The British Army recruitment website has now been nonfunctional for two months and has now, temporarily, been replaced by a post on a jobs website.
That’s correct, the British Army’s £113m Capita-run recruitment website has been offline for two months and has been replaced by a single post on a job listing website. The cost to post one job advert on Totaljobs, by the way, is £169.
An Army applicant contacted me in April to let me know that the recruitment system was still nonfunctional, weeks after log-in information was comprised forcing a temporary closure. I was told:
“The whole recruitment system is down. This means that applications cannot be made or moved forward. Candidates are also unable to receive updates on how far their application is through the pipeline. This could cause serious issues to recruitment as one, it could create a massive backlog, and two, interest could be lost due to time constraints.”
My source also told me that he’s currently stuck at the medical stage, as he is in the process of moving from regular to reserve. medical.
“All I need to do is redo my medical. However, I have been unable to move through the medical process because the staff at the recruitment centre cannot access the system.”
When doing so, he and thousands of others were met with the message:
“WE ARE CURRENTLY EXPERIENCING SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES WITH THE ARMY RECRUITMENT SYSTEM. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS SURROUNDING YOUR APPLICATION OR PROGRESSION THROUGH THE RECRUITING PIPELINE PLEASE CALL THIS NUMBER 0345 600 8080 OR CONTACT YOUR RECRUITER.”
That message was recently replaced with:
“We are currently experiencing some technical issues with the Army Recruitment system; however we are still accepting applications. To apply as a regular (full-time) soldier, please apply via our partner site, Total Jobs. Once you’ve submitted your details on the site, one of our team will contact you for more information and to start your Army application.”
The users are then offered a link to the job listing. You can find that here.
Another user contacted me this morning to tell me the following:
“I joined the Army in 1995. Applied on Thursday and started training on Sunday! My son applied for it through Capita and a year later he was no further forward with a start date and gave up for another job. I applied for the reserves over 6 months ago and heard nothing once the website went down.
Only now have they sent a letter apologising and telling me to pay for an eye test before they progress my application! I worked on a Regimental recruiting team for a year before Capita took over and we could get someone from application to start date within 2 months.”
The Register reported in March that the Ministry of Defence suspended online application and support services for the British Army’s Capita-run Defence Recruitment System after concerns over a potential data breach.
However, it is understood that the recruitment system itself was not breached. A spokesperson for Capita told me today:
“The recent compromise of recruit data was the subject of a detailed investigation commissioned by Defence Digital from an approved specialist contractor, which determined there had been no breach of the DRS system. The compromised data is thought to be linked to log-in information stolen from candidates.”
The website was shut down on the 14th of March and remains closed today. If you want to learn more about the compromised data, you can read more on the compromise of recruit data that caused the shutdown in this article from April by Dan Sabbagh at the Guardian here.
Was it hacked by Russia ? The lack of an explanation makes me suspicious.
Probably. Cannot the damned army get anything right?
All that money invested in cyber warfare…
Other than training the best conventional soldiers on the planet or delivering in spades on operations you mean?
easy to train em when theres less of em
Never easy to train people to become quality, its one of the toughest jobs there is!
Wembley stadium holds more than the Army has actual combat troops!
Ah, but do they all LIKE football?
Probably not 😂
The British Army has long ceased to be the best conventional soldiers on the planet.
Afghanistan saw to that.
And what good is an Army that keeps being constantly reduced in numbers?
Sorry, Bill, I think you need to explain that first part of your comment. In what way did Afghanistan see to the British Army ceasing to have the best soldiers on the planet?
There is a huge difference between strategic defeat and tactical success. So I’ll concede, I think at the operational level, the British Army comes up short. But at the tactical level – as good as if not better than any Army in the world.
Have you actually seen what we expect of our soldiers compared to other armies? Have you actually seen what our tactical level units can do compared to other armies?
So back up what you said.
Mate done 2 tours of ulster in the 80’s.
Am fully aware of the army’s capability and sadly there short comings.
Surely operational n tactical levels r the same?
No. The operational level is done at Divisional and above. It’s running a campaign – it’s the generating, deploying and recovering a force. I think we suck at running a campaign The tactical level is what Brigades and Units do – fighting the current battle – I think we excel at that.
