The UK has sent thousands of missiles and other explosives, over one hundred armoured vehicles and over 200,000 pieces of medical equipment and other items.
James Heappey, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence, recently said in a statement:
“The UK remains committed to working with our Allies and Partners to provide military and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine.
We continue to liaise closely with the Armed Forces of Ukraine to understand their prioritised requirements, to date having sent over 6,900 anti-tank missiles, 120 armoured vehicles, 1,360 anti-structure munitions, Air Defence systems including Starstreak missiles and 4.5 tonnes of plastic explosives. This is in addition to more than 200,000 pieces of non-lethal aid and medical equipment.
We are working to encourage and further enable the delivery of even more systems and capabilities from across the international community to support Ukraine. And continue to make a major contribution to the leadership and operation of the International Donor Coordination Centre in Stuttgart.”
Recently, I reported that British Defence secretary Ben Wallace said that donating the M270 multiple-launch rocket system to the country will help Ukraine defend itself against Russia. Alongside the weapon systems, the UK will also supply M31A1 munitions “at scale”.
Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said:
“The UK stands with Ukraine in this fight and is taking a leading role in supplying its heroic troops with the vital weapons they need to defend their country from unprovoked invasion. If the international community continues its support, I believe Ukraine can win.
As Russia’s tactics change, so must our support to Ukraine. These highly capable multiple-launch rocket systems will enable our Ukrainian friends to better protect themselves against the brutal use of long-range artillery, which Putin’s forces have used indiscriminately to flatten cities.”
The system can fire 12 missiles within a minute and can strike targets 50 miles away with high accuracy.
Pretty much same a last time with M270 added on. They better be careful with the 3 of them. We need them back. Maybe we could loan them more until they don’t need them.
Wonder if they want some land rovers, we have loads. More artillery. Anywhere russia has been is bombed out mostly already. U.K. should order replacement ASAP. Give as-90, get M777 as urgent buy.
Get training them on the spare Westland apache that could be left over. 12-17. They may need fixed up a bit but 3-6 months training would be a start. I think this conflict isn’t going to be over in 3 months. Get helicopter pilots. Fast track through U.K. training. Couple of training operations. Throw in some Blackhawks/mil-8, some gazelles/polish mil-2 or whatever it is they built. Czech L-39-159 could be useful as they were built to train Warsaw countries. Couple of thousand paveways to start, brimstone can cannon. Keep the mig 29 for top cover.
It’s time to push and you know what they say go hard or go home. If U.K. leads the way other countries will follow
Apache would be a huge step. The Ukrainians have no experience or logistics for it. I’m not sure what use it would be to them that they cannot get from drone(s) or M270?
Thing is that while the UK may not have the largest number of platforms we do have quite decent stocks of most expendable munitions.
I don’t think this will be over that fast unless we arm the Ukrainians better so they can deal better with the infinite amount of meat (excuse horrible image) Mad Vlad wants to put in the grinder in time expired tin cans. That said if the Russians are down to using T62’s then stocks of things are running very low as these will be totally useless against any ATW never mind NLAWS or JAVELIN.
At the end of the day if we can help the Ukrainians destroy the Russian armour significantly faster than it can be replenished then the, in theatre, depletion rates become the significant number as, sadly, that includes the crews.
I watched an interesting video by the Austrian army on their update and analysis of the Ukraine fighting. It was really quite nuanced in the analysis, and included some information that isn’t covered by the big picture reporting that we’re used to hearing.
They suggested that the T62s were actually not a bad choice for using as an assault gun, which is apparently what the Russians seem to be using them for in the east. They’re not seeing a lot of tank-on-tank combat, and A T-62 will cook up just the same as a T-72 when hit by a javelin or N-LAW. So, why not save the T-72s, T-80s, etc. for armoured combat and use the old -62s as the modern equivalent of a StugIII?
Just found the link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpC1kXhW2Lw
Maybe that was the thinking – maybe not.
