New estimates provided by the UK government have shed light on the extensive losses suffered by Russian military forces in Ukraine since February 2022.

The figures, disclosed in response to queries from John Healey MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Defence, outline a significant toll on Russian military capabilities.

British Estimates at a Glance:

  • Approximately 302,000 Russian military personnel killed or wounded.
  • Tens of thousands of Russian soldiers have deserted.
  • Over 7,117 Russian armoured vehicles destroyed.
  • Nearly 2,475 main battle tanks lost.
  • 93 fixed-wing aircraft downed.
  • 132 helicopters destroyed.
  • 320 unmanned aerial vehicles lost.
  • 16 naval vessels of all classes sunk or damaged.
  • Over 1,300 artillery systems of all types destroyed.

In response to Healey’s enquiry about the Russian military personnel losses, James Heappey, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, provided a stark assessment, stating, “We estimate that approximately 302,000 Russian military personnel have been killed or wounded, and tens of thousands more have already deserted since the start of the conflict.”

Healey also raised questions regarding the casualties among Russian private military companies (PMCs) involved in the conflict. Heappey noted the difficulty in obtaining accurate figures for PMC casualties, saying, “The number of personnel killed serving in Russian private military companies (PMCs) is not clear. Russia have utilised several PMCs and volunteer units in Ukraine to augment Russian military forces, but the deaths of personnel from these organisations are not reflected in Russian official military death tolls.”

Additionally, Healey sought details on the destruction of Russian military equipment.

In response, Heappey provided comprehensive figures, revealing, “We also estimate that over 7,117 Russian armoured vehicles, including nearly 2,475 main battle tanks, 93 fixed wing aircraft, 132 helicopters, 320 unmanned aerial vehicles, 16 naval vessels of all classes, and over 1,300 artillery systems of all types have been destroyed since the start of the conflict.”

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

131 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Micki
Micki
4 months ago

I believe nothing from Russian or Nato, all is propaganda, what is true is that Russians never expected so much resistance from Ukraine and that Russian army is not so powerful as it was estimated.

Andrew
Andrew
4 months ago
Reply to  Micki

I partially agree, Russian figures are completely unreliable, and can not be believed…. However Nato figures have a lot more authenticity to them… yes I have no doubt that some exaggeration has taken place, but overall you do have a free an independent press/journalists also operating here in the west, which allows for the estimates to be more closely examined.

Douglas Newell
Douglas Newell
4 months ago
Reply to  Andrew

NATO figures are filtered via Ukraine (which lies constantly) and dubious OSINT such as the discredited Oryx.

They all thought the Ukrainian Summer Offensive would be a walkover … and they got a shit-show that went nowhere.

All sides in war lie. WE shouldn’t be surprised by that.

Nick C
Nick C
4 months ago
Reply to  Micki

I think you are being unduly pessimistic about the data. The info from the Oryx website, posted below, rather confirms what the MOD is saying. And I have seen a video of a very pro Putin TV host saying that she had seen 285,000 obituary notices on the Russian social media. (Not sure who was counting!) If that figure is true then the MOD is under estimating. However, as is also posted below, the Kremlin cares not one jot for human life, and will continue throwing people at the Ukrainian trenches for as long as it takes. The only thing… Read more »

maurice10
maurice10
4 months ago
Reply to  Nick C

One thing is clear, video evidence I’ve seen on YouTube demonstrates the vulnerability of armour to modern weapons however, these figures will not stop Putin’s war. Russia has the resources to continue but will the people allow him to do so?

Damo
Damo
4 months ago
Reply to  Micki

Offensively I think you’re right. I think defensively we under estimated them (or over estimated Ukraine’s offensive capability). The Russians aren’t budging

Steve
Steve
4 months ago
Reply to  Damo

Russia has always said it’s forced were designed to defend and not attack, which maybe true after all. However attacking Ukraine clearly went against that. Unless something major happens this war is headed to stalemate, especially now that the west are losing interest in supplying Ukraine and Russia has no real external support.

The kremlin is clearly full of people with no care for human life Russian or ukrainian and you have to feel sorry for the average Russian solider that is just doing their job and has no desire to be there.

Gavin Gordon
Gavin Gordon
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve

If the West as a whole were truly losing interest in supporting Ukraine, rather than purely self-serving politicians, then it must be losing interest in its own continued survival. As we know, Ukraine is a Sovereign state essentially having to play Russia at chess whilst not being allowed to enter ‘black’s’ half of the board, effectively at our behest & ultimately on our behalf, to great personnel sacrifice. In the meantime, those Western nations that dominate arms manufacturing are experiencing a massive uplift in production and associated GDP, whilst further consolidating that market domination. In many respects, the principal suspects… Read more »

Steve
Steve
4 months ago
Reply to  Gavin Gordon

Unfortunately the western world has always followed the US when it comes to Ukriane and their political focus has shifted to Israel. European countries including the UK have never acted alone on this war and now that Russia isn’t a threat to nato their focus has moved to domestic issues. After all when was the last time we saw sunak pop up in Ukraine or any other western leader for that matter. With the west not having a skin in the game their interests have waned. Not helped by Ukraine failed offensive, which would have helped justify the need for… Read more »

