The Ministry of Defence has outlined ongoing efforts to strengthen the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) workforce and capabilities in response to written questions from Rebecca Paul, Conservative MP for Reigate.

The questions focused on recruitment, retention, and the impact of personnel and ship losses on the RFA’s operational capacity.

In response to concerns about recruitment and retention, Al Carns, Parliamentary Under-Secretary and Minister for Veterans, emphasised the importance of the RFA’s personnel, stating: “The Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) are highly valued, specialist personnel.”

RFA staff secure improved pay deal, ending strikes

He highlighted the recent agreement of a pay award for RFA staff, achieved with the support of Maritime Trade Unions, as a key step forward.

Carns remarked that this agreement forms part of a broader plan for RFA reforms. “These reforms will improve the wider employee offer for those serving and ensure the RFA can continue to perform its vital role supporting the Royal Navy and our allies,” he explained.

Royal Fleet Auxiliary recognised with new insignia

Addressing concerns about the retirement of two RFA tankers, Carns assured that the withdrawal of RFA Wave Knight and RFA Wave Ruler would not impact the RFA’s operational capacity. “Neither tanker was due to go to sea again and nor had they been to sea in years,” he stated.

The RFA’s fleet has been modernised with the introduction of newer Tide-class tankers, which continue to provide critical support. Additionally, the RFA is preparing for the delivery of three Fleet Solid Support (FSS) ships, set to enter service by 2032, ensuring the organisation’s long-term capability.

George Allison
George has a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and has a keen interest in naval and cyber security matters and has appeared on national radio and television to discuss current events. George is on Twitter at @geoallison

7 COMMENTS

  1. “ Neither tanker was due to go to sea again and nor had they been to sea in years”

    So the idea of having serviceable reserve capacity…..

    Both of them were, by all accounts, in good shape having been reasonably well maintained engines run periodically etc. I think the issue here is that they need dry docking for periodic hull inspections etc so a smallish amount of ££££ means they are sacrificed as cash is needed for getting all T45s serviceable amongst other projects….

  2. Well although the current government seem to be getting rid of ships, they do appear to have made steps to retain and recruit a sufficient number of people to operate these vessels. One does wonder why the previous government procrastinated so much in regards to RFA pay and benefits.

    • As welcome as this is, and boy is it welcome!, it’s not exactly quick off the mark either. The big two Navy things that HMG needed to do on day one was to decide on how to keep Harland and Wolff on track and settle RFA pay and conditions. As I recall there was a guest article from a Labour policy wonk prior to the election that listed day-one decisions, which included both of these, so it wasn’t like they didn’t know. However HMG just washed its hands of the former, mumbling something about market forces, before eventually paying the Spanish government hundreds of millions to take over. The latter decision took six months, but at least now seems to be going somewhere.

      Well done for getting there and let’s hope it doesn’t fizzle out.

  3. It is frustrating that the government refused to make a better pay offer for these “highly valued, specialist personnel” until the RFA was in crisis to the point of being unable to function. They really need to get the idea that you pay market rates for the skills and experience you want to employ/retain, or else you accept doing without the capability. There’s really no way around that and it applies to everyone on the public payroll. Having standardised pay grades across the CS results in some roles being overcompensated for what they entail, and others being underpaid to the point that recruitment campaigns routinely fail. It’s a policy that really should be scrapped.

  4. Has the RFA ever actually bothered to ask employees that resign why they are leaving?? Definitely not, because then it will have to be addressed. The recent pay award won’t work (6.5% when the RMT were demanding 30%) the whole culture needs to change and move the RFA away from the Navy so they can’t keep taking credit for the actions of the RFA.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here