I did two tours of Afghanistan and one of Iraq and worked with NATO.
Out of interest, who do you think does have the best conventional soldiers on the planet? By your metric it can’t be an Army that went to Afghanistan so no one in NATO, Sweden, Aus, NZ.
Probably Civil Servants…. Why don’t we go back to the old days and let the Squaddies deal with recruitment ?
Too simple for the M.O.D Gavin
Nothing to do with the Army. Capita does the recruitment, and has done for many years.
Of course aware that Capita have the contract. But one gets sick and tired of yet another instance involving the army and non-resolution of issues, Graham. ‘faid the expression ‘nothing to do with the Army’ somehow fails to improve the general impression. It’s well past becoming par for the course where technical issues are concerned, by all measures.
One way or another, General Staff need craniums heavily in contact.
Believe the Capita contract is up this year? I await the slap down! but fear conduct becoming of gentlemen.
Hi Gavin, I feel we should not blame the Army leadership for every ‘Army problem’. No army officer appointed Capita – it was a ‘bean counter’ decision.
The Army has lost its way with structures (a new one every other year, it seems – and they are not good ones, as Daniele often says), grip of procurement programmes is poor (although that also involves civil servants, politicians, the Treasury etc) and there is a tad too much wokery.
Good that CGS clearly declared that the army is too small – he is a good officer – I served under him in Colchester when he commanded 16 AA Bde.
Good to hear from you this morning. I’ve certainly no army background to draw upon, as explained in previous post. Frustration, as you know and I fully anticipate feel, comes from something in the region of two decades of negative (technical) news. In this instance, even the not uncommon downing of a website, sometimes international in extent and often attributed to Putinites (whether apposite to this event or no), is usually rectified in fairly short order. But by any reasonable measure, this is a local domestic IT system.
Even so, on its own or in combination with one or two others at long term intervals, it would not illicit much remark. But two decades worth of ‘similar’ issues makes you angry, as a taxpayer as much as anything else, doesn’t it? Just want them to come up with financial positives – BobA fully noted.
Appreciate the complication of what equipment is ultimately the ‘right choice’, in an extremely dynamic technological environment, so that’s not the beef at all. But, once decided upon, just get that something to the sharp end functional. Whether the perfect fit or not in time, it’s going to prove of some considerable benefit. Many denounce Ajax, and I prefer Boxer personally (something else we wanted, and then didn’t and now…….!), but the reason the former may end up cxd would be down to the latest faux pas, not its ‘fit’, of course.
Anyway, Rgs.
Hi Gavin, thanks for this. I am angry as a taxpayer, former soldier and Defence enthusiast, with some of the army’s decisions and management (of equipment (procurement and upgrades) projects especially).
I am one of those who denounce Ajax and did even before it had its technical problems – I always thought it was too big, too heavy, too expensive, had some strategic deployability issues, and was likely to be too slowly fielded. Then when Strike was added to its original Recce role, it just got worse.
You prefer Boxer to Ajax for the recce/strike role? I presume you mean the recce version (similar to that supplied to Norwegian forces), not the standard vehicle which is an APC.
Boxer is fine as a replacement for FV430s and Saxon as it was originally intended to be – not fine as a replacement for upgraded Warrior.
Agree that Ajax looks clumsy, especially dressed up to theatre standard, which as a layman on land force issues is parallel to saying it does not ‘look right’ – a more nuanced / instinctive phrase than ought technically to mean a damn. However, with it’s roots extending back beyond FRES, and concepts that presumably delineated from there, it should have been ‘relatively easy’ to bring it to the front line, in my opinion i.e. it’s technical but not revolutionary for these times.
Contrarywise, Boxer did and does look right, not least when you add in the brilliance of its flexibility in terms of mission modules, with new design concepts seemingly appearing every few months. What an advantage for a UK-based Army that necessarily finds itself third in line behind the Navy and Airforce – and what an advantage in wartime! Here Land Forces MoD, I’ll refrain for now saying Army though the point is ulimately moot, managed to negotiate us out of the initial design / manufacture contracts back in the day: Oh, pleeese! 😩
I know there is still debate over wheeled chassis vs tracks, though a tracked ‘Boxer-concept’ does not seem beyond achievability, I wouldn’t personally know. Err, MoD, please don’t note!
