Permali Gloucester Limited say it has been contracted by Leonardo Helicopters to supply a comprehensive ballistic protection solution for the Royal Navy’s new Commando Merlin Mk4 helicopters.

The requirement, valued at over £2 million, will create and sustain skilled composite manufacturing jobs at Permali’s factory in Gloucester, U.K.

The Commando Merlin is an advanced battlefield helicopter designed for amphibious operations, and will be tasked with delivering troops and supplies into conflict zones as well as supporting humanitarian operations.

“Permali’s ballistic solution will protect the crew and passengers against small arms fire. Following earlier work on the Merlin Mk2 & Mk3, as well as the previous Commando Sea King fleet, Permali worked closely with Leonardo Helicopters to define the requirement for the Mk4 and will supply a comprehensive package of ballistic protection panels, attachment hardware and custom storage cases.”

The new Commando Merlin provides a versatile lift capability with exceptional speed and range, and is also equipped with an advanced Defensive Aids Suite in addition to ballistic protection.

Image result for aw101 commando merlin mk4

The firm advises that this  project joins the wide range of ballistic armour solutions that Permali has supplied to armed forces and OEMs around the world for equipment operating in the Land, Sea and Air domains.

Permali’s Director of Special Projects, Nick Baird, said:

“We are delighted to continue our close relationship with Leonardo Helicopters, and are honoured to be entrusted with the protection of British military personnel. The majority of the UK’s Joint Helicopter Command aircraft rely on Permali’s composite ballistic protection expertise, including the Chinook, Puma and Merlin fleets.”

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

19 COMMENTS

        • Ha! Hi Lusty.

          No. That is the HM1’s, an altogether different shambles.

          This rant concerned the RAF versions and cuts to the RAF and FAA Support Helicopter Force.

          • Daniele,
            Our helicopter situation would’ve been a lot better had the fantastic Gordon Brown taken £1 Billion out of the rotor wing aircraft budget just before he left number 10. It is a bona fide fact that the RAF and RN fleet air arm have never recovered from that massive hit.. just another thing to thank him for…..

          • Correct Steve.

            To expand your point, the Puma and the FAA’s Sea King HC4’s were to be replaced with NEW helicopters ( not the “new” ones in this article )

            I alluded to Gordon below.

            Program was called SABR and around 40 were required. In itself the usual numbers drop as I recall the RN had around 33 HC4’s and the RAF 30 ish Pumas. ( Unsure of exact numbers )

            Instead, the Merlin goes to the RN, and the RAF is compensated with 14 Chinooks ( down from 22 )

            Love the Chinook myself ( and the Merlin ) but always numbers.

  1. According to Wiki the FAA has 55 Merlins in total. Does anyone know if these are the active air-frames or does it include those in storage?

    • That is the lot.

      30 Merlin ( of 44 ) were upgraded to HM2 standard and serve in 814, 820, 829 NAS, and 824 NAS as OCU. These are the ASW and Crowsnest cabs that operate on the QEC and in Ships Flights.

      25 Merlin ( Ex RAF, once 28, 6 of which were diverted from Denmark when Gordon Brown was caught with his pants down and wallet tucked away ) are those in the article and will furnish 845 and 846 NAS.

      Wow, if only the 55 were the active ones! The UK military is long, long gone from those sort of numbers for the moment.

      • As Lusty alluded to above there are / were also 8 additional HM1’s, reportedly striped for parts now, and I guess stored at Shawbury?

        Many had hoped they could form the nucleus of 849 NAS, as a dedicated ASCS unit saving the precious HM2’s for their main ASW task.

        Of the 55 how many are in the front line fleet in the squadrons or in forward or depth maintenance I do not know.

        • Pretty much what I outlined above, except I had the stored HM1’s at 8.

          Maybe someone can clarify? Think Lusty long ago mentioned they were no longer usable.

          • The above posts are pretty much spot on. The FAA currently has 55 Merlins, which includes those in maintenance, deployed, refit or in short term storage(to reduce airframe fatigue) but excludes airframes in ‘deep storage’.

            44 Merlins were originally ordered for the RN. Of this, 2 airframes were written off in accidents (that thankfully claimed no lives!) leaving a force of 42. 30 of those were converted to HM2 standard, with a contract option for an extra 8, which was never taken up. As far as I’m aware, those 8 are at MOD Boscombe Down. There were 3 airframes at Shawbury, though this has now been reduced to 2, with the other two at Kinloss and Yeovil. These airframes have been cannibalised.

            Of the ‘new’ Commando Merlin, well the ‘new’ strapline is government spin, of course. While it’s true that the airframes have been heavily rebuilt and modified, the more astute of us will remember them from their RAF days.

            Daniele has already stated that 22 were purchased, with 6 being yoinked from the Danes for a force of 28. Of this, only 25 are being converted, including all 6 of the Danish airframes. The other three are also at Boscombe Down. Two of these were involved in accidents (Afghan deployments), one of which was torn apart by our American friends during salvage. I suppose this is why these haven’t been upgraded.

            Regardless, the additional 8 HM1s in storage should be upgraded to HM2 standard as dedicated Crowsnest airframes for QE and POW. With only 30 ASW airframes, with between 5-8 of these now being asked to fulfill the Crowsnest role as well as their regular duties, we’re looking at a capability merger which shouldn’t happen. It’s worth noting that ALL HM2 airframes will be fitted with the capability to carry Crowsnest. I’d rather us spend the money on dedicated airframes.

            Only 10 Crowsnest kits have been ordered, but that should be enough for our needs in the short term.

          • I agree, the issue though is the amount of time it takes to re-role a Merlin equipped with Crowsnest back to ASW standard. Not forgetting all the testing required to make sure the kit works. Personally, I think the time taken will be too long, so at least 4 Merlins will be permanently roled for Crowsnest.

  2. £2 million for all that? Seems a bit cheap to me, it’s probably going to end up being a couple of standard issue body armour sets duck taped to the inside of the fuselage…..

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here