It has been widely reported in the media that an F-35 was outperformed by an F-16, the truth is seemingly a little different.

This article should be prefaced by saying I don’t work for Lockheed Martin, BAE or any of the companies or organisations involved with the aircraft.

Now that’s out of the way we can begin, the accusations of the F-35 being inferior may seem shocking at first but it should be noted that the specific F-35 involved was ‘AF-2’, this airframe is designed for flight testing, it’s designed to fly in certain restricted flight envelopes. It does not feature the majority of systems present in frontline aircraft.

The aircraft, due to it being a test aircraft, had also not had the software installed that is required to use the sensors and mission systems that would be used in combat. Additionally, ‘AF-2’ does not feature the radar-absorbent material coating that operational aircraft have.

Articles making the claim that the F-16 is superior cite tests performed earlier in the year to assess the flying qualities of the F-35 during within visual range combat and the F-16 involved was used as a visual reference to maneuver against.

The aim of the test was to demonstrate the ability of the F-35 to fly to the edge of its restricted test limits without exceeding them. The test scenario was apparently successful as it allowed the aircraft be cleared for greater agility in future tests.

According to a recent press release from Lockheed Martin:

“It [the F-35 in question] is not equipped with the weapons or software that allow the F-35 pilot to turn, aim a weapon with the helmet, and fire at an enemy without having to point the airplane at its target.”

Test pilots say the additional maneuverability available as the aircraft expands its flight envelope after every test is a testament to the performance.

According to test pilot David “Doc” Nelson.

“Pilots really like maneuverability, and the fact that the aircraft recovers so well from a departure allows us to say [to the designers of the flight control system laws], ‘you don’t have to clamp down so tight’.”

Despite the claims that the F-35 is inferior to a decades old aircraft, previous exercises tell a different story. Over the last few years there have been occasions where a flight of F-35’s have engaged a flight of F-16’s in simulated combat scenarios, the F-35s reportedly won each of those encounters because of their sensors and low visibility.

This seems to be a case of comparing a test aircraft still in trials, that has a restricted flight envelope, against a mature dogfighter with no such restrictions.

Recently, a Royal Norwegian Air Force pilot responded to the now largely refuted headlines relating to the F-16 and F-35.

Major Morten ‘Dolby’ Hanche has flown many mock dogfights since becoming the nation’s first F-35 pilot last November.

In his blog, Hanche remarks:

“So how does the the F-35 behave in a dogfight? The offensive role feels somewhat different from what I am used to with the F-16. In the F-16, I had to be more patient than in the F-35, before pointing my nose at my opponent to employ weapons; pointing my nose and employing, before being safely established in the control position, would often lead to a role reversal, where the offensive became the defensive part.

When I push the stick forward; the F-35 reacts immediately, and not delayed like the F-16.”

He adds:

“The F-35 provides me as a pilot greater authority to point the nose of the airplane where I desire. (The F-35 is capable of significantly higher Angle of Attack (AOA) than the F-16. Angle of Attack describes the angle between the longitudinal axis of the plane – where nose is pointing – and where the aircraft is actually heading – the vector).

This improved ability to point at my opponent enables me to deliver weapons earlier than I am used to with the F-16, it forces my opponent to react even more defensively, and it gives me the ability to reduce the airspeed quicker than in the F-16.”

While there are valid complaints about the programme, the latest sensationalist headlines aren’t among them.

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Jason Rushton
Jason Rushton (@guest_302936)
8 years ago

Thank you for posating this UK D J ! So many un-founded comments about this on the Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carrier, group pages .

Danny ODonnell
Danny ODonnell (@guest_302937)
8 years ago

Kenneth Fleck

Robert Farley
Robert Farley (@guest_302941)
8 years ago

Well, while the F-35 may well outperform F-16 there can be no denying. But when it comes down to which has the better looks, I think the F-16 beats the F-35 hands down any day.

Philip Spencer
Philip Spencer (@guest_302957)
8 years ago

bet it did

Lee Hodgson
Lee Hodgson (@guest_302958)
8 years ago

Are they hushing it up like when the typhoon beat the raptor ? ?