Gavin Gordon
Gavin Gordon
4 months ago
Reply to  Steve

Well, ‘luckily’ we’ll not have to wait beyond 2024 to get a longer term pointer upon the extent to which ‘our’ politicians stop Partying (in every sense – it’s nearly Xmas) and start taking existential security decisions on behalf of their electorates. Using recent UK past performance, I was disappointed when Sunak failed the first litmus test on Defence Secretary. Not sure why the effective Wallace left, but the replacement could have been practically anyone* but Shapps. I also thought Foreign Sec. was going fairly well, but apparently we need DC – evidently ‘credible’; though last I recall he was… Read more »

Peter tattersll
Peter tattersll
4 months ago
Reply to  Damo

Russia a 2 nd division military at very best had Ukraine been given long-range weapons and F16early on I believe Ukraine would have won within the first 2 months

Wasp snorter
Wasp snorter
4 months ago
Reply to  Micki

Open source data and independent sources back up most of these losses. Although you never will get your finger on all the truth, it’s bollox to compare the very obvious lies from Russia to NATO, of which can be scrutinised by free western press. Russia is not in direct war with NATO and there is no ‘NATO’ propaganda. is the BBC also NATO propaganda then? Let’s go back to the beginning, NATO said Russia would invade and gave evidence, Russia called it ‘western hysteria’ and denied it, then a few weeks later launched the biggest land invasion of a neighbour… Read more »

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
4 months ago
Reply to  Micki

By any objective assessment this war has been reckless and unnecessary. Statistics are no way to evaluate the real cost, particularly as the necessity of Putin’s intentions were so flimsy and self serving. Russia leave alone Ukraine and its neighbours would be better off in all parameters had this senseless adventure not been undertaken. Civilian losses are ignored. That I find disgusting.

DaveyB
DaveyB
4 months ago
Reply to  Barry Larking

Sadly Western liberal sensibilities don’t hold water in Russia. If they did you wouldn’t have autocratic regimes being constantly in power, with so called elected Presidents holding onto power for so long. The Russian special military operation has spectacularly failed. From my understanding, one of the key reasons for the invasion was to prevent Ukraine from getting influence from the West. But also to stop Ukraine from applying for NATO membership. Thereby maintain a buffer between it and NATO. Due to Russia’s actions both Finland and soon to be Sweden will be joining the club. Plus the Baltic States have… Read more »

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
4 months ago
Reply to  DaveyB

I agree with all of what you have written; indeed I have written similar elsewhere. A fragmenting Russia is not in anyones interests; anyone who can think that is.

Blessed
Blessed
4 months ago

I do hope JohninMK wasn’t among them. I miss him

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
4 months ago
Reply to  Blessed

I heard that he had been assassinated while on a trip to Moscow, apparently he fell out of a hotel window

John Hartley
John Hartley
4 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

Only after a cup of tea.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
4 months ago
Reply to  John Hartley

Wasn’t he recently on a flight heading North out of Moscow that mysteriously crashed after being the victim of an explosive mechanical failure affecting both its wings at the same time?
RIP Johnski, we miss your moronic lies and utter incompetence.

WSM
WSM
4 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

You’re all way off the mark – Comrade John has been relocated to nearby Bletchley by his superiors as they’ve just learnt that there is a British Intelligence facility nearby

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
4 months ago
Reply to  John Hartley

Ummm… Darjeeling w/ a soupcon of Pollonium?

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
4 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

Multiple times?

UKRAINAPOLIS
UKRAINAPOLIS
4 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

The only person confirmed pushed though the window to his death by Putin

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
4 months ago
Reply to  Blessed

Me too. The ‘Airborne Correspondence’ were very nearly the cause of my being carried off to hospital from laughing too hard. Relief from contemplating a frightful situation for Ukraine’s people.

Last edited 4 months ago by Barry Larking
John Hartley
John Hartley
4 months ago

I watched that Dispatches TV prog on lost Russian fighters. There was one guy who went from cemetery to cemetery, photographing graves of recently buried soldiers & putting them on his website. It was often the only way families discovered where their relative was buried. He said he found on average 45% more soldier graves than the Russian MoD admitted to. He was accused of being un-patriotic & had to flee Russia.

monkey spanker
monkey spanker
4 months ago
Reply to  John Hartley

There is a channel on YouTube called 1420 by Daniel. He goes out and talks to ordinary Russians around Russia about the special military operation, putin, politics, west, nato etc.
the answers given are broad in scope. Quite a few take the stance I’m not interested in politics, can’t speak freely so don’t answer anything. Some can see it’s all nonsense and some are ardent supporters of everything.
Some of the stuff they answer is straight out of propaganda 101.

John Hartley
John Hartley
4 months ago
Reply to  monkey spanker

Yes, I have seen some of the 1420 posts. Some Russians claim to be not interested in politics, but when pushed, know far more than they first let on. Young people have VPN to see foreign news. Russian troops have phoned home from the front line, telling their families not to believe TV propaganda.

