Armed Forces Minister Luke Pollard has signalled his support for a future expansion of the RAF’s Wedgetail fleet, citing improved economic conditions and growing defence budgets, amid continued scrutiny over the programme’s delays and reduced size.
Speaking in Westminster Hall on 16 July, the minister acknowledged that delays to the E-7 Wedgetail had left a critical gap in the RAF’s airborne early warning capability but said delivery was now on track for 2026. He also echoed growing cross-party support for restoring the original five-aircraft fleet size, up from the three currently on order.
“Disappointingly, the E-7 Wedgetail programme has experienced delays,” the minister told MPs. “These are due, first, to wider challenges faced by the global aviation industry… and, secondly, to more specific programme issues, including complex certification work that Boeing has had to undertake.”
He emphasised that “test and evaluation are now under way”, with a Wedgetail aircraft set to participate in the Royal International Air Tattoo this week, and added: “We are working flat out to get a fully compliant aircraft into service as fast as possible, and we are holding suppliers to account.”
But much of the debate focused on the earlier decision to reduce the RAF’s order from five to three aircraft in 2021, a move widely condemned by the Defence Committee. Labour’s Luke Akehurst pressed the minister to reconsider the decision.
“Does the Minister agree that upgrading this fleet of aircraft would be easier if there were five airframes?” Akehurst asked. “That would allow one of the five to be taken out of service for an upgrade. It is logistically more difficult if we stick with three airframes.”
Pollard responded affirmatively. “My hon. Friend makes a strong argument. I support the wording of the strategic defence review, which talks of possibly buying more E-7 Wedgetails when the economic conditions allow.”
He pointed to the government’s long-term defence spending commitments as a reason for optimism. “Thanks to the decisions taken by the Prime Minister, we will be spending 2.5 percent of GDP on defence by April 2027, 3 percent in the next Parliament and 3.5 percent by 2035,” he said. “For the first time in a very long time, there will be a rising defence budget in the next decade.”
Framing Wedgetail as both an operational asset and an industrial opportunity, the minister said the UK is aiming to become a key partner in its global sustainment and export.
“Our long-term aim is to grow the UK industrial base in support of Wedgetail, including potentially to support NATO and other global customers as they commit to E-7 in future years,” he said. “We have to ensure these platforms are exportable, that there is a work share for British companies, and that defence can be a real engine for growth.”
He promised further detail in the coming months. “Members will also know that we hope to publish the defence industrial strategy in due course and, towards the end of the year, the defence investment plan. That will set out what we are spending, not just on kit and equipment, but on infrastructure and people.”
Though critics remain concerned over the capability gap left by the Sentry’s retirement, the minister said confidence is building as the aircraft nears operational testing. “This is a detailed process to demonstrate that each system operates as designed. The aim is to bring this vital platform into service without compromise.”
Pollard concluded with a clear message to industry.
“As a new Government coming in, we committed to look at purchasing new E-7 Wedgetails, as part of the recommendation in the SDR, when the economic conditions allow. That is a vote of confidence in the platform, and it is part of our ambition to improve defence procurement. Boeing and the partners in the supply chain should be in no doubt that we expect the aircraft we ordered to be delivered, to be operational, and to make a valid contribution to filling the gap that the last Government created when they axed the previous aircraft providing this capability. I am happy to ensure that a copy of the detailed notes are shared with the House, so that answers to the questions put to me are properly provided.”
Boeing became disillusioned when we reduced the order to 3 – even though we had already bought the radars. The government should recognise the urgency related to the current lack of airborne radar provision, reinstate the order and lets get things moving
The new SoS Defence Healey should also revisit the numerous MoD decisions to retire assets before the replacements are available. Particularly the Albion class amphibious ships
It could well be the lack of skills in the outfit doing the conversion coupled with MoDs nightmare certification regieme?
The conversion wasn’t given to BAE or Marshalls who have plenty of competent people.
I see a lot of people on here stating that Boeing is disillusioned, like it’s some lost child.
Is there actually a statement from Boeing to back this up? I can’t find anything.
To my knowledge Boeing is doing everything it can on this project and fucking it up like it does with almost all its projects.
The prize is not delivering two more aircraft for the UK but dozens for the USAF and NATO.
We do seem to have a real skill for buying relatively little ourselves and then holding the hand of others through support contracts. Nice work if you can get it.
So the extra two are now bait to get a wedgetail support facility in the UK. Not sure it’s going two work or really that strong leverage.. well we ordered 5 but said we only wanted 3, when we knew we actually need about 9..and we now know we are going back to 5 but before we do we want an industrial concession…. Weak but worth a play. Now if we ordered 9 to be built and maintained in the UK, knowing that NATO want to buy wedgetail, we could then sell NATO 3 straight of the bat from the production line..that would be a strong position.
It’s always about ling term and when economic situation allows, it’s depressing! There is a complete failure on the part of UK politicians to understand why we actually need an armed forces!!
It’s good this is being raised and the government is not shooting it down. An E7 fleet increase would seem like the most important and lowest cost upgrade to UK air defence and the best capability we can provide to the USA and NATO.
And what about some additional P8s? 3 more? More?
A p-8 reportedly costs $242m. Do we know how much it would cost to buy 2 more B737 & convert them to E-7 with the radars we have already bought?
The MOD stated it saved £700 million by dropping down to 3 aircraft from 5 so you be looking at at-least £700 million to go back to 5.
£700m !!!! That has got to include maintenance, spares and training costs over some period of time… Surely that is not just airframe cost and integration?
Cheers CR
We are paying about £1.9 billion for three so yes £700 million sounds about right.
Noting the old ‘when economic conditions allow’ caveat thrown in there, this doesn’t signal any commitment at all.
Indeed.
Maybe. Some day. We’ll look at it.
Perhaps.
In 2030 or 2035 when it won’t be our responsibility.
Standard HMG.
Hi mate,
The daft this is if they want to generate economic growth they need to drive it forward. Sitting back and talking a good talk and then cross your fingers just isn’t going to work. So if this government is serious they need to pick the pace up, and use defence to drive economic growth and wind in secondary cost benefits into the cost equation for all procurement projects. That way I would expect that buying a few more of pretty much anything will extend the production runs and bed in the financial benefits with the local economies around the country.
So they are talking about buying more E-7 when economic conditions allow. Stupid. Commit to completing the final 2 examples now to keep the line hot then order at least 4 more to bring the number up to 9 aircraft, but order them on a one per year delivery cycle to extend the life of the production run. With the extra number and time negotiate with Boeing / NATO for a workshare at a plant that is integrating these platforms in Europe, namely, Birmingham. Result, leveraged economic growth and a proper capability for the RAF (although 9x is a bit on the small side for a peer on peer conflict, no pleasing some 🙂 ).
Economic conditions allow… take control show leadership… muppets!
Cheers CR