RedStatePatriot (@guest_304311)
8 years ago
Reply to  Lee Hodgson

A typhoon never beat a Raptor, you are daft. yeah yeah, I know the silly French put out a photo of a F22 in the kill box of a Rafale fighter. Only what they failed to tell you was that the photo came from a Red Flag drill held in the US. Those drills involve setup fights, sometimes the F22 starts with the other aircraft on its tail , sometimes the other way around. No one ever said a heavy F22 flying low and slow would be able to out maneuver another lighter modern aircraft. So the photo is bogus… Read more »

Dan (@guest_364243)
7 years ago

Wer on about the f22 and the typhoons in the Mach loop trail I g area when the typhoons responded to f22 playing with them in the training area. The typhoons hammered then to the ad is ion and suprise of the f22 pilots. Consider yourself educated. Wer not on about a shitty photo

Austin (@guest_411083)
6 years ago
Reply to  Dan

Consider yourself educated, at Red Flag, the Eurofighter Typhoon defeated the F-22 5 times while it had a transponder (Meaning the typhoon pilots knew where it was at all times) and it was limited in maneuverability, and even under those circumstances the F-22 defeated the Eurofighter 180 times, but okay

jt (@guest_304326)
8 years ago
Reply to  Lee Hodgson

Jeez. You can climb down from cloud 9 now and come back to reality. No one cares about two Raptors getting killed out of 239 Typhoons/Raptor engagements were Raptors were overwhelmingly victorious. F15s, F16s and even older F5s have killed Raptors. Its the pilot that wins the fight not the plane.

Gregory Paul Box
Gregory Paul Box (@guest_302992)
8 years ago

The defence industry is never going to admit that the aircraft is mediocre (and our tax money that’s being used to buy these frivolous over-priced baubles)! Lockheed Martin must be so pleased.

Gabriel (@guest_303357)
8 years ago

Go to Syberia, rusky

Kirsten Farr
Kirsten Farr (@guest_303057)
8 years ago

So why put it up against an f16 if it wasn’t ready

Simon (@guest_303925)
8 years ago
Reply to  Kirsten Farr

Since it wasn’t a test to see if it could beat a F16, it was a test to see at which AoA (angle of attack) it could fly best and to see how good of a maneuverability it has… As stated by other people on this forum it has gone through tests wheter or not it could beat the F16 and because of its tech it could ;).

jt (@guest_304327)
8 years ago
Reply to  Kirsten Farr

All development fighters have to fly against something in order to create unpredictable scenarios that challenges its flight control abilities. The F16 was a reference platform.

David H Lewis
David H Lewis (@guest_303179)
8 years ago

Some of these comments (such as Kirsten) demonstrate that people don’t understand the test and development world. There’s no reason why they should, of course, unless they’ve been involved in it at some point.

Eric Dumas
Eric Dumas (@guest_349699)
8 years ago
Reply to  David H Lewis

That’s exactly what I though ! Engineering is something a little bit more complex than what people seem to think… Developping such an aircraft is a long long journey ! I heard that this aircraft will be 20 years ahead of anything else when ready ! Nobody will discuss the money it took to achieve such perfection. I’m canadian and we are also putting a lot of money into that project. Politicians (not the ones in power) a very critical about it and they try to make it look bad compared to F-16 for example. That is basic politics… They… Read more »

Jim Ball
Jim Ball (@guest_303187)
8 years ago

I think Jason Rushton makes a very valid point; the amount of dis-information being circulated about this project is remarkable. Is this the result of a negative media or those of a political opinion that we should not spend money on defence? Or is it coming from a more worrying source, are ministers and their civil servants releasing negative information about the project in order to prepare people for the sale or abandonment of the project?

Eric (@guest_303195)
8 years ago

I have been looking with passing interest at all the negative press about the F-35 and have yet to understand where all expert opinions are coming from? The aircraft is being tested and examined in typical incremental stages as any test program will proceed and so far, the results have been nothing less than impressive. These rumours need to be accepted for what they really are: unqualified opinions.

jt (@guest_304329)
8 years ago
Reply to  Eric

Overblown liberal media criticism against military developments is a long standing tradition…lol.

Canaan Rhodes
Canaan Rhodes (@guest_303230)
8 years ago

@ Lee Hodgson. I keep hearing a Typhoon killed an F-22. Are people confusing the Growler that got a kill or is the Typhoon kill number 2?

