Soltsy airbase, home to Russian Tu-22M3 Backfire bombers, was hit by a drone strike yesterday.

Images of black smoking billowing from the base further solidified those reports, showing a Tu-22M3 engulfed in flames at the base.

The images first appeared on Telegram and have since made their way onto other social media platforms.

Russian MoD has said one unspecified aircraft was damaged due to a drone attack, stating the following on its Telegram channel:

“At around 10:00 Moscow time today, the Kiev regime carried out a terrorist attack using a copter type UAV against a military airfield in Novgorod region. The UAV was detected by the airfield’s observation outpost and was hit with small arms fire.

As a result of the terrorist attack, a fire broke out in the airfield parking lot, which was promptly extinguished by firefighting teams. One airplane was damaged; there were no casualties as a result of the terrorist act.”

 

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

82 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mick
Mick
7 months ago

Well done, I love the terrorist attack bit, they really are brain washed scum.

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  Mick

The Ukrainians use the same phrase for anything that hits them.

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

Yes they do and as it is normally residential buildings they are quite correct my little red friend.

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  Mick

Didnt you see all those videos in the early days of troops in upper floors of apartment buildings firing missiles at Russian tanks below, or the shopping centre car park with military trucks- and next door the tank maintenance centre.
I bet you dismissed UK and USA military destruction of civilian targets in Iraq and Afghanistan as just agit-prop from Islamists or is any war brutal and involve civilians

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

Silly little person clearly a Putin lover, and delusional if you believe defending your homeland from an invading army is a terrorist act.

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  Mick

Exactly . And defend it from apart blocks, shopping centres and various civilian buildings and even keyboard warriors from their living room

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

Yes and little trolls like you, who haven’t experienced anything except in a video game, go away now you little Russian Pratt we are bored with your pathetic tripe.

Matt
Matt
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

Yes – hitting an apartment block 500 miles behind the front line is justified because Russian tanks will be driving past in the morning.

Hmmm.

Marked
Marked
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

There’s a difference between targeting civilian buildings containing defending troops and targeting non military occupied civilian buildings miles from the front line just for the vindictiveness of it. Anyone who isn’t Russian knows the difference between the two…

Our militaries have hit civilians too, the difference being it was not intentional. Mistakes unfortunately happen. They are mistakes though, not a deliberate strategy of terror.

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  Marked

He isn’t worth it mate, a typical Russian troll, they always pop up and try and defend the actions of a tyrant, I pity him if he really believes the bile he comes out with. Silly little person.

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  Mick

Got all your toy soldiers lined up ?

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

Sad little person aren’t you, I bet you live with your mum and sit in the dark in the spare room. Just south of Moscow.

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  Mick

oh dear Choupette is not a happy pussy …claws are out

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

No just bored of dicks like you, otherwise having a lovely day.

DMJ
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

No one said Putin’s forces attacked or destroyed all residential targets.
If Putin was attacking my country, I would fight back from every possible vantage point, damaged or not.

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  DMJ

Obligations on defenders too to limit defense in civilian areas
Article 58 requires parties, “to the maximum extent feasible,” to remove civilians and civilian objects from the vicinity of military objectives, to avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas, and to take other necessary precautions to protect civilians and civilian objects from the dangers resulting from military operations.’

of course the greater obligation on the attacker

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

Except as they were the innocent party who was attacked and invaded, in their case they are correct. I suppose you could call those brave guys on the Bridge in London terrorists if you like for attacking a man with a weapon who had killed two people already, but in reality we all know who the real terrorist was in that incident as in Ukraine.

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

And another product of the troll farm breaks cover…..

I’m assuming a rehash of John in Minsk?

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

And you are in Chicken hawk farm squawk squawk

So what about that Invasion of Iraq by Blair and Bush. let me guess was the same as Putins …to save us all from an evil regime….hahahah

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

So, you are John in Minsk….

What about Blair’s invasion of Iraq?

I certainly never agreed with it, I don’t know many that did. The difference is, I can say that without fear of going missing…..

Just for kicks, will you condemn Pitlers illegal invasion of the Ukraine by his rapist rabble?

Go on Dunker, live dangerously 😂😂

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

of course it was a crazy mistake for Putin to invade – I never thought they could win as his military was unprepared

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

U do know that the Iraqi government asks for help

Duker
Duker
7 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

And Syria

Jonno
Jonno
7 months ago
Reply to  Duker

Its all right its only damaged.

James
James
7 months ago
Reply to  Jonno

Looks in better condition than some of the ones flying.

