Babcock International, the Aerospace and Defence company, has successfully completed the refit of HMS Penzance at Babcock’s Rosyth site in Fife.

HMS Penzance – one of the Royal Navy’s Sandown class minehunters – underwent a 10 month docking period at Rosyth. The refit included the replacement of both main engines, multiple Glass Reinforced Plastic repairs and Addition and Alteration packages.

A team of over 50 Babcock employees made up of experienced electrical, mechanical, engineering, joinery and GRP shipwright resource delivered the work – alongside specialist
sub-contractors.

After passing the Ready for Sea inspection on schedule, HMS Penzance returned to her home port, HMNB Clyde, with full operational capability.

The second of the Royal Navy minehunter flotilla, HMS Pembroke has arrived at Babcock’s Rosyth facility to undergo a similar package of work.

Sean Donaldson, Managing Director of the Babcock Rosyth site, said:

“We were delighted to work on the upgrade of HMS Penzance and look forward to working on HMS Pembroke.

Our Common User Facility at Rosyth is home to one of the largest waterside manufacturing and repair facilities in the UK. This, alongside our skilled and experienced workforce with their commitment to innovation and quality, ensures that we offer the complete package for visiting ships.”

Avatar photo
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

19 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Steve Taylor
Steve Taylor (@guest_456312)
5 years ago

SRMH fantastic pieces of kit. Most expensive ‘ships’ per tonne ever purchased by the MoD(N).

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_456337)
5 years ago
Reply to  Steve Taylor

Down to 6 from 12? Very sad.

MCMV fleet very easy target to salami slice.

Cam hunter
Cam hunter (@guest_456314)
5 years ago

I still think we should have anti submarine frigates even just two based at Clyde with our submarines, and to patrol the North Atlantic, it’s crazy that it’s just mine hunters.

Harry Bulpit
Harry Bulpit (@guest_456324)
5 years ago
Reply to  Cam hunter

It makes no sense to just base two. It take a huge logistical effort to support them. Also at the end of the day ship basing is no longer made for strategic reasons but rather political. HMNB Clyde has enough work with the submarines plus minehunters to keep it open. However, are surface Fleet is berley big enough to support both Devonport and Portsmouth. So if you take 2 type 26 from Devonport that leaves you with only 6 to be based there. Not enough to justify the harbour. So you may as well shut down Devonport and move the… Read more »

Rokuth
Rokuth (@guest_456316)
5 years ago

Hmm… Where are they going to get the pirates from to man her?

Helions
Helions (@guest_456317)
5 years ago

Sheesh, and they turned down HMS Boaty McBoatface???

Cheers!

Steve Salt
Steve Salt (@guest_456322)
5 years ago
Reply to  Helions

Hi Helions.
Penzance is a port town in my home county of Cornwall and as such is perfectly entitled to have one of Her Maj`s ships named after it. It`s the gateway to the Channel so a minehunter is an appropriate choice.
Hasn`t the USN got it`s fair share of dodgy ship names?

Rokuth
Rokuth (@guest_456326)
5 years ago
Reply to  Steve Salt

Blame it on Gilbert and Sullivan…

The USN does have a ship named Churchill though…

Rokuth
Rokuth (@guest_456330)
5 years ago
Reply to  Rokuth

That’s USS Winston S. Churchill, Arleigh Burke-class destroyer…

Daniele Mandelli
Daniele Mandelli (@guest_456338)
5 years ago
Reply to  Rokuth

With a RN navigator at all times I believe?

Gunbuster
Gunbuster (@guest_456525)
5 years ago
Reply to  Rokuth

USS WINSTON S CHURCHILL Was affiliated to HMS Marlborough ( before we sold it to Chile) .
The Navigators where swapped. A UK Navs in the States and a US Navs in the UK.
When HMS Marlborough visited Norfolk (Virginia) and Churchill was in it got, from what I can vaguely remember through the flash backs, very, very messy 🙂

Steven
Steven (@guest_456344)
5 years ago
Reply to  Steve Salt

Got a problem with USS Ponce ? 🙂

Helions
Helions (@guest_456473)
5 years ago
Reply to  Steve Salt

Hi Steve,

The USN certainly has had some deusies for ship names – the current USS Devastator – a small MCM ship stationed in the Gulf comes to mind – better name for a DDG IMHO – :D. I’m certainly not impinging on your hometown’s good name! As Rokuth has noted it’s just the automatic affiliation the name has with G&B. The RN has a great tradition of quirky names though and “Penzance” certainly wouldn’t make the list for the quirkiest! Here’s a few I found at the Portsmouth site.

https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/defence/14-odd-names-for-royal-navy-ships-1-7168404

Note number 14 is also an MCM… 😀

Cheers!

Steve Salt
Steve Salt (@guest_457277)
5 years ago
Reply to  Helions

Hi Helions
I think the good ship Spanker is named for a sail on frigate from the days of fighting sail.
But I’m ready to corrected by any real sailors out there.?
The RN has certainly had some crackers over it’s history.

Lusty
Lusty (@guest_456371)
5 years ago

Ah, HMS Penzance. Named for my hometown. I’m glad she hasn’t been salami sliced. Shame they have shown no interest in reactivating the three decommissioned minesweepers.

Anyway, she occasionally berths in the town’s harbour, a fine vessel to visit.

Tony
Tony (@guest_456388)
5 years ago
Reply to  Lusty

Agree – too few MCMV’s for the hard work they are tasked with for my liking.
Look at the make up of STAN’s Navy, always used to be an RN contingent as a mainstay of the core groups, whether big or little ships. Now, very rarely see HM Ships mentioned in the news articles. Walney is beyond return as far as I can tell, interesting though to know how much was spent on HM Ships Atherstone and Quorn before their mid life updates were canned. I imagine a fair sum in terms of prep and equipment purchase……

Bill
Bill (@guest_456457)
5 years ago

Good grief! How does that refit take 10 months? Sounds like they have been working on Crossrail as well.

Gunbuster
Gunbuster (@guest_456526)
5 years ago
Reply to  Bill

GRP hull ships are a lot more difficult to work on.
Also you need to factor in the Non mag work that needs to be undertaken.
10 months isnt bad…compared to some refit work undertaken on very very similar vessels abroad.

Bill
Bill (@guest_456738)
5 years ago

Duly noted. Cheers!