Andrew D
Andrew D
4 months ago

IF these figures are true and the deserters been in thousands and yet there fight on. Really find hard to unstand how Putin keeps is grip on is people ,what does it take to get rid 🙄

John Clark
John Clark
4 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

It’s the Russian mentality unfortunately Andrew. Top down leadership, with a boot on the peasants neck. It’s how it’s always been from the Tsar to the Communist elite, fear, totally controlled media and violence keeps the masses complient and doing what they are told. If it takes a million dead for Putin to save face, then one million dead it is, the leadership won’t give it a second thought, or loose a winks sleep over it. The complient masses do exactly as they are told, pop on a uniform, pick up an AK74 from the pile and march into the… Read more »

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
4 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

Hmmm…liberals are casual w/ others’ money, autocrats/dictators are casual w/ others’ lives…Is there a hybrid, a liberal dictator? 🤔😳😱

Jonathan
Jonathan
4 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Give it 5 years and I suspect Donald trump will give it a go if he gets to become the next US president..he has apparently already mentioned he would like a bill to repeal the 22nd amendment..so watch this space you could end up having a never ending president..

Nathan
Nathan
4 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

The US is heading there already. The FBI, DoJ and IRS are already weaponised against enemies of the narrative. You start opposing the narrative and suddenly 30 heavily armed FBI agents will “knock” on your door. If you’re business you’ll get investigated by the IRS. If you’re a charity you’re suddenly taxed like a business. If you’re a Clinton or a Biden and you mishandle classified information at home, nothing in fact they invent new ways to escape accountability. If you’re a Trump they throw the book at you. If you’re a church during lock down you can’t hold outdoor,… Read more »

Nathan
Nathan
4 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

We’re already heading into liberal dictatorship. Try going to certain places in Poole and Dorset and praying silently in your mind dispassionately in the evening. You’ll quickly discover your freedom of conscience doesn’t exist there.

Gareth
Gareth
4 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

His grip is maintained by obscuring the true casualty figures and intimidating anyone who speaks openly about them into silence or labelling them as unpatriotic. Remember near the start of the invasion the Russians deployed rather grisly ‘cremation lorries’ with, presumably, the intention of removing any physical evidence of losses. Horrible really.

There’s also probably some piddling law or two that the Kremlin has passed against speaking out publicly on these issues too, so chances are one would face a kangaroo court in addition to the above.

Last edited 4 months ago by Gareth
DaveyB
DaveyB
4 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

Better the devil you know, may be a key factor here! If Putin does get shoved, who steps into his shoes?

There was a Channel 4 documentary not so long back looking at this very question. Those that have the power, are either on the same level as Putin or complicit with the Mafia. So for the masses, nothing is likely to change. However, for the War in Ukraine it will likely get worse, as they may bring in proper conscription. Rather than just the yearly intake they currently have.

Mark F
Mark F
4 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

AndrewD, Send in John Wick, sure he could persuade him to call it a day ( wishful thinking😉🤣)

Andrew D
Andrew D
4 months ago
Reply to  Mark F

🤗 like it ,sons favourite film . 👍

monkey spanker
monkey spanker
4 months ago
Reply to  Andrew D

It takes a lot of organising to try and get rid of a president and his government. Russia is good at stomping out any opposition before it gets to much traction.

Graham Moore
Graham Moore
4 months ago

When I was serving it was reckoned that a unit was not combat effective with 30% casualties. Must be true aggregated at the broader level – ie valid for the whole of a deployed army.

Posse Comitatus
Posse Comitatus
4 months ago

No battle plan survives first contact……

Or , The dildo of consequence rarely arrives lubed…..

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
4 months ago

🤣😂 Had not previously seen second formulation. Copywrited?

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

I’ve seen Ukranian FPV drones with front mounted Dildo’s that are have that slogan written on them.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
4 months ago
Reply to  Dern

👍

Dokis
Dokis
4 months ago
Reply to  Dern

I think the original comes from X Darth Putin account (which is great indeed)

Gareth
Gareth
4 months ago

‘nearly 2475 main battle tanks’…? So it’s 2474 then?

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
4 months ago
Reply to  Gareth

The Oryx website only posts data on Russian armour losses that have been confirmed with geolocated pics or video. Today, its:

Tanks 2485, of which destroyed: 1628, damaged: 140, abandoned: 167, captured: 550
A sobering observation when the Army only has about 250 Challys

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
4 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd
mark one
mark one
4 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

Indeed and even more so when we only have 77 thousand soldiers.

Andrew D
Andrew D
4 months ago
Reply to  mark one

IT is a worry 😕

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  mark one

The counterpoint is the British Army is not going to unilaterally invade a country on it’s own on three axes, with several hundred thousand soldiers.

Last edited 4 months ago by Dern
mark one
mark one
4 months ago
Reply to  Dern

Well that’s comforting.😄

UKRAINAPOLIS
UKRAINAPOLIS
4 months ago
Reply to  mark one

and of course Putin is fighting the war of aggression in Ukraine with North Korea and Iran. The UK will fight with more than 30 countries

Animal
Animal
4 months ago
Reply to  UKRAINAPOLIS

Like we did in 1982 !