Either way they are old garbage that any decent NATO weapon will take out with ease.
I agree that analysis often needs more nuance.
I’ve no doubt that they’re using them because they don’t have enough of the better gear. Just interesting that they seem to be deliberately re-organising their BTGs to make best use of their now limited resources, rather than just blindly replacing T-72s with T-62s in tank units that might expect to be fighting other armour.
I would replace the light guns with the M777’s and get the Hanwha K9 as the AS90 replacement
Are you sure the corrupt failed state of Ukraine is worth the expense to the British taxpayer?
Sell to them for hard cash by all means, at top prices with no credit. But even then, all we are doing is pouring fuel on a fire for no gain. With the very real possibility that it will blow up in our faces. In a thermonuclear manner.
Russia will not sacrifice it’s ethnic people to the Ukrainians or it’s Black Sea Fleet. The Ukrainians will not concede any territory to Russia even though the majority of inhabitants only speak Russian and want independence.
Then there is Putin, the KGB Colonel. Anyone who thinks he will not resort to tactical nuclear weapons to secure victory, has not been paying attention. I hope I’m wrong but his profile and track record indicate otherwise.
BTW, I thought monkey spanking died out with Michael Jackson.
If Russia’s army is not exhausted in Ukraine it will move on to Moldovia , Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania !
If the Russians set foot on the territory of any NATO member, all bets are off.
Like this for instance, MS? Strong case for long range GMLRS rather than 70km ‘ because west doesn’t want to hit Russia’. How about not wanting them to hit our weapons donated to Ukraine?
ERR, and this!
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/ukraine-situation-report-russia-claims-destruction-of-western-supplied-m109-howitzers
It’s going to happen it’s a war zone. Stuff blows up. Afghan mission this is not. What can be used to push Russia back out. Combined arms is all I can think of. Tanks, troops, gunships, artillery and rockets, drones better situational awareness and tactics. Ukraine can’t get stuck in a slugging match over fixed lines. It will just wear them down
The Ukrainians need better area air cover and support as well?
Indeed it is! but I fail to see why we are playing by Russian rules, MS?
Putin hits seven bells out of Ukraine whilst threatening anyone who hits back at the smug bastard on his. And the West lets him to a significant degree, supplying about enough capacity to hurt Russians when on Ukraine’s own territory.
Of course, Ukraine is fighting on our behalf as well as it’s own, and has accepted the premise if we supply equipment.
But give them the best i.e. 300km GMLRS, long range anti ship, armour, or whatever. That way they can stand back somewhat within their own territory whilst still not hitting deep inside Russia (for now).
We may eventually do this, but we’re wasting Ukrainian blood whilst we ponder. And we would not accept those RoE and that handicap if it was NATO directly attacked.
We’re on the same page, mate. Rgs
Are there any Western munitions that a Grad could use? I don’t doubt the Ukrainians are running low on their own stocks if they haven’t run out in some places, and I think other countries who operate Russian weapon systems have excessively large stockpiles either. Or is there any chance of the West producing some sort of arm that a Grad could use?
Good idea.
It’s not like it’s rocket science……oh hang on…….
The GRAD is pretty primitive.
Much better if focussing on M270 of which there are large stockpiles of missiles in storage. M270, depending on version, is really accurate. So should be one missile one kill.
Reactivating properly stores munitions is quicker than inventing and testing new ones.
Pretty sure Egypt manufacture there own improved rockets for there BM-21. Poland also had BM-21 in service as well
There are signs this war is getting bogged down in trench tactics similar to WW1. If so, the emphasis will be on artillery and MLRS will help to keep the Russian forces firmly placed in the east. I can’t help feeling that artillery needs to be a new priority including cruise missiles for the UK. In combination with drones, Ukraine is proving the worth of artillery and how poorly the MOD has treated the RA in recent decades.
Trench tactics wouldn’t last long infront of a tank force or mech infantry force.