Brom
Brom
7 months ago

I would like to confirm that aircraft looks damaged

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  Brom

its just a scratch lol

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  Mick

It will buff out!

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

Ahh such a shame, they lose a nice shiny plane as well as their Luna 25 spacecraft, although the Russians did say that after it had impacted the moon it ceased to exist !! Looks like a few more boffins are going for a dive through a sixth floor window lol.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
7 months ago
Reply to  Mick

Be great if the Indian lander makes it onto the moon successfully just to rub it in.

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

Knowing how well the Indian Aerospace companies tend to put stuff together, it will probably miss the moon, orbit it and end up taking soil samples in a Dudley allotment…..

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
7 months ago
Reply to  Mick

I’m sure Johnski will come along soon to say it successfully landed and is now carrying out it’s lunar mission. Any minute now…….

Mick
Mick
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

He will probably say it was the moon that was destroyed by the Luna 25 lol

John Clark
John Clark
7 months ago
Reply to  Mick

In the spirit of fairness Mick, they generally break their necks after falling though bungalow windows….

Jacko
Jacko
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

Or get moonitis and end up in hospital🙄
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1804258/russian-scientist-crashed-moon-mission-rushed-to-hospital
Forgive me DE I know😂

DH
DH
7 months ago
Reply to  Jacko

Heh heh, don’t fuck with the Clangers 👍😊

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
7 months ago
Reply to  John Clark

🤣😂😁

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
7 months ago

it’s just bad practice for the pilot to leave airplanes in the parking lot. I bet he takes the blue badge spot aswell.
Oh well easy solution to end it all, Russia pulls back to the motherland, war ends instantly, everybody’s home for tea and medals.

Last edited 7 months ago by Monkey spanker
Steve
Steve
7 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

That is looking more and more likely. Ukraine is pushing forward, slowly but steadily and at the same time Russia surged a big force to the north and achieved almost nothing. It’s feeling like it’s fame over for Russia, although autumn is coming and with it rain and mud, and that will slow things down to the spring.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
7 months ago
Reply to  Steve

Seems like the Russians are pinning all their hopes onto their favourite president…. That’s Trump not Putin of course, one has to be realistic about their chances of salvaging something from all this mess the latter got them into.

Jon
Jon
7 months ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

True. Nobody will be going home for tea before the results of the US elections are known. However, I’m not optimistic even after that. Putin believes that no matter who wins in the US, support from the West will fade before Russia’s determination gives out and he will be able to regain territory, creating “facts on the ground”.

I fear we may have to be thinking in terms of years rather than over by Christmas.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
7 months ago
Reply to  Jon

It’s a concern. Especially as the NATO secretary generals chief of staff was recorded saying that there would have to be a negotiated peace whereby Ukraine concedes sovereignty over it’s captured territories for a negotiated peace. That’s a big concern as if NATO has not seen the Ukrainian war through to the end and has not given Ukraine what it needs to win the war it will be seen as feckless unreliable, weak and lacking in the moral fibre to stand upto Russia. Putin will think all he has to do is apply some pressure over a prolonged period of… Read more »

Steve
Steve
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Not really, this war has nothing to do with NATO. Sooner or later Ukraine will either win back its land or hit stalemate, the later is looking more and more realistic and NATO is offering security through membership if that happens and Ukraine wants peace. It would be nieve on the west not to start talking about it, if they think Ukraine can’t win all out. Not doing so would be abandoning Ukraine to an endless war.

Last edited 7 months ago by Steve
Jonathan
Jonathan
7 months ago
Reply to  Steve

It has nothing to do with NATO, I would say it has everything to do with NATO.A war of aggression against a democratic nation on the boarder of NATO..is an existential threat. Any peace negotiation is Ukraines prerogative and if the west is seen in any way to force the issue by reducing or ending aid it would be essentially a catastrophic blow to western hegemony and that is not a good thing.

Steve
Steve
7 months ago
Reply to  Steve

Whats it got to do with nato. Nato is fundamentally about defending it’s members, none of them are involved. Not saying it’s not of international interest, but nato is a treaty organisation with very defined remit.

The idea nato has is if Ukraine gets to a point of wanting peace, they compromise with Russia that Russia takes the occupied land at that point and Ukraine joins nato preventing Russia from regrouping and trying again in the future. For Ukraine joining nato is a must for their long term security.