Bringer of facts
Bringer of facts
4 months ago

If the Russian command had any common sense they would give up and withdraw.

But you have to admit they seem to have resilience, reserves, and resources, they still do not seem to be running out of ammo or equipment.

Currently, this has not been a good month for the Ukraine. Russia is on the offensive near Adiivka, Lupiansk and today they are advancing from Bakmut
making small gains but still losing lots of men and equipment.

Phil C
Phil C
4 months ago

I think that Putin will be fairly happy with how it’s going. He cares not about how many Russians die, but he will be delighted by the increasing sense of fatigue and distraction in the West. He certainly won’t get everything he wanted, but he will not lose. Whatever isn’t going well for Russia, they are clearly not running out of arms, men or cash and another two or three years of this will be fine with Putin. He’s still flogging arms and energy to India and China (and Nuclear plants to NATO’s Hungary who are doing all they can… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
4 months ago

Or are the Ukrainians letting Russia use up men and materiel in a meat grinder.

Then the Ukrainians can push through the weakened and exhausted Russian lines?

Particularly when the F16s arrive and Russia will lose what fast air domain it has.

Bringer of facts
Bringer of facts
4 months ago

IMHO Russia is trying to overwhelm the Ukrainian defences by using attrition tactics.

Russia knows it has access to more resources than Ukraine and can quickly resupply from China, Iran and North Korea.

And given some countries in the West are now starting to hesitate about giving more funding, weapons, and ordinance to Ukraine, it is a tactic that will very likely work in Russia’s favour.

Last edited 4 months ago by Bringer of facts
Mr Bell
Mr Bell
4 months ago

The F16s are not going to turn the tide of war, I think only 5th gen stealth jets would do that. The Russian’s have lost enough high performance jets over the battlefield in Ukraine to reduce the number of sorties down and strive to preserve what they have left. They are fighting with one arm tied behind their backs as they need enough first line jets left to face off against NATO and/or China or any other power. The performance of the Russian Airforce has been similar to their Army and Navy, utterly rubbish. The air force numbering several thousand… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
4 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

I disagree.

Ukraine has done a fair job with its tiny airforce.

F16 with modern(ish) weapons would wipe out S300 and S400 batteries.

That changes the dynamics and they can then be used for high level GPS and laser guided bombing runs which makes up for the small supply of missiles.

TBH I hope that Ukraine has held back Storm Shadow and Scalp so that they can use those to suppress when the F16s arrive.

I think Ukraine can then control fast air and naval domains totally.

UKRAINAPOLIS
UKRAINAPOLIS
4 months ago

Totally agree. They will also need aerial refueling platforms-which will allow then to attack the Russian navy and heavy bombers out in the oceans

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
4 months ago
Reply to  UKRAINAPOLIS

The Ukrainians already control the near waters? I don’t see Ukraine needing, getting or wanting AAR. They would be better off with missiles / drones. Launching missiles from the F16 extends the range both from the launch location and from the imparted launch velocity. I suspect they will be given a stack of older air launch Harpoons etc that they will modify to Neptune / Harpoonski standards. Given that the Ukrainians already gave good technical skills and success I’d be optimistic of their success. But they don’t need more naval success they need to supply ground operations with loads if… Read more »

monkey spanker
monkey spanker
4 months ago

Not sure if storm shadow is a bit heavy for the F16. Hopefully they can keep the su24 going as a cruise missile launcher.
What the F16 will hopefully be good for will be hitting incoming missiles, putting off Russian aircraft, anti ship missile launches.
Really hope the training pipeline and jet supply can be kept going for the duration. New jets will be needed with new pilots.

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
4 months ago
Reply to  monkey spanker

I’m sure they will launch Storm Shadow from Su24.

I think it is the smart bombing that is going to do the trick as there is a bigger NATO inventory of guided munitions that are F16 compatible as well as versions of Sidewinder that would still be perfectly effective against the Russian airforce scrap heap challenge.

Paul T
Paul T
4 months ago

Don’t NATO Smart Weapons work best when the Aircraft is at altitude?.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
4 months ago

Concur. If NATO collectively provides a sufficient number of F-16s, including attritional reserves, ancillary support and especially if brought up to F-16V standard (Block 70/72), UKR will have a formidable weapon system. Paired w/ numerous, cost-effective JDAMs in various configs, and after Orcs’ Pole-21 jammers suppressed/eliminated, it will be the start of open-season hunting on Orcs. Some probably do not realize proficient pilots can shack these bombs, all-weather, 24/7/365. Don’t care how professional and disciplined the opposition, the continuing prospect of 500 to 2000 lb of HE being shoved where the sun doesn’t shine would tend to be mildly disheartening.… Read more »

monkey spanker
monkey spanker
4 months ago

Russia won’t give up without a change in leadership or some way of saving face.
To be able to say the special operation is complete and we accomplished the goals of: liberating this Donbas? Land bridge to crimea?
The west need to up the game and get war production up and running quickly. This is not the time to be slowing support. Why this isn’t happening faster I am at loss to answer.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
4 months ago
Reply to  monkey spanker