So, Boxer is right, though our module decisions still manage to be askance. As said before, if you’re unconcious / injured, do you care if your ambulance is a Rolls Royce? Boxer / Ajax are for the front not rear echelon.
Survivability is key, evident from our friends in Ukraine, so any warfighting unit is going to need some Trophy-type additions, possibly ahead of overinvestment in armour; which itself impinges on essential manouverability, both to the battle and within, and further on the tracks vs wheels issue, no doubt.
Off piste slightly, but it’s hard not to notice that we have an RN whose surface units outside of Carriers * (thank God someone got that design & build right, regardless of the fit or otherwise merits. An arguement that”s a relative luxury if you’ve actually got something you paid for). Anyway, surface units that are primarily about self defence and not offence at present. Then an Army that ‘majors’ on the opposite. A levelling up n those aspects is essential. On that basis then, the Airforce is closest to a balance with Typhoon whilst we await * F35B fully earning its keep.
That’s me exhausted on the topic. Some may well give a sigh of relief.
Ajax is a recce vehicle that Americans would recognise, one that enables recce to be conducted by fighting rather than by stealth. The US had a large recce vehicle in the Bradley CFV fielded from 1981 and this probably influenced British officers who worked on the US/UK TRACER programme in the 90s.
Ajax is an exceptionally complex and ground-breaking vehicle and could be called revolutionary – it breaks from classic British design ethos as mentioned above, is the first fully digitised platform and has a revolutionary weapon system.
When you talk about Boxer instead of Ajax I am sure you are referring to the somewhat rare Boxer recce variant, not the standard vehicle which is a quite ordinary but over-expensive APC.
The MoD left the original multi-national Boxer programme as Boxer was not C-130 transportable and we thought we could do better alone within the FRES or with the US in the TRACER programme.
Wheels/tracks? Few advocate wheeled infantry trying to keep up with tracked (tanks) in mutual support (especially as CR3 will do up to 60mph), although the French do this, but they have little experience of armoured warfare – so I discount their experience.
Not sure what your tracked Boxer idea is all about!
Trophy – we are fitting Trophy to half our CR3s – thats defence cuts for you. No other AFV gets a look in.
Totally different discussion to be had on Boxer as a replacement for Warrior IFV of course. I always favoured upgrade of WR (WCSP) for Infantry carriage, which was the Plan A.
Tracked Boxer would be a mission module system to keep up with tanks, etc, I suppose. But Ch3 doing 60’mph’, isn’t that still open to much debate over whether it meant ‘kph’?
Rgs
I’ll believe tracked Boxer when I see it – you can’t change a wheeled vehicle into a tracked one by fitting a new mission module.
CR3 is widely quoted as having a max 60mph (100kph) speed on the road –
https://www.military-today.com/tanks/challenger_3.htm
Hi, Graham.
Although I fully admit not having any land force knowledge, hence the anticipated relief at my exhausting topic above, I’m not talking so much about Boxer, but the concept it embodies i.e. a chassis, in the presumed case tracked, capable of mounting various mission modules (readily admitting I just don’t know if achievable).
Again, whilst not having knowledge to draw on – but being delighted if it transpires, the 60 mph quote is evidently something of a quantum leap in MBT speed; with a power source that is not that different from Ch2. Either way, surely it would require road conditions and likely not any theatre/battlefield standard, though indeed very handy from the point of view of consigning low loader availability (but not wear and tear on the actual roads or Ch3, perhaps).
Hi Gavin, I have only heard of mission modules for Boxer and not for any tracked vehicle – the approach is usually that a family of vehicles is built.
All my research from multiple sources confirms that CR3 will do 60mph (100kph) but that is on the road. It will probably do at least 40-45mph cross country. This is significantly faster than any other tank in the world including the gas turbine equipped M1 Abrams.
But not faster than a ATGM unfortunately
As has been proved in Ukraine.
Bill, I take your point but speed and agility does reduce exposure times.
We have had to operate armour against the threat of ATGMs since the first one was fielded in 1955 – and other (less smart) anti-tank weapons since 1916.
Fortunately our tanks have about the best frontal armour in the world (particularly when augmented to TES) and are operated properly tactically in all-arms groupings.
Afternoon, Graham.