Jonathan
Jonathan
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Yes unfortunately the west is more and more being seen as a weak partner…reality does not necessarily matter in geopolitics..perception is king…it does not matter how strong you are if that strength is not seen and the perception is you are week…the retreat from Afghanistan was a low moment and unless the west keeps supporting Ukraine in the way it’s doing to the very end it will see its influence hit again…the west pulling the rug out from Ukraine would seem to me to be the first steps in the road the Chinese hegemony ( if we cannot even secure… Read more »

Steve
Steve
7 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

Seen as a weak partner by whom? Certainly not Russia who for all is bluster must be fully aware that they are losing the war due to western support and hardware. Nothing has really united western countries more and even Asian and African countries than supplying Ukraine with hardware.

No doubts China has had second thoughts about Taiwan, as I doubt anyone expected the level of support that the west has given Ukraine to happen. I personally thought the west would be too scared about starting ww3, but luckily they took the gamble and it paid off.

Last edited 7 months ago by Steve
Jonathan
Jonathan
7 months ago
Reply to  Steve

Africa, South America, India…all those places that have the resources and markets that the west and china/Russia are competing for and trying to influence…Russia and china are doing better than the West..it’s not the US flag or any European one that’s celebrated in many of these nations it’s Russias. It’s unfortunately hubris to think that just because we think Russia is weak wrong..other none western nations will think the same….

Steve
Steve
7 months ago
Reply to  Jonathan

It’s not about thinking Russia is strong its about anti western and specifically anti US mentality and Russia being there to cash in. Too much history of the british/French empires interfering against the interests of the locals and more recently big US companies. It will swing back over time as Russia is there for the same reason, their own self interests and that won’t end well for the locals either.

Steve
Steve
7 months ago
Reply to  Jon

The question is how much support is there left to give. What does the various countries have left in their storage to handover. The big one will be the f16s, but I doubt they will make a massive difference as Russian Air defences seem to be doing a reasonable job at least against bigger targets and realistically the training levels are not going to be there as there isn’t the time. I also doubt that large numbers are going to be supplied. Russia is still building new military gear but the west isn’t really, so will run out sooner or… Read more »

Jon
Jon
7 months ago
Reply to  Steve

We have plenty more to give if we gear up for it. This war is switching to a longer timescale, and it doesn’t have to come out of stocks, it can be built. You are right, the West isn’t gearing up in the same way as Russia, but there are a lot of contributing economies and we all can gear up a bit.

If we won’t do that because our politicians can’t see that now is a pivotal time, it’s going to be very difficult to support Ukraine properly.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
7 months ago
Reply to  Steve

Be in no doubt NATO could give much much more, it’s a difficult calculation donating hardware to Ukraine now Vs waiting for replacement hardware ordered. The problem for the UK is there doesn’t seem to be any sense of urgency or rearmament going on. Unlike Poland.
You’d have thought an invasion of a democratic country bordering 4 NATO member states would have constituted a situation where the UK government thought about upping force levels by 10-15% at least. Instead we’ve actually continued the slow decline of defence cuts. It’s quite maddening really.

Steve
Steve
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

Where would the money come from to rearm, we are broke as an nation. Have you not seen the state of all our public services or even just driven down a road recently with its potholes, caused by massive national debt, next to zero growth and sky high inflation, plus plumpting exports in real value. Our economy might be the worst of any g7 nation, none are doing amazing.

Steve
Steve
7 months ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

They would be very stupid if they were. Even if Trump got in, he won’t support them. He personally might be in putins pocket but the nation as a whole is very anti Russia, there isn’t a hope he could get anything through Congress. Just look at Boris, very pro Russian (was considered a national security threat because of it) but his a populist like trump, and does whatever is the easiest option in the moment, rather than having hard and fast beliefs. It’s about ego for them rather than ideology.

Mark
Mark
7 months ago

Surprised they didn’t blame someone “Smoking” like they have for so many other times…

FormerUSAF
FormerUSAF
7 months ago
Reply to  Mark

Possibly conscript(s) smoking while performing flight line duties? 😁 That would be both justly ironic and hysterically amusing! 👍

DH
DH
7 months ago
Reply to  FormerUSAF

👌👍

UKRAINAPOLIS
UKRAINAPOLIS
7 months ago

F16s enabled with air refueling platform will ensure the Russians fly only deep inside their territory. Black sea and other oceans where they launch their terror missiles will be a no go area.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
7 months ago
Reply to  UKRAINAPOLIS

Seems early New Year now with a small number of pilots already having a brief intro on them and training even on Gripens which was out of the blues. So as Denmark has agreed to supply around 20 may see them active any time after that hopefully. I wonder what long range weapons will come with them. AMRAAM I wonder, if so what effect might that have in suppressing Russian aircraft and indeed helicopters, I wonder. Must surely make them think twice about being too exposed.