If there’s plenty of anti-tank weaponry facing them, then the tank can’t work like it did on the WW1 western front.
True but Ukraine doesn’t have much anti-tank weaponry capable of taking out a tank per round. but then again Maybe it has. Another thing is repeated tank attacks cost plenty ammo. trenches are vunrobell to airstrickes too.
I hope Ben Wallace can return his attention to our mil.
Tough soldiers can survive in the open with arty support: raise another reg PARA Bn, re-invigorated RA – deep fires, counter battery and AD widened out?
Step back from AJAX and save money? All Challys upgraded.
Serious conventions should be challenged.
Agree mostly but I think that either Ajax or an Ajax like vehicle is needed (think CV90) as CRV(T) is getting rather long in the tooth now and needs replacing.
RA definitely needs some love – a program to replace the light gun and the AS90 should be a priority. Not sure we should be shipping out our limited number of M270 without a replacement in the pipeline either. Air defense for the RA is also needs work.
All the Challengers all need to be upgraded. I think most can agree that the number they’re planning on upgrading isn’t enough to deal with the attrition rates that a pier conflict is likely to bring.
I think it’s about time that the Army got some love… Although I might be bias.
Spain is sending 40 early model Leopard tanks. Anyone know how these compare with a T72?
If they’re Leopard I, not that well. If they’re Leopard II, they should be better, though that depends on the model of the T72 and how well it’s been maintained.
Leopard 2A4 apparently. Though it seems they need German permission
https://www.overtdefense.com/2022/06/08/scholz-no-request-from-spain-to-deliver-leopard-2-tanks-to-ukraine-yet/
The latest in Russian anti missile technology 🥴 they really are sending these relics forward!
https://defence-blog.com/russians-equip-cold-war-era-tanks-with-improvised-anti-javelin-armor/
The slat armor they have crudely applied doesn’t work much. If applied correctly it can stop some munitions but not NLAW and javelin. I can’t say about the rest of missiles. This picture is in the Kearson region so they are in an area that a counter attack is headed.
It’s at the point where Ukraine needs loads more stuff if the plan is to force Russia out.
As a project manager in real life, I’m going to unapologetically ask for a tabulated list, which would make it much easier to evaluate than a body of text!
That said, thanks for keeping track, it’s good to see that aid continues to flow.
Ukraine is simply not worth the investment. Before 2014 it was the most corrupt country in Europe, afterwards things became even worse! I appreciate the poisoning of former agents and use of Sarin by Putin on British soil was bad form. But is it worth the cost for a little “tit for tat.” It is certainly not worth escalating an already dangerous potential nuclear war.
I fear NATO involvement has more to do with the crooked business dealings of Hunter Biden and his father “quid pro – sleepy Joe.” Than any desire to prop up a failed state. Then there is our government – Vote of no confidence be chuffed. What was Boris thinking when he agreed to do Biden’s bidding and throw weapons into the bottomless fire pit that is Ukraine?
Making the most of a terrible situation, I hope he envisioned a huge investment in British military spending as a result, we are going to need it. Doubling the size of our armed forces and tripling the defence budget. It’s arguably still not worth playing nuclear Russian roulette with Col Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. A very high risk brinkmanship match with a “former” Colonel of Stasi/KGB.
Former – In his own words. “There is no such thing as a former KGB man.”
The training and indoctrination he experienced can never be reversed.
The idea that the Bidens business dealings have any influence on NATO (especially UK) support of Ukraine is so laughable it’s hardly worth responding to. Do we need to go down the pit of Republican-Trumpish self-delusion?
It is not utterly unreasonable, if you want to be cynical, to say that Boris and co are using his support of Ukraine as a distraction from Partygate and the economic woes brought on by pandemic, inflation, and Brexit mismanagement. On the other hand, Boris has always preferred to wave the UK flag and dam the consequences.