Nothing to do with above specifics, but thought you may like this to add to your Ch3 portfolio, if not held already. It’s potentials the author feels to look out for in the programme, bearing in mind Ajax, including adding APS – always likely to be necessary – late to the equation.
https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/challenger-3-keeping-tracks-road/
Really want everything to go fine on this project. Challenger deserves nothing less.
Rgs
Thanks Gavin. Dr Jack Watling always produces an interesting, well researched article. The problems with the Ajax programme are manifold – I could write a book on it. Jack is right to say that there are far more positives to be had from the structuring of the CR3 programme, especially the selection of the JV company, RBSL. He is also right to highlight 2 specific complex areas. I had not realised that DE&S was to be the integrator for Trophy APS onto the platform – big mistake – it must be RBSL.
In would add to Jack’s article that it is not just ‘the army’ who could screw this up – it could be civil servants at DE&S, the Treasury, politicians, RBSL.
It is capita getting it wrong not the army. The mistake is outsourcing everything to the “cheapest” option, being cheap is not helpful if there is no function. Keep stuff in house, especially recruitment have the shops on the High Street staffed by ex military. Sudocco, capita and the rest can’t even get the food right, leave it to the army.
It’s not the Army. It’s the M.O.D.
An ATS is great but should easily be replaced by paper… We recruited over a million men in 1939.
Capita may be great at many things but this clearly isn’t one of them. When do the bean counters want to admit their running of recruitment is a failure?
I was amazed that Capita got the follow-on contract.
They’re also in the running for the new AFRP contract. True story.
Isn’t that the same thing as they are doing now?
It’s Tri Service, so they get to screw everyone over if they get the contract!
Never happen Stu. Bean counters never admit to cock ups they cause.
As things currently stand, the candidate support managers have access to the system. This enables them to call candidates and arrange the next steps of their application. Have been advised that candidates will not be able access the portal till at least early June.
I still remember the day walking into the local army careers office it,s pizza shop now, but i remember the basic tests, then being took to see a gp for a medical, then a few months later off to sutton coldfield for physical tests, being told which one of the choice of 3 if you accepted it was swearing in the oath of allegiance back at the careers office then given a date to go to depot, i still remember my first day arriving at sir john moore bks winchester for my 44 weeks training all 168 of us only for 33 to leave the following day…how times have changed, i don,t think it has been for the better…for starters a good point of contact even if it was through a dedicated military recruitment team, i did regional support teams where we went around town centres with trucks and weapons setting up a stand and chatting to people, or going around visiting the last year of schools who may or may not have decided what to do when they left..
I remember the office in Plymouth. It was a joint Navy/Marines and Airforce one. Turn left Air Force or right Navy. There was a chin up bar, where you had to prove that you could do 10 chin ups, if you wanted to go Marines. That was my first introduction to inter-service banter!
days like that will never happen again, to many easily offended people in society now..
especially teachers…..
Haha I was taken downstairs and did the chin ups in 1995 in mayflower street Plymouth to join marines from school my friend, then watched a recruiting video upstairs!
I initially tried to join the Police (after 2 years at 6th form) i was actually laughed out of the Police station, so I tried my hand at joining the RMP, I failed my medical at Leeds recruiting centre (informed I had weak ankles) so the next week I travelled by train to Huddersfield and had no problems joining up. Shipped off to Sutton Coldfield (i had to borrow a suitcase) the recruiter there was hell bent on me becoming a clerk, i refused and he threw the book on the table in frustration and stormed out of the room, looking through the book, I saw the Sappers went to Norway and as I had done my DoE i was hooked so i was shipped off to Gibraltar Barracks .
Regards my weak ankles, I’ve belonged to 3 different squadron march and shoot teams , I was selected for an all arms ex ped to climb Mont Blanc , (Tip up at Capel Curig with around 200 others and made the last 18) joined the squadron Boxing team , represented the army at Karate ,completed Nijmegen twice (no blisters) and I had a habit of running around the camp fence with a Bergan on my back.(often asked by Pads if I would take their dog with me) I can only presume the old civy doctor who carried out my medical at Leeds wasnt impressed when I smacked him one after he stuck his finger up my backside.