Ukrainapolis
Ukrainapolis
7 months ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

That should include AIM-9X Sidewinder and JASSM

fearlesstunafish
fearlesstunafish
7 months ago
Reply to  UKRAINAPOLIS

only problem being russia has longer range aa missles than the us does….. shame they didn’t integrate meteor on the f16…..

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
7 months ago
Reply to  UKRAINAPOLIS

I don’t think we will see air to air refuelling with aircraft anytime soon.
The aircraft will still need to stay low and away from SAM bubbles.
First I think we will see the aircraft being used to intercept incoming cruise missiles.
Aircraft versus aircraft fights are unlikely to start with as Russia doesn’t fly far into Ukraine. Perhaps cruise missiles, glide bombs if possible to launch safely.
Ukraine’s current aircraft can still play a part In offensive attacks while the F16s should be kept back to hit the incoming missiles and drones.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
7 months ago

Interesting that one of these bombers was apparently parked in the Car Park. Fiendishly clever these Ruskies in trying, if failing to hide them from the Ukranians.

Mr Bell
Mr Bell
7 months ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

It’s an important strike as it eats away at Russia’s strategic forces the TU22-M is a considerable threat to maritime assets so reducing their active, serviceable fleet by 1 or possibly 2 aircraft is important.
Best estimates are the Ruskfascist airforce after this strike is likely down to 55-57 serviceable aircraft of this type.

Monkey spanker
Monkey spanker
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Bell

It will hopefully force Russia to base the aircraft further away. Longer flight times give more time to get prepared for incoming missiles.

Mark
Mark
7 months ago
Reply to  Monkey spanker

The rest of these bombers moved to the Kola Peninsula after the attack, but there’s reports on another attack today on another TU 22 base.

Spyinthesky
Spyinthesky
7 months ago

That’s the second big hit by these type of drones this week, I assume they may be something new and it seems very effective, being less easily detected no doubt than the more traditional aerofoil types, but where are they being launched from I wonder, range is usually their big disadvantage.

Last edited 7 months ago by Spyinthesky
Frank62
Frank62
7 months ago
Reply to  Spyinthesky

400+miles to the nearest part of Ukraine. So yes, impressive unless UKR SF sneak closer & drop smaller charges from back pack drones.

Jon
Jon
7 months ago
Reply to  Frank62

You think UKR SF forces sneaking three quarters of the way to Finland and using backpack drones isn’t impressive? Impresses the heck out of me.

Last edited 7 months ago by Jon
JJ Smallpiece
JJ Smallpiece
7 months ago

Cat 5 damage

DH
DH
7 months ago
Reply to  JJ Smallpiece

Have the orcs even posses a repair unit?!?!? 😳 😅

Nigel Collins
Nigel Collins
7 months ago
UKRAINAPOLIS
UKRAINAPOLIS
7 months ago
Reply to  Nigel Collins

Haha indeed!

Frank62
Frank62
7 months ago

400+ miles north of Ukraine. That’s some reach through Russian air defences. One less TU22M to carpet bomb Syrian “Rebels”.

Jonno
Jonno
7 months ago
Reply to  Frank62

Wow great stuff bring on the 1000 droner raids. Make them precision and aimed at military targets.

Quentin D63
Quentin D63
7 months ago
Reply to  Frank62

Hopefully they can take out some more of these aircraft. Wonder if they’re able to usr “sleeper” type drones that come alive later on? Would be good for Ukraine to take out some Russian docked ships and subs in Crimea and on the Asov if they’ve got enough range. Drones are really making everything and everyone vulnerable.

James
James
7 months ago
Reply to  Quentin D63

The Naval ones are proving very effective aswell, and against big size targets!

Jon
Jon
7 months ago

Maybe it’s time for the government to invest in the UK drone industry. Let’s send 50,000 cheap, UK-built drones to Ukraine and kick-start a UK civilian drone industry at the same time. We badly need a Western counterpoint to DJI.

Richard M
Richard M
7 months ago
Reply to  Jon

Hit the button on the head. I have been involed in the civillian drone industry and I am very concened about companies like DJI and its chinese backers. Sadley yet again the industry was a follow on from the radio controlled flyers who built from off the shelf parts re purposed. These days some of them even build up to 1/3 real size. I have seen a jet powered Vulcan that in the sky looks like the real thing. Change the body shape etc etc all buyilt in fred dibnah way but they work. A commercial /military industry UK built… Read more »

Bringer of facts
Bringer of facts
7 months ago

Russia can expect a lot more of this when the Ukrainians get their F-16s

Mark
Mark
7 months ago

Reports that another base has been hit today, Russian sources say 1 has been damaged so on their record another loss?