As for disinformation, I believe the detractors are getting desperate. Their critiques have been bordering on ridiculous for some time now.

RedStatePatriot (@guest_304315)
8 years ago
Reply to  Canaan Rhodes

Those are all from “setups’ in a Redflag drill. Sometimes the F22 will start low and slow with an opposing fighter on its tail. To say a “This plane” or a “That plane” beat an F22 is silly and the fools that keep saying it show their ignorance of how these drills are conducted.

jt (@guest_304330)
8 years ago
Reply to  Canaan Rhodes

so what if a Typhoon killed an F-22? An old F-5 has killed an F22 before. So has the F15 and F16. It doesn’t make the F22 and less formidable. Pilots win battles not planes.

Val (@guest_304765)
8 years ago
Reply to  jt

Dumb pilot on a dumb plane wins no war.

Eric Dumas
Eric Dumas (@guest_349700)
8 years ago
Reply to  Val

I don’t believe that a regular fighter pilot testing a F-30 can be qualified as a : “dumb” pilot. Sorry but that makes no sense at all.

Andrew deacon
Andrew deacon (@guest_303255)
8 years ago

Flightglobal is reporting a rather different perspective !

Anker (@guest_303266)
8 years ago

More years ago simulations was done against Russian fighters. When we flew “Russian” fighters we were not allowed the Better russian missiles. When we would Like to fly 25 nautical miles line abreast so we could look more or less not straight forward on the F-35 and link the picture to the wingman so he could fire on the F-35 we were not allowed. The simulations gave a completely wrong picture. The F-35 was not “allowed” tp looser. Because of this (manipulation) a test pilot and I left the simulations. Returner to our home country and complained to the appropriate… Read more »

James W. McCarthy
James W. McCarthy (@guest_355192)
7 years ago
Reply to  Anker

Exactly where are pilots allowed to fly Russian fighters against F-35s in simulators ???

Anker (@guest_303286)
8 years ago

I had a comment on manipulation of simulations with F35 vs Russian fighters. That reply is not Here. Why was it not acepted?
A test pilot and I left for homecountry and complained to appropriate commands about the sumulations we attended.
F-35 loosing in those simulation was more than difficult because of restrictions on tactics and weapons on the “Russian” opponents.

TDS (@guest_312711)
8 years ago
Reply to  Anker

You can’t write in proper English. You are not a trained fighter pilot in an English speaking country. It’s obvious how you write/grammar/spelling etc.

TetraB (@guest_303299)
8 years ago

Unfortunately the damage is already done.
F-35 will remain in history as the most expensive airplane with software problems, nonfunctional gun, beaten by 4th generation airplanes.

James W. McCarthy
James W. McCarthy (@guest_355191)
7 years ago
Reply to  TetraB

Out of hundreds of tests, exercises and simulations there’s exactly ONE that said an F-16 defeated an F-35. That F-35 was a test aircraft ONLY, that was limited in its flight envelope.


[…] UK Defense Journal points out that in other exercises more representative of real operations than a canned BFM scenario, the F-35 has performed quite well against the F-16. […]

Edd Beadling
Edd Beadling (@guest_303410)
8 years ago

Amazing how this has been reported read the article the f16 was used as a benchmark as they continue to widen the performance envelope of the F35 simples

Dugixy1 (@guest_303507)
8 years ago

That is happened because you show many inovations , flight tests , diffrent software , errors … perfect for enemy and competition . That we can not know or see in China , Russia , we do not know nothing when they build weapons , only when is finished . Some conclusion can give only experts , pilots when is plane finish 100 % and ready for fight . Primary mission is destroy enemy far away and before enemy know how you are there . To much peoples , journalist , today are some experts and know everything about plane… Read more »

Larry (@guest_303570)
8 years ago

What good are your sensors and RAM when you are in a close in, visual range dog fight? The only thing that matters is your energy, turning capability and the ability to bring your gun to bear on the target. The f35 in question could not keep up with an F16 with drop tanks!! Even if the aircraft had sensors and software to aim and fire missles…he couldn’t as the helmet is to darn big to turn without hitting the canopy!!

