The Defence Investment Plan commits to three floating docks and new infrastructure at Faslane under Programme EUSTON, one more than previously planned, easing the out-of-water maintenance shortage behind the submarine fleet’s availability crisis.

The United Kingdom will acquire three new floating dry docks and supporting infrastructure at the Faslane submarine base, giving the green light to a long-stalled plan to ease the shortage of facilities for taking nuclear submarines out of the water for maintenance, the Defence Investment Plan said.

The plan committed to “acquiring three floating docks and infrastructure at Faslane,” which it said would enable resilient out-of-water engineering for all submarine classes, the work carried out under the Royal Navy programme known as EUSTON. The number marks an increase on the two docks the Navy had previously been planning, and the commitment moves a project that had sat in its concept phase for years, without a firm date, towards delivery.

Faslane, on the Clyde, is the home of the United Kingdom’s nuclear deterrent and, since the attack submarines moved north, of much of the rest of the boat fleet too, yet it has long been desperately short of the docks needed to lift a submarine clear of the water for deep maintenance, relying for years on a single ship lift whose failure at one point left no docking capacity at all for the Astute-class boats. The consequences have been severe, with submarines such as HMS Artful and HMS Ambush spending the best part of two years alongside while they waited for a dock, a bottleneck that has been one of the main drivers of an availability crisis in which the Royal Navy has at times been unable to put a single attack submarine to sea.

A floating dock is a mobile structure that can be flooded down, manoeuvred around a submarine and then pumped out to lift the boat clear of the water for work on its hull, and three of them would give the Navy the resilient out-of-water engineering capacity it has lacked, able to support the Vanguard deterrent submarines, the Astute attack boats, the Dreadnought class now entering the fleet and, in time, the SSN-AUKUS boats to come. Taking a submarine of seven or eight thousand tonnes, complete with a nuclear reactor, out of the water for weeks or months is a far more demanding task than docking an ordinary ship, which is part of why the capability has been so constrained, and the First Sea Lord, General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, has said plainly that “submarine maintenance throughput needs to drastically improve.”

Where the docks will be built is already a live question, since unions including GMB Scotland have pressed the government to place the work in the United Kingdom rather than overseas, pointing to yards such as Navantia UK’s site at Methil in Fife as candidates and warning against a repeat of contracts that have gone abroad.

The docks form part of a broader effort to rebuild Faslane for the decades ahead, sitting alongside the Clyde 2070 infrastructure programme and a new Trident training facility, all of it aimed at sustaining a submarine force that is being asked to do more as Russian activity beneath the waves increases.

George Allison
George Allison is the founder and editor of the UK Defence Journal. He holds a degree in Cyber Security from Glasgow Caledonian University and specialises in naval and cyber security topics. George has appeared on national radio and television to provide commentary on defence and security issues. Twitter: @geoallison

15 COMMENTS

  1. I wonder if they ship lift is in worse state then we thought so the third dock is to replace it?

    I also wonder how hard is it to have roofs on these docks? I’ve not done much research but I’ve never really seen a floating dry dock woth a roof.

    • The ship lift will be life expired soon and a floating dry dock is probably a better facility. They can also be moved should we find ourselves in need of forward deployment or leaving Faslane one day.

      • I wonder if they might lock the ship lift in an upright position then put one the docks infront the shed. Then use the docks to lift the subs out the water and roll them into the shed. Kind of like what they do at barrow to get the subs out of the hall but in reverse.

    • Ivery ntresting idea of Roof..!.
      .has several benefits as well as being Weather orientated, Anti Drone and Satellite photo Intrusion come to mind…! Would also Produce a stronger Dock Structure and allow a containment area to be formed….!

    • I belive There were corrosion issues associated with the Ship lift at the Start…!
      Wonder over what time span will the three floating Docks be expected to enter Service…

  2. These should have been ordered months ago (years ago ideally! ). It didn’t take a long delayed plan for the future for it to be bloody obvious they were critically needed!

  3. Who’s going to build them..?
    Basic question with no easy answer..!..
    Do we have the Capabilites to build what could potentially be the most Complicated and Sophisticated trio of floating dry Docks (Nuclear Certified ! ) ever built…!!
    Its All very good Unions pushing Scotish build but it’s not that simple….!

  4. Discussed as an urgent need for years yet not ordered, even with there being no A class boats readily available at the moment it seems time still is not a concern. These shouldn’t even need to be in the DIP, something this important should have come directly from Treasury reserve funds considering the role both classes of subs should be performing daily. Now they’ll take a year or two to decide where to build them, due to the severity of the situation it should be who can deliver in the shortest time frame at the standard required, even if that is a foreign yard, Sub deployments are far more important than a small number of jobs.

    • 100% agree it is an utter joke , how the h**l we prevailed in two world wars beats the hell out of me.

  5. Long stalled, LONG STALLED!!! That sums up the MoD. You would think the fact we have no Fleet boats available would merit some action. That they are all tied up awaiting dry dock time. The fact we know the Russian are sniffing about our undersea infrastructure would merit some alacrity on resolving this infrastructure issue. Does it, does it f**k.
    The climax of Carry on up the Kyber was made in the 1960s. It sums up the British government attitude to defence. “ what are we going to do, absolutely nothing, until it is too late”
    The Russians must be p***ing themselves with laughter.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here