Oh yeah, never went to Norway
Its fine if you just had a fairly average career. Literally no-one has ever had a finger inserted into their anus during a medical. There is nothing up there that would need to be checked.
It was a very small recruiting office in Huddersfield but had a big turnaround….especially for the Duke of Wellingtons etc…
It was opposite the Parish church if I remember 👍
(Just up the road from Johnnys’ nightclub…boy were those two places intrinsically linked!)
I’d say my experience was exactly the same, though on leaving Sutton Coldfield I went straight to Woolwich Barracks. Towards the end of training one of the Bombadiers called me into the office and said lucky boy your off to 22 Gibraltar Battery. There was me thinking I’d got a sun shine posting only to find out it was not so sunny Larkhill.
Ha ha I actually got posted to gib from basic! Best 6 ,months of my army days!
1 Queens.
We used to have a small Radar detachment there, 8 Surveillance Troop. You might have come across them?
This posting was just after Regan bombed Libya in 86 😉
KAPE – Keeping the Army in the Public Eye. We also used to do a lot around the North East area, plus the Royal Tournament a couple of times which was great fun.
There’s hardly enough of them to b seen by any sort of eyes.
Good point. I am now an officer in the ACF – we have far more army cadets in West and East Sussex than there are Regular Army soldiers.
Remember those days?
Pathetic
You could create a secure recruitment relationship database in something like FileMaker in a week at most, the processes are well mapped out so that would be easy and then give it a web-server front end.
The problem with re-coding stuff, half taken from something similar, is the fundamental insecurity of the connection between web end and DB end. I’ll bet it was SQL and I will bet it was an injection hack.
Fail.
I wonder if the COE pulled a plug so the soldier wage bill would fall. I am joking (I think)
These soldiers are so over paid said no-one in history. I’m amazed the government doesn’t have more of these cheap expendable young people.
Crapita at their best.
They do the recruiting for the Home Office as well. Shambles.
That could explain a lot Chris. No wonder the Home Secretary can’t get anything done. Withdraw all Capita govt contracts and let people who know what to look for do the recruiting.
Capita has a history of IT cockups e.g Greater Manchester Police IT system. The army recruitment issues have been going on for 10 years. The government still throw money at them! Beggars belief.
Well well well, it was expected as this way to get them in was always going to fail and it has. Get back to the real face to face with real people who know whats it’s all about. When I joined the RN some branches had over 3 years to wait to get in and at that time the RN was as big as the Army is today. Services are not inspiring the youth anymore and this is just one of the many reasons they are all short of people…………… The Services are not only for fighting wars but dealing with any situation that needs people to ensure the good folks of these islands remain safe and secure (what happens when the Fire Service go on strike again???? – Not got the manpower to cover that one anymore and that means in simple terms – people will DIE). RN 45K+ RM 10K Army 100K+ RAF 45K. Oh and RAF has about 100 fast jets yet France/Germany and even Italy have double that……….God help us
In the private sector the contract of an IT supplier that performed this badly would be terminated. Just saying.
Who do you think builds the billings systems for the energy companies?
And they work well?
Crapita are.. Well, you get the message. Just saying I have seen IT contracts terminated for far less in the private sector. Amazed that the MoD puts up with this.
Unfortunately the amount of money HMG pisses away to these very large private providers of “anything that makes them profit” is staggering. The public sector can and does provide the same or better service level cheaper.
The problem is the private sector is never better or cheaper on large infrastructure projects as the market balance does not work in that way. Use the market for what it’s good at, areas of high competition for simple delivery of a product, anything complex, integrated or lacking a true market place approach is just give shareholders taxpayers money for old rope.
I recall that the first ‘military areas’ which were operated by profit-driven contractors were the staffing of the Messes. We all noticed a reduction in the service – frequent staff turnover and less flexibility. I thought about having a private function (Parents-in-law’s Golden wedding anniversary) in my officers’ mess but the cost was far more than a very good (4*) hotel in town charged.
Capita have cost the forces lots of potentially good candidates for years go back to the forces recruitment process
CRAPita contract should have long gone
They’re known as Crapita for a reason. Government gives them lots of money, they do a shit job, but a few people get very rich.
6 weeks from walking into the recruiting office early 72 to being interviewed, tested, offered a unit, medicalled, sworn in and arriving at my RHQ to start training.