In a submission to the UK Parliament’s inquiry into European security, Airbus has called for enhanced defence collaboration between the UK and its European allies, while advocating for deeper integration with NATO’s industrial frameworks.
Airbus, the UK’s largest aerospace company, highlighted the critical role the UK plays in European defence and warned of the risks of strategic exclusion.
The company stated, “A European industrial strategy that excludes the UK would be very damaging to both sides.” It urged the government to continue its efforts to establish a Defence and Security Pact with the EU and to strengthen bilateral defence ties through initiatives like the recent UK-Germany agreement.
Airbus emphasised that the UK’s contributions to NATO, particularly in satellite communications and cryptographic security, are vital to the alliance’s operational success. It noted that the UK’s MilSatCom and SKYNET systems provide “assured, secure multidomain communication essential for success in modern conflict,” with the systems already in use by the US and 17 other NATO allies.
Airbus highlighted the export potential of UK military satellite technology, estimating up to £10 billion in possible revenue, which it said could help bolster the UK’s industrial base while reinforcing international security partnerships.
The company also pointed to its global leadership in Crypt-Key technologies, which are crucial for enabling secure and interoperable communications between NATO allies. “Control of CryptKey allows a nation to muster and coordinate its forces,” Airbus explained, while warning that without adequate national control, “NATO or a country could be left unable to act coherently.”
Airbus urged the UK to seize opportunities within NATO’s forthcoming CP122 programme to embed non-ITAR solutions, allowing sovereignty while maintaining compatibility with NATO operations.
Airbus called for a “NATO-first” approach in UK defence policy, prioritising interoperability with NATO forces and alignment of defence procurement strategies. The company referenced NATO’s Next Generation Rotorcraft (NGRC) programme as a model of multinational collaboration and stressed that exportability should be central to UK procurement.
“Exports are a means to drive the UK’s economic growth, strengthen the industrial base and drive down costs for the UK’s own defence needs,” Airbus stated, arguing that current UK procurement processes are too limited in considering the long-term benefits of exports.
The submission also recommended improvements in the UK’s government-to-government (G2G) sales approach, which Airbus said lags behind competitors like the US and France. “A new and properly resourced model in government to support G2G deals is required,” the company advised, citing the success of recent agreements with Romania as a template for future deals.
Airbus concluded by reaffirming its commitment to helping the UK and its European partners achieve greater defence integration, stating, “We believe the UK and EU have a co-dependency that is essential, not just in terms of industrial capability, but also in terms of our mutual contribution to the defence of Europe and to NATO.”
Interesting.
They were threatening to pull out of Filton if Brexit happened, I assume they’re still there? 😏
So no surprise here….
Airbus said it would have to leave the UK in the event of a no deal brexit which did not happen.
So let me understand this; Starmer is expected to make concessions on youth freedom of movement and fishing rights in order that the EU accepts UK help to defend Europe? In the immortal words of Terry Wogan….is it me?
That, was almost poetry.
You couldn’t make it up. The relationship with the EU has to be mutually beneficial.so freedom of youth movement for study and a defence and security pact has to go alongside free trade and acceptance of comparative equivalence without oversight or control from the EU. Unless we wish for a Norway style renegotiation which I’d be happy with as long as it is NOT in any way impacting on the UKs parliamentary rights to democratic decisions on the UKs own self determination and it’s courts being sacresanct. So compliance with EU rules around animal welfare, farming, use of chemicals and pesticides etc but this is for a complete free trade deal. Norway pays a token gesture towards EU funds of £2-3 billion a year. I’d be happy enough with that for the gain in trade and boost in growth.
If we sign up toa defence and security pact that is with the EU and separate to NATO then what does the UK gain?
It sounds like Airbus touting for trade on behalf of the UK government.
Sounds like even AIRBUS is sensing the need in a change of direction for UK military
Maybe we should get the EU to donate to Dreadnought and all it’s systems if they want us to continue to provide their nuclear umbrella?
I was thinking the same recently.
The UK is arguably the most reliable nuclear power for most of Europe.
Not forgetting of course Frances’s nuclear deterrent is independent of NATO, so if Europe is relying on the orange one and the US to put up the goods on their behalf I ‘d suggest they think again.
France ?
Whilst France as a nation is in NATO only their conventional forces are available to that force, it’s nuclear forces come outside of NATO and for use only to their discretion. Trump of course has said in the past that the US might not come to the aid of Europe unless the Europeans up their spending (which is right if course in my book). If the EU want to play hardball on trade we should take the same line on defence and adopt the French stance. Let to EU fork out for it’s own deterrence.
Well it has, under the form of the french nuclear umbrella. Not as prevalent but certainly a good deterrent. Counting on the Americans in this day and age isn’t advisable
Tallzter, as I stated earlier the French nuclear deterrent does not come under the NATO or EU or any other umbrella. Its purely for Frances own deterrent to use as and when they are threatened. The EU are the ones cherry pick want they want. Let them pick up there own bill, they’ve been eating at this table free for long enough.
Yes. Agree the EU should pay France and the UK for our strategic deterence
This is Airbus sticking it to Dassault.
It seems increasingly there will not be another euro competitor to Tempest. French are talking now on Rafale F5 standard despite some pilots came to talk about how Rafale looses to F-35 in stealth.