Paul Madsen
Paul Madsen (@guest_303587)
8 years ago

It should be called Porky or the Magic Penguin. This aircraft is a huge step backward in terms of energy maneuverability performance. The entire acquisition process was a Charles Foxtrot. 28 year Air Force Veteran. 2600 hours in an F16.
Gulf War, OSW, ONW, OEF, OIF.

RedStatePatriot (@guest_304316)
8 years ago
Reply to  Paul Madsen

Yeah, right… you go get en Maverick! If you were a pilot you would understand software limited fight testing.

Nashingun (@guest_303723)
8 years ago

The fact that F-35 is still in its developmental stage speaks for itself! DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE! So why are so many wannabe whiners out here? As I have noticed the dog-fight is under some limited testing stage meant for something… And there it is, the aircraft is for some edge of the system trial! Watch until US Marine’s F-35B gets into service and see how the real one functions in a real battlefield, then and only then that you can grudge on this program and call them junk.

james (@guest_303799)
8 years ago

If you will all cast your mind back to the late sixties and early seventies you will find that TTF he same arguments were vaunted regarding the phantom development and the ability to avoid dogfights. The result? American 3rd gen aircraft were destroyed by the hundred by 1st gen MIGs . why? Because the MIGs could bloody dogfight , the no1 basic test on an airframe. Never never never rely on flipping tech it is the power agility of the airframe coupled with the guile and skill of a pilot that wins in battle. Nothing else. And do no forget… Read more »

Imtoolazytoread (@guest_304339)
8 years ago
Reply to  james

People like you are too lazy to read up on history. In Vietnam ROE required USAF to perform visual identification prior to engaging a bogey. They had to resort to F-4 operating in pairs so one would go head on and ID the bogey while the second engaged with sparrows or sidewinders. BVR missiles were in their infancy but restricted ROE didn’t allow them to use the weapon to their advantage. Not only that USAF waged a limited war against the NVA air force allowing their them to operate from their base unmolested to sneak up on Thuds. So go… Read more »

Dexter (@guest_306299)
8 years ago

You do realize that the US often had more aircraft in the air than the NVAF had operational period? Like unrestricted BVR would more than likely had led to a lot of Blue on Blue incidents especially considering IFF wasn’t exactly faultless.

8 years ago

[…] mentioned earlier.) I notice that there are now some ‘second generation articles’ that have picked up on the same observation. (You can get an F-16 pilot’s perspective […]


[…] The UK Defense Journal summed up the controversy as follows: “While there are valid complaints about the programme, the latest sensationalist headlines aren’t among them. This seems to be a case of comparing a test aircraft still in trials that has a restricted flight envelope, against a mature dogfighter with no such restrictions. Despite the claims that the F-35 is inferior to a decades old aircraft, previous exercises tell a different story. Over the last few years there have been occasions where a flight of F-35s (has) engaged a flight of F-16s in simulated combat scenarios, the F-35s reportedly won each of those encounters because… Read more »

Patrick (@guest_309318)
8 years ago

NVA MiGs did not down Phantoms by the hundred. They couldn’t even kill much less maneuverable F-105s by the “hundred”. The score — F-105s made 31 kills against MiG 17s, vs 18 losses to MiG 17s. Twenty four of those MiG 17s were shot down by F-105 gunfire in tight dogfights. The USAF only claimed 27 & 1/2 kills, but the Viet government admitted post war to an additional 3 MiG 17 losses to F-105s. The 1/2 kill was shared by an F-4, that finished off a mortally wounded MiG 17 previously hit by an F-105. Regarding the F-35 vs… Read more »


[…] anteriormente.) Eu noto que há agora alguns “artigos de segunda geração”, que tem escolhido a mesma observação. (Você pode obter uma perspectiva do piloto de F-16 […]

Calvin (@guest_318973)
8 years ago

“However, despite the F-35’s technologies and next-generation sensors – the JPO statements did not seem to necessarily contradict the central finding of the test-pilot’s assessment that, in terms of pure dogfighting maneuverability as its own variable, the F-35 did not perform as well as an F-16.”

