MBDA has signed a contract with IAR Brasov to support the integration of the Marte ER missile onto a maritime helicopter platform for the Romanian Naval Forces, according to a press release.

The missile will be installed on the Airbus H215M platform, providing the Romanian Navy with advanced anti-surface warfare capabilities.

MBDA asserts that the Marte ER’s excellent performance will enable the Romanian Navy to protect the nation’s sovereign interests more efficiently.

This contract is a significant step in the cooperation between MBDA and the Romanian Armed Forces. “As the European leader in complex weapon systems, MBDA is the best suited to tackle the challenges faced in Europe by reinforcing European decisive defence capabilities. We are proud to contribute to the Romanian Armed Forces’ strategic autonomy and we will continue to act as a trusted partner by offering a comprehensive portfolio adapted to their current and future needs,” said Arnaud Rousset, Vice-President Europe at MBDA.

The integration project will involve collaboration with IAR Brasov, Airbus, and other partners to achieve full integration of the Marte ER at the mission system level.

The Marte ER missile, representing the latest generation of its family, is designed to operate in all weather conditions and can deliver highly effective lethal effects at ranges over 100 km. It offers a flexible mission profile with features such as automatic and manual waypoints, salvo firing, and the capability to attack land coordinates, along with specific methods to counter ships’ hard and soft-kill defences.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

36 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_827587)
3 months ago

We should really have this missile for the typhoon fleet, not having an airlaunched anti ship missile is a bit of a hole for an islands airforce.

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_827601)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

And for Merlin, P-8.

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_827615)
3 months ago
Reply to  AlexS

Merlin is too busy with ASW. They’re already working on Sea venom for Wildcat they’re not gonna go beyond that.

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_827743)
3 months ago
Reply to  Hugo

Italians have no problem having Marte versions in their helicopters since 1977. Their large ones SH-3, Merlin, NH90 were and are multi mission.

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_827793)
2 months ago
Reply to  AlexS

That’s great but they’re still not going to bother with it. We don’t have enough Merlins as is. Their roles are very distinctly divided between Merlins for ASW/AEW and Wildcats for prosecuting enemy’s and protection of the ship or CSG.
Plus they’re getting sea venom so why would they get this.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_827670)
3 months ago
Reply to  AlexS

There’s also the JSM and LSRAM options for P-8. Probably on F35 too, not sure.

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_827613)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

I don’t think they’re going to bother getting another interim missile system when Fcasw is relatively close to when it’s supposed to he introduced.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_827618)
3 months ago
Reply to  Hugo

Fcasw is not going to be operational in typhoon squadrons until 2030 at best…we really need an air launched anti ship missile now. Marte ER is the only one we could move to an operational status in the short term.

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_827619)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Thats why i said interrim, NSM is an interrim till Fcasw, and its the bare minimum in no. of launchers and missiles too. Theyre not going to pick up another system

Last edited 3 months ago by Hugo
Jon
Jon (@guest_827644)
3 months ago
Reply to  Hugo

NSM was sold as an interim to the politicians to avoid them cancelling FC/ASW, but it’s no more an interim for us than it is for the US or the Aussies.

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_827648)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jon

I’ll believe it when I see it. I seriously doubt they’ll order more sets for new ships. On a different note how is it taking so long to get them fitted.

Last edited 3 months ago by Hugo
Jim
Jim (@guest_827662)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jon

Both the striker armoured vehicle and the E7 all carry interim solution designations in the Pentagon.

Interim can be a long time

Andrew D
Andrew D (@guest_827617)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Sadly what makes sense doesn’t go down with HMG at times 👍

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_827620)
3 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

What project are you scrapping to get it now instead of waiting till Fcasw comes online?

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_827682)
3 months ago
Reply to  Hugo

It does not have to be a zero sum game…this is a cheap off the self missile that is already had integration work done with typhoon. It’s not a billion pound contract…your looking at maybe half a million per missile..so 50 odd would be in the 25million range that’s pocket change.

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_827685)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Bet the MOD wish they had that kind of money lying around.
And you have to consider the fact that trying to fill the gap with a weapon like this then presents the risk of scuppered Fcasw entirely for cost savings as it’ll be seen as they’ve already got what they need.

Also it’s still not as simple as slapping it on the wings of our typhoons. Not all the Typhoons especially the older ones are in sync with other nations software and weapons integration.

