The House of Lords recently debated the United Kingdom’s air defence capabilities, focusing on the need to modernise and address emerging threats.

Baroness Goldie led the discussion, emphasising the urgency of enhancing air defence systems, particularly given lessons from the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The Minister of State at the Ministry of Defence, Lord Coaker, outlined current efforts to bolster air defence, highlighting advancements in technology and international collaboration.

“The UK continuously reviews our integrated air and missile defence requirements to ensure that we are adequately defended against the evolving threats that we face,” he explained. He pointed to investments in new technologies such as the DragonFire directed energy weapon, which aims to counter drones, and upgrades to the Type 45 destroyer’s Sea Viper missile system, designed to defend against ballistic missiles.

These measures, he said, would be further developed in alignment with the forthcoming Strategic Defence Review (SDR). Baroness Goldie, however, raised concerns about the Government’s pace of action.

“Recent very public concerns about our air defence capabilities have been amplified by our European and NATO partners,” she stated, referencing the significant impact of air defence systems in Ukraine, where “12,000 missiles have been fired…showing the importance of air defence now.” Baroness Goldie called for immediate reassurance rather than awaiting the SDR’s publication. She urged the Minister to provide a comprehensive update on the current status and modernisation plans, suggesting that the information be shared with the House for wider scrutiny.

Lord Coaker acknowledged the validity of these concerns and agreed to write to the Baroness, promising to include “a stocktake of where we are” and to “put a copy in the Library, so that the information is available to all Members of this House.” He also highlighted ongoing efforts, including the development of ORCUS anti-drone technology to protect airfields and the DIAMOND initiative, a collaborative European project for a ground-based air missile defence system.

The debate also touched on past criticisms of the UK’s air defence readiness. Lord Browne of Ladyton referenced a 2024 report from the International Relations and Defence Committee, which described the UK’s air and missile defence capabilities as “limited, to the point of being negligible” due to persistent underinvestment. He criticised the lack of ministerial engagement with the inquiry, noting that former Defence Secretary Grant Shapps had refused clearance for ministers and officials to testify.

Despite this, Lord Browne urged members to read the Government’s response to the report, praising its detailed examination of the challenges facing air defence.

Lord Coaker admitted that the report served as a “wake-up call” for both the UK and Europe. He highlighted the changing nature of threats since the Cold War: “We are now in a totally different situation where we face a 360-degree threat. The launch of missiles could come from a variety of launch systems, and we need to protect ourselves against not only missiles but drones.”

The Minister underscored the importance of public understanding regarding homeland defence, stating, “Air defence will become one of the critical systems that we will need to make available to ourselves and our country. Our population needs to understand that homeland defence is now of crucial importance to us all.”

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

10 COMMENTS

    • Not only to defend the population and infrastructure but also fundamentally a country’s ability to fight back and hit hard!

      • I’m convinced that Jim just makes up stuff as he goes along. In another thread earlier he was making an argument for different gbad systems.

      • I might be wrong but i think he’s being sacastic. If Ukraine had had more GBAD early on that there’d be less destruction in their cities and countryside. And they still need more!

  1. Good to hear m’ Lords and Ladies are raising their, others and our concerns over the lack of GBAD and hopefully they will be listened to and some actions taken.

  2. There is no excuse apart from poor leadership to have no UK GBAD. Especially since we’ve shrunk all our expeditionary capability into a handful of undefended locations. No point in buying expensive frigates or fast jets if you cant keep them safe in their bases.

  3. WW111 runners and riders
    USA Evens
    China 6/4
    Europe 3
    Russia 7/2
    Near/Far east 10 (B)
    Commonwealth etc. 25
    Nato NR
    The rest 100 Bar
    Once the nukes start all bets are off
    Make peace you imbeciles 🫶✌️

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here