The House of Lords recently debated the United Kingdom’s air defence capabilities, focusing on the need to modernise and address emerging threats.
Baroness Goldie led the discussion, emphasising the urgency of enhancing air defence systems, particularly given lessons from the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The Minister of State at the Ministry of Defence, Lord Coaker, outlined current efforts to bolster air defence, highlighting advancements in technology and international collaboration.
“The UK continuously reviews our integrated air and missile defence requirements to ensure that we are adequately defended against the evolving threats that we face,” he explained. He pointed to investments in new technologies such as the DragonFire directed energy weapon, which aims to counter drones, and upgrades to the Type 45 destroyer’s Sea Viper missile system, designed to defend against ballistic missiles.
These measures, he said, would be further developed in alignment with the forthcoming Strategic Defence Review (SDR). Baroness Goldie, however, raised concerns about the Government’s pace of action.
“Recent very public concerns about our air defence capabilities have been amplified by our European and NATO partners,” she stated, referencing the significant impact of air defence systems in Ukraine, where “12,000 missiles have been fired…showing the importance of air defence now.” Baroness Goldie called for immediate reassurance rather than awaiting the SDR’s publication. She urged the Minister to provide a comprehensive update on the current status and modernisation plans, suggesting that the information be shared with the House for wider scrutiny.
Lord Coaker acknowledged the validity of these concerns and agreed to write to the Baroness, promising to include “a stocktake of where we are” and to “put a copy in the Library, so that the information is available to all Members of this House.” He also highlighted ongoing efforts, including the development of ORCUS anti-drone technology to protect airfields and the DIAMOND initiative, a collaborative European project for a ground-based air missile defence system.
The debate also touched on past criticisms of the UK’s air defence readiness. Lord Browne of Ladyton referenced a 2024 report from the International Relations and Defence Committee, which described the UK’s air and missile defence capabilities as “limited, to the point of being negligible” due to persistent underinvestment. He criticised the lack of ministerial engagement with the inquiry, noting that former Defence Secretary Grant Shapps had refused clearance for ministers and officials to testify.
Despite this, Lord Browne urged members to read the Government’s response to the report, praising its detailed examination of the challenges facing air defence.
Lord Coaker admitted that the report served as a “wake-up call” for both the UK and Europe. He highlighted the changing nature of threats since the Cold War: “We are now in a totally different situation where we face a 360-degree threat. The launch of missiles could come from a variety of launch systems, and we need to protect ourselves against not only missiles but drones.”
The Minister underscored the importance of public understanding regarding homeland defence, stating, “Air defence will become one of the critical systems that we will need to make available to ourselves and our country. Our population needs to understand that homeland defence is now of crucial importance to us all.”
If we have learned anything from Ukraine it’s that GBAD ain’t worth much. Which we knew before.
Not only to defend the population and infrastructure but also fundamentally a country’s ability to fight back and hit hard!
Based on what ?
How has GBAD failed in Ukraine ?
I’m convinced that Jim just makes up stuff as he goes along. In another thread earlier he was making an argument for different gbad systems.
I might be wrong but i think he’s being sacastic. If Ukraine had had more GBAD early on that there’d be less destruction in their cities and countryside. And they still need more!
That surpasses even your usual level of drivel!
What Ukraine has most definitely shown is that GBAD works, when you have enough units and plenty of reloads. Ukraine’s problem with GBAD has been the drip feed of gifted SAM systems and replacement missiles. The German donated IRIS-T SL is a good example. Germany provided the system and the training but only enough missiles to last 3 to 4 months. They are only now sending replacements. Does this highlight a bigger supply problem or is it purely political?
Ukraine is an argument for more and more GBAD systems.. if your systems get overwhelmed it’s never an argument for less, it’s generally an argument for more.
Good to hear m’ Lords and Ladies are raising their, others and our concerns over the lack of GBAD and hopefully they will be listened to and some actions taken.
There is no excuse apart from poor leadership to have no UK GBAD. Especially since we’ve shrunk all our expeditionary capability into a handful of undefended locations. No point in buying expensive frigates or fast jets if you cant keep them safe in their bases.
Yes, agree. Pretty lazy thinking to neglect a stronger and more comprehensive GBAD umbrella. And to think that maybe we won’t or can’t get hit or even to wait to get hit and then react. I think various posters here have said the UK is within reach of some serious missiles which should be focusing our political leaders minds.
What are we going to do about it ??.
Probably invest millions, then give it away like all the other stuff thats gone east.
If you mean Ukraine, they needed it more than we did.
WW111 runners and riders
USA Evens
China 6/4
Europe 3
Russia 7/2
Near/Far east 10 (B)
Commonwealth etc. 25
Nato NR
The rest 100 Bar
Once the nukes start all bets are off
Make peace you imbeciles 🫶✌️
I’m sorry but the only imbecile I can see is you.
The russians attacked the Ukraine. They continue to threaten all peace loving countries, they build up their military constantly.
You are suggesting appeasement.look in your history books, doesn’t end well.
I think we should be more concerned about the thousands of immigrats we are just letting walk into are county befor we know it the enemy will already have an army withing are county taking the streets befor any missiles are even fired
Ukraine is not best example that fits UK, GBAD is an important asset but you must have strong air power to retaliate hard, conflicts like should end in 2-3 major punches back and forth, GBAD can’t be sustained forever costs wise, but it gives you the required survivability for your army, national assets and people moral, depending you can cause real pain to the attacker