintain our independence and high-quality journalism. Please consider making a one-off donation to help us continue our work. Click here to donate. Thank you for your support!

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrew
Andrew
5 hours ago

3 years after the withdrawal, and we still have some of the Brave Afghan men and women still seeking sanctuary?????

Joe16
Joe16
2 hours ago
Reply to  Andrew

I know, ridiculous, isn’t it? As far as I’m concerned anyone who can prove that they served in the Triples, whether directly employed by / supporting British forces, American, or other NATO or not should be a shoe-in for asylum here. They’ve proved their support for and commitment to western-oriented values, and their character; they and their families should go through to the front of the line.

simon alex
simon alex
47 seconds ago
Reply to  Andrew

The migration observatory: Afghan asylum seekers. Reported that 95% Afghans coming here get accepted. World wide 10 million Afghans displaced. Afghan was loose loose sadly despite sacrifice of uk forces.

Joe16
Joe16
2 hours ago

Nice of his Lordship to confirm, categorically, that it most definitely was nothing to do with our SF command looking to limit available prosecution witnesses for war crimes trials…
Don’t get me wrong, very proud of our forces in general and our SF. But I’m pretty sure the evidence for that being true was pretty damming- until it all got deleted of course.