Last edited 3 months ago by Hugo
Jim
Jim (@guest_827654)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

We are due to have FC/ASW on typhoon in 2027 ish. FC/ASW should be a massive improvement over anything available today.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_827659)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jim

Hi Jim have you got a link to that, the last piece I read was 2030 for integration and deployment on typhoon.

Jim
Jim (@guest_827663)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

You could be right, that being said stormshadow deployed several years early on Tornado in the 2003 gulf war.

Robert Blay
Robert Blay (@guest_827666)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Spear 3 will provide a very capable anti ship capability.

Armchair Admiral
Armchair Admiral (@guest_827667)
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert Blay

Yes, we have something already to fulfill an interim fit. It should be put into service ASAP.
It may not be a heavy hitter, but they network together and you could carry and launch a good number from a flight of Tiffies.
Ditto the proposed the EW version

AA

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_827675)
3 months ago

Not ready until 2028 unfortunately…we need something now..as we need to be showing deterrent to our enemies now…no point showing up after war has started.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_827674)
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert Blay

Indeed it will, but and it’s the same with a lot of things at present, in service date is 2028…when we are looking at the next 4 years being difficulty. At present a lot of our programs could end up being ready after a shooting war has occurred….snipping budgets for in year savings have put a lot of vital progress back to an extent they become to late to support deterrent actives at the peak of risk.

Hugo
Hugo (@guest_827686)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Gotta be honest. What shooting war is going to happen in the next 4 years, Russia would be off its rocker to get into a fight with Nato. And in a war over Taiwan European nations for one would not be obligated to get involved or be all that useful.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_827669)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Collin will love hearing you say that! True, it wouldn’t hurt would it? Unless the RAF is getting the JSM which I think would have double the range? I think the later is being trialled on the F35s. We need an update on Venom too.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_827678)
3 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

JSM would be lovely, but I don’t think it’s integrated on typhoon. What makes Marte so appealing is all the integration work has already been done..it’s on off the shelf cheap but effective air launched ASM that could be with squadrons very quickly..not in years.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63 (@guest_827688)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Yes, a good intermediate AShM and four can be loaded on a Typhoon. Would be handy to have pre FC/ASW. Is the air launched version coming before the vessel launched then? Has anything been selected for the RAF P-8s besides torpedos? It’ll be interesting to see what Norway and Germany adopt on their F35/P-8s fleets.

Frank62
Frank62 (@guest_827693)
3 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Indeed it’s stupidity of high order. I’d go for the NSM though. Facing down WW3 still practicing serious capability gaps literally is Russian roulette.

Jonathan
Jonathan (@guest_827713)
3 months ago
Reply to  Frank62

Hi Frank the only issue with NSM vs Marte ER is that MBDA have for the last 5 years spent a load of its own cash sorting out the weapons integration of Marte ER on the typhoon..so that’s integration money the MOD would not need to spend as well as time, so we would probably need a good few years and wad of cash for integration work to get NSM onto typhoon..where as with Marte it’s pretty much at the point the MOD can just buy it.

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_827598)
3 months ago

Genealogically this is one of older missile families’ in the world, with origins on command guided Sea Killer that entered service in late 1960. Marte the helicopter version entered service in 1977.

Last edited 3 months ago by AlexS
FieldLander
FieldLander (@guest_827614)
3 months ago
Reply to  AlexS

Old, but not obsolete, much the same might be said of the B-52. Still selling.

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_827639)
3 months ago
Reply to  FieldLander

Well i doubt any piece remains from the oldest versions – the first version was rocket now a turbofan and guidance was beam ridding command control and now it is an active radar..
Just saying that there is a path and appearance is similar.

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_827643)
3 months ago
Reply to  AlexS

In other words, he’s right, it’s the same as the B52, which I also doubt shares a single component with the first versions.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky (@guest_827660)
3 months ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

B-52s don’t need to be cutting edge it’s a shuttle us for the missiles that do the real work ie missiles like Marte that do need to be extremely capable and modern. Not saying it isn’t just that comparing B-52 to it is like comparing Apples to Oranges.

SailorBoy
SailorBoy (@guest_827661)
3 months ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

The point wasn’t about the role, I was more referring to how much both things have been upgraded over their lives to the extent that they are internally unrecognisable from their original state.
I would challenge any 1950s bomber pilot, if we summoned one to the present somehow, to fly a modern B52 in combat.

AlexS
AlexS (@guest_827671)
3 months ago
Reply to  SailorBoy

I did not say it was obsolete, i have even made reference to the old command guidance.