Our war industries , unlike Russia’s I guess have not gone into full war production mode. Not has the entirety of NATO rearmed. Why should we? We already have 2 million professional military forces in NATO Vs Russia’s military which has probably lost the cream of its professional military already fighting in Ukraine. Our lack of rearmament and defence investment is a political decision. By my estimate the MOD needs a £45-50 billion cash injection to sort out the rot, return some semblance of attritional reserve, close some capability gaps that should never have been allowed to occur and bring… Read more »

monkey spanker
monkey spanker
4 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Why should we be increasing war material production? Because we are supporting Ukraine and must do the best we can to provide them with what they need. Millions of artillery rounds and guns are needed. Millions of all other types of ammo, loads of SAMs, thousands of vehicles and so on. We should be making new equipment for Ukraine and helping them to make their own equipment in Ukraine. Providing what they need until Russia stops attacking.
If we aren’t going to supply Ukraine properly why bother at all

Tom
Tom
4 months ago

I wonder what the Ukrainian figures are?

Tom
Tom
4 months ago
Reply to  Tom

Thanks John… I’d thought that Ukraine had a similar size army, however (as I’d said to some back in March) the Russians were always going to have a massive advantage, with their population size, and attrition rate.

Andrew D
Andrew D
4 months ago
Reply to  Tom

That’s is Too Trump

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  Tom

Ukraine’s population is about 33 million, Russias is 140 million. While there is a big difference there, it’s not an insurmountable one. Anyway the US is estimating about 70,000 ZSU dead, even if it’s higher than that Ukraine has the bodies to replace them, it’s probably more of a question of training pipelines rather than raw number of people.

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
4 months ago
Reply to  Dern

Perhaps a significant, if not gross simplification, but in a war of attrition, w/ both sides suffering significant casualties, concerned UKR will exhaust reserves before Mad Vlad depletes supply of Orcs. Does this not parallel the Allies’ experience during WW I? Infusion of massive amounts of NATO war materiel would be beneficial, but frankly uncertain whether NATO collectively has the political will to bear the economic costs of indefinite duration warfare. The official NATO position is that UKR negotiates solely on own behalf, but will that remain the case if ME conflict expands, and especially, if scumbag ChiComs simultaneously invade… Read more »

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Depends on how you are defining reserves. And kind of what I meant about the training pipeline. If your definition of Ukraine’s reserves becoming exhausted means “The number of combat ready troops they have is no longer sufficient.” Then yes, that is a threat for sure. But if by reserves you mean “Adult (mostly) Male population” then they’re not going to run out: Neither side is inflicting casualties on a scale that will cause a breakdown due to lack of phyiscally present adults who could fight. To use your World War 1 comparison: Ukraine has lost less people in 21months… Read more »

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
4 months ago
Reply to  Dern

The former, as your previous text stated. British Army has done a yeoman’s job providing an abbreviated training regimen for UKR personnel, but less than certain it is sufficient for demands of modern battlefield. Presume the time required to train combat ready troops is at least a multi-month proposition (or longer). 🤔

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

Yes, it’s one of the reasons I get annoyed with (usually pro-Russian) accounts describing the new Ukranian Brigades as “NATO trained” or “NATO Standard.” The UK’s training program for Ukranian soldiers is 5 weeks long from start to finish. By comparison the training period for a normal infantry soldier in the British Army is about 32 weeks, and when they arrive in unit they’re considered as “needing babysitting” for most of their first year. Specialist skills are even longer, Combat Medics from start of Phase 1 (basic) to arrival in unit is 40 weeks (and then they have to return… Read more »

Last edited 4 months ago by Dern
John Clark
John Clark
4 months ago
Reply to  Dern

I take your point Dern, but let’s perhaps not be so cold about it and pause to remember these 70,000 + dead are someone’s loved one. Each loss touches hundreds of people in one way or another.

They can replace the fallen and persist, yes, but the cost in life when this terrible slaughter eventually ends is going to be biblical, like the world wars, there won’t be a single Ukrainian village or hamlet that hasn’t lost a son or father in the fight.

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

True, but unfortunately when discussing what resources the Ukrainians have, Human capital has to kind of be viewed in a rather cold light.

John Clark
John Clark
4 months ago
Reply to  Dern

I guess so, I just think we should pause occasionally to acknowledge the human cost.

It’s getting decidedly WW1 on some fronts, with Russians pushing human wave after wave into the meat grinder…..

Absolute insanity, Russia is most definitely gambling on Ukraine loosing Western support before Mother Russia runs out of fighting age males….