Risk of nuclear war is indeed serious. An all-out nuclear conflict could wipe out humanity, forever. Does Putin have more than 10 years to live anyway? The world has tolerated the suffering of North Korea’s millions for half a century. Putin needs to be deterred to prevent the risk of him attacking smaller NATO nations and triggering world war III, but western leaders, especially firebrand Boris, need to think beyond how best to distract the public by cosplayiing Churchill and more about not playing with nuclear fire that could kill billions of people, rather than the tens of thousands.that Russian aggression has so far caused
The UK and some elements of the US (witness the leaked boasting about targeting Russia) are definitely being irresponsible with the fate of the entire planet. I don’t oppose sending weapons Ukraine needs – but leave the jingoism and rhetoric to Ukraine; there is no need for the UK to lead a sacred crusade; that will only make it a lot harder to ever come to any negotiated settlement. Though it is fair to say that Russia’s war crimes are the single biggest obstacle to such a peace and that is all on them.
Ukraine’s true level of corruption vis a vis Russia can probably be judged in part on the battlefield. Russian’s corruption is and was likely far greater – it’s just that they’re less transparent and so hid it more. Now, in the crucible of war, we see how it’s come back to bite them, with the problems it caused their military.
George, is it right for a country (even one with corruption) to be brutally invaded by a huge neighbour who has committed hundreds of thousands of war crimes against ordinary people? Then for us in the West to standby and say that they are not worth helping?
Right and wrong in the context of international politics are not simply relative terms, dependant on the position of the partisan observer. I postulate that they are meaningless. One mans invader being another mans liberator. The Russia v Ukraine spat is far from black and white.
Both sides are masters of propaganda, subterfuge and weaponising information. They did after all learn from the same Soviet KGB masters.
Do you honestly believe that Ukrainian extreme right wing militias have not committed severe injustices against ethnic Russians. There is more than just a kernel of truth in the reports dating back to 2014 and earlier. Why do you think the ethnic Russian in Crimea, Luhansk and Donbas want to be aligned with Russia and not the EU west?
Ukraine is a Pandora’s Box of pent up hatreds, vendettas and historic ill deeds. Stretching as far back as one cares to look. Cossacks, Kozaks, Tar Tars, Soviets, White Russians, Kiev Rus, Yiddish, Polish Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox. To name but a few. Literally volumes have been written about the contradictory history of that region. To be completely honest, I’ve given up trying to fully understand the background setting. It makes understanding the intricacies of the former Yugoslavia seem relatively simple by comparison.
I forgot to mention a race of people known as Rusyns who mostly occupy the Carpathian mountains, have their own culture, language and traditions. They had their independence for a total of five days! Yet another group reportedly in favour of joining Russia 70 to 30.
Graham, I should have started with the following. What I think is of little consequence.
As a PFC these days and not in uniform. I’m trying to be impartial and unravel the Ukrainian Gordian knot. Oligarchs on both sides have used historic prejudices to justify and promote their own agendas. By using the various ethnic racial and religious divides of that region.
I hope this helps because the BBC, ITN, CNN etc tell less than half the story.
Thanks George. I don’t think about the politicians and oligarchs, just the ordinary people.
Sadly the militias listen to the politicians/oligarchs and implement their prejudiced policies. Right Sector and Azov, for example. Trying to deny it, simply adds to the crimes they commit.
As I said. Both sides in this conflict are less than worthy of our support. I truly detest Putin because I know how and where he was trained. He is behaving exactly as one would expect from a proud KGB Stasi trained Colonel. Many Ukrainians are the product of the very same system. The question needs to be asked.
Why are we supporting them and risking the very real possibility of nuclear war?
An interesting comparison is the Vietnam War. Russians complain about the west sending arms to Ukraine but during the Vietnam War, the Russians sent 1,357 missile launching systems, 18,300 missiles, 316 fighter jets, 52 warships, 21 transportation ships, 687 tanks, 601 armored vehicles and 1,332 artillery pieces to Vietnam… Of course, that was over a 10-year period…