Alejandro (@guest_345422)
8 years ago

A realy big problem would be, if the us replace all his fighters wasting billions and billions of dollars with the “súper advanced” F35 and finally this fighter is useless, how can your country would deal with that?

bbmb (@guest_359110)
7 years ago

A fighter that can’t maneuver when the merge happens and it will is going to have problems in a real fight.

k (@guest_359453)
7 years ago

sounds like we have a Russian spy that approved the development of this monster crap load of an aircraft so it would lose in combat so the Russians will take over. It doesn’t matter anyways we don’t have any money to improve the software now or make new planes. Our country is gone! =O

Andy Miller
Andy Miller (@guest_361018)
7 years ago

That would say an awful lot about 1970s technology otherwise.

Mark Barrie
Mark Barrie (@guest_361019)
7 years ago

Just let the non-believers blether their rubbish.. Given that it’s now widely known the F-35 ‘kicked some F-15 butt’ lately…

Miklós Matláry
Miklós Matláry (@guest_361020)
7 years ago

Of course it was not.

Gaius Aurelius Hammond
Gaius Aurelius Hammond (@guest_361021)
7 years ago

You can buy a dozen F16s for the cost of one F35. The F35 only has 2 missiles. As our American cousins like to say “you do the math”

UK Defence Journal
UK Defence Journal (@guest_361022)
7 years ago

Your claim that “The F35 only has 2 missiles” is incredibly incorrect and very misleading.

UK Defence Journal
UK Defence Journal (@guest_361023)
7 years ago

Also, the “dozen” bit is nonsense too.

David Burrows
David Burrows (@guest_442756)
5 years ago

Wrong a f16 cost 80 million f35 cost 90 million and one f35 does the work of 3

Falcon Aurora
Falcon Aurora (@guest_361024)
7 years ago

really an truely any fighter can outperform the f-35 its airframe is not built for dogfight plus it only thrust vectors up an down that makes it alot harder for it to dogfight its role in air combat is recon nothing more

Mark Trundle
Mark Trundle (@guest_361027)
7 years ago

Do we really have to keep recycling old news all the time.? It was a test aircraft operating within set limits not free to run. Surely people can’t keep needing to be told all the time? Boring.

Glenda Davis
Glenda Davis (@guest_361030)
7 years ago

Agreed Mark seen this about a dozen times now real boring!

Francis Xavier Sowerby Thomas
7 years ago

It’s not a dogfighter, sure, but is that what we actually want?

George (@guest_361862)
7 years ago

The completed F-35 Lightening can be challenged only by the F-22 Raptor which might loose in a contest or even actual combat. No other fighter domestic or foreign comes even close to the fully equipped and deployed F-35. The advantage of the F-22 is that it is larger with greater range and speed using super cruise for speeds of Mach 1.5 (about 1200 miles per hour) to intercept the enemy. The vectored thrust for extreme maneuverability is IRREVALENT (not important) for the F-35 since it can fire missiles anywhere even to the rear without maneuvering or using radar but by… Read more »

George (@guest_361863)
7 years ago
Reply to  George

Additionally and by the way … the F-35’s primary mission is ground/sea attack missions not specifically air-to-air combat. It can be electronically linked to “everything” of friendly forces in the air, ground, and sea. It can even request and take control of friendly missiles to use as the F-35 pilot wants in combat just like the F-22 will do.

Jasprina37t (@guest_368637)
7 years ago Buying a new or used auto could be a hard method should you not know what you really are performing. By teaching yourself about auto store shopping prior to deciding to head to the car dealership, you possibly can make points easier on your own. The following advice will help the next buying trip be more enjoyable. Generally deliver a auto mechanic coupled when searching for a whole new automobile. Car merchants are well known for marketing lemons and you may not need to be their following target. Provided you can not get yourself a mechanic to think about… Read more »

CharlesNam (@guest_455888)
5 years ago

hOur company offers supreme quality non prescription products. Take a look at our health contributing website in case you want to improve your health. Our company provides a wide variety of non prescription drugs. Look at our health portal in case you want to strengthen your health with a help of generic supplements. Our site offers a wide variety of non prescription drugs. Look at our health portal in case you want to feel better with a help of health products. Our company offers a wide variety of non prescription drugs. Visit our health portal in case you want to… Read more »