When conscripts turn up at the front line with 40 + year old AKM’s drawn from stor, instead of AK74’s, you know it’s getting bad

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
4 months ago
Reply to  Dern

At the very start of the war 500,000 Ukrainians signed up and joined their military. The Ukrainian army must have suffered at least 200,000 dead and wounded by now and therefore they will be seeing a developing manpower issue, conscription within Ukraine should offset these loses up to a certain point but the longer the war goes on, as Putin knows, the greater the clamour for a negotiated settlement from supporting allied countries like Germany, France, Italy, and to a lesser extent UK, Poland and USA. The tiping point will be a Trump presidency. Will Trump continue to support Ukraine?… Read more »

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

IIRC the last Casualty (Wounded + Dead) estimate from the US was just shy of 200,000, true. Although that doesn’t allow for those that can be returned to the force. But as you said, the issue will be political pressure, equipment, and training pipelines, not the actual number of Ukranians (it also won’t be the number of russian dead that will determine the war on the other side, unless those Russian dead start piling up on the doors of Moscows middle classes, which might change the mood, but even then it’ll be appetite for casualties, not physical bodies present. For… Read more »

Paul T
Paul T
4 months ago
Reply to  Tom

Ukrainian casualties are never reported, for whatever reason that is a bit Strange.

Tom
Tom
4 months ago
Reply to  Paul T

Or we just don’t get to see those reports here in the UK? I found out long ago, that if you want to know what’s going on in the UK, read an American newspaper.

Paul T
Paul T
4 months ago
Reply to  Tom

Oh yeah – the information is available you just have to know where to find it.

Paul T
Paul T
4 months ago
Reply to  Tom

+1

Joe16
Joe16
4 months ago

The willingness of Russia to take casualties is hard to get one’s head around, but the evidence of it is plain to see. I have to assume that they’re still recruiting heavily from prisons, but likely straight into the army rather than Wagner or a similar PMC, because they seem to have a ready-ish supply of people to throw at Ukrainian lines. The delivery of artillery ammunition from North Korea is problematic too- even if it suffers from high dud rates. We should remember that it took two Chechen wars for Russia to get more or less what they wanted… Read more »

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
4 months ago
Reply to  Joe16

Agree, well written summary of events. The West needs to be prepared to sustain the Ukraine war effort long-term. Probably at least 2-3 more years. Our military industrial base has to be able to manufacture war material at vast bulk and to a cost effective price point so ammo, first aide kit, uniforms, helmets, armour, drones, boots, tentage, everything a military needs to stay in the fight. I’d like to see a European NATO response whereby a list of requirements is drawn up and the whole of Europe agrees to manufacture supplies to meet those requirements. Instead we have had… Read more »

pete
4 months ago
Reply to  Joe16

The death rate is damaging the future of Russia due to its low birth rate of 1.5 , it will speed up the countries decline !

Luke Rogers
Luke Rogers
4 months ago

Does Heappey have no self awareness? That would be the loss of the entire British forces 4x over or more and they are still fighting and if we are honest, winning and growing in capability. The UK government would not have survived a tenth of that politically.

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  Luke Rogers

I’m really not sure the Russian’s can be described as winning. They failed to take Kyiv, they failed to take Odessa, couldn’t take Mykolaiv, the sieges of Sumi and Chernihiv where lifted, the Kharkiv offensive drove the Russians back and took a huge amount of their equipment, Kherson was taken back, meanwhile, after the initial surprise, the Russians barely took Severdonetsk and Bakhmut, two very small advance.

At present it seems like the Russians are busy smashing their foreheads bloody at Avdivka, while the ZSU Marines are happily crossing the Dnipro.

Netking
Netking
4 months ago
Reply to  Luke Rogers

Winning?

3 day operation going into it’s 2nd year. Lost a significant portion of your fighting force and it’s most experienced soldiers. Having to be going hat in hand to Iran and North Korea for weapons. Having your supposedly super weapons be exposed as cheap knock off of western weapons. Hundreds of thousands of your working age population flee the country. Watching your military slowly get worn out by your biggest rival for just 5% of the US yearly military budget.…….this list goes on and on and on.

“Winning”

Luke Rogers
Luke Rogers
4 months ago
Reply to  Netking

“Your” lol.
“My” nations forces were halved and hollowed out by “my” government from 1991 until now and it continues apace. Thousands of “my” vulnerable children get groomed by foreign invaders that are entering “my” country at the rate of a million a year.
Do I feel like I’m winning? No.

monkey spanker
monkey spanker
4 months ago
Reply to  Luke Rogers

In an Ukraine situation the whole country would be mobilised. With MP’s and tories dodging service or becoming officers far from the fighting. Does the U.K. have a million SLRs and other guns sitting for them all is anyone’s guess.

Luke Rogers
Luke Rogers
4 months ago
Reply to  monkey spanker

NATO can’t fight land wars without air supremacy, and the RAF is so small now we wouldn’t have it. Still with our Tiger 2, sorry, Chally 2 wünderwaffe killing their tanks at 10-1 we will all be rolling about laughing when they activate T64s. They won’t stand a chance against the hundreds of CR1 and Chieftains we will bring out of storage…and the tank production facilities in Leeds and Newcastle will definitely be churning out new kit won’t it? Op Bagration plays out the same way no matter how many times you watch the movie. A major land war in… Read more »

Jon
Jon
4 months ago

“Killed or wounded…”, a pointless statistic! Summating someone who has twisted an ankle and has suffered a few cuts and bruises with someone blown into strawberry jam just gives a meaningless number, from which we can draw no conclusions.

mark one
mark one
4 months ago
Reply to  Jon

Not really…. Cut’s and bruises and twisted ankles are not going to included in the Intel statistical fact gathering data.

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  Jon

It’s a meaningful number, it’s how many people have been taken out of combat.

David Barry
David Barry
4 months ago

Good.

The only good Russian is a combat ineffective one…

500 captured tanks is an astonishing figure:
Circa twice the size of Chally 3 numbers;
And +/- 2 Armoured Divisions.

Does that not focus the minds of both political parties?

mark one
mark one
4 months ago
Reply to  David Barry

Doubt it….. An Election is on it’s way.

RobW
RobW
4 months ago

It is oddly impressive that they are still able to fight given their losses. Utterly crazy stats.

Mark F
Mark F
4 months ago
Reply to  RobW

RobW, Also to be concidered is that winter is on the doorstep soon, that may slow things down, although saying that, Folk from those parts of the world are quite hardy ! Just that machinery does not like there kind of temps ! Winter there is harsh at best !🤔

Gavin Gordon
Gavin Gordon
4 months ago
Reply to  Mark F

Waiting to see what precision-fires on long supply lines does to winter trench warfare. Presumably down to West maintaining interest, not capability.

DaveyB
DaveyB
4 months ago

What the personnel and materiel losses do show, is how slowly Russia learns from bitter experience. They keep on trying the same tactics and get repelled every time. Before they even consider changing the narrative. It’s almost like their front line Officers don’t or aren’t allowed to use their initiative. Which is a very Soviet era mentality. Ukraine is between a rock and a hard place. Due to the slow delivery and training using Western equipment. This gave Russia the breathing space to build layered defenses. In particular the laying of vast minefields. Which meant it was an absolute slog… Read more »

farouk
farouk
4 months ago
Reply to  DaveyB

I’ve been most intrigued by the rise in tempo of Russian attacks of late and as we have seen a huge rise in causalities and that got me asking the question why? So, a little digging reveal that the next presidential elections in Russia is set for March 2024. So, we are looking at 4 months. Putin knows that if he goes into the election with the war inside Ukraine still ongoing, no matter how much he blames the West, he knows his just a few days special operation inside the Ukraine is going to act like a mill stone around… Read more »

Dern
Dern
4 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Doesn’t help when you can’t stop the Ukraninan Marines coming over the Dnipro either.

Nevis
Nevis
4 months ago
Reply to  Dern

The Ukrainians are asking for operational silence on that front. A big push could be about to commence 🤞

Barry Larking
Barry Larking
4 months ago
Reply to  farouk

The grown up just entered the room. If it is stalemate Russia loses. Ukraine ‘wins’ by not losing. Putin can wreck Ukraine but never hope to conquer it.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
4 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Mad Vlad wont worry about an “election” in his banana republic because he knows and engineers the outcome before anyone is allowed to cast a vote. Russia is not a democracy and Putin has about as much risk of being voted out as I have of winning the Euromillions so thats a 1 in 42 million chance.

farouk
farouk
4 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Mr B wrote: “”Mad Vlad wont worry about an “election” in his banana republic because he knows and engineers the outcome before anyone is allowed to cast a vote.”” That is true, but whilst he can engineer an outcome to his liking, he can’t do the same for public opinion and for a self-styled narcissist egomaniac that is what really counts, plus there’s the added fact that from small acorns do oak trees grow. Saddam, Gadiffi, Saleh, Assad, Mubarak, Barre, al-Bashir were all dictators with absolute power and yet all faced the wrath of public opinion, of which they cared… Read more »

DaveyB
DaveyB
4 months ago
Reply to  farouk

Yeah, I saw that about the elections as well. It will likely mean, Russia’s forces will be doing their utmost, for more advances and try to gain more territory leading up to the elections. Trying to show the populace that Russia is still in the game and making progress. But it will be another Bahkmut, except without the assistance of Wagner. Ukraine has shown that it can easily trade space for Russian Lives and materiel. It was said that Russia had as many as 10,000 MBTs, with approximately 7000 or more of those in storage. Russia must be burning through… Read more »

Supportive Bloke
Supportive Bloke
4 months ago
Reply to  DaveyB

“ Su30/35s”

I don’t think they really can make them now – maybe at all.

The would have to reverse the designs to remove all of foreign bits that started to creep in.

So guard that dishwasher…..it might be Mad Vlad’s only hope!

The next problem is that all the specialist metallurgy was always done in Ukraine….

As I’ve speculated before the Ukrainian invasion was about seizing those capabilities back.

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
4 months ago

Drones have clearly had a very big impact, it will be interesting to see how we impliment them into our armed forces and in what numbers. Analysis: Ukraine has ‘turned conventional warfare on its head’Despite Ukraine not having a navy, it is continually “hammering away” at Russia’s – one of the largest navies in the world – and succeeding, military analyst Sean Bell has said. One of the most recent successes for Ukrainian troops has been the targeting of another Russian calibre missile corvette. Enough damage has been done to leave the ship unusable for the foreseeable future, Bell said, speaking on… Read more »

Ross
Ross
4 months ago

So I think it’s worth disecting these figures, noting that this is ‘killed and wounded’, and that these figures are extremely likely to be inflated. So let’s call it 250,000. If you make a rough assumption of a 3/1 ratio between injured/killed. That comes to about 62,500-65,000 KIA a figure which is still much higher than the 35,000 estimated by Mediazona. But we have at least ballpark figures between 35k (very low end) to perhaps more like 65k+ in my rough view. I do note the comments around loss of interest by many nations, I somewhat disagree. I think there’s… Read more »

Geoff Roach
Geoff Roach
4 months ago

Very sad that all these young people should be put to death for one man’s demented view of his own importance.

mark one
mark one
4 months ago
Reply to  Geoff Roach

“Again”…… History repeats itself.

Donald Allan MacColl
Donald Allan MacColl
4 months ago
Reply to  mark one

History never repeats itself, it ryhmes.

Ajith
Ajith
4 months ago

Those figures might be correct, then how on earth Russia still fighting on the line? Instead Ukraine would have overrun entire Russia by now!

Mark F
Mark F
4 months ago

I say ‘ say it like it is,or not at all’, i have something to say ! This is by no means a dig at those who serve, but those who wield the whip ! When a country goes to war with another it is at the behest of the man/woman in power and advisors. (What say in the matter do the people of that country have ?) A soilder is there to serve by choice or in some countrys by force, who do they serve, the people of said country or the person/persons in power over them. To take… Read more »

DaveyB
DaveyB
4 months ago
Reply to  Mark F

Hi Mark, Human nature is very difficult to change. Genetics have a large part to play, that goes all the way back to our ape ancestors. Where they struggled for food, but also the rights for breeding. A lot of human desires are based around these instincts, for not only surviving but producing offspring. Which inevitably leads to conflict, as others with a similar requirement are trying the same. As there is a need to control and maintain your resources, but denying it to others who will exploit for their own needs. Perhaps an overly simplistic analysis, but sadly true.… Read more »

Mark F
Mark F
4 months ago
Reply to  DaveyB

DaveyB, I understand your example..i will say no more on the subject, ‘Least we forget’ with respect thank you for your service.

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
4 months ago

The estimable Forces News YouTube channel has posted a very interesting vid of Ajax being tested last month on Salisbury Plain by the Household Cavalry Regiment

Some very positive comments from officers and men of the Blues and Royals about reliability, capability etc with no injuries being reported. Its well worth a look but due to links being moderated, i’m going to post the link underneath

Youtube – Forces News – Rare access to British Army’s monster new battlefield vehicle

David Lloyd
David Lloyd
4 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd
David Lloyd
David Lloyd
4 months ago
Reply to  David Lloyd

As I suspected, the youtube link has indeed been moderated, but anybody interested should be able to find it using the data in the first post

Last edited 4 months ago by David Lloyd
Uninformed Civvy Lurker
Uninformed Civvy Lurker
4 months ago

At the risk of being lambasted for suggesting that both parties are likely to need to concede land in the end. Does the panel believe ? A. Russia will eventually need to withdraw to pre-2022 invasion borders ? B. Ukraine will need to concede territory lost since the invasion, but not as much as they initially lost – but concede that Russia has created a land bridge to Crimea and captured more of the Donbas than they had. C. Ukraine can recapture the land lost and take Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk and push Russia back to pre-2014 borders. D. Russia… Read more »

Last edited 4 months ago by Uninformed Civvy Lurker
Paul T
Paul T
4 months ago

Interesting points – perhaps George could turn your post into a Poll.? 😋

The Artist Formerly Known As Los Pollos Chicken
The Artist Formerly Known As Los Pollos Chicken
4 months ago

It’s utterly amazing our defence intelligence can confidently come up with a number for Russia without any issue however what is more telling is they can’t or won’t more likely come up with a number of Ukrainian casualties? . After all Ukraine is a close ally ,the west is funding and directing the Ukrainian war effort so it’s laughable they.can’t let Joe public know the figures yet entirely predictable. Government estimates on everything are always wrong the previous track record on everything down the ages is there in black and white for all to see. Why this one will be… Read more »

Paul T
Paul T
4 months ago

I think we are both reading from the same page Mr Los Pollos,in the not too distant future i think Egg will be very popular here 👍

The Artist Formerly Known As Los Pollos Chicken
The Artist Formerly Known As Los Pollos Chicken
4 months ago
Reply to  Paul T

Indeed sir , as the UKDJ posters most prominent critic of this war & premier Artiste I believe none of the cheer leaders of Ukraine in here ever come back and provide the evidence for anything contrary to what I point out about the lack of success or progress on the failed CO or war in general ( some good lads though who are perfectly sane and I enjoy their posts on other matters😉) however that said bottom line this war stinks ,we shouldn’t be involved , U.K. military needs come 1st & Ukraine is the most corrupt nation in… Read more »

monkey spanker
monkey spanker
4 months ago

Main thing is giving Ukraine everything it needs To succeed.
Asraam production should be kept going
to keep them supplied along with everything else the U.K. can make and source to help. While the U.K. does supply some it needs to do much more.

marc
marc
4 months ago

All propaganda.